The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

16 \VILMETTE LIFE, FRIDAY, MARCH 28, 1924 ~ - ,, .. _ I:' ' CH Christ~ A PROBLEM IN J Membl ofT Ch The PRACTICAL The only county ~~didatea in the approaching primary election who are publicly, unalterably and positively for Essington and against Small, are those who comprise the group which has the support of McCormick, Brundage, Crowe and Barrett and their allies in · the country town :districts. Opposed to this group of candidates are men representing the so-called Thompaon-Lundin elements in the republican party of Cook county. The Thompaon-Lundin representatives in the primary are admittedly for Small and their position is publicly stated and known. Mr. Deneen and the candidates of his faction are not publicly aligned on the Small issue. Mr. Deneen asserts that he ia neither for nor against Small. There ia, however, no ~nteat betWreen the Deneen and Thompson-Lundin elements . of the party. Wherever there is a Deneen candidate for the republican nomination for an oflice, there is no Thompson or Lundin candidate for nomination for that oflice. This extraordinary interlocking of organized political forces opposing the anti-Small candidates may be the r~ult of coincidence, but whether it be that or the outward sign of a private working agreement, or simply a :~OLITICS- As Cl as the take n combination naturally resulting from a desire to eaeape the hazards of a three cornered political fight; is not important. The combination acainst the anti-Small forces, whatever the real explanation of its existence may be, is a dangerous combination. Len Small is not the whole of Smallism. Small ia but the conspicuous head of a school of so-called repub.: lican politicians, whoae methods are no different than his. His followers in Cook county are making a desperate fight. They are highly organized, powerful and well versed in the game of practical politics. A vote for any candidate who ia not publicly for Essington and against Small, is a play into their banda. The election of Essington and the re-election of Attorney General Brundage will not mark the end of Smallism, unless all of the allies of Small are swept out of powe~. This cannot be done except J,y the nomination of all the candidates who are unalterably opposed to Small and Smallism. The answer to the problem is plain. There must be no scattering of votes. Constant and intensive support must be given the anti-Small candidates. Should any of them fail, the victory against Smallism will be incomplete. terpret ings bJ church lowers in con mainta teachin1 sick as sinner. Chri healing of sin same proof teach in T he Vote for These Men: GOVERNOR-Thurlow G. Euington. ATTORNEY GENERAL-Edward J. Brundage. SENATOR~Medill McCormick. CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURTSamuel E. Erickaon. MEMBER BOARD OF ASSESSORSCbarlea Krutckoff, Cbarlea Ringer. MEMBER BOARD OF REVIEWWilliam H. Weber. TRUSTEE SANITARY DISTRICTWilliam J. Healy, John ~ Lawler, Gottbard A. Dahlberg. COUNTY SURVEYOR-Fred Norlin. STATE'S Crowe. ATIORNEY-Robert E. RECORDER OF DEEDS-August W. Miller. CLERK OF . CIRCUIT Thomas 0. Wallace. CORONER-Oacar Wolff. COURT- Primary Election Tuesday, April 8, 1924 .