The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

3. bS f . "Ni. 1i r f." tt lbw." '3" T , _ F"et " Trp, , 'd" ' ""M r " cr 91's": ....u . . n -. r,'. 11"" FT, /t in! "P pp 7 i - " ' ll C . i _ to In.ur° ttittittttt or cs1tfl ".1." " 5FWI "w. "l ' _ . m-tuTtiromiiti where the estates were ' 1'li,ll"'l2d, who kl'o'.'n2'?riMg,t,i,t, sang ' 3. . ." C l i but he thou ht it would IA 'ytttrty I cause looked toone thing alon end perms. I ' R"d shut out 5:0 great porthq of "in"? ' consider the hi: of others. Il', tif turt v» m was that all cases iihouldbe brought mum" tttfe, m at intoxi T id not! _ . gimme g, rier Courts. The cases which ' had b' . G I I . at"! tree , did arise end; this Bill were essentially could ,iiii,ic"i717fhta2,f,t "undid? ones in whidi it would be advantageous to , btneetioUi, In 'ttttte, he i Tll1tf1e,', '" the t,'tggu,"uhu't1igfir,2o . trphoid Amar, it "I l Molnar 'e2'f,'l'dt g tit te',t,k,rirg in had primed that l :gcurg'h' '",'l'i,"' '2,thti It that were iii: remedy should be a local 0:0 "hfah:d l "iiull'd" ofw 'lnt,'0t!,cu of toitnsi possible, one gentlemen to w om t' be ii'l'i'l.'li:'t'-U,1r2ru',t going further than hen had suggested that power should th . te t of th I "In to twomagkratea, todawithmtehos-tm; l 'l/dl,l'l'f h tt country required. t.r." t'uvell'il,l,' hh e h the greatest respect for t lei-ms e,f our?!" _ to stop, if. poasihle, _ ut ' g Nd Province. he believed t e vteso drin mg, but this Bill did not the magnum? o rtant a 'urisdietion to strike at the root of the evil at all. All it that this M00 impo . 1 did was to protect a man as far " " pro- th d that it should not go I . otrtut to em, "h J d e of the County porty was concerned. m beheved a man 'det.' tghttlt,'ai'g ll, the Bill was who drank ought bto be trented in the esti- ft t tier the order of interdiction had been . motion of .dhe he as a criminal, because f a a h J l c it could be regiatotod, it_wasa crime or emu to do an injuryto issued by t. 0 "Ed . f re the drunkard himself in that way, and he should be pun- and whi tt it couhnuedellll o 'i mart " " his lobed therefor. . So far as this Bill was con- could not buy nor ' no ti 5 corned, he thought it would be difrioult to estate. " , cairy it out. It would be ditfioult to say Mr. WOOD (Brant) - llcal property . who was a babiiiuul drunken]. There were ' jsN r-Yes or an thin else. personsyho wen (i soak themselves in liquor rl,', rrre,ii'r111oehl(cii,h2'ti, the 't'l'd,'r','l.TeCl; and be in a maudhn state from year's end to "a, country "on. keeper took advantage year's end, and there were persons who a: tT,',Tl','CU'l': druukard. How frequent- would go on sprees lasting for weeks at a il he ran up long bills in a tavern, and that time, but these latter would be Just es un- . followed up"in a drunken moment by the able .to attend to business as those who were '33:," of . mortgage, a deed by which he continually in a maudlin condition. A man, in; big real and ieriostUpropprtr. But byfar too, might be generous when he was drunk the most important provision in this Bill was and not so when sober; or the reverse might that it would shut off the liquor from the un be .the case; and there would be a law mane fortunate man during the tear. It provided taking the pennrious man into custody, be. that the interdiction might be served on the "all" he happened to b? Pe. and Pmur1ous. tavern-keeper after which he would belioble, There was no proper. distinction made in the d he continuodtesell tothedrunkard, to a duo Bill. He did not think that any good would [ of ahurdred dollsrsandtlie abolition of his in come of it, and when the measure went reuse {or three ears. m was not one of into Committee it would be found to those who mihd all the persons engaged be inoperative. He believed that CX. engaged in the liquor trade, as he behaved cessive drinking should be treated " a there were many honest men in it who made crime, and a aw made that no matter it a rule to sell no liquor to habitual, drunk- whether at a gentleman's table or a drinki ' ads, but there were, unfortunately. many house a person who should drink fli'l,ta hnrheepers of a very different 0138' who into a state of inebriety should be punished would tako the meanest advantages Of a therefor. If such were the case he believed drunkard's weaknesses, although they knew it would be bomshoiat. He never tested any- they were draining the life-blood ot the at». thing intoxicating himself and was practically fortunate and his family. The Government a temperanoe man, but he did not consider measure proposed to shut up the dnuskard that a man who was moderate in his habits from his drink. m proposed to shut up the should be prohibited from taking a glass of drink from the drunhrd. A! ho Mid beiforrr, wine at a frlend'a house. As long as he did this was not a new measure. It had boon no harm there should be no such resolution. i tried in some of the States in the Union and The advocates, of temperance in advancln . had been found to work well. It operated their views overshot the mark and prevented l in this way. It did not simply restrain the the attainment of the good object they had i drunkard, butacted " a prevention. When in view. He had man warm friends who ' a man knew that the management of his believed in total prohibition, and althouah f propert wouldbetaken oat of his handaii it might be considered objectionable he . l he dranh to exMM, he would ba apt to '0" wished them to underst exactly what his , _ train himself before he brought himself undor View was. Opposed as he was to glcoholic F the operation of the law. lie asked the drinking in any shape, he did not think the _ ' House to aftirm the irinciple of this Bill- manner in which tern wrance societies went the sound and sacred principle that a man to work to stop the liquor trailie was the , has no right to do wrong to himself or to his way to do good or to achieve the object they ' l family. A man liada tttt liberty to (to had before them. ' irirh buthehad no right to to wrong 0 ," . . _ . ' bani" or his family. The machinery of the Mr. PRINCE said. it was perfectly plain _ . il to h t lo t d m the Gor. by the number of petitions presented to this Bill "at 'tlit "d 3 3 :1 til it the My!!!" House that there was a strong feeling against airmen KI _ "1:01:11 -viacd. There wu no the sale of liquor. So many petitions were c .inrry at $1333 y', to stri'-'l . may yer. there, that the opera did not give the names a iigero e i. icing " 'e" l L , of the societies It whom they were signed or 1 the danger watt that the Bill woa.h1 Inot from Whenco they eminated but merely _ if . 1',f;p11at"rt1p1,rivdtpile 1.1222223 stated that so many such petitions were pre- mint of his propzrty unjustly. tl/IS, h" be. scuted. The chenpress of alcohol in this licved that the liill would have tgood,etreet, coqntry was the root (f, tho e'wL and poor and he had no doubt that almost every men 'l') at???" women tRt .ered .rom it most. her had some one in his eye who should be very "a', ItT,t,v,e, felt the curse or. the brought under the operations of this mea~ traiiic. ° would like'to know 1tlt.?seiadg. sure He could insure the House that the tmrr.st, under the operation of the Bill, would counti y was watching them on this questiiin. all??? Wh? the hab.itual drunkardi, were; ' 'lho temperance people formed a large army an t notiee of tttbrVttNt was served 11pou a of noble men who in: years had been striving man who was one of that tttfortunate clam, with much m-yit.deuia'l to mitigate and, if :ebwould not know what. it meant, for .an possible, destroy the evil of intemperahee. y?itua.1. drunkard. was "my! a "who Dipend It nit it members voimi aroinst This notice of Bernett would to the tiffeet this manage tn; would hear about it bwhen that if he did not, within eight tlays, attend , they went back to their constituents The before a judge he would be interdlisird. He vice of intempcrance was the great :vice of had witnessed many dim" 'ttfeet, from the age, and it was the duty of the House, flung"? "dd Ir"',',.,,,',?", Botmt dear '.r.ld irruoycciiveot party or creed, to do all in $01.? $1181 died rough the habit} their power to diminish that rice. (Cheers.) 'lt,': P, firm y eltuvsd, With the late Mr AIlad . . eh ab, ' that drunkenness could not be Mr. CAMERON and tho mover of this abolished by Act of Parliament. The moment Bill had called the attention of the House to a thing was prohibited, the keener the the fad: that the temperance organization desire for it, and he did not think that the was ",etitg?cg.tt,itt and that te Bill would accomplish the result looked to. were we c on. on .cmnn u on e Mor oi this him". ii that 'do/rf,,,,',',',',' Mr. WOOD .(Brant) laws" that ublic out n . throat b, prevent mm. opinion was being eduea d more refiners hers frmn discharging their duty towards prohibition. The remedy for the here freely it was ityproporly done 3 sub of the liquor trailic must be more strict ' m uiieTikrdL'i was due to those who and more general than now, though he would were advocating the tom rance cause- they not favour tho prohibition ot tho manufac- . showed . great amount "fem".donm ,but at tore or importation of alcohol. That article times they advocated that cattle 'iiiTi'ciiii'i.' was of use for ma mechanical and chemi. i As he desired there should be no uncertainty eat DWI", but (t most anomalous tlyr.tg as to his position on this question, he would was thii prominent p1aots gtron t" akohot m '" that so far as this measure was concerned the tttug of hotels or "ioorm, which Wttm to i hd believed they his. right to legislate in be found at slum can?!" corners. or tho directiontowhich thisBill pointed. They "We"? them w . 1mm" At; ' M , rfg1.tt.to Palm} mm 'rho attempted l s time would undoubtedly come when rr