Ei , f) . I ' - Mil . ' . _" ¥wgl u ' ., l 1ial ' r . I , " . . Mr. GIBSON entirely agreed with theI f r 4 Mr. mum prescntrd a return relating marks of the hon. member for Stormont . A, , . to shol'ldiuld reporting in the 'ciuperiot , 3" Bethune), and he warned the House to . y t i ' Courts. be very careful as to its legislation, for .tuo V " After recess, English money market was very seInSitive. F , 3, GUELPH BURIAL GROUND. i Mr. MACDOUGALL (Simcoc) tftdy, . 'lt 1 Mr. MASSIE moved that the Bill rNr. l, a Railway L'ill in." already el,"",?,,',,,,:"'",',') JJ, " I . pecting the public burial ground in the I the Home, in which, ly, {be "tful,,," one 'd town of Guelph be discharged. , bondholders, l clause simi at o i.. 'l 5 . . under discussion was inserted. An enu , , The motion was carried. i nent railway financier stated that he T."' J G r ' REVISED STATUTES' i entirely satisfied with the legislation of this ( . l l The Trouse again resolved itself .into I' House, and was tsatisfied in the Wise leader- I I . i Committee of the Whole on the b'il.l to I ship ot'horrgcntlemcuoppoyite. (Hangman) Il.,', i make certain amendments to the Itc,vised , Noone who read this clause could believetbat , li' Tr , ti'. n Va. 1 it would take from Misting bondholders _ " l " On the consideration of clause fifteen,. l. ' 2 any right or privilege Iwhich Ithog' $1: . , .0 . providing that bonds shall nyt by reation ol I CI'JOD'?d {WHY I,',".,'.,"'.,"'.,,",-,',,',:",),)'),'"; Wl'ncit sub- a anv preferential claims defeatjudgatertuotr I a charter from this JagisiaItuieI Ioo: t my . B" i Mined for working expenses, We! to its right to amend Iihc charter a / Ir, . Fs - inst I time. 'Ili, clause prepared that any one x Mr. WILLIAMS tToke strongly NP f who sold "oods in railwav companies I i i ar1opt,i.n,z. this Clause i' the 5.11311t05tmlnt 0. shrill-l lit: ih'olculrd in thdir clairrs, and 'r repudiation was attacks! to it. Of the large, tl t l be'ttr ft '" runner t s'n-ulil be made " i" number of railways which had been all). .. 'jl any}, "him in: "ii' "and; Imminir' ii ,. '; sidizcd in this country only two Iliad been {in Ina: (. 'll':")'))',',",,]),',") it "is ~iiiii'a-cily com- , N irregular in the payments of claims made iiitv'iitlihr 'he "will to do "sol tin" he did II . I against them for working expenses. "I, lsrlitrri, I)" the "milking" uould q -, I Mr. BARR expressed the hope that the nth-r. For any T.',ii\-il\' C' nnpany to Como f c, r t Government would not withdraw this scc- In this ln-gix'liilii'ut-lni u'li that lilu bond- ' I k' tion of the llill. holders should hold a lien upon personal . I lil : L Mr. MERRICK approved of the policy of property unpaid for, against the claims oi ' 'li , the Government rosirccting the matter worlitmuittud when, Was to ask the House 'F , under discussion, and he did not thinkItlIiut to pcrlntlmt J a fraud. , , '9 . the operation of the clause would be anu- I Mr. MOWA'I' belicvod that some modifi-. P 7 ' rious to bondholders. , cation might. be made. in the clause, and 1.: in , " ' Mr. MILLER would not have tmolten had thcrefore asked that it be allowed to stand. f." i, ' not the sentiment of the Rout-z touching Everyone felt that ihe object of the clause II )' I, = _. r this matter appeared to have undergon" a "as cxircmcly just ; and it was believed that , 'r, ' , t: change; and he proceeded to argue that the it WH',' 1tn.jr,st that the WONG of the Pro.. i ' 1- in .. -roads ill" ut which complaints had boen rim-u should have no claim upon railway, _ s i , ' Rr made could not continue to work unless companies for value sold. n was, on tha, i, F .. . . I they tttrt tluurrututhsg exi"mses. It was a. other hand, desirable that there should be ,', r, , 1'; Ik?) . very important matter to the persons who no intern "MW by the "muse with the 1cyal I ij I i [tl IlillW,/, l had provided the supplies; but it wasa rights of drri'ciitut l.nldvrs, but they pos- , 'krt."i, I '2. mere barctclle to the bondholders. s .s,cul no ram; whh n this clcuse soughtto l «It I? 'i - it; Fir. llUlTL'l'l'lR thought that if the clause ll'lllUVL' ol [um-n. I F, " 'tli, was carried into law it would do no inju - Th I. clause was allowed to stand. i ', tlr, , Fi- hir. s'rl/r?'A'r' tyl"t.tiycd an mai.rlif'uyiial', ' / a . . ' ' = _ F '" . _ _ clans: r. lain); to the Library, which stands i K' ' ' mr' would have to be met. . . for further consideration. I A , LI ' Mr. f1.'s,ij.,H,y,T.?y "Noam! 1tyTiy,i..iy Mr. CROOKS explained the following I tr' , to"c'I:ni;ilnI1s' .l'silrs. ' I l .f1i'" I." ii. 9% ', (hum-s to be insrrtcd in the Public School l I a , hum" legislation Inn a innit) In l l cun- I Act ttn' sub-Sictions to section 161 I-- I , 'tt ' lit'i'ici. rilliUL'Cio "5.1L" i .'i Ltd. lilieiiiuLi-LU f , I t .. 1 'r F: e 'Oiui'icr I II, r., ry t:rylC; or a lulnm School shall he onI- I Ci, I .. _ a . tzt wl to he paid his salary for the authorizud hors.. t b), "I Mt . lili'i'lli' N H had as mini! t'ytnl .thy day»: occurring during the hurled of his engigemont _ Cu .. MW. . l I with tin: lill Milli}: t'1lll'l"'.l'.iiy as ll.I' ""Y" Thisis,"(liliilfiirivfi.-ll':h(i:,'1"iiitiuixlililii'.iivi'ifiitiili'Ji'lin 11:31: is a ' I mcuulrcr, but it " ottid i" tts WI il in "Kuhn". t r,rteiuriurg whklbl: b bus 'orvcui, or the term of tus ', Y 1 as to ihn lillli.'i:'l' of railwags this ('laun' argtvuuurntwirh sucLtrustt'co. " ,', r could at -L. ll "will: in . till' At c iiidldl r.,f')h1ct',t' e.f/jr1li,'l"rneCj,.s,"t,.e,t,1. by unedicnl man, l , , ' we w Iii-ra! v, cs'., r't ,"l' th ' wNI mm; ','i'jss'i""y,', '.'i' _ 'f I but it, might the it), ilanai, the Toronto, [ am wk: for the emin- yu-ar; which period may bom- i (1133:1311 l',, MW, tho llalnilt. n and Emil;- i chased atthe pleasure cf tho fru,tcca. , J : iicstcin, and the l'crt Don r railways. ll: l lie wid these clatccs 1'hH'rt simply to sup. l , _, explained the l'i't'r- lion ss'tl.r, clam, n. , ply an omission in the l'ublic School Act, i , LN , omnibusr t', aw \.l.u had ilaims abdinst hi which had been made by the Secretary ut 5 a i i _ railway to seize all the furniture mid tin. l tha iluismg Commission. I l' I wood alum; tin- lvrs. I Mr. RICHARDSON said there Was a good , . . I fir. MACl)CrUG.' LL ("inn-(u) nul'ml l dcnl'of dissatisfaction in the countrv about i ' , ' i whether tlw- hon. i' i:'|-:'.: Crt llllt'lltiwl to i the paynwnt of teachers while 'il'liSLllt , i i say that a lim- m l. in a million Ofdt'iim's I through sickness. '; . l _ prevented all tho property which tl.a'.. lirn ', Mr. CROOKS said he was not aSSlllllill" l I ', covered from lst.inv' FUI,', "1 exc'cpt by tlic. t _ l to change the law, but to lilac: [ ', bondhcllvrs. I it in the posilion in which it wus buforc (In; Ct 1 Mr. 1'du"l'HUNr', replied that such was the ' stiliiics were revised. a = law,I llcduaIs rcfiI-rring LII the li-gislaIliun '; The clauses Wore adopted. ',' . I whic 1 ha ta sell p mo in 2mm of ran nay l 3 n ' t H . I _ r' I bondholders in the United States, when, I n sllriid1.lfe,1i'iC1'/,11so':,,oyc,tti' ltnscrnnn of . ', Mr. MILLER wished tolmuw the alumni i the election oi'hSchool 'l'rustcli'ii it tiIVoteI for, a it had cost those boudiwldevs in gt'itiug l income as Well as for mnniciii tl iiiii'fl)t'*d01 l r t such legislation from the States Legislatures , . k . l; y otios. I V ' II ' . -. l Mr. CROOKS said the question involv d , . q and other rcprt'sentative bodies. inthehon member" t, I e _ i _ .. . , .. . t"y,ou?.nvsonewhichhii _ _ Mr. BFA'llUN I', did not Lnow as to the not yet been decided by the Legislature i r a representative bodies, but one of the. bodies the hon. gctitloxnan "milled to d; "IItI, and I , i . I in the United States which Lad given deci. (Mr. Crooks) had studiously 1/l1l',Y/ be l, I L: a ,sions favourable to the bondholders had doing, viz./to make any 'iicL"t1'2uui Io/tt . I I . . i not the slightest taint ofcui-ruption charged School Law until the people asked sl,", tIiIc I ' i in I against it. He cottclurled by saying that The Bill was not for the bullion" of . Iur It. , a T " this close, if enforced, woulIdI be1 _,',1r1t ing the School an. v k min-ml. y . irc'udicial to the interests or the um trslrl. , ' P '" , i; in: but ultimately to those of the l'ro- "firm Pidgin" II thought there' Was tt Ihr,. l s', Vince generally. 1l'fC'l,1 1,1llj".)luo" Ithc part ot the Gov, I C' I , Mr. HARKIN summit d the clause of the income frillltilihc 'v'o/.lJl"o"uicco' to lllsul; I . . j ' u , , - . 'r, incnt w iii' is A, ion. Imunhet'sattaeLi. . our in. when a measure rclatinw j, .- fl, tho School Law was before ",1: 1,t "our. of: iii-iniiiiiily ff". for complaints . _ "", , I ot income franchise g' M