The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

U o siid _ l Aoont was in fact a new onter-- | ., y fiomfl" if he was not | ex?':'wfl was to be considered altogether The ClgAIR'MAN ruled that f l'"'rt from the other part of the line 'They | tlhOflld h pnt. the amend-- | _ :le):'ef hld any right to t;fllld that belorol,"i: ?;! amendment w fore, an entirely new enterpr still objocfing:.::l'. put--Mr. Feor-- W'(;'i:h::: a question for the House to decide | . . Nays, 31. k. carried. Yeas, ::'h" time should be allowed them The result was received with"applau to constract the work, The time M:. RYAELERT moved in o e allowed other railway enterprises should _ nsc3, '"That saiq oopipaHy, Mnendment to | | 1 _";p,ip guide in deciding this ques _ o railroad within pany shall commen:e tiop. In all fairness they should be con-- n a year, between St. | '1 richts similar to those given to others, _ air River and Glencoe and St. Tho ceded right8 ®. r 'd St. Thomas and Forkt E ri6, #b mas, He believed six months to organ1z8 and com-- e scame time, and in default to f:tfml::ig «uM f":f,s 1;3?:" ::: fl;r:'i?;{::r'yh:::;k Itz | .;t;rpd tgeozfi';:i:;d tofl'l):in;h:h:bg::; wat ;i::oze, one year was not at :.sll too short. f Mr. McKELLAR belteved himaolt and bis | | , 52' 1y was a fallacious argument to | riends were qngto cap;ble of attending to cow work. ® e 8 . the matter without the assistan ({ bh gay 80. c bon, member for St. Catharinu,"'l?he in? The amendment of Mr. Rykert, substitu-- tention of the gompany was to build the ting eight months instead of one ysear, was oad as far as St. Thomas first and thence | | carricd: ;m,eed weetwards as rapidly as possible. It | _ Hon. Mt-- WOOD moved in amendment, | . was a sons{ble and a proper proposition to | ' Provided a_lwayg, that the said Company let the company commence that part of the |-- shall be limited in the construction of its road which would pay best, He did not | railway from St,. Thomas westward to the wish to put such a restriction on the enter-- _ Detroib River 3ud t.hs' River -- St. prise. The hon. member would not have |_ Clair respectively." He explained that as liked to have such a clause in his own Bill | . be uudeystccfid the :x:nt. member for Groxlx'w;;lle Mr. GALBRAITH said no better method as (Mr.t d( }:; telze con:t mcg?,:?t tl'xvl:srailw:% could have been adopted to destroy the road gr!g!q;,e'l'hcmm westward; and that the line than this, It was necessary for fhe CompanY }:ading from St. Thomas to Fors Erio was to have the road c::in:;;no:l. h:ihm m;tlos _ already preoccupied; and that it was not pro-- wf" the most absur ng he ever hear | _ posed to grant a lc:harl;er over the samse 11;0'.1t1¢:. o5 4 . |_ The objict of this amendment was then to Mr. PARDEE wished to know why this |. jip; tjbe portion of the Act for the con-- lize must be commenced in three places At | | pzyyrction of a railway from St. Thomas wost-- _ once. _ It was quite evident that the oppoa-- | | _,,4 (Op, oh ) He could not think that | ents of this Bill wished to kill it for it this || gp, (immittee intended to graut a charber motion were cartied, the promoters of the | | over the ssme route R Bill might as well withdraw it at once, 1/ _ Hon Mr. RICHARDS--Well you have | -- The motion was withdrawn. ; {lbe it ah'e; dy. y .*ir. RYKERT moved the adoption of a l Hon, Mr. WOUD--Sursly the House 4 » * ye~ T | dause siwilar to thet introdused 6y Mr BX sot grent a charter over the same route / _ _ ('o; ne Into the rival Bill, to the efect that Mr. ELAKE--WhLy. you havre alread ths Company should be obligsd to §ive éoner.it > 7. you have sTeoauy | $200,000 guarantee that the work would be | _ rrou My, WOOD said ho did it on the commenced within a certain time, ground that the chartor then interfored with Mr, PARDEE would prefer to have the | -- was effete. moving of this clause deferred till the third The remainicg clauses, the schodule, and reading of the Bill, and in the meantims to the preamble, were then carried have it printed. The clauso was a very long Ihe Committee rose and reported the Bill oune, very restrictive, and. very strangely with amendmenrts. wor;li]cdéi It was unfair to spring such a clause Hon. 1(\3], WOOD said he wished to move | on the fiouse, | an smendment. Mr. COYNE said this was for the purpose Mr BLAKE said it was too late ; the of affording a guarantee to the people that Epesker had taken the chair. the road would bs built, If the promoters Mr SCOTT (Ottawa) did not belisve in of this road were really sincere in their pro-- this sharp practice. fesslons with respect to building this road, Mr WILLIAMS (Durham) said he had they should have no objections to placing | not been guilty of any sharp practice. He $200,000 guarantee in the Bank to show thoir | had waited a reasonable time tor the hon good faith. _ He desired to have the same member for Bothwell to move his amend-- | . clauge in both Bills, _ The promoters of the | ment. other Bill made no objections, and he did not | Mr SCOTT said it was the Hon. Trea-- see why the promoters of this Bill should. surer who had the amendment to move. Mr. BLAKE thought the clause was a Mr WILLIAMS said he had not been very proper one, but the natural consequence . AWBFP of it. a & woula be to extend the lins, It would hardly After some fnrthez dlscussxox.l Hon. Ml' be fair to put this additional fetter on the WOOD read clause 17 of ,th° Air Line Bill, company without extending the time. ;fi{fh he proposed to introduce in this Mr. COYNE said when Mr. Thomson was x F before the House two years agzo be expres;ed anha];; !::gggl%AR cou'd not accept such his readiness to organize a Company within Y § 24 hours. If hefound it such an easy matter rg:n(i i':& :V Oola "idt lt)l: w&flg ht;p it he skould have no objections to the loagth of || PM*** Tought up a) £no reauing. | time allowed by the Act. || EXTRA STTTINGS. | _ Hon. MNir. RICHARDS objectc1 to this ad-- || , Hon. Mr. Cameron, in the absence of the \ ditional barries thrown in the way of the || Attorney--General, moved that the House do _| Company. | have two si:t;ngu to;:lgrrov{,--t:fi first to ) Hon, Mr, CAMERON said this clause way [| (Ottmence at 5 p. m. aud bo Jasé Hil 6 p. t : an independent provision, and the extension the second to commence at 7'30£ m. and to of time was not a sequerce. tl:.tthll%:da:]tglrnmfl :lf:h:f ou:;; and on Mr. RYKERT was williag to admit of an | House do ln:: :hy,'e, sittin;:--ttel:; fi::ttl:: extensicn if this clause was adopted. commence at 10 a. m. and last till 1 p. m., | _ The motion was then carried. and the then following the sams hours as The remaining clauses were then carried | OD Tuesday (to--day). without discussion as far as clause 9. of%.{xr. gLAKE wished to call the attention Hon. Mr. WOOD sugeested the adoption e Government to the fact that several of the 17th clause of the Air Line Bifi, in |, ® ublic Bills "}d Reports of Committees this Bill also, tho clause was in relasion t, |. Were Yet remaining to be decided, and if they the running powers. wished to prorogue before Christmas, it was Oh clsuse nine-- lltte:gytm}tpu;:iblo to get thrc;ugh tl;lese Bills, | so that it became a questlon either of the "bhé;. R\"M:':Tldpm?cgeq t}x at the w'or-;s prorog".tion, or of the "slaughter of the inno-- year' should be struck out, and the | cents." To--morrow,they should require from words '"eight months' insertsd, from the Government a knowledge as to the Hon, Mr. RICHARDS objected, and _ Curte they intended to pursue. § t;gig that the clause should stand as ADJOURNMENT. f x Mr, COYNE M;'. ?I:Al{Etsaid it was felt to be of the -- adjourn. Mnt 2w ts 4* jreatest importance that the suspe After go dis F h"i" O:hght bto be inserted, and the$ ::;;K; lost. id cussion, the motion was o give the chartor, as a new charter; thsy | TORONTO WHARF AND -- W R ® * | & ARE-- l bered to give them a your, as they HOUSING COMPANY. ! pr T saat s \ _ _Hon, Mr. CAMERON d that the | Mr CAMERO: h 7 move a 0 Ms CAMEROY raid thas thors coult b | rowp. shopld (go l Comntites on Bl e mt tnien "ol t thnt | 52l dn i 19esp Who it onl d been statements made by Mr. Thomp-- | ard Warehousi ' n, at the first granting of the chartar, that | Bill :lu pmg . Company, The could obtain the capital, and not & word i was was exactly similiar to one which ( ob e granted in 1845, by the Le:-- q egeten .batid' about thg'.gsuge. § But ho had ; gisla.ture of _ Canada, $ witg the e:- o obtain the capital required. | ception of the third clause, which ided Mr. HAYS said that the Hon. Provincial | that the Company might buy a lease fror m Nrfigar i 1e ght buy a lease from tary had not the wishes of the district | . the shareholders and directors of the Co | . consideration when he proposed the con-- [ pany, and this could only be done weith tile | t:on of the proposed lizes and the Grand |. accordance of the shareholders. t ink Railway. The Bill then passed through Committee | ir. CALVIN said that thsy found that || &rd the third reading fixed for to--morrow. '(8 people on the route wero in favour of the || .. The House went into Committee on Bill _ now proposed, and those on the Greoat No. 46, to incorporate the Misslesippi Navi-- stern were in opposition _ He thought | Eation Company (Mr, Carnegie), Mr. Code they ought to considar the intsrests of | in the °h,'h'- " people. Here they were on their knses The Bill was received with amendments reciprocity, and this was a rectprocity | 824 ordered for & third reading to--morrow, _ i a vengeance, 'They were obliged to rua The Houso adj » 14. ] the naughty American paople,'who had | night ) journed at 12 o'clock (mid-- |; :fid' of l:nillc:; of r;u, and it was absurd ~--------<----._--_--__ | ey should ask them to alter their * t ge to suit the }(lianadian line. Tho¥con'.d NOTICES (_)_F MOTION. expect Mr. Thompson to get on with his Mr. Currie-- nt gauge. He hbad, hegconfessed, en-- amo:u.t i';';:d f(',ff ;;:31 for a return of the y lost patience with the reasoning of the | the sale of lands for tax county advertising e on this matter. He had not skulked | Canada Gazeltfe, since Je!i. each year, in the uty, but had set it out like a man; but Mr. Currie--Enouiry q {- 1867. ust say, he never had so entirely lost _| ment intend lppoi(zl\tiny whether the Govern-- | ace with the manner in which hou. |--| ing the present Parli g any Magistrates dur-- bers bad argued the mattor. (Cheers). ; iament, d ir. CLARKE said it Mr. Thomson werse | _ _ _ . _ fls t t ks in possession of the exclusive right which |. P :40 M iL i thigo + * \2 4 formerly possessed in the Southern Pon. e en ies s n 1 C oo p ooany, it wonldboair:ve matter to consider ' We tl% iA oaiaie e stt her they should be allowed such an ex. | _ _' _ C onie. s oo t ts a c n io a n n of time as had been proposed. But ' Hiokeas: oL o. . oo ult . psidered that their former powers had | . . -- Jt ol To ae s NiNe) Waiysiate nnulled by the action of the Housa to. | . _ . _ * «. . . ysd o The question then was, what time | . eEA . e ho v?:"t\? 3 Ailys"~ be 'fioy them to construct their ) _ . .. ho o Nicle : man s e tie'ss s '-'_,... .A--'.'Ty fnidie, t m:"w * .' ' 'f§