The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

F % _ se ® C " RenPa® P C \ _ | on its merits. 6 * Mr. RYVKERT moved the second readinz v Mr, SCOTYTT (Grey) aupported 'gf_l.'"":i:""';'r of Bill relatirg to Municipal Iostitutiyns 't' l'i:ug';xotnfi :n ::::2:::1 ;f,{-'-:n:;:x "":)' towa-- ' Carried and "e'erred' to select com -mtp'e'-', «bips affeut"td" should be named ; sad W\"'i» (;on"'!'"ns of I'.Tctaffl. "':neron' Perry, Par. regard to the Bill, he was unot aware that | aee, Cow, ana the nmovel any injustice wou'!d ho done, | WE3T OXFORD. t Hop, Mr. McMURRICH said he failed to ! Mr OLIVER moved to recomvreit §111 b!;o see the injust'ice complained of, in Toronto, | legalize and coniirm the o cop . t bong mank two thirds of the ratepsyare af a street could | ' William Smiley, Deputy P L S , °f."""t'"_"' petition the corporation {for improvemaents, | of the townrhin of \Vest. Oxtord l';fnika tfe i which, after being cone, the whole street | southerly part of the said tomsg D: . (;lOv'H] would have to pay for, The same poneci | as the 5th and 6th concessions,--Carried a t 'e wou'ld apoly t he quest:iog neow nelore | , im nre sESER 1:is i4ij ToR pa~ ' gio ered maaly to tw ; LSNboX, Kuorox AND Ax0oB Ra:L | Mr. CARNEHE argusd Vist thora wa i WAY COMPANY,. j ro injusiiwe in the provistons of she Bul. He | Hon Mr. CARLING moved the seso~:' did not natiove i evan if it were in tasir | reading of the Bill to incorporate the Lo: ower, the ratepiyers of one group of tows-- | don, Huror and Brucs Railway Coimpray.-- l bips wou'd unjasily tax a smailoc groug. _1 l Carried. se mactel ont nithjus relwrsaye co cce | ST. JOHN'S CHUROH, ANCASTE®. i doiey of iriermete . ano 40 eny th5% dn y obs | Bill was read m second time, to vas i ooudmo akjund sys A Douns for Paiwha. | certain real estate in the Churchwardeu ¥ly 'prvue . comiz chere shoall of 8t John's Church, in the Townshia &* dn prmpons . s d o .* & a 1 + _]| of Anosster, with authority to sell th rmpan's 2y oo a ud | ame, and to parchase osher lands, an i faciol § A Iruso, bit k | otherwise to apply the proceeds theraoi.~-- a '" se3 y , ¥ith in ' Mr. Sexton. | rovigioss bad : ¥wZ | PRTERBOROUGH. t Bill was read a second time, to amend a1 ' frovrov » k Act to authorize the Church Society of th» $ »» e ; 7 A8 P Diocese of Toronto to sell certain parts «4 1 sn usasiin t i4 id aave { 2 the Re--tory Lands of Peterborough, aad for '._| be drawn somewhere. 'The presont Bill wa-- other purposes. --Mr. Carnegie. opposed by certain _parties, not because its C Tbe Hcuss adjourned »t 10:20 p. m. provisions were unjust, but because it did o. rmrinliereniflie oo es | not suilt their particular purposes, a Mr. CALVIN said he partially agraod ; wilth the member for South Bruce, hecause | there should be a limit somewhere, Mr. CURRIE said that the priaciples o' | this Bill had been discnssed before, and wor, not unknown to the House,. As a gecorca thing the people of the country aai vrov raifroad made _ But there was suflic:en : power in our municipal laws, as they now atbod, to give snfficient power to any muai-- cipality to aid in the construstion of rail-- | ) ways. Any county council had a right to | paes a by--law with reference to raiiway-- | and eubmit that law to the ratepayers. Tc would vote in favour of the amenduwsnt ot | the member {for South Brace. | kir MeCOLL (Norfolk) said that the prin siple involved in the Bill was a most viciwms one, and if carried would fatlict the greatoss irnjury on onr munictpal system. There was arailway mania abroad, which he though was atimulateA by the expesctation of th« distribution of the surplae, Ho would vos for the ameadment The amendment was put to tho vote and lost--Yeas, 30. Nays, 38. YEAS--Anderson, Baxter, Beatty, Blake, B y) "hritie Clemens, Craig («tussell), Carrle, Kyse, in P layson, Fraser, Galbraith, wow, Grahame (York) Lens er, M cuall (Norfol «), UoJo 1(WMain), MsD mug idt, McKim MclLeod, < liver Pardse, Rykert, %c vt(Grey , 8--xton Sinclair, Smish (Keut), Smith (Miduies ») Wiglo--350. NAaxs--SBarber, Bonlter, Calvin, Cameron, Carling (! ondon), Carling (Eurom», 'a negie, scock urn, Cl «nnoun, Cook, sorby, Goyae, Craig (Glenga y) rosby, Evan*», Fecrier, Fitz=@mmons, Granam (i ;. t ing *), Hays, Hocp r, L unt, Luton, Lyon, Macdonald, | (Gil, veMac ich, Marcett, Murra , #axton, t ad, ' Ri hards, Smith (Loads and Greavilic), strange, 9win | iton, «+¢t? Wallis, Wiltiam > (ou. hams Wisn--3* On motion of Mr Uarnegie, the do>sto on | the Bill was adjorrand. | THE DORCHESTER GLEBE3 Hon Mr RICHARDS resumed the al journed debate on Mr Beatty's resolutl»n respecting the Dorchester giobes _ He said hat some of these lands--of which th--re was a quantity in the County of Wellana -- had been sold since he had beou in offhi~. Phese landa wore acattored over the Pro. vince, and were to be treated as Crow» | Lands. _ The Jiflicalty was--to decide win | was cntitled to receive prao emption. . Th« | principle had alroady been atfirmsi tha' | | vhese lands were Crown lands, and bolonged | | ro no religious body. | || Mr BEATUY said that the Conm'ssionsr | | had accepted the prin wiple tavolved in his re rolutions Thougsh it bhad been aald ths«> were Crown lan's thosler ty of that losalht: § were deriving revesue fronmn them,. Vh 'id no* the Government take possesalan / | theso lands, and why did not the reovann | from them go into the Preasury aad not in the pockets of tha clerey ? It had been d ; rided that the clargy had no right to tha«s > | | lands, nader the Clergy Reservo Acot of 1853 | Hon. M». RICHARD3 said the questi> 1 | would have to he setrled ultimataly ag t> | who should have tho right t purchase t ie f ' lands. It was not at all certain that th> Government weu'}d not interfore in this mas ter, but it would not do so at present, | The motion was then withdrawn, |