The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Iceman: 'Ill:?,),? " sale, an it would b the ales ---- ,Vowm- - - "HIV" th. $hyntnleiorer of Urowu Lmde had shown had megelly taken pleas. If it were in the inteteat of the [ammo that those also ehould belegellzod, e . abould be intra. (laced tor that purpoee ; bat he objected to Wagon: .h, this menu. He read 'tsit' "w. deetnble that there 2d1'l be "Mg? In the winner of conducting the saw, "id it Wes gentnlly supposed that It would be to the interest of the ublic for the do. to be conducted by tll' county cflitters Mr. HARDY pointed out that while the oPfh'ff of u the "clam? under that M89 or the - --...- l cmuidiration would 'usg'I',""t, iu' m it would render illegal those' which were gt present 1ogal. Mr. M. O. CAMERON said the olfact- of tho Chm 1e.ll Po m'legglizo the gala whloh "coerarnutioationa Lu. be. d received so to the "Witty of ell-using the law, and he con- sidered the limplvat way would be to allow 3. "I. to be oonductnd by the county olii. "In Hon. Mr. PARDE'E pointed out that ado- uinblo feature with rrgard to them also was that they should be conducted with uni- formity, and it was canal-lured but, and in the interest at the patios, that the sales should be conducted by county offioerot Luger audiences would 'y this means he obtained, and I butter {Moe would be ob. tained for the land. ,_._-_ .1 u... aux-"nun Ul um worn! 'ma ohm and! not Apply to Municipd ttlitters." Hon. Mr. CROOKS aid personally he had mobjection to the amendment. Mr. FI SLAYER IN suggested tint the words County Mumuipal officarU should be employed. The chase. with the but amendment, m carried. Hon. Mr. CROOKS next moved the adop~ Eon of the seventh clause. Mr. MCLFOD objected to the nmeudmont mpoeed With "and to land tax sales. The ff,') u it then stood had been found to work very well .Mr. 'l'OOLEY celled attention to o one in hia count in which the Regiotrar and Tree- !urer of the county lived outside the limits of London, ell-lo their oifiee was within the limits of the caty. The city Lad no control over the sol-rues of these gentlemen. They performed dunes on behalf ox the county, and their unconn- should not be "enable by lhecity. He considered the clause should shf,,,,ttiee. by the addition of the wordy " :...I-_..A-L-|' . . -- _ _7_ 1...". _.. - mun Ola-I188 Mated that the objectof this abuse was to midi: for the assoaament of persons who a lucntive appointment in one Munici- pality while thes, resided in another. the Hidopgtlox; - of m the old "Ac;,. wlrtiGiGi"iGGiGii on"! out of the Provinces. Mr. M. C, "A If "IRON weuot aware that the chase had hitherto been muotyts.truttl. m tlions!" the hon. gentleman lud dia. Coramt adiirioalty that never existed. The iimt chase was adopted. ,The Nomad clause was ndopted without 'it,", . the motion tor the Mo tion of the third chase, p . Mr. RYKERT moved, as an amendment. that it should be expugad .1110 Amendment we: lust on a division. With regard to the {on ', oboe, Hon. Mr. CR r.. " n d 5 adoption :1"! the insert, " the . J'Iowiug Worth, "Btfore owner uv. " in tho C9th lino. The'motion was -- 1tys fifth clause we carried withouhamonm Hon Mr. mamas moved tho tHophiott of the first chum, and explained that its ia. tmhliiiii wan intondnd to nuke clan the ttttie" IP mg on. the attahytot" clauses THE AR'HESQKENT ACT. C Hm: Mr. f RUOKS moved the Home into "fth of the Whole on the 8111 to amend ch:;4l5mment Act, Mr. Hodgins in the Hon. Mr. FRA'H'JR bro htdown the cob {patience and pupa". 2l'eo'f,l'gllof, with $) Grunge Incm-porttion Bills. '. ARDAGH was of the same opinion, Mr. C'ROOKS, In moving nth." " AL, -2ku . 0 RANGE BILLS. 'd carried withoutatnend. ye , ijth 7 arg', Hon. Mr. MOW"? aid the objection' winch had been iuat ruined Ihqwod tinge clauses could not C,' pmed as they stood m the Bill of Mr. WOOD Victoria) w" in incur the law remainig'xg u it stood, and thought that if illega1traia had been made anAct should be paused to make them legal. Mr. BETHUNE was of opinion that you; Imwdmmtto the law was necessary. S. d said it was true a great my panel}! 'llfl got think there had been any change In A The 9th clausefwns passed with's verbal amendmujz. . 0n the 10th clause, Hon. Yr, CROOKS proposed fan unend- m'ent. which he said wsl Intended " mesh. one uniform dsy for returns of ssseeevnent rolls. At present, the noted day would do- ttf upon a brine of the oorpdedtiott, iias ted l)? the 49th section of the Act to some day her the first ot February. He pro- poaed to nuke ths uniform dsys for con- mowing and ending to be in future ths at February and the 30th of April, respecta- ively. Mr. ARDAGH regretted that the Assas- ment Act had been touched at ell, but when It had been done, he was sorry that some better mode of assessment had not been proposed then that st present existing. Home check should be laid upon assessors. _--.- ... ___ _'I' _.....,-.." law. Mr CAMERON said that boom-e some lawyus had not discovered the "w, that was no reason why it should be mowed to "and. . Eoe. Mr. CROOKS then moved that the Ab and 8th clauses be withdrawn. . V Hal-ii; Fifiiila: approyed of the wit:- drlwul of the clauses, who): were ncco . ingly struck rut _ --- k " . MINI] .9th Mr. CAMERON said he was not, "are of anything which the proposed amondxuant would remedy. There val no real necessity for this amendment, and ho contended that ',',,,pi1.on1" embarrudng legislntioa to in. " 1 Hon. Mr. CROOKS aid that under the present law the fourteen dag: during which it we: legal for on Ippad to e lodged Igainst m tunerrrment in the Court of Revuinn miggxt be mistaken by the person aggrieved, M t e day from which these fourteen days begsn to be dated were fixed by by-law of the munici- pality According to this Bill as nmen'led, It would be known to all thtt m appeal mast be lodged tom-teen doya utter the 30th April. He pointed out that all the subsequent clauses were in harmony with this. Mr. FINLAYSON pointed out that owing to the date st which County Coanolls were. nrgnnizcd, it would be too early for them to fix the day of beginning on the lat of Feb- 7 Ban. Mr. CROOKS said he would alter the date to the 15th of February. Mr. CLARKE (Norfolk) thought ample time should be given to tho Assam!- to per. fotm his duties. Ile, howevttr,yumertpd that there was vow wide dirsatiafaetion with tho present law throughout the Province. Mr SCOTT suggested that the winter was a bad mason for making assessments in couu try places, t ud urged that they should b J lied to tal n place in the summer time. Mr. M (M ANUS thought town'hips should thenuglves have the power to " the d syn upon which the assessment bhomd begn. M r. WOOD said that two sessions ago he u ttodneed a Bill to change the tine M. as- "sement, but withdrew it on a promise by the Government to deal with the whole tatt. ter during the succeeding Session. Next Session he introduced a similar Bill, whieh we: the ground for I very unionized duca,. Aon, and resulted in a very fair expression of the mind of the IIoutso upon the whole subject. 139 ngglo 'thtlrrutrte Bill on the nuing like a genera smendmont It .' gm}: the grant objection which the t"tt have agttinat the Want Act. 4rhat was wanted won u menu" which would assess nll property " its proper value, when" tt I',',',',",':, the " u-montl were, It not du mostly made, at {out most unfair; and the kw ought tobOIIoh u would compel mot: and courts of revision!» do thdr dnttoa. The [meant system was wrong. He mo took exception to the ohmic: a the exam that. Re did not.. see why) 9913:3199; ant" to subject. He agun wnhdrow the Bill on the pndenhndéng that 913i! Seqslpn there In: to be .1 Re did not see why} merchant going to Europe and put-chm}? 8100,000 worth of goods for which he pa cosh, ohouuottor to had brought than home and put them in u, sgeneru Act. fht,t't, he apcfroved of BiiiAetorP. the Home, - a {tile to use in