The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

l . _ ' a (c. _ .0 . m'"-, .. " T 'WY,"" RF. "fTvi" ",0 a r . "l: " " " " l " c":"' T ' BW-' _,.; fl." IF"'"" _ .-'. Lhwilvgi .7 _ _ . i bp , (:15 ' _ . ' c"" ' ' Vi w "h ' pry I . I A I "m, J, " -" ' i v} . ' _ , s. , 3 h , i oec . r _ ' . . . .. ' , rs,ttt,'if"rl Ily.? llif llll. ' l It'll inmrnurd that the tho right of trial by Jury was " i"; 'ldlrg")1c.2ifoi)1 L'ill had received hi: taken away Were surprised and astonished. F had failed to "wt in): 0:113:35"! ticyt', he , He concluded by expressing the hope that . , . _ v, ' ' l t i . ,rt . i ' ' . e . the verdict which Le t'tu)uurht ougtltt t Jil',',) this Wits a flucstj"P.uih"1 which they could _ been given o c, o taw, . vote Without. part-y bias. I . t . . ensure _ " Mr. BETH i', ' . 77 ' . Mr. MILLER} was in favour ofa mo. 7 p ought to be ol,liit'i.,J,Tty"dcc'i,,1d,hattotld: 1:" which would give the country some scheme '. ii - L-r V ' cu r. . .. . "' . -1 0 famed, purely on itsiiierits. and not becunus '. f5 substuntml law itl'orm, theicioit. life of an ar,qument of am kind last sd tV ' pocld not vote for the prrsm,t.1yi,1. Tly' e - . had no il'i. illu~tion of. h; vi L" J!f, . T ! feet ot the. Sew-nth clause, which had found . bias in that "i/iii,":,'. a no rcceived it". {some advocate: on the floo1s of the House, . , l c. - ' l I would be that if, after once the jury notice _ Mr. HARDY expressed satisfaction tl t 0 , had been given, it could oly be struck off ' and} was not the case, and concluded 'l,', '. m Chambers; it would add tt'tsttt torty to l _ hoping that his hon. friend would not n 'l fifty dollars to the costs. 'that ' . " nut the Bill to go to tt0'vision, but w '".1'i would be law reform in the opposite - _ withdraw it. (Cheers.) - ", direction ..to that desired by the liouise. l ' .s', ' I v: v . . _ . l - ' I [ Mr. CAMERON WM afraid that as he. was F 1112:1110? "uh-anytJntng m Winch £1118 co'uxl'lmt I I _ . about to CXllrUsS views tlioroughly in accord 1 C a 1 opinion If.'. Jeyylt to t '0 prob1n , f with the Government on tl.is point that the .i1'ffitr'iet,n,tt n Iva? that they had been In- l i' 'f .. " t 2, t ' strurnental in running up the expenses of T . a some as on previous Cccnswns they would be . . _ T defeated (Laughter J Ile did not belit ve t carrying on law cases. "C did not, person- . . D . ' u l ' 'n . . _ .' I . t . . n . that any change should be made in the jury ally, entirely endoi'uc thut opinion, but .he . ft . . . . . T . . t-houghtthut the Urovcrnmctit, should bring .rr, 'ystem, for it wasjust as probable that the d 'lc.,, . " ,, dcali r . p m 'v.,.- one dissenting juryman might be right and ['tr5'tia"l comm, 1ucatr"di'e "4 Ing wil c k, the eleven wrong as it was probable that the ll Jee " T F" reverse iviiiiti he the (THU. Till; (IllCStEOH Mr. ])EROC"E said that he believed there ' , of whether a jury should be unanimous was some good in the measure, and he should " Ought not, he Mic-xiii, to be an ided :id- "Upped it. The principal was not new, for V f . . . 'ttle tg that ophsiou. At times he l "d to twenty years ago; a similar measure was in- l, u: complain tlot up: judges in tonli,.,' troduced into the old Parliament of Canada , up din Atul (ht-jury's attention too slrorc,- and "1900?th Ip.' prominent Itcformere of r' . . ly to "with. of tut, iush.vl 0;- that day. He did not agree with the hon. ", ' laying CUTE" the Li's: heron: them. In suvh member for Muskoka (Mr. Mm?" that the " Cu ic', tin i, I'tliii oi the jcrv. it in "tcord.. l, costs wyld be {1019.110 for striking out a _h, gun will thi- 144,; "up. judge, m ti'ot' bc Jury notice. As ~indgcs were so eminently , tire vurdul oi' the .,ruirr. ln tsrsl.'tr. "a" Conservative! this House, (and especially ' .' juls were i ilinml to .:,iso i'i-itlh la a .'hiiix't l tlieliclorm side), should not be too clrfur- , k, mm, ",titlui ; "M t'lt "m "hm! M j Cl'lllal in their opinions on a matter ct this , , . favour, I the L-i, i'i' me " tilt Hill, that. iln:{ kind. W' I ? lliuliirli ihzit_:._iu._y in 'i_i-il"l'h\( d with ~h..i.fvl I It being six o'clock the Speakii left the - he made hotel -tl " suit und not. .it it. lie Chair; _ also was of opinion, in common with the Th . . . . a, . . . . c rem. ' V ' F - / Provincial b'ecretatr, that special juries 11ng held 0:33" of this roport " unavoid , Jr Were more apt to disagree than ordinary ' i: Juries. Perhaps this was to be accounted THE SUPPLEMENTARY ESTI- '; . for on the ground that learned men were MATES _ 'F _ _ more apt to theorize than to deal with . " matters of fact. When insurance eom- . - ' 1 " . r , , , I ' . g panics sit up a ples of arson the following are the b"yp.h1yntary il I ; in tl case where a plaintiff claims an in. Estimates required by the Ontario Govern- I v' . surunco he contended that the matter should ment for the services of 1878, and to coxn- J ' l he referred to B Jury. lie thongzht that the plctc the services Of1377 '.--. t _ remarks of the hon. member for 11uroa(Mr. , l "l ' View) were entirely pertinent to the Bill, JkDNthHtiTitAT10.Y ONCSTICIL - _ and ti at l.i< ttty,imtcvts v. re rnth r in l l CourtofAppeal. a , . "Your oi the position mien oy those who , l Messvngur, bulanco of salary, j opposed the bill. It did not speak much l lt73.. _.................. $330 C0 . for our educational system to my that, its , EDUCATION. 'tiine progrrssud the quality of jurors deteri- , I To In," thn allovraroro for _ orated. The argument of the Provincial the war 1577 of 3.30 to l0 , 0'; Secretary relative to the number of pity Norm 56110015,"! ylfitio.n I I', crises in which there hm. been tlicwp,rwtrsutt l tt,0ifid'd'.i'e,'t"t',drgr,ri/,' I " _,;' could haT.butliule "eight until the total [ l of which ah; in after- , (, number orjnry crises during that Autumn I _ 9 3'3"" ii"i,'/.iiir'ia,yi: 8 507 oo _ ,-.. " , . ' g. a men D in ii to '.", F (Art "It was h y/Y. 53,1001 Board of the city of f3 Mr. MA(_'iJOcta'ALL (Simone) was onu- Ottawa to; Public sown . sidr-r'ng whether it was not 'utvisahle tr, czi- 'i1,irii,12:'1i'.o.r.f/".1.ti.'.u.1i 1 0,0 00 l . i don"t-in to incorpornt: the print-5M0 of bis 3. For e'Giiiric,r"ai'i"rhio'r'tt ' " I . Hill dealing with the mime subject into the inst Olt lil/yy,' and Prim i . ' pit-sent Bill if it passed the swcortd roimg. I _ 1!'i11',y7.o.".'."."."11 to be haul I one no i i The opinions of the lodges "hirh had been i ...........n'.. "'L....L'L1.'L.2'. e To: CC i: . _ . ., . " read P the House, should haw; been printed i AGRICULTURE ' -- Ir Ct Ct - , all! uistributcd, at first among the Incinlicm. I my" "um, and Design) URaTUrrIEs. J'"' b, Thu of Mr, Justice Wilson cvideutly was l LUiiGT."..T.r..C',"."."j Hon. Wm. "Wm: Auditor n ()00 oo ' , tnvoumhlu to the change. ll HOSPITALS ANI) John JIcsnlurd, Guard and ii." n, 'i' Mr. 1ttyi'H C'NE.-..Ht i . the stro nest ttWet . To defray the expenses 0 f.'y.:1y, Provincial JU ry- _ inextll . '.' . 7 . ' ,"3 tro'll . , grantin aid of 'e,",gt tjy1.e.ry ltl yours' "mm - l t mm e er read in its nuour. tsnd Ilrarititts, being adi J c,al2?f,',0.thtyd".tt,'rcvv,,cc. 000 00 ', ' . , , . ' ' t _ ', . 'rlectson, 'riiard Provincial I ' MY. MAI) t'ol".i.cirb, flisPh. site). lint] 'lt'gh Cjhior;ll'ri."i1"; licfoi'inntor; ,1; your." aer- _ I l thought so on St't'lllg the placid and smiling Wang!" lat-mob inMii ms at SM. 14 mouths" m M I ' T t' Face of his hon. fricnd from 'o'torrrlont (My. l tions under the Net... so ----- 2,oy, Co l g Bethune) when Lu' wus reading Mr. Justice :33" the ttnoun! ttaid Il I'I'BLIC hummus. l , w' Wilson's opinions: lie then. proceeded A) 1 Refuge for iaiiiHiGiGi,'i Asylum for the Blind. Ttvans l show that {his suchCt had received consider. ', tawa......,... .... ...".lr, fot l, Prinoipal's residence. 5 000 00 i ' , able attention '1 England, and he defined i St. Nieltulas'. 1iouie,r'urou Asylum! Ir tho "will" To. , i l . . , . . . I r t o millage an wall! l the law as it wal In operation there. ( suppliv in connection Will: l , v' By an Act passed in 1875 in the l onscrnmxmus A 11,'thig"t1i,ncr,,carc,rc.cv. 5,000 00 , l [louse of Commons liuirland it was pro- } Consolidation of Statutes- '5' Ill or ,t,!t.e,,.1.yeay.,eesli/y: - t n , . 7 uteri topureuaseadditio al I ' ' vided that no it?! l T tl ' Act or any "e. _ "we rcquired to u'ort1p l d, m , , . ' '. C 4 " it 0 . m" - '" Mg. 1 Law Society-claims for w t" t'irl.,n/'iiiGraii,icicrcc,: 0,050 00 ~ , nous not. would prejudice or take aWune and gas, luhject to 'ture "" Jivlf,y,","'id1T,',1a'oeit "I I p, right of any piety. in any action to have the contet't?ii,iiciirrrrj commit," 's'h1PmfJposh' ', issue of trial by my submitted to a judge l Jam, Meek-claim G'iii.i.1dt new industry.......-..... 4.000 M ' before whom the trial by J-ll'y was made. " Maldctt ttnd Loud: :3" 20,050 to 0 a He further contended that the lathe showed Lieee'hud"s,ir,;iiarc,c,c PUBtag WORK3- » a i that the right of CW ry subject to trial by as in ii'iiiliifiiiii'i"ei wh Furl?!" pt?trouttt for "WWW. cl iury Wi18 not wcakened in any respect. 'll1'gga,riut,'c,',t, 1804 iiispetlorii . itriritratiouk, e . . . i ' a . an twin s. tt _', tcti - His experience mm] that people yho ! the" "cum fy.".".?. Y/ tsithpublw JI/ii',".'.".".?.",') tt 000 no i I were informed that in this Province l Paris 1t:fuhition.....,...".', -.ilirLC.', c 000 - i . l A. N. Ihtell, to rulinhurse h = ' no ' tf . tor pal menu and dish" $5" iri.r,T, l ments while, Accuturvaut'.. con W ""-""""'"errreeerr. -,- a 07 1. , t . .e=TL7d n J T __- » __ " - ,A _----------.-.-.--;)"- 1