Georgetown Gemini (Georgetown, ON), 9 Oct 1996, p. 6

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

THE GEORGETOWN GEMINI WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 1996 OPINION Maturity of youth While the problem is not new, few ever are, the tensions between skateboarders, police, and citizens reached a fever pitch in Georgetown this past summer. With some justification on all sides, people were feeling put out by this sport, which is growing in popularity. On the one hand, homeowners, drivers and business proprietors were up in arms at what seemed like swarms of youths gathering to skateboard in parking lots and on the street. Concerns included vandalism, littering, foul language, intimidation, and in at least one case, public urination. As would be expected, it wasn't long before the police got involved, ordering the skaters to move on. From the start, members of the Halton Regional Police Service knew this to be a Band-Aid solution -- once the skateboarders were ordered off one property, they would simply move to another. Finally, we come to the skateboarders themselves. As they would be the first to point out, skateboarding is not illegal. It is a sport, no different thah rollerblading or mountain biking. After a summer of mutual discontent, Constable Keith Bennett decided to take on the project of trying to find an equitable solution to a growing problem. Hosting a series of meetings, Bennett, with the help of Stacey Green of the Town of Halton Hills met with residents and skateboarders. The final two meetings had attendance nearing 200, an even split between the two camps. Of particular note, the Sept. 29 meeting at 11 Division in Georgetown showed a number of things, specifically the levels of maturity displayed by both sides. While there was no formal dress code announced, several of the skaters showed up wearing dress shirts, a few even wearing ties. Despite tensions running high, there was a minimum of shouted, derisive comments from these youths, who can, with some justification, claim that they are being blamed for many of the ills in Georgetown, guilty or not. Under the intense glare of the spotlight, they bore up wonderfully, obviously cognizant of the fact that their every move would be scrutinized and that now is the time for good public relations. Sadly, the same cannot be said for many of Georgetown's residents in the opposing group. A number seemed to be committed to a private agenda. Almost like clockwork, after a youth would make an intelligent, thoughtful statement, a grumbling could be heard throughout the crowd. To be sure, that grumbling was not coming from any of the youths in the room. The Gemini's reporter in attendance heard several adults making derisive comments, unwilling to listen whenever a point contrary to their own was brought up. However, the real coup d'état was to come toward the end of the evening when one member representing the interests of homeowners addressed the crowd. While his comments could be described as "middle of the road," his lecture was peppered with profane language. Without missing a beat, one of the skateboarders pointed out that if a group of youths could make it through the meeting without swearing, why couldn't the adults -- the same group complaining about profanity coming from skaters? Excellent point, young man. Excellent! The real hypocrisy comes when these adults, many only a 'decade removed from their younger counterparts, seem to forget the exuberance of youth. While we could never formally endorse any actions contrary to the law or even community standards, it seems that some of Georgetown's most upstanding citizens have taken an attitude of "do as I say, not as I do." Guess what? It didn't work when these adults were teens and it's not going to work now. The sad fact is that it is those committed to obstructionist actions who usually have the final bearing on what happens. In other words, the squeaky wheel gets the grease, or, at least in this case, the squeaky wheel gets greased. / don't know where you get it from, and/ don't know exactly what you did to your little brother... But you better not "Alomar" on him again! Your LETTERS Hyde tries to clarify Towntrak issue To the Editor, Let me acknowledge Councillor Moya Johnson's elegant and con- sidered response to the debate and relevance of the Towntrak Benchmarking Program. I am also delighted to learn the Municipal government has acknowledged and provided language for performance and benchmarking measures in the municipal sectors. Towntrak's position is that mu- nicipal governments are operated as fiefdoms for the benefit of staff not the constituents. Let me illustrate the huge gap between perception and reality in appraising municipal expenditufts using the Towntrak number, now acknowledged as be- ing the average increases received by staff over the years 1988 to 1993. The units of this increase are 7.8 per cent per annum, per residence. Recall that the per residence divisor is what Municipal Affair's Nancy Bardecki complained about. The divisor automatically corrects for population growth and the increase is a clean, unadulterated increase. City Hall knows this very well and I wonder why it chose not to bring it to the Audit Committee Chair's at- tention. The other missing information is to note that in the year prior to an election there are no raises, so in fact for four of the years in question the real increase hovered around 10 per cent, rather that the 7.8 per cent of this debate. Even had the increase been taken at face value, without the per resi- dence divisor, the increase should raise eyebrows. Halton Hills has not managed an annual increasein popu- lation, or in residences, for any of the last ten years over 1.5 per cent per annum. The good Councillor knows this. So a 7.8 per cent in- crease is needed to cover 1.3 per cent growth. Itdoesn't take too much imagination to see why our town ranks so poorly and why a Towntrak- like benchmark is so necessary and importantto separatethe perception from its reality. Finally, don't expect any help from the Town staff. The Annual Financial Information Report costs $15, a tariff to discourage inspec- tion, one of the few Canadian cor- porations who charge for an annual report. Bill Hyde, Towntrak Harold Street Slo-pitch season ends with thanks To the Editor, Recently the Limehouse Slo-pitch League completed its 16th season will Bill Van Ryn's Express win- ning a double knockout final over Charley FitzWhiskey's. I would like to take this opportu- nity to express my thanks to all the sponsors, players, team reps and umpires who made this an exciting and fun year. There is also another group who deserve appreciation: Barb, Bryan and Joy at Recreation and Parks Department, who contributed to the success of the baseball league. Over the last three' years this league has contributed $1,800 to local charities. Finally, I would like to say that weare looking for an eighth team to fill our league. Please'call me at 877-0427 for more details. Dave Ward, Limehouse Letters to the Editor should in- clude the author's name, signature and daytime phone number. The Georgetown Gemini re- serves the right to edit all letters THE GEORGETOWN GEMINI LETTERS POLICY for style, taste, libel, length and slander. If specifically requested, The Gemini will respect the anonym- ity of an author. all Publisher & Editor Paul Nolan Advertising Manager Rick Butler Office Manager Linda Hayes Editorial Staff Kyle Goodlet Jamie Harrison. Frances Niblock Joanne Stevenson Advertising Staff Lynne Buscher Trish Henry Production Staff Kim Konarzycki Distribution Manager Marie Shadbolt Regular Contributors Eve Martin Steve Martin Mike O'Leary THE GEORGETOWN GEMINI is published weekly on Wednesdays by Wicklow Hills Publishing Co. Inc. Mailing address: P.O. Box 145, Geor- getown, Ont., L7G4T1. Phone: (905) 877-1113. Fax: (519)853-5040. Geor- getown administrative office: Per- sonal Secretarial Services, Unit 47, 360 Guelph St., L7G 4BS. Reproduc- tion without permission is prohibited. Ideas expressed herein are those of the author only. AD SALES: Publisher is responsi- ble for errors in advertisements to extent of cost of that portion of the space occupied by erroneous item. PHONE THE GEM: (905)877-1113 FAX THE GEM: (519)853-5040

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy