The Ontario Scrapbook Hansard

Ontario Scrapbook Hansard, 6 Feb 1873, p. 7

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

uai.rtua,akgia mm. W . ', _ t 3?:th tte,' ttJ,thtT, Ylg'y',',rt'8 . bad been 2h'g1'2tt'dg) "high: 1 l q day monument ttfff, take up the mat- 82.2233? tg, comuld ttet', hi,t them m [ ter and pen a law on the aubject. excluded the when" (if 't1"hh'lt,l'e,'f. in. 01230an and that a far as in. 0x. mined. It had been bontended that in in; penence went the general opinion of all United Statea through the medium of the l ehadea of pubtica waa in favour of the ballot ballot a much larger number of per-Iona , . eyetem. 'tttlu",? tending to aboliah cor. ' voted than were votera. The however ' -ruptio_n and bri " Ha knew of many - ', had had the lame experience in (End; iil _ in which the influence of lumbar merchant- , recollectod an inatance when he war in Par. anhothor we employer! of labour Wind Iiament before. In the county of Recall l, ' undue uenoe upon their duplex: in aeveral hundred we, had been t on the l election mature. 1i,te,titt1tt had roll which had been copied from gm Alban \ it in their power to ooutro the voter of un- Directory, and m instance 3 good iUal "my, " tomato mortgagora. . F appears to have occurred in the late election Mr. PRINCE wondered how it waa poa- for the Home of Common: at Renfrew. Hun. eible that the hon. member for East Toronto drede then voted whose namea could not he [ could go against the Bill.'Sir John A, Mao. found. Our eyatem did not preclude the donald, the political chief of that hon. gen- poeeibility of Inch fraud. m t ht that tleman, when he refused to introduce the on conferring with his hon. trim! they rt Contented Election Law into the Dominion would be able to preoare a aatiafactory moa- olection, etatcd,_in fact, that he intended to "we on the ibieat and in tt bribeall the ridinga. m (Mr. Prince) Wlli before the House. He agreed with the m favour of this measure. view that had been suggested on both sides w, MCMANUS w" of opinion that there of the House, that if the Bill became law ' war ten timea " much corruption in the t ty.P.P Government should Uke the responei- 5 United States under the ballot ayatem " bility of it (hear, hear), and that it was ' under our election law; and read from a New not a matter Which should mat merely with e _ York paperan extract stating that income . private. member. He thought this I , of the ward! of that city there were many was . th principle which they muat re- more votee cast than there were inhabitant; 0083'" all the more cordially and . V Mr. SCOTT (Grey) contradicted Mr. ttgh, the In?" tg.iu11g became we had , Princc'a statement ac to Sir John A. that: art one Chamber. ethought it fish 9 Maodonaid's action in reference to the elec- h , dup.to .ue.uy, not 019" Without hie " _ tion law. He believed that if a good elec~ 'lpl'hr,'S,',f, " indivtdual tpin.ioy. in favour 'sl, tion law had been in force Ontario would h t 0 general principle y the ballot, and hi. have returned a majority to the Ottawa op' that they wo d find it praatieable to Government- J','? "tlee?""' mature upon the gab. Mr. ROBINSON instancul the case of hie ' , ' [ own election, where men emplovod by the me,tUt.'tg'/,',"g',tt,',roat M3 Boultbee,the , Grand Trunk and uy the Government were six monthP hoiethown' h "hm; ment for the . i brought up against their will to vote for hie to tio naye (Choora 'l' w" cat by 14 y", , I opponent. He hoped, that acme manure such The motion for the ac d di 1 _ l ea the one now under diacusaion would econ Bill wat, then ut, d con . ree "Jr of the [i, . hope-0d,." the country wan pro ared for naya 14 p an earned by hear 50, h , it ie advised the promoter of UG'h' to push Y . I , is through. In at..." to the Grand Trunk c lamp???" AIME Barber, Bethune, , influence he could aay that the employeea of It, 2glk, 1?hrutie, Clarke, (Norfolk) Clarke, i that comgany were moat strongly coerced to e mm"; Clemens, L'ook, Oral t Glen. i vote for it ohn Maodonald. all}??? (Run?!) 2rla tir?lbiiii,i,'i. , Dr. CLARKE strongly an rted the bal. ' Bpon, m" ib M, Gib-on. I lot ayatem. which he atatod R'l been one of flghfttitt 32%30. (36", Inner, INI- I J the planha in his election platform. Molt", Mow'at, 0:53]. "hd; Me Mamie, y y' Mr. new: remit that agood deal of Prince, and, Robin"; 550:5. Sexton. I vyhrtetwtyytety been given in favour Sexton, Sinclair, Smith, Booking... S ttom; . of the Bill. lie teat aupported the Bill, Eitnker. Watterworth, Webb was??? I and pointed out aev caaea M. gro- oorrup- liama, (Durham) Williama, iiLiiiii; ST,' . ' non on the part of the Dominion Govern eon, Wood (Brant) Wood, (Vi torlan) ii. l meat, which the ballot would hamravented. Nave 1h7iiii Boul M? F-60. I l He showed the defecta in the ot ayatem ron, Code Deaoo' F" ttr, Boulthee, Came- I in the United sum, and explained how it iriliiriii'd 'st',',",',,',', "ttimaytaq. matilton, i could not be regarded an accret voting. with, Ryhert, Tonic? Em". Monk, Mon. ' l,, Mr. LAUDEB gave come reminiacenooa of Attorne Alett , hie own election contcat, an well an of the ut,',,',",',',',,?,; of Ttdell" moved the . Welland nicotion, reagent); which he and fl','." CAMERON asked if th r that Mr. hinge men were obliged to nae of the Bill did not intend to e mover , .'llot'lll in "if-defence. de 1tf"td 'tttt Committee of the Whole hm it into , in "S'.',' we: no, " hymn o c Mr. CLARKE raid . l ball» . F't'iig wan willing to try it. lion of the Home he 'lt tt, tl,1g,Tt, . Mr. SINCLAIR ,',tt,iga to m of the {193" th.e matter to the Government. m ' atatemente ot the mom y for South ftp. t not intend to - the, Bill tluough, but , ' and armed Limaeli in favour of the Bi . ; th'tttg,Stgn, ho moved it be referred l Attorney-Genaral IOWAT laid one or Hon. Mr. thfuthPgftu . m gyttktanrx oppoalto had referrad to the merit had expreaaed their {he . Govem. I ' (act that he had not epokea upon thia not up this lub'ect, but held that ii" to "m, i . Pet at Ill early stage of the debate. It wan podiont 'lll'lf, Mt now, and yet a: 'th . ', ""t " quired by the 1iytsrm.neat that the) voted against tho six montha' hoist. y ' ahould at - oxpreaa_their view-a upon any Attofnerr0enemi MOWAT aaid it w 1 Bill introduced by l private member. Thai well ttndamtood that . Tttttt for alx month? y, _ we ' ntircly ir.iteittiis.ert with the Govern- ho.iat m always, a vote in oppoaitio t l "with Be "1033.1 the: he huge not earlier principle of the Bill. n o the _ up: upon an ject, came the ' . . cad now a very valuable (mention). M ngICIpiu' LOANFLND' anfi they had found a very general intuition IEROh asked if it w" the ' "Pinion in favour of tho measure, which was th h ot the Government to briug down not influenaod by any eximusaion of opinion Loin" can with mterxsmm to the Mtinieipal on the part of thy Government. It wae not A thd to narrow. . 1098!? that the meaaure would have been ttomeryAhrneral MOWAT - Not to. powdered amoat revolutionary one; now ac mar?" " hum being connidered in that light it eHouao then adjourned It 1 o'clock. ' waa "ppo.ru by {one Conaervntivea. He --_----- I L" :3 el'," ht, .faitit'," 'the moraine, but M 01-on OTICES OF MOTION. on ion in an in that he r. b - . gought the ballot a good thymus, "a he titled " 1t'iatl't,'erg'fii-A, Bill tn' , t mtgltt tho moat naeful result: would "38 and dating the nae 2f teraczi1 thorim allow from it. He thought the ar- gutet, mug. highmya of thia Pro . Il',,"'" gum": toe " "PM f"gg Were atronger Mr. Mertgiithuthi Manda fdl'elllt . . in ace again-t it, . the "9.1-1..." of Minister. whether Meaghan? will" 0 than who were even pro] udiced aitsinat it GOVernment during the D tion.o the come". 12, 'a..v.oxc.. Thire mm- no doubt, introduce amounre to prom: Mtogttm to h g'tSlif'tl.h,,t fifth in), 'ii'epihhw 'pete,? ot the general Statute olfairhgf 'tlt . . rom " Jl'on rovinc . choke of the dannera ottrautU,ttehtg can? 6 feet,',',,?.':-,..- . p .

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy