The Ontario Scrapbook Hansard

Ontario Scrapbook Hansard, 20 Jan 1882, p. 4

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

r " " , '7 . P"" wr _, .-". , "ip, T, . " - f . Pt. ,-. Te'??, T7t7's5 Ty, tSB 1 c, "1"": '"! ici. - . , . wit: " ,-." -. ' _ t . ' "373:;- I _'- t il':', " _ TN on" .. ' TW 'vm , . 12','ticr, _ ' " n t I mrMILLER-J'or the inmate reason ttt .the i timber would shortly be out otr, and when the tim- t . her is cut or? the road will not be of any P'". . Mr. Fytatuiik-ytirit would be taken into cont I . ttideration. " . _ ""------. 1 Mr. MILLER (continuin "aid that the d,ee.ision.' . -' . of the higher Court ',Wllllr'/',T,.,'d the decision oi "on Mr Patties Ill the Debate the lower C'ourt in the ease now before thetoni ts. a n The Privy Council had _ higher respect for if"! on the Mir SS and property and vested rights than the hoop l or e a . thin country. and in the end that nueS- _ [ than would be decided "tetor:tiin.t to the ---------.--., , original 'ill'lt"ihig,', and 'gl'Qtuitiiift"M,igit ' on httie orernmon a o x " will: hind and improve ttttlitre-trust, ami by THE VETO AND BOUNDARY AWARD. charging a toll they would be recouped (oral! ---- outlay. and a "Jt'llh1ev'ii,'t,1 letter'..',",,,'?,',,?,? e . Wott one o I i . . . t 'h1hl't2iy thereowns nothing unjust in the luv Dominion Interference Due to I . position, and that it the Government set about Patty Hostiltty. j the could carry it Ottt. l Myra tr'RArsFHtVThe genllgmnn knows 2f 2t -------.-- Government. at, Ottawa. ma 8 improvemen s an v rninilo revenue. RED. lite": ?.tlL.Lr'ur-Ther could have inereasod the ONTARIO DESPOILED AND IGNO tolls. (Joptinuinit, he hoped llltlthtllf' y'c'21"///,'n""gt' -------- i Bill dealin wit t m taxation 0 . . . 33.1%?8": .enmzented Flint a _'i,'i.el,/i'iiiii',' he Tho Inconsistent and Disloyal Atti. ed roridin that when a setter WW Ir' o . . . fllff, aIllre lie 'hll'/ll get permission from a :li- tude of the Opposition. Panther! 'et'ittgttec,),o should lieu? t Wrong)? ------ g tucnt t ere was no ran tang." . $232: giggling. He hoped that the Government l The following is an extended report of Hon. Mr. would do more than they had 'lone ttt yid the ciet, Pardee', speech. delivered in the Ontario burials.- 2'ae.Yo had Buttered ipottt the thes. IAP, . tare on Thursday afternoon. in the debate on the er. BADGEROW moved the adjournment of f Address '.-- , the debate. [ l Mr. b'ig,"J,ri, on rising,r 1-0.}:de to "the! CV ' ' t N , I c large made by t to member or 'mst 'rey a , Tilt. " DU ATURP, At T. l the Attutuusy-ticulucai han interi'ered in his eloc- l Mr.MOWAT laid on 1he table a number of Or- l tion ill invourol' A; resident .of the .eouutr ot the l tiers in Collin-ii which haul been passed under the t'eyte,political stripe. and said that " was not at : provisions of the Judicature Act. t all to no Wondered at that the leader of the Got It being an o.vloek, the House adjourned. . ei-innt-nt should pi-eicr to see a Rood, consistent 'l""'----------. C'ottsovvarne cici-tcn than a gentleman who. to any the least. had not always been an certain and reliable in his political opinions. It was not our- prising that the hon. gentlemen opposite should i display considerable uneasiness on one or two at the questions referred to in the Speech from the Throne. when, as in the ease of the boundary award, theyt'onnil themselves in the position of consentnw Danie-i to toxin away from Ontario one half "i2ti'ti. territory. lilo desired to call the . attention ot the Home to the tstgniiivavat tact that although they had oocii discussing the Address for '9evt'ral days out. and nearly all the leading members of the Opposition had tsoolceu.notodi Btttgle charge had yet been made against the ad. ' ministration o. attain-t by the Government. tt'hecrs.) The present Parliament had been in existence for three years. and liotwithstandinz thctngeiiuity and ability of gentlemen opposite they had been unaole up to the present time to brim: forward one single act of improper inatt- V Agenient oi the pnbiii- atl'atrs. Their position was l . that they wen-entirely upon the defensive. Not one argument had horn heard on the Opposition I side except those oi iietcnce, and a stranger listen- mg to the debate: might easily be ledintothe error that the Govtuuuueiit was seated on the left I . side ot the Speaker. and the Imposition being the . Party on the tictcrirnvr. oct'upied the right. lie! itiil been a member of the House since (Jont'edcra- _ lion. and he iiii.;lit my. Without egotisni. that he had taken some part in its deliberations. but he [ had no hesitation in saying that at no time since Cont'tjdt-riiiioii nail the Epcot-ii from the Throne i L'Olllullit'tl such imp iriaut questions as on the pro- 3 Sent occasion. 'OvowuujeciQ returned to in that I sport-tr the th:htot veto by the Dominion Gov. "rttttttut and ils right to take away trom Ontario .no leis than LL. be square miles or territory rich agendas. minerals. and ivaptur'uiture--were two ot MOST IMPORTAN' r QUESTIONS that hail been brought before the House since 1867. _ Upon the answer to om.- of these questions de. pended the maintenance of Provincial autonomy and 1yrersenttuiuu, and in a sense. responsible, government ', and on the other tit-pended tho Q question whether or not Ontario shall be deprived , ot one-halt or tty tt-Trntory. it had been l charged by hon. gentlemen opposite that I the Government" did wrong in introduc- in; this llrebrand. this apple of discord tty it was called. into the Address; but were not tluse two (lliudllulla the questions of the day at the !.T"tyi! limo! It the Government had not ad. l Iscul His l'in-elli-ni-y to make Pelcrence to them. thc "WHIP: would have demanded that they 'iltoti.d KIN lilm'v- to others who would have hell" thull'tli-il the people}. ntiiiirs. They were 'Y,1), "m [sy lion. K"l2llclllt'll opposite to tliscGs, this l illiesin,n U-'lllllll' and in a judicial rather than a piwt.'r,au 3mm. It "as his tiesuta to consider it in ' that Tay, temguizing as ho slid the gravitv of the f'c.1t','//. lint what (lid they int-nu by caliiiticqqt i011 (//r'u,'gyt, Illiartthcy would wo to t.,1t-',19e:ay',tt- not llthlltHV (b/llll' JI) J/dl'Y//, and an?" t ""39 do to m" and we Ir." _ n. int we lave thought lei-tutor}. it yluliulli') it? iv//hye to Nb tttt m our et'ttt WI. w _ tl . 'l _.. m4. y, iiaiiiage our pros. ' f'uetc,'.tt. l " ittt totem. lint ityou deem it nbso. l wa 'lira"tir,ti.s,yy to the Ttaiume of otitee at Otta- int out hills Nllllll he vt'toed we shall have to "mile the bis-t ot'it." it'iiccrsJ The Government, "than" 1il,l'otu'pj"ci))'i' deal with the quag- ".."" ay, , ttt tie vim . ( t'1atelttyn/iiii. manner which the impgrtrulgg . t the but»; 'r". demanded. Tho Opposition contended that 'lic P1ytiin"iirvri'me'ri'l'lf,'f/tirg i right under Hie ll. N. A. Act to review an ' 2 disallow every bill on its merits. This would in- . eludi- Ptrticipnl lulis, bills relating to the rights ' i 'lLl"'t'?tyy um! "very other class of measures ' an On all (Irllil'ie the Government claimed the. _ . Ptulit ot "tsuliowadii,', nut-oral"; to their ind". ' Int-lit. rcaardlessol' the fact wnctln-r or not the blunt-rt P,al,tu'ilwus within tin-jurisdiction ot' the .P.rdvi.uaii Jdy,risustr/t.'ei.' This doctrine was notari- [ ling one. and he tliozt;lit it was not the coustitu. tioiiai doctrine as laid down by the u. N. A Act and as established liet'c.i'ore throuzh a. iGit' Icrtes of .ve,arp' by "ou.sritutional new; between Colonial legislation and the Imperial Government which rule and practice must be the Itiiriiiil _ guide, and iiiihtpi-cvail. lie contended that prior to the time Sir John Macdonald prepared his, re. . port in 1868 upon this unmet-t the law and prac- tice was clear. and not it) be Pytakru/'iiiii, that report and the Order iti Gounod basod upon it was ' _

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy