Oakville Beaver, 4 Dec 1994, p. 6

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Oakville Beaver Weekend, Sunday, December 4, 1994 â€" 6 â€"Editorial x S > THE OAKVILLE BEAVER 467 Speers Road, Oakville, Ont. L6K 354 845â€"3824 Fax: 845â€"3085 Classified Advertising: 845â€"2809 Circulation: 845â€"9742 or 845â€"9743 le, is one of th P Ian onver Pu-bliSher f“:mupol suburban newspapers which inclu les: Robert Glasbey Advertising Director Norman Alexander Editor Geoff Hill Circulation Director Teri Casas Office Manager Tim Coles Production Manager iton Canadian Ch ThomhilVVaughan . f All material published in the Oakville Beaver is protected by ction a i consent of the publish ising i ted on the condition that, in the event of a raphical error, that portion of the advertising space occupied by the :"d::n:mg_ S wi for, but the balance of the advertisement will be paid for at the applicable rate. The publisher reserves the right to categorize and reject advertising. In the event of typographical error, advertising goods us item, together with a reasonable allowance for signature, will not be charged or services at the wrong price, goods or services may not be sold. Advertising is merely an offer to sell and may be withdrawn at any time. obacco smoking is the leading preventable cause of death and disability in Halton. â€"most smokers start when they are children, before the age of majority/responâ€" sibility. â€"tobacco is an addictive drug ~the extent to which smoking is permitted or condoned is a factor in the onset of smoking. â€"environmental tobacco smoke is especially detrimental to the health of chilâ€" dren and adolescents. â€"ventilation systems cannot entirely eliminate tobacco smoke from the enviâ€" ronment â€"public opinion supports restrictions on smoking, particularly in areas freâ€" uently. S If ;’ou think this bit of stuff comes from Ontario‘s new (and controversial) Tobacco Control Act that came into effect Wednesday, you‘re absolutely...wrong. This preamble was from a Jan. 1990 report called ‘Smokeâ€"Free Spaces For Halton‘s Youth‘ which was prepared by the Halton Council on Smoking and Health Subcommittee on Community Smoking Prevention Strategies for Halton Youth. Whew. Aside from the almost fourâ€"year time lag, the current TCA has addressed most of the concerns of the Halton document...and more. The writers of our document will be pleased to learn that the TCA... â€"bans smoking in facilities used by young people, such as day nurseries, schools and children‘s hospitals â€"restricts smoking to designated areas in shopping malls, hospitals, colleges and universities and sets out stringent criteria for those areas, such as size, numâ€" ber and ventilation â€"bans smoking in public places such as stores, financial institutions, video and amusement arcades, coin laundries, hair salons, barber shops and transit shelters and stations â€"bans sale of tobacco in health facilities including pharmacies, as of Dec. 31st. â€"bans sale of tobacco in vending machines as of Dec. 31st. â€"bans sale of ‘kiddieâ€"packs‘ (packages containing fewer than 20 cigarettes) There are more restrictions and for those who don‘t toe the line, there are fines...up to $2,000 for individuals and $5,000 for corporations. If lawâ€"breakers reâ€"offend, they can be hit with $75,000 in fines and if new packaging regulations are ignored, fines of up to $300,000 are possible. The government‘s strategy in passing the TCA is basically threefold: they want to prevent children and teens from smoking since few people start smoking after they reach 20 years of age. (b) They want to protect the public from secondâ€" hand smoke that has been linked to cancer and other ailments in nonâ€"smokers and (c) to make smokers quit the habit. Maybe now we‘ll see more people buttingâ€"out. WEEKLY FOCUS _ Noxious nations Top 10 CO,; emitting countries per capita ranking in metric tons, ‘90 Per capita CO, emission Czechoslovakia 13.47 USSR (former) _ 12.83 NEA Graphic The Oakville Beaver, published every Sunday, Wednesday and Friday, at 467 Ad., Oakvill : e Mo\mland‘rirli u:‘lhhg Distributing : Ajexâ€"Pickering News Brampton Guardian, Burlington Post, Colingwr:;d nection, Etobicoke Guardian, lown 1 W Acton Free . Kingston This Week, Lindua“ This Week, Markham Economist and Sun, Stouttville/Uxbridge Tribune, Mi ion, Mississauga News, rampi h Newmarketâ€"Aurora Eraâ€"Banner, North York Mirror, Oakville B.a\ll'gfa Orillia Today, Oshawa/Whitby This Week, Peterborough This Week, Richmond Hill by copyright. Any on in whole or in part of this material is strictly forbidden wiom the er. s Women are superior to men... all you have to do is ask his wife »ach week, readers rush to read this column B because (among other things) they‘re anxious to absorb the fascinating facts the column contains. Facts like: twice as many women as men clean their belly buttons every > week. Readers also covet this colâ€" umn for the crisp, clear remarkâ€" ably researched insight it proâ€" vides on topics as diverse and significant as what the heck is happening in my dayâ€"toâ€"day life to, well, what the heck is going on in my dayâ€"toâ€"day life. The odd time this column tackles a topic which, some sugâ€" gest (my wife included), is "way out of its league." Apparently, such a column appeared about 818 days ago. And I‘ve been hearing about it ever since. In the unlikely event you don‘t have my column topics memorized according to publiâ€" cation date, the column in quesâ€" tion was generally about "modâ€" ern science" â€" more specifically, about the discovery that the brains of dead men are larger than the brains of dead women. From this discovery, I deduced â€" and not without backâ€" ing by a few men of modern sciâ€" ence â€" that if the brain of a dead man is larger than that of a dead women, it stands to reason that the brain of a living man must be gads greater than that of a living woman... From there, I logically leaped to the concluâ€" sion that men are obviously betâ€" ter than women. I followed this leap with the very mature lines: "Na, na, na, na, na, na." Every day since, childish women (my wife included) have confronted me with soâ€"called facts and figures, stats and more stats, which they believe prove that compared to women, men are but mold buildup on a showâ€" er stall. This childishness peaked recently when my wife â€" whose brain I scientifically observed in that longâ€"ago column "is conâ€" siderably smaller than mine" â€" brought home an ‘In Health‘ magazine in which I found the aforementioned fact regarding women‘s preoccupation with lintâ€"free belly buttons. "This should end all arguâ€" ments," my wife said smugly, handing over the glossy magaâ€" zine. On the cover of this publicaâ€" tion was the headline â€" "The Superior Sex" â€" which (as a man) I naturally mistook for a headline promising an inside scoop on superior sex. Having raced off to my room to read the pictures, I disappointedly disâ€" covered the headline hailed a fabrication, I mean a report, about how women are superior to men. Bigger brains. Sharper senses. Longer lives. That sort of malarkey. Indeed, according to In Health magazine, 16% of men and 41% of women pull Oreo cookies apart before they took a bite... Oh, and apparently, women are not the weaker sex. If you can imagine. In Health says women outlive men. on average by.seven years. That of the 12 causes of death, each cause kills more men than women. That women are better than men at distinguishing colâ€" ors. That women have a sharper sense of taste, and a better sense of smell. That women have greater sexual capacities (although they tend to get more headaches)... Also, In Health says, "Scientists, who have studied the femaleâ€"male health gap, find that all the data point to one conclusion: Mother Nature is a bigot." Apparently, the male has a higher mortality rate in almost all forms of animal life studied â€" in nematodes, mollusks, crusâ€" taceans, insects, arachnids, birds, reptiles, fish, and mamâ€" â€" mals. Finally, while women are more vulnerable to everyday sicknesses and pains, men are more vulnerable to lifeâ€"threatenâ€" ing diseases. In Health says, "Women get sick, but men are dead." Ouch. I decided then and there to blue box In Health. To recycle the heck out of it. "What did you think of the article?" my wife asked. "Hogwash," I replied. "But it‘s factual," she argued. There‘s only three facts in that magazine worth mentionâ€" ing," I countered. "The one about belly button cleaning; the one about Oreo cookie opening; and the fact that 22% of women like the way they look nude, while 68% of naked men are pleased with their appearance..." "And doesn‘t that tell you something about men?" my wife said. And again, I detected that smug â€" dare I say, superior? â€" look on her face... e ul C ce Exc k\m-...â€"J Nok k2 C us 0 C Td d D o t o un o e es SA t 10 d ue nR Te d Eoi ce 00 es ies t L Es n tA i e N o en ue h Cc s t ol

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy