The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

$# 1+ 8 1 $ 33 and upoiftheir workmen to sign a docaument promising never to make any further deâ€" mand for an increase in the rate of wages, or something to that effect. The result is that eight hundred men are now on strike. The woikinzmen of Hamilton intend har ing a grand parade and a monster meeting ‘n the C: ystal Palace on the 15th inst. At the termination ot his little passage of arms with the Premier yesterday, the leader of the Opposition exclâ€"imed * not caught yet." But if ever a man was "caught" in an attempt at misrepresentation it was Mr. Mackenzie, who h«d given the House to understand that the amendment proâ€" posedâ€" by the member for Sou h Uxford had been framed in consequence of the altered position of affairs connected with the Treaty, As a matter of fact it was known and commonly taiked of on the street and in the corridors of the louse yesterday thatAfr. Bodweli‘s amendment was to be introduced by the Opposition. We regret to hear of another strike in Hamilton. Some of the employers in that city, acting under the advice of the leadâ€" ing Opposition organ in ‘Toronto, called " We would just remund our ponderous contemporary that whilewe do nut follow it through mud and mire, we consider our course in politics quite consistent with twue Reform princi rq arxi in harmony with the majority of Reformers in Ontario and we will not be bon: down â€"to the Globe stripe. or rehash sentiments, |as -..l».‘l-hoounvuml-p-lhitvh.'J do and say everything that his master in Toronto tells him, and is thus very ireâ€" quently compelied to adrance sentiments which are altogether opposed to his own sense of right and wrong. The Simcose Examiner objecta to be cal led " a Ministerial journal.‘" Because it ventures to agree with the policy of the Government in reference to the Treaty, however, the Globe applied that term to it. The Examine saye: «From the information we have receired we hare zo doubt that all "Claims tor ns ditéct damages on the part of the United Some of our contemporaries argue from Mr. Mackenzio‘s course in relation to the Treaty that he is " either a traitor or a fool." Thisis a mistake. We do not beâ€" lieve that the member for Lambton is either one or the other. But, as the no«= minal leader of the Opposition, he has to benegotiated, by the terms of ‘which it will be provided that all the provisions of the Treaty of Washington will be carried into aeffect, while no claims for indirect damages cither in the piut or in the future will be urged. * _ obscene‘" tiade by the Secrotary of State for the Provinges on Friday. last In the course of his speech, however, Mr. Bod: weil had the bad taste to travestio & text o.lasifimht manner which could not fail to be very objectionable to a majority of his hearers, * The Manitoba Liberal says ; The Hon. Alexander Morris has for some time been spoken of as Mr. Archiâ€" baid‘s successor. Wadoubt if, another man exisis in the Doounion whose .apâ€" pointment would be hailed with more general satisfaction by the people of this Provsince than that of the hon. gentle man spoken of, as the deep interest which be has taken, tor the last fifteen years, im the North West and its requirements, pre emimently qualify him for the Governâ€" wam.uum‘ld We regret to learu that a portion of the dam on the Greaville Canal gave way y6és terday, and that the progress of the works there is in consequence stoppel.. . A large number .of men, however, somewhere about a thousand we believe, have been put fo work, and it is boped that the damage done will be speedily repaired. : The. honourable member for South Oxâ€" lord. thoaught proper yesterday to allude to Maritime Provinces mxie the sam> con: cession in 1334, and no one ever asserted that they were «dishonoured"" thereby. It has been afirmed that the admisston of American fishermen to our waters for aterm of years is‘ a cession of territorial tablished some eight or nine months 2g0. Among its directors and sharebolders ean be found some of the most substan> tal men in tha Dominion. e s prosperity â€"of the Sun Life: Insurance Company,x purely Canadian Company e#â€" Aibion Hotel For Saleâ€"John Graham. Four.â€"Qored Boat For Sale by Auctionâ€"A. * 'rw.ndmw;-u-»uh porâ€" dintely at this office. esd April 18, 1872. ww U 0O L ES ALE. s supunen, maersotn a oo io Megest Rexiim s mareh shee ponigte will find the as low in price as gt in Montreai and equal in fnish and to " i uioh mruavfictd 19824 _ For the convenience of their L ethers in the trade LIHTONâ€"‘ MI:- fl.S‘flthl"b , Hast of sapâ€" pers‘ Brdge. rpecial advantages will be offered © buyers* 1962.6 (1‘0 PRINTERS l o * A8SSOCIAâ€" 1Â¥1 TION, f " F the will be held waveny mt on ie ioh haatot n1 go n en 5 in % acdy similar to that of the Ragieh . HANSA RD.* bzwhdwâ€"lw fihq‘-‘- the Sewate for the, session of 1371, (bound) can a‘te meobtained SESSIONS OF 1870 AND 1871, L FULL REPORTS of **o proceedings in the Dominion Rarliament TIMES PRINTING _ AND Wa. are glad to hear of the. continued *LOTHING, NEW ADVERTISEMENTS. COttaws, May 11, 1872 ’ou:s'n'n sHOES, o. sMM O LKS 4 LK 13 PRMSATAY RMT TUESDAY, MAY 14, 1872. Can be had at the Office of the _0'1“6 fi‘..l_.‘ the. Genevea tribunal are PP «# 6 School. mor Augumedltecce e ied ".. 7. The & X teacher;â€"his place and ) power. . g oiil.yo es mwa Valiey Sabbath School Association, :ipoill.d to be hald in the Wesley.n urch in this city, on the 18th, 19th and 20th June pext, All Sabbath School taachers in these counties will be welâ€" ecome ; but it is hoped many will com»> as delegates, in sccoriance with the ruleâ€" that schools having 50 or fewer scholars, may send two delegates, and larger schools an additional delegate for every ad.â€"iimuon«l 5) scholars. 1t is hoped that the convenâ€" tion may, like that of last year, prove a season of wm pre ent. I ne committeo are vortng to secure the services of a distinsuished Sabvath School worker.. The sollowing Themes are proposed for discussion : 1. The 6§, Superintendent‘s/office and duties, 2. The extension of 8. Echools, or Hible Classes, with a view to to the retention of Senior Scholars. 3. Music in the 8. School ; how may it “43 me &&‘qih gh tHow may tereste in Christian missions m 5. 8. S. teaching in relation to the famiâ€" ly and to the Church. _ 6. Encouragements to labor in the S. _ The Committegé cifat‘ a "prize of twoury dollars for the bes! essâ€"y ou the last parhunt s aevereuiy dnsete their essays to the ingui ed by their. names Oor mottossâ€"if nzl mwmu names â€"A % Ahe snesting. . The judges ‘of â€" the Ter.Homur: Stiphotees, and. Goraon. .â€" Messrs. A Ministers and delegates will be entartainâ€" ed free of expense ; and be furnished with gertificates entitling them to travel at sreduced rates by cars or steamers; and with introductions to their hosts here ; 1 they notity Mr. W.J. Topleg, m,ofm intention to be preâ€" sent, on or before the 3.st May. Meanâ€" while all friends are réquested to give wide publicity to these announcétmients, and to join mun.:.puyouhu:l:: coming r:e union may be gruced by the E‘!"‘E‘;““'Q."'!?'!‘“g" _ The leading Opposition organ, acéused Sir John Macdonald ot trying to influence the House to passe: the Fishery Act by intimating that it they did not do so our connection with Great Britain would be severed. A few days since the Premier took occasion to deny that the I1mperial Government had attempted in the least degree to fetter or influance the action of the Canadian Government and people, by anything <‘but fuir and reasonable arguâ€" ments. So, says the Globe, this béing the case, Great Britain having expressed her determination to stand by Canada under any circoumstances whether we make any concessions for the sake of the Empire or not, let us pay no attention to theâ€". wishes. of the Mother country, let our policy beâ€" &n altogether selfish one. What a gener= > ous spirit is thus displayed by the Grit organ, and how entirely opposed it is to the feeling that animates the people o‘ Canada ! Had the Imperial Gorernment threatened to desert us, our pride might Bave been aroused, and we‘might havé_beeh disposed to refuse to acceds to their reâ€" quest. &twh@mtm-nlow,,l U@make this concession for the sake of OITAWA VALLEY SABBATH SCHOOL ANSOCLATION, The Pasters of Erangelical Churches and teachers of all Sabbath Schuols in the Quunties of Uttawa, Pontiac, Renfrew, Lanark, Carleton, Russell, and Grenville, are cordially invited to attend and t.ke part in the Annual Cnvention of the Ut dollars for the best essâ€"y ou the lust ons aoeirers us their essays to the ingui wisk i “Mw d ish to names â€"A x:mm.n-m%w essays will be the President with the Rar â€" Mesasra. Atanhemson and Gordon the Empire, but whether you do so or not the army and: nary and the treasury of England will be used in your defence when required,‘‘ when she addresses us in this by the most selfish of Canadian politiâ€" tone, we do not believe there arse many in or out of Parliament, who will care :‘32"""‘“".5.'? course recommended 441,108 quintale. Nove Seotin......... mgm:r ‘The fish product of Ontario is considerâ€" ably leas than either of the three. Yot MMMMM'W than double the extent of any of the others, is decidedly in favour of the passage of the ‘John Macdonald~ procured ~them to be | written. We may say that this is altoâ€" ’ Judging from appéararnices, the Nova Scotian fishermen are all * traitors." . Sir John Maedonald iw said to be a. " traito:‘"‘ alopted. â€"The â€"Nove Scotian fishermen doâ€" sire the sanie thing ; thercfore we preâ€" sume the. Grits must. consider that they are traitors also. How‘is it that the momâ€" much opposed to the arrangements: under the‘ treaty which affeet our fisheries ? _ In, the fisheries they have little direct into«| rious â€" provinces appears ~to be~ in an exactly inverse ratio to the stake which each Province h «s in the question. In the last return issued by the Marine and Fisheries Department, we find that the fish product for last year was as fol: is neither rhyme nor reason. this may . be,. it may safely be afficmed, that on the side of the Opposition there knew no more.concerning them on their author than Mr. Brown himself â€" did: <The Opposition organ finds fatlt with the supâ€" porters of the Government for a proneâ€" wesse to indulze in ~rhyming.© However BRITISH CONNECTIOYN AND THE Certainly the Giobe must be stits wit‘s ends for something about which t0 ettack the Premier. At the opening of the sesâ€" sion some verses ‘were published in Ot» tawa called The Meeting of the Magi, which though‘decidedly clever were somewhat profiné. The Globe in an editorial of over <~column in length, intimates that Nir NOV 4 5COTIA AND THE FISHERY â€"â€"CLAUSEN, se« i4 ackenze] did not look upon that amend â€" ment to the motion for the second reading of the bWill} as sim lyudrndyam olmtolm&t’nu.-'oln sure houn.. gentliemen on his side of the House had no coufidence and did uot pretend to have any in the government, but in proposing his© ameudntent the bon. member for ‘West Durha a ha? n> wish to express wart of" tonfidenta (I‘he opposition only de aired to express &oa opinon up n & quesâ€" tion which was nb’u(;o «11 the interests of y, because it deeply affecrted futur r:l':&ionl and condiuon of this oouutr;“': a dependency of Great Britain (hear, hear} 1t was in that sense the amendâ€" ment had been moved and not as the hon. ‘gemileman hai said to express want of confidence in his Gorernment, althougl if it had thit erfect it would be none the le:s acceptable to him [Mr. Mackenzie). on that account. ° Lo: ol \ * Br JOHN A., XACDONALDâ€"â€"The hon thut he didâ€" not care what honond;l-s commission . should be â€" appointed and that he had made up his mind to op ed of one commissioner from pose the Treaty on his own account. It md, one trom the United States and mig.t be too that he thought the motion | one trom Canada. .That was a proposition of the hon. member for West Durham did | thit had. certainiy, come . frowm;>Canuds ; not meet the case, and that it was im his outho(&r(-‘rgnol) besitated not to say rom to offer a better one (hear, hear, and | tuat the Commission then suggested was aughter). â€" Wuatever was the cause the |of a totaliy different characier from the House ought in all ft«irness to have an exâ€"| Joint digh Coramisslon wihnieh sat. at planâ€"tion of a proceedi~g which was unâ€" | Wa«shington. â€"It nad never be:n contemâ€" muomomcy. extraordinary â€" and _ very | plated that a Commission should h.ve $uch ny (cheers). exiensive powers as the : Waspington non »r. MACKENZIE said the hon: | Treaty. The idea of a mixed Commussion geutleman might set his inind to rest, tou | originated in 1866 «ith Mr.. Adsuis, . Wih. the amendimeut of the hon. mesver for | was then Minister from the United Staites‘ West Duroam would be pressed, and it | in England. in that proposicion. â€"Wwhaich woulid be woted upon, and every hon | had been adbered. to throughout from nember would have an opportunity of | beginning to end, it was never câ€"niemâ€" expressin« his opinion upon it by voting | plated to givethe Commission any powér (hear,]} hear). It, was not, however, un~} except to muke suggestions for the ap« parl tary as the . hon. tulemhd proval of‘ tne (Governments ot Angland s#ud. f»r an amendment to be moved to a ‘ ana the United States. in point Of fact, motiin by an hou. member on the same toe main object . _ of .: â€" the: side of the House; and the hon gentieâ€"|Commission â€" was to â€"â€" try > | and:> man could call. to mind, no doubt, when | detine the beadiands .lln{’byin"tho line the same thing had tveen done on his side | down upon the chiris. The Commisioners ot the Housse #Hince the amensment of | were not to negotiate a new tresty," They . the honu. member for West Durham had | were to intâ€"rpret the the sexisting Treaty, beeit mosed the House had learned from | the Treauy of 1818 ; and they were ;oen.;i whe hon. gentieman himself that ciroumâ€"â€") deavor to lay Gown the lunius beyou! stances hud arisen which did not exist «t | which the American fishermen might now. the time when that amendment bad been4 go. Aiter performing this uty Lhey' propuse!; and the h n. gentlemanfnesd | were tosuboit their recommen lations to. not try to hold a whip over the h«ads of his fqllowers in order to deter by threats those of che. n who were disposed > +upport that amendment. He .{Mr. ‘fido{ their own motion and that they committing . something which it would not perhaps be Parliamentary to characterize in the langusage it deâ€" served, (cheers). It might be, however, that the hon. member for South Uxfo.d had taken the bit in his teeth ; thut he didâ€" not care what he moved, and that he had made up his mind to op pose the Freaty on his own account. It mig.t be too that he thought the motion of the hon. member for West Durham did not meet the case, and that it was in his wer to offer a better one (hear, hear, and mghtor). Wuatever was the cause the House ough:innll tiirness to have an exâ€" lan.tion of a proceedi«g which was un â€" g:ucmentcy. extraordinary â€" and _ very y (PHAbbEh .:. c soc. _ se + ry Lambion anl West Durham, it was not to be suppsed and belierâ€"d that he was 'ukiugnoouru appo«ed to the wishes of those hon gentlomen. «tear hear,) . It was rather to be supposed and belierec ihat this amendment was moâ€"ed with their concurrence and sanction. (Hear, bear.) â€"f that was so, then the Governâ€" ment must conclude that the Oppoâ€"ition hii taken wis in â€" their anger, (cheers), and that although the hon. member for Weset Durham ha«d propueed a vore of want of confidence yesterday, he was afraid of it toâ€"day, and therefore got the hon. member for South Oxford o movre this resolution. (Cheers). Now, the questi n became an inumt:g oneâ€"w a the resolution â€" which been â€"moved by the hon. member for West Durham w â€" te pressed or not? If it was toâ€" be pressed, then as a matter of fairness to the Government, a direct rote of the House ought to be taken upon it. Such an idea as an hon. gentleman movâ€" !ingsvouol‘mt.o( conifidence and then ‘ Ettingmothetontho same side of the ouse to move an amendment had never been bheard of in P-rlhmoni:; proceedâ€" ingsâ€" It did not show a spirit of fair play. It was simply juggling and what ou‘{t Rot to be done oF tolerated by the House. (Cheers). He [Sir John) could understand an hon. member opposed to . the est Durham doing such a thing as this ; bnthooouldn&w itm u; presumption w()ppond.:nm now _ afraid of: the Durbham, were trying to get it in this way, (hear, hear). He (Sir John) th&t:;uin fairness . the House. and the ment ought to be told whether the hon. member for West Durham would press his amendment, or support this moâ€" tion in amendment to his own, and also, whether the hon: member ijor Lambton would â€" support & _ motion . which was in effect a supercession of the resolution offered by his colleague the hon, member for West Durham. _ Jf that was the case, ift.hody did support this amendmedt, it would show that they were Mr BUDWELL resumed the â€" debate. He sttacked the Secretary of State for the Provinces (tiowe) for having discussed the question in «n improper manner. ° After baving attacked the tGovernment at conâ€" siderable length he concluded by moving the following resolution "That ail after toe word ~That" be omitted and the folowing inserted. "H«vinog regurd to the exisiing difference between the United UStateâ€" and Great Britain, it is inexpedieut sopr:ond further at thisâ€" time with the m‘d n-" * + SirJJHN A. MACDONALD said .the hon. gentleman who moved this resolution hud of course a right to do so, ind as he was a meinber of the ug:}dtioo â€"0o ably led in the House by the hon members for The tirst order of the day being called for the second reading of the Bill to carry out the Treary of Washington, _( _ _ Hon. Sir JoHXN A. MACDONALD said the Government had no communication to make as having been received from any official source whatever." He had received a telegram fi:s a private o{friend saying there was a prospect of an arrangeâ€" ment, and‘unt oxpmimu wonld‘:o made in the g:)un of Commons toâ€"day. The only ot information hethad re. ooiv;d was eonmntz in the ordinary midâ€" espatch to newspapers, an adâ€" ezco copy of which he had received and which he would read to the House. He then read despatches from London and New York of toâ€"day‘s date respecting the latest phase of the negotiations, these despatches being the same as have been transmitted.â€"to TAhe Mailâ€"toâ€"day by the mssociated press. . | _ _ . 7 | pM Hon. Mr. MACKENZIE asked the Gov ernment if they had any intelligence to communicate to the House with rogard to the nexotiations respecting the Treaty of Washington. ‘They all knew that disâ€" cussions had taken place with regard to the Freaty and that these discussions had disturbed the course of the negotiations, and within the last few hours they had learned that an entirely dift:rontu:“mmp- ment had been proposed from ro vided in the Tresty. It.ludoocurrog‘w him thereforé that the Government might be disposed to make some statement to the House concerning these renewed negoâ€" tiations and the changed aspect in which the House and country stood in conseâ€" quence of those negotirtions. _ _ T HE â€"O.TTAW A _TA MBB, . se aXC 44. __18 18. 0_ The motion was carried and the rule being read by the clerk, Mr. McKay reâ€" Hon. HILLY A4RD +«AMERON said the other memvber who had beefl returned for the bistrict of Marquette, Mainitoba, Mr. McKay, was present in the House, and he theretore moved that the Standing Orders with â€"regard to the double returns be «it HARRISUN imtroduced an Act roâ€" specting the Toronto Savings Bank. The Bill was read a 1st time. _.Hon. Sir GEORGE E. CARTI#R comâ€" plained that sometbvody had been smoking within the precinets of the House. He hid no objâ€"ciion <0â€"theâ€" habit, although he did no: indulze in it, but there was a room deve tei to the purpose and the hon. members who wishe d to smoke shou.d go _â€" Mr. PHOMPSONâ€"Refer it to the smok ing comunttée [laughter]. _ . thâ€"re. He hoped Mr. Spesker would give his attention to the matter. " Dominion Prrltament. Mosavar, May 13, 1873 The S>?EAKER took the Chair atâ€" $:20 HUUSE OF COMMONs. go. Aiter performing this uuty they were tosubmit their recommen lations to the respective Governments of wureat britain and the United states. _ ‘The latter part of the minute_of Council, which â€"he questioned very much whether. the hen. member for West..Ducham hali read; showed what the idea of those who proâ€" posed the Commission was. ~It showed clearly that in cage of disputes there was some third purty, sonie impartial arbiter, to whom the qrmwu-tmbo referred for deuision. . It. w «s therefore quite .ciear that the Commi«sion‘then propos U w.is of a lormlly difftâ€"rent â€"charactér from that which satâ€"at Wishington _ .[Hear, heur J Un a previous 0â€"<c.sion he ha«w statéd that the First Minister could not as a man of honour huve actei on the Commission enteriaining the views wuich the: bhon: genilemen opposite entertained. 1t would then have been his auty to bh«¥ve told the secretary of State that he intended to act on his responsibility to the Canadiin Gov. ernment, and thit if he happened to diifâ€"r from the views of the Rn&luhc\hu:nm ers he should he mage such a stipalatiod is, therefore, a Treaty upon which the Gonnlm:: damzc‘uly give‘ a flu} approval, but y composition o lf they were virtuailly responsivle." ° Now, was the House to disregud theso state â€" ments and hold the first Minister of Canâ€" ada responsible in the absence of all arâ€" gument to support such a pretension ; for there really h:d been no argument, and the doctrines which had beenâ€"laid down by the hon. member for West Durham would have been laughed to scorn it they had been set forth in the Imperial Parliaâ€" ment (bear, hear}, ‘The speech of the non. gentleman was the ingenious arguâ€" ment of a lawyer to boister up. a bad case. He had attempted to found . some so.t. of argument upon a Minute of Councl inâ€" which it ) was _ suggested _ that. municated to the Government at ‘home, and by them assented to (hear, hear)}. it that every clause of that Treaty was | com missioners were concerned we have the hon. member for West Durhim:. was not | cc0upyi08 4 f} 1t would have , purely and simply & v0te of t..;m been her d 0 have advised .the United | dense. The motion did pot s1y .that inso mmfl&% and if many words, but it wis a_vote of censure | such had been done, the States and ah vote of censure as everybody knew mmufil’fl J?"m'h»bu was the sume as a vote 0t want of counli .ofl‘;;ho anegotiations. may 4) look dence.. The amendment, in fict,. was in |thequestiqn was to consider/â€"what ‘ufi the . satrongest. .sense.‘..A. v.ge â€" of| non. metuber for West Durham would want of coniidence and as such it oughi.] »«vé doue in like circumâ€"tances. Would, t0 be pressed. ~‘The hon: gentlemain nag ‘be bave wken a plicg on the Commussion said that it was toâ€"beâ€"pre@ssed ‘und vored. deceviag.the Governtnent which had done upon by the House. Well, how diui he him the hon»ur to appoint him,; taking a kuow thart ? [tear, hear} Howcoulid he part in the negociations, and then at the ‘ tell :t was to be voted upun u less he :md»'ru'- moment dectaring that be would not | his supporters had male up their minds to {®ign tbe Treaty. The hon. member had ; Yote »gainst the amendmeut Of the. BRon | Wel! na]wdA::t. was one , gase in member for south Okfrd. "IFe coul 4 not | Which wiâ€" Fi \{;:" Wo'lld'b"".i\""-. know Ootherwise, out â€" thitthe, l;m ld.u h:zg:s‘ ‘agree to. thet Freaty amendment would prev il, 1itl then now‘ R«mely, <rticles relfting" to* Canadia could there be a voire upon th« amen i. | bui not been left to the "decision. of the ment of the hon. member for West Luur,.| Parliament of Canada. _ As to the naviâ€" hm (cheers.) ‘The hon: gentleman had |gation‘of the Ss. Lawrence, he did said that since thit amendiment new cirâ€" | Lot _ intend to speak at length cumstances h:d arisen, and that the hon. | on â€" that â€" point, _ _ as one â€"â€" of membver for South O«ford‘s motion was | bis 00;:088!?8 ll‘;dg to‘address m intended to meet the 3??' e "That to tat subject.\ But EgnuLt s f | occurred. Now, he (Sir Johny wT)did'?E‘ki‘ lrlumeni??rtbo Upposition on.!ihi- ques the hon. mem»erfor south Uxford if at | tion were perfectly futile. Nc member the time he moved the adjournment of the | could say that it was any injury to Canada debate on Friday !rln:; he did not hive | t cede the navngnuo:.h Up o lul;u'ed his amendtment slready prepared (chcers). | WaÂ¥ the@ river not ope Aags of Wutnutfl.nlfiuen&rfid( tw b). w_b’?bfl?, It was il proposed, alshough $1e ~member® for she neégoci:tions @vel «Wal COf~ Hon, Sir JOHN A. MACDON ALDâ€"W hy did you ask for information then. [Hear, bear. ) 2s o > + Hon. Mr. MACKENZ E sad the hon. gentliemin had no rignt to misconsirue what he (Mr. Mackenze) had stated. He had sad that since the amendment of th« hou. n:?ber for WestDurham had been moved ercumstantés hit chinged. He did not say that this motion was :o meet the change, although bhe was well aware it had ocourred, for he had the inâ€" formation in his desk,; and it did notâ€"reâ€" quire the hon. gentleman : to read the despatches in order to muike him aware of it. We 2 M M e , Py# ) Lambton said it was drawn with a view to meet the change toat ui sinse ocdurrei ia the circumstances connected with the Tresty (cheers) â€" _ _ _ * followed suit‘"‘ when they so distinctly ‘protested ? When. showever, the Impeâ€" ri 1 Government agreed to the Treaty, a +ressure .was «xereised on uc‘\fln Governmens and people, for if they had then refused to. periorm their Em.hn mkwurd.w?:thn been position towards, both kEngland and : the Ufiud Suates ? â€"| ho «rrangement was consi by all parties in England to be a ‘fair and re sonuable. one, and, &s had been truly suid by the first Minister, if Canaila bad to make a s1ctifice, had not England to do so l.firmmnm refused to ratify the Nreaty she would be pinced in a very disâ€" agréâ€"uble position tuwards hw 1t oo m mnnnflenanatmpnnge negotiati matioer e ) Luf‘&ud fisherred was in a ‘véery unsatisfao. tory poâ€"ition, and that for w"z”’ .‘lm f 4 21€°} . . C nc }. s g‘ft.h Anaw m- H. obHisions wi in > C e iben read an extract â€"& speech of Lord G«ernarvon; who, he said, was preâ€" emingént among the members of the Houe of Lords, «s a warin triend of the connecâ€" ‘tion between England and .the Colonies. ‘The speech was to the ogl_'mlh‘ freaty was a poor bargain for : as Toho'hsd conceded more &fio-vzd« have done to any other country than. United States. : Looking at the ; queation; . however, from a Canailizn..point of view, ... Hon. Sir _ FRANCIS HINCKS said the ‘Fémark just reminded him of something he desired to say. it â€"haut been stated more that ence from the.ather side of tha House the Governmens .kad. * follov:lo:l’w suit©?: in their "{Gdespuaich * of â€" thbeâ€" #8Sth. He read an...extract from»<that despatch stating that ‘the Treaty of 1854 had met . with the .approbation of Canadaâ€" whereas the Fizshery ‘marticles of the pre= sent {reity wore.adopted against theâ€"adâ€" moo of the Gun «dian Gonnun‘;&t. ‘\How uid â€" 4t‘ be said.. that.. the ernment Hon. Mr. MACKENZLIEâ€"Y ou @followed suit‘ on the ZSthofJuly. _ _ __â€" _ _ Globe newapaper, which ‘Wwas 50; fuat mufif"&m'?w; i not di.ob::hi&\ He. not â€" ferred to matter ‘m\u a bon. members® for % est Durham had stated that they had stated their views in anticipation of that nevse paper. Let any one take up the files ofâ€" tne ‘Globe, and t.hrymmlcti see how : lenuy the Treaty was Q.mo\), a a how those hon.â€" gentlemen followed suit, and oveyeu the instructions received trom their master. and the speaker, expressed . the ..opinian thit in the Treaty it would, be fom while é)num’ v.i:(d Q“:o:l would r-dd“y. accept‘it, ha % main oppafidq‘-nu-;-m the Maritiche Provinces. SirFrancis continued, that.considering ‘ the enlightened view @utertained on the subject â€" byâ€"the mem bers for Hochelaga= and ~Chateaugray;> there was little doubt thit the Treaty was ‘ yiewed favourably by~Quebec, but ‘little did Earl Derby lnmflfll how! that‘ would mea«;'fiw Friw of Ontiti6," it n eb C 1 6n efi e " V nection in ,finshpd. . A. great deal, had been gud gbout the, cession, of : tecmtorial .rights 4nd the compronuse of honer, . â€"As io the latter.. however,. Ahore.. was not.a .enilem«n , @pposite who would not be préepared to concede‘ everything it they voul i get a little more. If it was a quesâ€" tion of â€" honor only what difference was there between the cession of rerritorial rights to us by the United States and ours to them? ‘The moment the despatchâ€" was received suggestin« the idea of a money payment for the tisheries the Government at once pressed their opiunion that settleâ€" ment should be made on that basis withâ€" out the consent of Cansda, Admitiing that the. Freaty had great defects wha«t had been the duty ot the Gorernment and what was the duty of the Howse for the s1me‘ reasons that in:uensed the Govegnment should have the ame inâ€" fluence with the House? _ I:L..wouldham been . lad if the fishery arti had been excluied, and if, when the Imperial, Govâ€" ernment had the Q]’Prumity they had decided to wilhdraw Trom all funhu neâ€" gotialions respecting the tisheries, but.the circumstances were, materially changed when the Imperial Government tools, the respongibility . to nfimu the (reaty. 1t was cartainly not @ little surprising that the most violent opposition against.the T.eaty proceeded ftrom.those least. interâ€" ested in it: He re«l. an extract from a speech of Lord Derbyâ€"to the.â€"effect that vne Imperial: («orernment had acted fairly in giving Canada the power to veto those quudomt:.hioha:;:ud' bher,~ and " ox~ pressing the ‘hope no‘ preasure would would be brought ‘to bear : on ‘ her. ‘The speech then went on‘to say that the Weak point ‘of the Conféderation was thit it was me pronay ies n Priemiie n q eb / and as the Maritimé Provinces were in the. miriority they were at ‘the ‘mercy of the Other portions of the Domini+n in all quesâ€" tiong where the, local interests differed, e feipiacua Treaty, git . was _ not of .course altogetherâ€" acceptableâ€" â€"to ~ Canada, bat they wem'el} u; deal with it as they thoughg fit, if it . were.netessary cooticm whathid been previously lfi(fi gn.tno’flhq-fiur in reply to the memâ€" b8r tor lfi. ings, he oouldnzfmmt;:d hevitatingly that no re of any had bben brofight 'wm_th% %'03 @WE#S;@‘WM‘WM 4:, M it L ndered . .come fogm The feey beat frienda. uf thigeh ons ha a ic of uy Bacink Boy recsived and considered by the Americans framkty and fairly. <lt was mot correct ceded to the United States. The same charge had beenâ€"made‘ in the House of Lords of England, but the Opposivion there, as would be seen trom the speeches ot Lorits Derby, Cairhs, and Salisbury, had tre:red the maiter in a very different way from the «â€"pposition here. They had not enured&wm matter into. a.. splri tile t0 interests of the t ton iemuing tiro Treaty where thy " 00hn: sidered it open to condemnation they ofâ€" fered no factious opposition. He referred to a speech of Lord de Grey ~sta that the. English Lomnudm-.Ld ft::flbo question of reciprocity as long as it was possible to do so.; With reference to the complaint of theâ€"member for West Durâ€" ham that taking first the protocols and then the emarks of the first Minister, he did not know what to believe, he quoted from a speech of. Lord Grlnaflo in tofl;;l.y to Earl ‘Russell,> stating ‘that at the first meeting the Commissioners decided to keep their deliberations secret, and that there . *was* * ~no doubt of the wisdom of that course. Also that the conditions laid down by the Americans were in rrfm good faithâ€"to some of them the English Commissioners at once declined to accede, others were referred to the Imperial Government, and such had been done, the United States Governtent would at Jc&nm'hom off the negotiations. may &> look '.m,‘::mm wis to consider/â€"what nfi' _non. member for West Durham would uave doue in like circumâ€"tances. Would, he bave wken a pl1cge on tie Commussion deceisiug.the Governtnent which had done him the honour to appoint him,; taking a part in the negociations, and then at the Baglish «Govern h I: yuntir 1t l;‘uildwhm' & | wot ive ‘%o have advised the United â€" | in uars ‘The revision of rules as to the duties of neutrails was of the utmost importance to Oanads~ as the third: maritime power in such omission obtained an equitable right sean plfoned to butli" ihe Usnal at shair own expense ' that fact, and be mi.m they had by been asterted that the Canal was built traiy in ts ooo aMicarine Miinents Dâ€"~was t0 be construed as to the pursuitâ€"â€" and.not as to the locality. â€" It hadâ€"been said that the action of the House last r:. in the tariff, as to the <respect of ‘::fiu-ol oeal, could h:“l: effect on American proposition protoâ€" col; for the matter was settled before the House dealt with the matter. He referâ€" red‘to ths dates of the votes and mainâ€" taittod" tlikt that was 50t the case, and that the‘ Minister of Justice was ?s in What he had said as 16 the resu.t of the action 2!&3«:@ Hohdofioudthohpod those duties, because had believed &:&tirq 1 lead to the proposition Hon. Col. GRAY spoke of the observaâ€" tions of ‘the =ecretary of State for the Provinces with regard to the ‘Fenians as most unexpected and most : unexcusable. Hoduqflr;:hhdmy to speak of this,and to say that such ox;‘)rouion copming from a member of the Canadian Government could pot be approved. . He was ishâ€" d to hear..the hon. gentlieman de € the Fenanse. ... . Hon. Mr. HOWE denied having defendâ€" ed; the Fenians, he had merely saidâ€" that W.th?m-intbri‘h& lnqi-f&;b ln-“ bound i scopt i was to accept the \bon, ‘ :&-'. explanation, and ohouhnflnhouhomtmuthmnl{ onthtmt‘holhmld Otherwiso hav matle. As‘to the Treaty he Mh:fim‘“ the most imfportant quéétion that had ever been beforée the House, ‘The member for ten foaale un racgge bat bipe Appoiated iter of Justice ha appoin MM@&&% dian and not as an Imperial & er ... To..._him ~that.question â€"seemed z material, . for in whatever. oapacity â€" Premier acted, whether as a Canmiian or as an Imperial Commissioner the result, m.won.t}uflouo.‘hnd.nm be..a0. cepted orrejected as the House pleased. Then referring to the â€" use Ey the memberâ€" for â€" Durham “.VH“‘.‘ motto, he wouldâ€"askâ€"what right Caunâ€" ada lost ?â€"=Has not the fact that they wmthondhudnrfln::pfiatyfl the concessior proof that all was proposâ€" ed to be conceded wis still theirs. â€" It was for them to say whether they would > part n&tm! or not. Thes best plah would "to lo MN‘anu of the Tredty, hut he nitist first refar to a remark or the ‘eiaber Tor Bothwell, at to the adâ€" o (he ime phay e e e e We y ++ Q Â¥ % * . m waters within of exclusion, and therafore the term "Fisheries‘ in Artiole SPEECH OF THEâ€"HON. COL GKAY ON THE WASHINGTON TRBATY. to expect r-&u-ld on from England after llh(hld failed toâ€" procure it for us from the United States. Althouzsh his: hon. friend, the Minister of Justiee, had difâ€" fered from hm he had contended that the Correspondenee leading to the formation of the : Commussion fairly incladed®* the &onhn claims as one of the subjects to be dealt with. The Min. of Justice had however thought that there was some doubt, and that there was lom:thing 10 be :fi on the American ud; of the question, in consequence 0: that &?‘hnd had assumed the responâ€" sibility of them although in a rery guarded manner. They had never said that they were prepared to pay all those claims. He felt certain that nothing would have been more prejudicial to us thar to have enterâ€" 1 ed into a n{o‘otinion with England ’w‘ got a sum of money in com tion for those few Fenian c{nm-. “o would have been boundtgf olonm wnud:l:ory exerâ€" tion to get the.l rgest possi amount, and he gd no dbufi?thst he could have have made out a large Bill. (He was cerâ€" certain that no statement which could have been made out weuld have been assented to by England. We should then have got into a controversy, and should have been obliged to come down to the House having imads a large claim which could not be recognised. . He therefore thought thit in endeavouring to get comâ€" pensation in, another way more advanâ€" | judicious course had been nd'%ud The House adjourned at 11;30, uestion was essentially an I one, gnd(kmdg as an inmmf the Em_pj::,awonlgh.m as such to do her duty even to make a s .crifice if ne cessary, adding that while the Treaty might press hardly on the Maritime Proâ€" vinces, he had confidence in Nova Sooti~ and New Brunswick that they would ac cept the sacrifice cheerfully, for while naâ€" tional feeling had evbed very much in England, he believed it to be very high in Canada, and he trusted that Uanada, with a wise exercise of her liverty, would not withhold her consent, as the measures were not to be judged by their immediate effect, but would tbe found to result in seion of, thoseâ€"articles, and it now turnâ€" sequential= claims »between the United Btates and Great Britsin,> important corâ€" re«pondence, which was maugarated z Gen â€"Schenck, bas tran«pired, by whi "the Waehington Treaty '-oobo-ng:ndud 4or the present. or usiii the twoâ€"~ Govern ments can negotiite and ratify a new or supplemental treaty covering the disputed nestion raised by the presentstion of ?Qdmddm-. The British Ministry ex. pressed their willingnes to resume ne. gotiations on tht mm tele. urspbed bere yesterday Last The Timeés says positively that "all will yet be righted, and mentions that the American Government has agreed â€" in principle to withdraw the claims for in direct damages, and ~advises forkerrance pu‘tho part off‘oth!hu_nol Parliament. , . A despatoh from Warhington #27y» since the»negotiati ns were so suddenly ter mined :m London on Fridiy over the conâ€" The tondon Times of yesterday (Mopâ€" day) says th1at the announcement of Fridey, vhat ncGon-tiono between Groat Britain and the United States, with re, to indirect.claims having beepn broken were premature. >‘ M 30 s <4. npuuumymubom-uu aomgr:mb- f but had found it mm tions .to the which should cause the House to ; 1%. and in conclasion mrrd hon. members who desired to t Canada, and at the same time do real service to England to do that which lhonowtmt.tobo neceseary â€" for the peouce and of the Kmpire. Withdrawal of all inâ€" Hon. Mr.:GRAY ‘replied that it was a substance and no {orm, and it was) within the power of the Canadun: Parlizsment to rejeot it if they would be please J so to‘ do. &Gwmhdw that posiâ€" Hon. Sir JOHN A. MACDONALD asked how the {:overnment had don ® so, _ _ Mr. MILL3 â€"By cheers. . .6 bir JO.1N A. MACDONALD emphati oally denied that any cheers had imued from the Government seats. Col. GRAY said be could see nothing in the action of the British Government by word or deed to show that they bhâ€"d mddnnmtnm:nfi. s & to :ounq they ;:nh.d the full strength and forse of the Empire. It was shewing the highest deference to Canada to have inserted in an Imperial ‘l‘n'n:hntfiplhdonmzpm of it should be entirely to the action of the Canaâ€" dian Parliament. = Hon. Mr. BLAKEâ€"Was it a substance or a fo:m?t Lholefi?nhn‘ ion of veâ€"sels, f Mr. MILLS said that the hon. gentleâ€" man had referred to the remarks of the mflh e Mfllfi reit itaim, in giving us the liberty to exer. cise our judgment as reg rds the Fishery cluuse, referred also to the questiâ€"n of conneéction or sep«ration, and said those who voted, rejecting the Fishery clauses, to the nuvigation of the St. Lawrence which was onjected to was more in sound than in substance. The United States must take the advantage of the Can«dian canals to get from if not to the seabo«rd, and winle they cculd do so they would not deem it necessery to mauke cauals ou their own side, thus giving ours the benefit of their trade, and in case of war the whole would be in the possâ€"ssion of Canrinr as she commanded the sea entrance of the st Lawrence. . He agreed with the non. member for Sherbrooke, that they must be prepared ts make some sacrific> in or der to maintain the connection wich Great Britain, but h .d they m.de any sacritice ? If there wus any complaint it was from Untari0, and not from the Ma«ritime Proâ€" vinoss, which were most interesied, What the Maritime Provinces wanied was the coasting trade of the United States, and States, and there should be feither duties or bounties on either side. They could not prevent the United States legiâ€"lating by way of bountiesâ€"hbowever unfair it might beâ€"â€"but they must remember that it was inst British poticy to give bountiel,..‘:d he thought cucg a system unadvisableâ€"it must be remembered ‘that the Canadian Parliament would bhave the g:wor to adopt that course too it it should found th«t the Unitéd States persisted in doing so. It hid beem argued that the Fenian claime constituted no part of the Treaty, and therefore should not be conâ€" sidered in the present debate, but he thought the country would . look at â€" the ‘question _ as it now stands, and not as it stood on the 20th January last, or at any other time. The British‘ Government might have thought they were not in a position to press their claims on the United States, either from the previous action of her own Minister at Wufiingwn, or for some otherâ€"re son, and offered Canada in lieu of the claim on the United States, herself to pay the compenâ€" sation for the damage Canada had â€" susâ€" tai ed, Surely there was oo * humilia~ tion‘‘ to Canada in this... He had observed th1t the ory of those in the United States, as well as in Canada, who were opposed to the Treaty, â€" was " humiliation." . He thought the term so used was more indiâ€" oative of the opp sition _of party : thanâ€"of opposition of principle. All knew that such was the case in the United States. Gen. Grant bhad been.charged with * huâ€" miliation" and yielding to British bluster, «nd although gentliemen in in the Canadian i‘arliament :m:‘hd risen above the question of party it was singular that the samelanguage should be used in both countries by party men. He was of opinion that the cession in regard foreign power, and unable to detach any large portion of her navy to watch the Zenpm coast and protect our ships, ming that the United States could be imade a base of operations for fitting out privateers, He could not estimate the benefit Canada would derive by means. of the peaceful relstions which the Treaty of Washington would establish between the two countries It must be pla.n to every man of intelli;ence that twelve or fourteen years of pe.ce would do more to plxe ’ t anada in a position to maintain her rights in the future than anything else that could possibly be dveised. . The fazts before ‘them must convince the House that they had parted with nothing, anda thit the concessions necessary ftor the ratiâ€" fication of the Treaiy would be to the adv:ntage of the country at large Then with reference to the points that hal been objected to â€"first the tisheries. If : anada were a separate independent country, unâ€" connected with England in any way, and able to maintain ber own position he doubted in view _ of a _ national porition if â€" amy fcompensation could be _ deâ€"med â€" adâ€"quire _ for _ the cession of the joint use of thée inâ€"h>re fisheries. But us they were not sepirate they must expect tâ€" mike some sacrifices for t .e interests of the Empire and beneâ€" tit of the conneciion. ‘[he tisheries were invaluable, but would be rendered doubly so by the mirket which the Treaty g»ined.â€" The undoubted sdmission vy the Unized . States of our territorial rights, and the compensation offered by them for the dxflca:oo in value between the American and Canadian tisheries was of importance. He had heard no objection to the Treaty from the M«ritime Provinces; on the contrary, he believed they approred of it. In orcer to m«ke the joint use more clearly reciproc<l he thought Canads« should be on equal terms with the United A telegram fromâ€" Washington, The "nemmational ~ T‘eaty, i iesr elaints! TELEGRAPHIC. stbility of deciaring tor Expimait Gryring Dock," aldressed to 1B# ’mweuu Works, Victorits mwmumumdâ€"w noon of the 15th day of November, 1873 _ Persons who may consider the abovre guaraniss it be insuffécient, Are at liberty to tender on the batlf . of such suppletmantal guaran se by the Proviscis! im-’o-md other fnancial induce» ments, as they may cuggest, The Goversment do not bind themselves to accept the lowest or any tender. Each Tender must be accompanied by a Bond _p-mcm-.-flm-fibc-u-h’ the payment of £10,01) to Her Majesty, her beirt and successors, conditioned upon th s due fuléiment > ‘of the Tender which it accompanies, provided i.08 ’ Do of entrance...... . M fect, To afford a depth of water on the sill fnt%let‘ than 2 feet athigh water springs, and to besubâ€". stantislly constructed to the approval of Gorertnelit. . upon a site to be provided by the person whicne to6â€"" der may be accepted. M Further particulars as to site, borings, &v. be obtained frow T. A. Boucranr,; Bey., Obist «ginser to Government,| upon applieution ‘ to the Chief ommiscsioner of Landsand Works * Tenders must specify the time within whichk th# Dock will be compisted, and must be sccompaiied‘ by drawings and descriptions showing exasi dimes" sions, waterials, and mode of construction of pPM"" The Government of British Columbia are prepared to receive Tenders for the construction of a Graving Dock, at the Noval Station, Requimalt Harbot under the guarantes provided in the T weifth Sestion of the Terms of. Union â€" of this Province with the Dominion of Canada, which section is in the follow= interest for ten yearst from the dhte of the completion of the work, st the rats OUf five por cent per annum on such sums, not exceéding £100,000 steriing, 4 may be required for the construction of a first cl## Grering Dock at Kequimalt,®" _ .. .. ; .. ouh The Dock to be of masonry, and of not 1e# 84 the following dimensions :â€",. _ _ _,. ... . ; ==. Length on foor 570 foot, _ Uo. over all 409 fost, * *P 3 Width between copings 90 feet, +Ki *A UIMALT GEAYING DOCK mmunflu received hy of the iadies connected wi w:-w.’. GUWAN‘3 HALL ON THE 2e MAY, A very handsome Focrâ€"Oizzm» Boiat in exoellest order, quite new. Ottawa, Mar 14, 1872, The undersigned will sell at the Russel Houso scorper on Tonder®s a~e to be sealed, superse~ibed A FOURâ€"OARED PLEASURE BOAT lleas May 13th, 1814 â€" Great @xcitement exists in the ‘city to, night owing to the Police Commussiongy teking upon themselves to dismism4}, the men of the Police hm-,-luvh‘-' city withont protection. f toege At a meetling of the Council thisere» ing Ahcthâ€"ddi:-u. took «pluge; dufiuuhhhthoeo.dmof&.o..., sioners was strongly condemned. s *§1HE LADIES This is one of the best paying hotels in the Domâ€" inion, and is doing the second largest business in the Toun Hiowet ‘"and "whine "ove beie nroitt ve 1nd from the 95'-‘:"6&...4 Partiament Buiidings The vwroprietor can give satistactory reasons for wanting to sell. TERMS EAKY. Ottawa, May 14, 1822, A UCTION 81 L& tA LBION HOTEL 4 ; City of Oftawa, Ontario,. . . *with Cutbuildings, â€"and with or withest. t C T700 £rr L Hidnor 4o ob‘er'.' ie |neutralits when the other is belligengas‘ | ?mngelu.u are in 8"’""‘ RElmeey |Gen. Schenek and Ear] muville o , tfor the présent a suspeusion “w‘G"'nl... | Conterence. It will merely meey, 90 Jupg |lith and again asj»arn. A new ; ‘ will at ence be negotiated in umd,.: | forwarded ‘here for ratificition DY the [ United Siates Nenute. If ‘CeBzreq | adjourns beftore the treaty is 1eOLiÂ¥=0 here | the President will convene the Senate % | session to discuss and ratify it. The ai ministration, theretore yields the prin ;. ple involved in the indirect d‘i‘% and throws the responsi «il ty from its own shoulders to the Nenate. These facts are derived from «<fficial sources and may be relsed on, @ The Urder of Victoria and Alh... . 10 t 0 1+ 4 4 Dt!b. 4 # At Grenville, of Small Pox, 4 inst., Charles:\Goodwin, aged 22 A large number of immigrants yestarday and ~ #re * proganim Alfred Rusy, river on Saturday Ogawe, April 2 872. . . . in serious riots. maâ€"ny Terms Cash. night the Presijent convened , =A Cavinet meeting at the White ®Désiat which this new and important plh.""l the situition was thoroughly and of ly discussed. The result was .n"' L&dodu&berthm' let the *" Was Treaty fail to enter upon u,..m‘:' framing a new t eaty to include that, herea‘ter neither m‘: m mak» any claim tipmtheothe,g.“ sequential dun*‘eg because of "07 falD . on the part of either to Observe Sbriet neutralits when the other i. 1 .C For further particulars apply to the Projristor, JOHN GRKAHAM ttawa, May 14, 1%22, 106414 @ BT. JAMES CBUBCHK, AULL 2t u) s w# % 44 w oB- o » FANCY FAIR night the NOR SALE Vistoria April 2th, 193. W y Khi ‘Ere / proceeding ird. 7 Weather cool and cleer. 5 i Another rebellion in Mexico A labor strike < O 1O sirike in Michigan has resuiteg THREE POLLOYING paY¥®s. SATURDAY, MAY 18r8, 1872. f At 12 o‘clock noon, *n & ~limmmemes....... , " / Srro â€" ydms the .'.‘ in the indirect claims, s responsiil ty from it, . KONTUREAL TOROKTO t CaAlYy to ; ag. T6 Of r _u.m'°““m:m ‘:::P:;the Other fop :‘l * “ f M f either to :}..“.!."i- Furniture. 0. %. WALKEM l‘u“!”u # o. @F t aball gugrantes the nter, feli A. ROWE, bes and may be Emperor of Ger on ‘tThe 1st into the arrived feuduot on the pubiic atrp, ‘,I‘"; »"hnth‘ E in $A0L. _ 5ho waaet #e hope it may, is will â€"ttKte oscasions in the c ame a part of our C city and its vicinity, whic unstion of the Adjutin Tas F wor Faseâ€"It n "'â€"'|.~“d wale pusiod. Nevigation ve! lawse.â€"By the boat wirs thet the dabris of t curied into the lock. Chboim & Bros. Ste«? Guide, which is replete Gaemiia Caxal~* vite telegram was e plue in their rooms, this oevening at 8 o‘cle titled # The Power of 4 selame her. 25 * 10 cents Young Men‘s Christian as. May 18 oraws. May !* Rai Geome Y. K. C, A Laxp.â€"A , * > ‘,â€"ut i. La o % McGillivray _ w i9 & large â€"â€"The last Aush wortb, khowp 6 16 Cgx TEA 5ALB . «» 1672 C 1000 lor