Illinois News Index

Sheridan Road News-Letter (1889), 3 Jun 1899, p. 10

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

The Glencoe council held a special ‘ ”WM WI meeting Wednesday evening. 31“» mum toutzsoto £330 etch. ‘ ' HR in)“ -e ‘ o “"2 ”WdP'PNW“°“' 5“?” 2:2... .mE”...I.“‘°W.. “2.2: Chicago Milwaukee Electric BaIl- m... .I, pm.“ who .311 mm way looking to an arrangement that W I32 ti. Sheridan Rd 1 would enable thezn tobeginthe oper- E PERCY MA YN‘ R‘ ation of their'road through the vil- ‘ new”; cm“ lage, it they should â€"~as they expect, M,M__._....-~.. be mad! ‘0' W" “to“ “"3 comple acceptable solution of the dificult “0“ 0f “'3 '0“ 0‘ macadammng A part of the consideration invulv Gwen 3'! Road Th0 company 5 in the prepoeed arrangement I franchise in Glencoe provides that, that the village ahouldreceive m they Sh!“ not ‘ ll ‘ WWI till the the railway mpany one than“ improvement 0‘1 “3°“ Bay 303d i3 dollars in cash and grant the fr 'mmplewl and imapted by thecoun- feet additional width to the right oil. «The object of thisreetrictiou is way which the hammer. ofllc recognized ‘3 ‘ proper 09°: b‘“ it is - say is not only essential to ena not without its, disadvantages to the them to make the superior road tl company» the villése and to the 960- want to build, but necessarytoaas‘ ple of other villages who are im- the wfety of the public who t" patient to see the road - in operation on it. _ at the'earliest moment. but who must It is said an apparent explanati all wait for several months in order in part, of the action 0! the Glen that Glenooe may be ”.30!"le 39' council is found in the presentai cure in the cotnpletion of the street I 0‘ a petition handed into the 00'“, improvement which is the considers-'_ protesting again 4‘ giving- the 0 tion giVen by the railway people for ' puny any greater width of right their franchise The railway oflieers _ way unless they obtained a h appreciating the obligation resting consent from the property owner on theGlencoe council not toendan Green Bay Road who consented ger this result, realizing'atthe same the f“ nchiee. This : too, altho time what' Is due from them to other the consent then. given made 11 o ‘ points along the" lines and under ditions as to the breadth of the ri; pressurs indeed, it is understood, of of way, leaving that to thediscre obligations that require them to have of the council and althdugh the the road in operation at a fixed date, to“ was signed by only four or ofl‘ered the Glenooe council a way, as of the 0‘."le of WOW”? abut A they thought, to bridge thedifiiculty. on the street They proposed that when their road The company will now be 6b] was completed In thht villageso they it appears, to adapt their track could begin its operation, if the Glencoe tothe “bobtail” pattern Green Bay Road improvementshould templated by the ~onginal {ram “Ot'then be completed, they won“ while other teams provide for a turn over to the, village the contract- - ov er which fir st class equipment or’s guaranteedbond, and also put be safely run in the hands of the village Wu Seeing that Gleneoe has been in cash the sum then remaining un- V ing and hoping for about tiliftYJ paid on the contract, so that the vil- that another railroad“'would ‘ lage should have absolute control of a 'oug and 3'" them . comp and security for the completion of 1 no and make some demand the improvement as fully as if the, their vacant lots and acres, the work had been contracted for by it- thoritiel there donotaeem tobe so“. w n‘n tn their nnmrtunita. ' OLENCOB THE STORMCWR WINNETKA and GLENCOE LOTS Singular to say this proposition was “turned damn" by go onanimous vote, although. up to the time of the meeting it wauuppoaedto he regard- ed by {majority of the council on an THE SHERIDAN. ROAD NEWS-LETTEE acceptable solution of the difioulty. A part of the consideration inn-Ind in the proposed arrangement was that the village aheulrlreoeive from the railway company one thouaand dollars in cash and grant the p four feet additional width to the right of way which the company? a ofioera say is not only essential to enable them to make the superior road they want to build. but neeeqaarytoaaeure the safety of the public who travel on it. ' A It' Is said an apparent explanation, in part, of the action of the Gleneoe council Is t‘onnd In the presentation of a petition handed into the council protesting again-It giving the com pany any greater width of right of way unless they obtained a fresh consent hem the property owners in Green Bay Road who consented to the fra nchise. This , too, although the consent then given made be con- ditione as to the breadth of the right of way, leaving that to the discretion of the council and although the pro test was signed by only four or five of the oWuers of property abutting on the street. v“ __v The company will now be obliged it appears, to adapt their tracks in Glencoe to the “bobtail” pattern con- templated by the \original "franchise while other toWuB provide for a road over which first class equipment can be safely run. . NPERCY. MA YNARD, "gamma. Seeing that Gtencoe has Men wait» ing and hoping for about tgirty years that another railroad: " woufd conic afiong and give than; i competing line and make v home demand for their vacant lots and acres, the au- thorities there do hot seem to be quite up to their oppoytuuity. , Mr. and Mrs. W. B. “'hite re- turned to their Highland Park home on Wednesday from a two weeks’ wedding (rip. macho. Ion 9239 to 8350 each. willy pinyin-u. about :50“ tronuge. Rd..nw. w. W Idk. Inc-du- pun-oat. mm; Iflldividctouit. Also-felehShonloun wad-Ipdcelud mummies whowmbuld. _ 5135;! m n Sheridn Rd mm nu: cash on". mu} cumo an: Inn Baud IA. Ind Ln- Win- mm- hw. J.\antetm. ‘to‘i .g-teer.I-‘.Â¥Iv«. .Louo hmoNonbstwn (:00th- I‘LL-hem: “fixin- an m w. Buckley m. Nun 15 but 15. w. . ya to Sc ,uuo. Lo: 1: bloc! l vaelud to \l Inncth. I. .Ie Ito A. .Vollman. m. but 4mifnw.. Thomas L. Walt B. C. Wolf. “.500. but. timd‘blocks. “meme. : -- . . .. - n A ‘1 I.“ u_. Cuiam Funny and we we. a M. a. By. $3.6”me non-then! k section an and l - . ‘ C 0! Highland Mannexmg panda-c- tlon unodflncflomlncdlon “3-13. Chale- loumn andwltc to John .V. N. Wu. all. We! M (ed lot I block 3. out! A. Hunjlmn'uecond addition to H in. land Put. , - ‘ , " Frank P. Cnudon nod wife Franc! I). Wait“. utilnflkbloci and I" not tM-dq-Ln‘clfllufis .‘ _ l Â¥~-_ ll 1‘-..‘ "‘1'“ c...» â€" Nm‘lh Chancery to Henry H. Gaze. sun ‘- Prawn! in.*¢3|0".3:‘-“.'n j A, 1““; Elizabeth H r Wetland and huuband me. C'. ucxempe. on. but a: South nghhnd ad- ditlon m Hughlund rntk. ' , - . Robert 1). Watts and um: H. Wilcox to Wm. C. McKenzie. 1. Lot 42 South fligh- land uddluon to High and Park. ' Chas. W_. Wilcox and wife. quphlne Brown and husband. and M: are: Wilcox to wm, C. McKenzie. .1. Lot 3 South Highland fiddl- tigq to_H!g_l}lu9‘d fart. J ., »‘ u uv u. an“... - .u... ..v .. [Charles H. Gailoway and wife, James M. Ualloway and Wife Eugenia Todd and his. band J usephine Ellfs and husband. to John E. wooémun. 01. South. :3 feet lot 15 block 13. Hyhland Path. ‘ n CI: on Odell and wife to M .' 15. R m. l. and a block 4. lots 42 and 43 b ock lab ”and” block I .10!!! 19 to 2,7 block 9. all in Deedield [tut LI . 8: lmgnvvgnngnt-Agw- 26143.12. u- v‘wiii‘uu â€" â€"_ ._...-_ -fi, clatIon’s uubdhmlon Inwwuifieafi 9,; section C J “IIILBTOM [OT 1... IAIL I. NAIILITON Money to loin on North Shore vicant property Telephone Hun-8028; . « 95 Clark SL. Rodguu 224-226. cut-c530. §end n postal cud tonne! on Bindlnt of :11 kinds. Old-books ”bound: maximum: my bladlng'sjf deified: all hand truth; will has: a lite-time. Pumpkin work I npechlty‘. Addreu. ' ‘ - " REAL ESTATE TRANSFERS. Fowlers‘ No. 88 Edison 8‘. Clucuzo. 1. Blumll. linger. Waukexan, c. J. HA'MBLE‘I‘ON a co. Real Estate "he Sun Book Bind“); Manufacturing 011: Good Inca-c.3- .. Chicago. Ru- «5. TthmBoothdcty, Optician. Entafiishcd z 1081:

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy