A' 7 "T: """'r""'MiWer"r' tC' I. e. l . I " ' ' _ . V ~_. , ."." V - "w " Vino?" '. I T . ' r I ", 51:" ' ' . . t. , l _ Y. ' I . tm, I .5, ' . . ' F ' . I r K a . l 1'. V t . I zoned thath.' nil "ic,1' informed that' the the right of trial by Jury Wtt8 er, ' " hon. .1110.th of this "all had received his Italmn away were surprised and astonished. V bins P. tuvout of the measure berausc he !, He concluded by expressing the hope that ' tfvthe.1",', if": 'l, urogglmum libel ease this was a. question upon which they could - _ I I been gold. w It I A'. ihought ought to have _ vote without party bias. __ . Mr iiiriicrNr,, ' l . Mr. MILLER was in favour ofa measure - l i our/i t b d ,I E Fifi"! ccd that tho RI" which would give the country some scheme '. i '. If. ' o .L L J3" It it, Wore to ho de., r' of substantial law reform; therefore he u I tinted, tnwcly on its menus. and not began w.'- could not vote for the prrtru" Biil. The, " o l -r1 . . ,. . _ . . T t i 1t,uat/ce.5.",i,e/1t,f "If li::! Inst used. I feet ot tLe seventh clause, which had found I sbias in bird u.) ion 0 hit/IUD received i m. Isome advoatcs on the floor of the House, I . '; . " winner. I I would be that if, alter once the Jury HOLICL I V Mr. HARDY expressed Satisfaction ti t I l had been given, it could only he struck off T ll' Pcl.twat not the ease, and concluded "l,', I l." Chamber" it would add trom forty to A ' hoping that his hon. friend would not 0:? titty dollars to the . costs. 'lliat I " _ mn the Bill to go to a division, but w "eli would be law reform in the opposite y . withdraw it. (Cheer-s.) . l direction .to that desired by the House. I y J, . , If there was an 'thin in which the codiiiry i I J, ad,rite',exeje,iu,'tt',/t'c,i:,1 "I? "s he, "'i\-: 1 had an opiniony detrigmeiital to tho present I n , . . o express Vic-Wis ioroiirrh y in iii-Cori , Je. "m ' . .. . a . . - I _ With the Government on this (ioiut that the YI?. ailment, It wa? that they had been In l traiite as on previous 'i,Cldi"olisl't') Wot id , strumental in running up the expenses of t _ I . L .- . e ' I De . " I . I " - defeated (Laughter J He did iiyot believe l c'trrying on law cases. He did not, person _ . a . . . ' . . t .c ' ' o . . . that any chaiivrc should be made in the jury ah), entirely c?yertt', that opinion, but lo I I 'system for it was just as prob'ihle that thi: thought that the Guvertttncnt should bring " o . , . . I I . i , '1 . i . " , ,' . . . , _ L one dissenting Jurymiiii might be riglitaiid (3.0%"? 0011"" measure dcaling with tltct . , the clown wrong 'o' it, was probable thui the ll Jec '- . l . reverse iv-oi/ii ire ih , Grid.' TI}; qti0s"tidn Mr. DEROCHE said that he believed there ' . of whether a jury should be uuunimoirs was some goy/n the measure, and he should I c', , _ Ought hot, he believed, to be iii-(Hui ml- Support. it. 1he prin.cit.a1 was not new, for I , . . . verse t" that ophiiou. At times he l "d to twenty years ago; a similar measure was In- I c. comp :ii'n th it the iinhros in summon; troduccd into the old Parliament of Canada I I ' up din ittul (lit-jury's (Llifjlltlllll too 51101.3. and supported by prominent 1tcformers ot I ly to limiters of to. t, lli'li'Iul or that day'. He did not agree .w'th the hon. r. laying "a..." iln- law "I," them. in MN." member tor Muskoka (Mr. Miller) that the I, l " min (In T, rdi, i ol tin: jurc, i! in "tcord- I CUSIS would be so large for striking out a if an" will, tho lie: with was," w, obi he Jury notice. Asjudges Were so eminently , tir. "I": We II". I.,;,,.,._ 'I,,'H,,;,,. s.tru.si'r Conservative, this House, (and especially . , juries :rcrc I c-ii!il'io.,('is-rnii,j,, " wins'i the Reform side), shorld not be too defer- _ a," rin'iott, ; "M t'lt ii..ii "I'll"! ist: j wind in their opinions on a matter ct this , . liiiiiuri ittlk' In". tr! Jim, (It ilii I'nll, thai, ""5I kind. Pr, f inoiim. that aju.-y in iic.'c,t ii ooh bli'vl.."l I It being six o'clock the Spealiii left the I _ be ttctde heroin t! v suit and not. at it. lie chair, I I also was or opinion, in common with the. [The remainder of this report is unavoid- I F': Provitteial Secretari', that special Jul'leti ably held over] V I I Were more apt to disagree than ordinary t I . - "A __ N" F-- - " ', I ' . a T I h: Iiiiriea. Perhaps this was to be accounted THE SUPPLEMENTARY ESTI- . I 'I for on the ground that learned men were MATES _ , I more apt to theorize than to deal with - . ' F ' , 7 i . wr u .. . , ' t 12:35:? 3ft "l, 11:heufsuc'snce 3:3; The following are the Supplementary , F, in a case where a plaintiff claims an in. Estimates required by the Ontario Govern- - " "l I surancc he contended that the matter should I ment for the services of 1878, and to com- ' ' I I hr: referred to a juiy. He thought that the I pletc the services of 1377 _ i _ remarks of the hon. member for 11uron(Mr. I , I V ,I ' Innis) were entirely pertinent to the Bill, Ar25HNItiTRATr0N Ok JUDT'CE' , J and that Lit nry,ttrrterts 18n't'C, rath r in I I Court ofhppeal. . ' favour oi the position taleii by those w ho I I Messrggor, balance of salary, _ , opposed the bill. It did not speak much I I Itr8 'r.'.'................ $3?) CO y, . for our educational system to my that, as _ EDUCA'I'XON. I ' _ tune 1u'ogrrssud the quality of jurors deieri- ' L To "W, tlin allowaneo for ' . mated. The argument of tho Provincial the ,»i.,;u-1377i,r_$3o 0.0410 I (rt Secretary relative to tho number of jury I kWh-l 33110918; an f/of"',.',', I ' I') vases in which there but: been tll.i.tveirs'etrityit. 'I tu/al/i/ll/i,,',' this "girl: T f , . could have Imtlittle "eight until the total of which came in after- L '," rofi 'ac t tine ha Lutumn I wards-..........,...' 50300 ', an: "ETD: , "I"? C .3 a in b t t A . 2. Pa merit to the Public It", ; Uirt Ill was t'arnt . 53,1001 Board of the city of , iti, Mr. MAt'DUlIGALL (Simcoe) was mn- Outline fir, 2/',2i1tg),oe . . .733: sid, r'ug whether it was not advisable to can 33:;'23; In" ".".') "two 1 (KO 00 I g '- c. dramur to invorpurat: the prittciplo of bis 3. For examining and "pull- ' a T ' sl, , Hill dealing with the sumo subject into "ii: I (ec'." l'I'fuleIWg "VIZ"; , i ' , no» Bill if it ptcsset't the gs-cond mug . I tiir'J,y/)t".".c11, o..)'."..',".'.", 1.000 M , ' A The opinions of the iuiiges "liii h had been _ , .__'_._.__. 2,795 (3 r (I u . ' raid in the House, should haw: beeii piiu'ied I ' AGRICULTURE urn ARTS. J, . - ll; goo oo '...s..'. ' 'ir.ct,, .r'. .. , [ "':'~. '- "I . ' aid distributed neiirsi .:iiioii,, t"? numbers. mm", M. Arts and Design in Mm _ L m T "I I _ That of Mr, Justice y, ilsoa evmeiitly was I London s.................. 600 00 m b.. I I' ' r ' Lvvourttulo to thc change. I non-unis no) CxIARlTXES. M I. Iw .. I . i - _ H " mine I ,,, . ' T MP. BETH C'l0l--lt is the strongest ili'gii. I to 1,j2ia,u1"uiTi"Ti,'ci'falt I --- r I I r, I . . F tw, ll ' . -, - - t 1 , I iuent I have ever read in its iiivimr. I at','.",'] mum", beisyrafid.i- In" I" ' I a I I . ' 3lv.h1A'itrol1lcllbttiiwut, some had tlt',, s'"t',rgc,'teyi"'if, It .' m 'a I " l thought 30 on "Ting tho Placid and smiling lbwangw certain insiihi- I] " an h '< I A face of his hon. fin-nil from :éiorn'iont (my, I tionu undorthe Act, on as l 39 I i , I Bethune) when i, J was reading Mr. Justice ','St1.'.e.' tttnount paid last 3 685 07 M, .211, I I 's l I . [l 1dl , Wilson's opinions. lle then. proceeded to ,' r.eri'sii%riaiiirtiGiLG,iT. ' , " wrt II: i C show that (his subject had received consider. ', P"."..-.-,..---,: '.'.... 150 00 0; Ilili'ii' V l I I. _ ' able attention .1 lingland, and he tiviined 'I St. Nicholas'. Home, lorouto.. 200 oo 4 N'.", ". ' I, l :1 ',,, ,', A. li , "it" i the law as it was in OPCIMIOD there. I . . . , N "' If I /.". l.,',,_" s'. I " f Mr, "y an Act passed in 18:75 in the I . 1rjy1"1'11" anNDI'IURE. 'y A, _,' ,.I .fiIvlli'T," " I Y,', "il . llouse of Commons, England, it was pro- i Coniolnlmon of :"itt,"t,e/'cl'i1 600 0 m, i'mmii \I': Ibl , r . . ' F , ' ' , . 'lliC' require oeoiup etc. o , ut I ' r vidcd that no €33.31). otlui, Actor I'll PIC Law Society-claims for water , I'; I " ' , nous act should prejudice or take aWiileTe and Sa," tsaW'eetto invesu- 'lt For" IN I yin 'd , " right of any pinty in any action to have the F o,,feflii?ii,i,iciir::rr: 3,333 2 on; ('1 iii, initm. I "I I 's, issue of trial by "It..." submitted to a judge I Joins Mri-clahn (Jeannine; ' I All r - before whom the trial by j~iry was made. I it Maiden and London 4 i) 7 "---, ' b r I , F . . mfr f - k. syium................... 0 00 / ..., "mm _ I I ' . Ue further ccnundcd thatthe lttis showed Lieeuw Law, trowarth, exptute- 1,3,0 I ', . that the right of cy, ry subject to trial by es in ntitnic'palities whom . T, - . , gory was not weakened in any resprit. I i',','"))',';',",',",:,')',',':',' 1,thit' I bl _F. r _ "is e.xpfriency Ivar4 thut PWPI" yho I Stat. C".'.'.".'.".?.'.".'.".'.".'.)..',': 8.000 00 I I t . _ were informed that in this Province I Paris _?crhiLition, ...r.....r... new no an a ii . I A. N. Rue", to reimburse hint I t (lit I J. MI r, . ' tor pal incuts and disburs- I e . l trrutts while Accountant" 800 00 'rum,,,, I i ' I I 'rr=..= . 4", . ('i"ir