PAGE 20 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 1980. WHITBY FREE PR] TOWN OF WHITBY The Planning Act NOTICE OF THE PASSING OF A BY-LAW BY THE COR- PORATION OF THE TOWN OF WHITBY TO REGULATE LAND USE PURSUANT TO SECTION 35 OFTHE PLANNING ACT TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Town of Whitby has passed By-law 947-80 on the fourteenth day of January, A.D. 1980 pursuant to the provisions of section 35 of the Plan- ning Act. The following Schedules are attached hereto: 1. Schedule 1, being a true copy of By-Law 947-80 2. Schedule 2, being a key map which shows the location of the lands to which the by-law applies. 3. Schedule 3, being a statement from the chief plan- ning officer of the municipality that By-law 947- 80 Is in conformity with the officiai plan of the municipality and stating the purpose and effect of the by-law. 4. Schedule 4, being a statement from the chief plan- ning officer of the Regional Municipality of Durham stating that By-law 947-80 ls in conformity with the officiai plan of the region. ANY PERSON INTERESTED MAY, within twenty-one days after the date of mailling, personal service or publication of this notice, file with the clerk of the Town of Whltby notice of an objection to the approval of the said By- law or part thereof together with details of all or that portion of the By-law to which there ls objection and detailed reasons therefor. ANY PERSON wishing to support the application for ap- proval of the by-law may, withIn twenty-one days after the date of the mallng, personal service or publication of this notice file with the clerk of the Town of Whitby notice of support of the application for approval of the said by-law. If no notice of objection has been fliled with the clerk of the municipality within the time provided, the by-law thereupon comes into effect and does not require the ap- proval of the Ontario Municipal Board. If a notice of objection has been filed with the clerk of the municipality within the time provided, the by-law shall be submitted to the Ontario Municipal Board and the by-law does not come into effect until approved by the Ontario Municipal Board. THE LAST DATE FOR FILING OBJECTIONS IS FEBRUARY 28,1980 THE OBJECTION MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS DATE IN ORDER TO BE VALID. DATEDat theTown of Whitby this 6th day of February, A.D., 1980. Wm.H.Wallace, Clerk-Administrator, Town of Whitby, 575 Rossland Road East, Whltby, Ontario. Schedule 1 This is a true copy of By-law 947-80 passed by the Council of the Town of WhItby on the 14th day of January, 1980. THE CORPORATION 0F THE TOWN OF WHITBY BY-LAW NO. 947-80 BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND ZONING BY-LAW NO. 1784, AS AMENDED WHEREAS By-law 98-74 enacted certain amendments to By- law 1784 in accordance with the provisions of Section 35a of The Planning Act, R.S.O., 1970, chapter 349, as they existed at the time of the pas-sing of the said By-iaw 98-74. AND WHEREAS the provisions of the said Section 35a were amended by The Planning Amendment Act, 1979, 1979 S.O. Chapter 59, to provide inter alia, a revised technique for im- plementing the provisions of Section 35a in that By-law im- plementing the provisions need not now be or form part of a Zoning By-Law enacted under Section 35 of the said Plan- ning Act; ESS Election 1980 Questionnaire Did the Conservatives take the correct action trying to reduce our national deficit? What is your position on deficit spending? Do you believe that the deficit should be paid off quickly? Correll The question of Canada's international indebted- ness, of Canada's status as a debtor country, is a question of the rule of the rich, the monopoly capitalists, and of the U.S. imperialist domination of Canada. The question of Canada's huge and soaring foreign debt is also a question of who should pay for the crisis. To build a genuinely independent Canada, to move Canada forward and to get Canada out of the crisis, the working class and broad masses of the people must take up as one of their tasks the repudiation of this debt. This means to declare all foreign debts, mortgages, bonds, etc., null and void, whether contracted by tahe state, its agencies or expropriated monopoly enterprises. To deciare all stocks, bonds, debts, mortgages held by AND WHEREAS the revised provisions of the said Section 35a have now been implemented by By-law No. 892-79; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED, AND IT IS HEREBY ENACTED AS A BY-LAW OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF WHITBY BY THE COUNCIL THEREOF AS FOLLOWS: 1. That Section 12(a) of By-law No. 1784 as enacted by By-law No, 98-74 be and the same is hereby repealed. BY-LAW READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY,A.D., 1980. Wm. H. Wallace Clerk-Administrator J. C. Gartshore Mayor Schedule 2 The key map showing the location of lands affected by By- law 947-80 is not necessary because this by-law is for a change to the text of By-law 1784 and will affect properties throughout the municipality. Schedule 3 STATEMENT OF CONFORMITY TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND PURPOSE AND EFFECTOF BY- LAW 947-80 1, Robert B. Short, the Director of Planning, have reviewed By-law 947-80 of The Corporation of the Town of Whitby and i am of the opinion that the said By-law is in conformity with the approved Official Plan of the Town of Whitby. The purpose and effect of By-law 947-80 is to remove the development control regulations for commercial and multiple family dwellings from Zoning By-law 1784. A separate by-law has been passed by Council in accordance with the revised Section 35a of The Planning Act. Dated this 14th day of January, A.D., 1980. Robert B. Short Director of Planning, The Corporation of the Town of Whitby Schedule 4 STATEMENT OF CONFORMITY TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN FOR THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM 1, Dr. Mofeed Michael, the Chief Planning Officer of The Regional Municipality of Durham, have reviewed By-law 947- 80 of the Town of Whitby and i am of the opinion that the said By-law is in conformity with the approved Official Plan for the Region of Durham Planning Area as adopted by Regional Council on July 14, 1976 and approved by the Minister of Housing on March 17, 1978, as amended. Dated this 23rd day of January, 1980. M. Michael Commissioner of Planning the Canadian financial oigarchy in foreign coun- tries null and void, and declare all income from such sources illegal as well. The importation of foreign capital through investments, credits, "aid", loans, joint ventures, or any other form must be prohibited. D ickerson If one believes that a budget which produces a rise in unemployment of more than one per cent, a rise in inflation of more than one per cent and a loss in the gross national product of more than two per cent is the proper way to reduce the national deficit, then I would be glad to entertain a debate. Proper fiscal management will, like any successful business, produce excess revenue over expen- ditures. The excess revenue should then properly be placed so as to reduce our debt. Fennell By taking positive steps to reduce the national deficit, the P.C. Government recognized that this debt is an albatross; a severe impediment to Canada's economic well-being. A recent Globe and Mail business editorial spoke of the deficit as an "...insupportable burden, and it is hopeless to think that it can be brought under control without raising taxes." Pierre Trudeau increased the Public debt faster than any Government in CAnada's peacetime history, completely out of line with any of our trading partners. While the forced economic stimulation brought us rising prices, record wage settlements, reduced productivity and increased unit production costs, it also meant reduced com- petitveness in export markets. We've lost both domestically and interanationally. Deficit spending is a perversion of sound business prictice. Look at the record: the gross national debt in 1979 is $97,991 million; the net debt stands at $6,371 per taxpayer; the interest alone on the debt is $23.2 million per day! Refusing to face hard economic reality, and continuing to spend without regard for the future is a totally irresponsibale attitude. Ironic isn't it? If the Trudeau Liberals hadn'd been so loose with our money, the new Government wouldn't have had to take such firm position on the Budget. I believe the process of reducing the deficit should be a progressive one: sustained and consistant, and no so rapid as to cause major upheaval in the ecomony. Did you realize that the current budgetory deficit means that the government's net debt increases at an annual rate of 200/1? And that it sooner or later must be met by higher taxes? By gradually reducing the deficit, the Government debt will no longer increase relative to the size of the economy. Public debt charges will cease to demand a sizable chunk of government expen- ditures. Posma Libertarians maintain that government deficits are always wrong, consequently, the govenment deficit must be reduced to zero rather passing it on to future generations. The cumulative deficit is the sad aftermath of years and years of government ex- travagance. This deficit must, of course, be paid back. Libertarians realize that taxation must con- tinue until this deficit is paid in full. As for future annual deficits, we propose balanced budgets. This can readily be accomplished by bringing gover- nment to manageable size. Rison The Conservatives promised to tackle the deficit. But didn't, in the Crosbie budget. What they did was attack the people who are least able to pay. the budget was a feeble attempt to increase revenues - not to reduce the national debt. A deficit is not quite the bogeyman some think it is. Each and every one of us lives by deficit budgeting when we buy anything on time - a home, a car, or a trip to Miami. For the government, allotting money that lsn't ini the coffers is like an individual taking on a mor- tgage. An investment in the future. Should the beaucracy be trimmed? If so, how would you like to see this done? Correli Bureaucracy should be eliminated. The bureaucracy in our society is yet another manifestation of the capitalist system. Highly paid "icivil servants", who are appointed and then pen- sioned off at exorbitant sums; corrupt officials in all sectors of the state machinery; personal fiefdoms that serve only their leaders-these things are well known amongst the people. Under the socialist system, all state functionaries, including the judiciary, will be elected, and subject to immediate recall. They will be paid workmen's wages and nothing more. Only under socialism will the bureaucracy be eliminated. CONT'D ON PG. 21