The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Clearing the air on the Clean Air Act I felt that it is important to write a special message on an issue that is important to me and to all of us-- the air we breathe. Recently, I was reading a stack of press clippings on the environment and the coverage was not very positive. Critics were quoted as saying that the government's environmental plan "could just... be a great waste of money," and that it lacked specifics and was "weak, vague, and pathetic." The articles were not about any environmental plan we released, nor were they from 2006. They were from 1990 written in response to the release of Prime Minister Mulroney's Green Plan. Mulroney received a lot of criticism and not a lot of credit for his Green Plan, yet he did more for the environment in this country than any other prime minister before him. This past spring he was awarded the title of Canada's Greenest Prime Minister by some of the very groups that had criticized him in the past. Like the early days of Mulroney's Green Plan, there has been a lot of misinformation about our plans to clean up the environment. I'd like to take this opportunity to correct some misconceptions and explain our plan to you. Our Clean Air Act is a sweeping and comprehensive piece of legislation that takes a fundamentally different-- and better-- approach from that of the previous government. The first difference: We are taking action to reduce both air pollution and greenhouse gases. The previous government's plan focused only on greenhouse gases and completely ignored air pollution or smog. As you all know smog is one of the biggest threats to our environment and it is simply unacceptable that we have to tell citizens not to go outside on a summer afternoon because of the poor air quality. Any credible environmental agenda must address this issue and that is exactly what the Clean Air Act will do. The second difference: We will put in place mandatory regulation requiring mandatory reductions in air pollution and greenhouse gases. The previous government's plan was based on voluntary compliance and voluntary reductions to greenhouse gases and greenhouse gases only. Michael Chong Our plan is mandatory; theirs was voluntary. The third difference: Our plan will regulate all sectors of the Canadian economy. The auto sector, manufacturing, the chemical industry, the oil and gas sector-- all sectors will face tough, mandatory regulations-- even weed-whackers, leaf-blowers and lawnmowers! Let me tell you a few other things about our environmental plan. Attention has been focused on our long-term target to reduce greenhouse gases between 4565% by 2050. However, our plan is not simply about long-term targets in 2050; it also includes short-term targets to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gases coming into force by the end of 2010, in four short years. Companies will have to move quickly to make the necessary changes to ensure full compliance. Companies that fail to comply with these new regulations and targets will pay fines into an environmental damages fund and be used to invest in research and development for environmental technologies. I also want to clarify our position on the Kyoto Protocol. We remain as signatories, we believe in the science of climate change, we are committed to the objectives of the protocol, and we will work constructively to expand its global reach. Our Government's approach will achieve real results for our environment and for Canadians. I firmly believe that our individual actions are the constituent parts of progress. Together we will build a stronger, cleaner, more prosperous Canada. --Michael Chong is the MP for Wellington-Halton Hills