The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

How can the habit of the obtain- ing of}: divorce for evgary frivolous ‘ loffense be stopped? Doubtless de- '/â€"\ fin other crimes uguinst'the‘ marital / mam, cruelty, debauchery; adultery rel on fahould- constitute a good ’excuw for divorce, but incompatibil- ity of mmpémment, by which is gen» emlJy meant inability w'rulo on the’ part of complainant, should be we“ ,,Weighed by u court before divorce is hllowed. Huwiwmgld it du tomqu the marriage of divorced parties unâ€" V._}a.,wfnl during 1' e? It might work harhship immeti es, but Wouldn't it loud to stop (I wh‘esnle‘divfmm hllflinefil?akwa [mg/an Gama; ‘ ~ _. The only pussible uhjeotiun Hml The Jour‘nalq . «'1 REAL ESTATE AND LOAN AGENT D. M. ERSKINE, J12, An uxvlmuge flhkh “ How Wuuld it l do furlhc vuriuua legislatuws of lhel country tn puss luwa compelling iml surunne Comp-mics to furniwh the public with blottmg pads?" W3; don't kntgw but what Burl: u mezusurci is now pending. If not wuh “ pads,” . W‘mg tquully absorbing as re- ' gunln sfuckholders. ~ - “ While this in very conclusive evi‘ The' way to restore (-onfidenoi- is ‘1 (lence ms, to the favor in which Chica- to restore it. Men who stand round, : go real estate is held, it defeats nm’ny and growl and whine, and Wonder: sales, and makes hard work for the how dull 1884 is to be, will not findihrokvr, who has his work for his it a good veur. ' But those who work pains. The larger transactions are hard are BCOUOHJil a], who push thing's i confined to no puiliculal locality, and advertise marâ€"«such men * but are distributed vcrv generally W111 make money and ulway 1mm», [11- . among acles, central business, and . , 1 . . *lgexj 1884 with pleasure: and enthusn ‘ Improved and vacant remdence prop- Mmaâ€"Boan ()(ulx. ‘ ex‘ty. All application for an injuu‘tztion‘l in the Chicago Evanston R. It? (3656, before Judge Shepard of thel Chicago Supexjor Court, ‘was oni Monday last very properly refused' by the lowed judge, hence the} Northwestern Company again suffers ydefoh't. The application for injuuc-l tiOxi purported-Lo be in behalf of the l people of lhe State, but was in fact for’and on account of the Northwest- ‘ ern. To my that the residents along the north shore are (1638‘. "mm, nay, anxious to have the‘ newfioad comâ€" 'pl'eté§d,, wouldhe but statingqfwts,‘ and for any gigotnt‘ic monopoly to ”oppose-(the wishes of} the people in thia‘respect only shows the necoééity of' a moro,public intefest being‘mken in the matter. ' The only pussible uhjeotiun Hml le had jbvesuéd several thunsanfl‘ we can we is, tlmtif thr mnrriggv of doller'N in what ‘wt-re suppose?! to ha); divorced parties was nmdv unluu'hq‘gilt udgt-d bands. and could, whang 'pg 1i e, “JeriA MM lu- nu awful the offcf wax mad», have rinsed ont’ ‘qdvanmgeuf Lheprmwnt at a hamdsmm: profit but U? the its repeal, thun’ Mgcking v time hifl offer “as: m-oepivd, Lu m'll ‘re'thr business of every lanthem would hnvv emailed a heavy} Court in the: mate Let' a man or lot-vs on him; ho wan, therefore, com-,1 Woman either [nofthat he or ahe' pelled to lose the ‘bugain, He art mt mnrxiod again, and emu-ma : ‘I kéow .6“) men who, like: INSURANCE IMI‘ED BY 1). M. Elisxmnffnxs INSURANCE AND BEAL' EQTATE'JOURNAE “The apparent delay in the cou- summation nf grades in not unrihut- ble to lack of buyers, but mflw new of holders. A number of. ‘inat‘u 1088 have come to our notice ‘ g wherein owners have refused to (-on- icede the slightest difference, for in» ', Hmuce, $500 gn u $50,000 deal, $250 on an $11,000 trunmtction, $100 un 11 1 $5,000 mule, an! no on. Chicago Real Eotate. ”The market for the pun month, while not productive of great Iesultu, was, in a manner, what [flight he Lermed ‘livaly'_ for luidwinw‘ex- «Hiding both in number and vuhfine of Hale the same period last year, and is indie-titikveiof ‘im early bpieuing of the spring trade in mm] estate. i i “ We p1 edict for acres an active 1 11iemand,the inquiry from both out-V isidl and home buy erg having alreadyE i commenced. Owing probably to the' 1 'fuct that Chicago is increasing in 1 |{population at the rate of 50, 000 per annum, and news that are now conâ€" i sidered gutside will soon be available i !9.11 residence and business localities “ As a infaw ’ showing the incliuuâ€" 1 t'um of ocumfinml stock operators to I Q invest their surplus in something ‘; Lmugible, We quoteune remark of one E X (an “m resiflont. of Chicago) who lmdi : “nude uu ufl‘n-r on a choice property; ‘ ; 110 mu] jbvesmd several «1.0mm ‘ dullsmu in what “we suppose}! to be“; ‘gilt udgt-d bands. and could, whan ; the offcf wax mad», have rinsed ont’ at a hamdsmm: 1vmfit lml U? the “ In number oi ' sales, residence property of course‘has the lead, as in cent'rul the [fifmuess of'holders fre- cquently defeats 525,1 ‘8‘, ‘the inquiry for- this class of property is veiy naive, 2 and will doubtless inciease as the l springfipproat h‘es. - “ For central property there, is alâ€" ways a remly'market, but tragéac- {ions seldom occur, unless at prices which a. few years since were scarcely dreamed of and are new Icqnsidgwd outside. “Sgburbm: preperty is, as might be expected very quiet but with the advent ofe pleasant weather, buyers who me now merely seeking informa- tion will be very hkely to dose on LheMw-Lionav A PREDICTION. A STRA W. ‘ “ Present hm": gthe wife)” with it $2,000 or $5,000 insurance policy on ‘yuur life," in u Bugger-din“ no nth-n _-nrgwl welzm‘ getting tired of it. In most L-usvs it isn’t true any more thuu 21 man mm he said to make the bank a present when he takes up hia- uwu " prmuisv to [my ninoty days altvr date." wto. Ditln’t‘thv man tell his ms’eetheurt 11 thousand times beâ€" fore he married her he could not live without her, that she “Pas all the world tu him? No Immense uboufi stock, who urg only awuiting a chance w sell out, even «at a moderate loss to 11118!“ the money m rend amt/c, as stocks an- allogflher Lon risky.”â€" Inter-(Avon, it. \Ve have been in the same 1156â€" dii-mnent, and said it withull the sin- cerity :1. human being could com- no inand. She, the one we loved, wzw . all the world to 1115 then and has been 'ever since. She is the light of our: eyes now, and when that light goes‘ out there will he :1 «lurk pull spread ' over human existence to 1111 No , . hude or blossoms are so I1 amount or i l beautiful as those she cultivates, and ' ‘ zthOUgh our home has always been ' ihuinblé, no happier ' children have‘ ‘ lgathered around any other fireside ithaii‘our own. \Vhat a paradise uhe 1. ihas made of the home ‘r Has she: knot given her life, her thought, her; ~; entire existenise to the one who "Hitid 7 ihe could not live without her. undl l, how far wrong was he?, What lisi due the bright spirit that has \varin- ‘, 1, ed the heart and blessed your home? ‘, l What if you die, leaving her in the 3 imise’rable condition you would' be, J'without her”. Surely everything that ‘9‘ lies inryour power to make her exis- [ " tenoe peaceful till her spirit finds its. l ' 1 way to yrfllrs again in the existemse 'Nbey'onod You leave her, what? The i ’ Homily, to care for. 7, Yes, and the 3 3 l home; the household efiects; ‘mttny i l of‘ your ovm, of little nae to her, ' ex: l cept as 'sorrowlul riienientoee when 3 i you are gone. » The settleino 11! 0I s the estate, the winding up of your” i business afi'itiin tint ubemloed so ' .mnch of your time, the payment of 41 your debts that gavo youyeo much 'umfietzyt» How illy have you prepar- “ed your idol for all this. Think of ) l the many unpleasant surprieo s othtit- ; . ing her, omd‘the torturing um o-itain- e ties to darken her future, and fiay,1if flyou dare, you do not owe, her the , ‘ heist bank amount you "can poneihly i ‘ provide. You readily~ user-m: ,We a”, knew you would, but the botnk av- 11 Eoount in Ho uncertain.m Your own ‘Ahâ€"‘A (v t’ '«xigeni'ien demotudu all your ~sourplini e 1neanumoflo1),nn«l thm mo ”Ito-n ‘1 drained so low it would not do to y nit ken and die M such a time \\ hat cotn you do? \\l1y,,just what you a Ihould do What we have done: elm the obligntion to your 1"“ PayXopf Debts. insurance policy, that cont» but a trifle each year, and provxde the bank account at. it time when, of all others, it is most iiéede-d, when tln Hufl'ering ividow and mother of your children will bless your memory for this ad- dit'l‘onnl evidenota of your fatherly care. Talk; the policx tit once. Eon owe it to the oné’ who bun done more for you than any one «15.4 cun, by the most binding obligation» that can rmst upon you. Protect llt‘l‘ _ thus, and, batter btill, Wlllll‘v doing tbiu, provnle by the Hung policy what will Hmootli your (ha-lining 3011”, if both l to go ilown the hill' to. gcthvi, F will it not a presunt, when y l in are up lain to your WlfC that this it uriuicc is the saffmt and best wltli on you ever made to thv joint e ' togâ€"”Rough Notrs." SUNDAY CONTRACTS IN [LL1â€" N015. The Supreme (‘ourt of Illinois in the ease ofltiehniond v. Moore tiled June 16, 1883, 107 ”1.429, held um Sunday contracts were valid. It appears that the St. Louis Court of Appeals filed an opinion on March 3.8, 1652, in Moore \5 (,‘lymer, just reported ‘In Vol. 12 of Missouri Appeal Reports, which an- ticipatee the decision of our Supreme Court, in point of time, in holding that a promissory note made in Illinois on Sunday, in consideration of money loaned,ou"that day, is not for that reason void under the statutesof this State, uor at common law. , ('onsider- ihg the‘ fact that our Hupreme'Court had not'epoken on this subject, it was r ayhold step for the St, Louis court. and lwllich receives the approval of our ,Supreme Court by a later decision. l without knowledge of the former. , The opinion is an able review'of the ‘, authorities and aatutee'of other States. . We copy one portion of the opinion : l‘ “ It thus appears that the weight of e authoritative interpretation would un» 3 questionably hold that the word l “ labor ” in the Illinois statute has no ; reference to ,tlie making of a promis- l'sory note or other'wntraet, unless per- l hops the consideration be some work 07: luborto he performed-on a Sunday." «The contract in Richmond v. Moore, 107 111.429 waua vessel contract. 0f "such uoontract the lllluoin court sayzl l, “Here there wars nothing to disturb ,the peace and good orderot~ society, which it is the primary purpose of the “statute to prevent. Had this contract j been made in such Ii manurr my to di» turb (he punt; anil good order of no- ciely, or any portion of H, Ila/n u w m , Idlfi‘e'rcnt qumtion would ”haw ,btul preuwttcd, but" out! which newt no)! In ,disouased hrrzz.” fi‘huult'will appear lthat hoth courts in the passages itnl- 'l ielfied'ahove. fidfiptmé camm in which w theb‘uudayfitutute mighthwwnu-oper , ative hymnnuhnynt of the nontravl. 7We are compelled to admit ilm’ the ' opinion of the St. Louis; “on“ of Ap‘ peala is superior to t’u .lmlunwnt or ‘ onrown mum-m.- (‘nu t, | an. in lealn It ink and diction. -I,I'g/u/ Arlrixt‘r ‘ cHIéAco ”YEAST"