The Ontario Scrapbook Hansard

Ontario Scrapbook Hansard, 10 Mar 1886, p. 1

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

x rme C */ w with all applications, if any, by any munici-- Firfth Pa.rha.mant aint rI'"'" * pal authorities for the appointment of such i Commission. Also, copies of all correspon-- SQSSIOQ~ dence respecting the report of such Commis-- sion, or the subsequent «dealing with the smmse omm license fund ?}E ther C'}nlmtv of (:iarletonl in consequence thereof. He pointed out that (By Our Own Reporters) thare had been a deficiency in the license WEepxrespay, Marc h 10. | fund of $251, and the County thought they The Speaker took the chair at 3 o'clock. P should not be charged with the cost of the e Spea At investigation. FIRST READING . Hon. A. 8. HARDY said as far back as res x 5 ad the first time:-- 1890 a dispute arose between the Township The following Bill was read the Nt * of Nepean and the License Inspector as'to Mr. Drury--To amend the Muuicipal Act. whether tl.h'e at'rln';)m;t due had been 1naid to y k the township. he Inspector contended that PARLIAMENT BUILDINGS & he had paid the money by cheque and an in-- Mr. MORRIS asked when the Commis-- vestigation was ho;lld. 1'I'he costs r};'f t].he in-- f j Zorks would make his vestigation were charged against the license ::(:::,:\e:ft :;;::-ldcm;\ :)1:. Parliament Build-- fund, and all of those who were entitled to a j share of the fund suffered in like ratio. _ He ings. ow d did n?ty.kn(]xw that any other township had Hon. C, F. FRASER--In a few days. complained. ' O AHIRD READING. Mr. MEREDITH--Wly were not the costs . Mr. DILL moved the the third reading of p]?{ogg. OR.thS?. I}'{chelggYIi'qI!;:g lu&;'mmissi oner I the Bill to incorporate the vil\age of Hunts-- did ngn ;llnd a.bsolutel%rh t'hbnt fllle in{a(;)ertm' mii ville. Carried, ceived the money. e bank could »0,,te ESTATES OF DECEASED PERSONS. who actually received the money. o On the third reading of the Bill respecting. Mr, MERRICK contended that banks were f, ctates of deceased persons not in the habit of doing business in the t";'{g;ta(t)"'f\'l)o'\"-':'l'f':"0!.(.,{ that the order be manter 1;1}11?\ were starfid to l;gvei Withtnfi C oge, cB 1 & i a spect to 8 . iey co 5 * discharged and \l:le llolllse go into Committee l "Pho rew r.h: :]e]((l'::zv y coulid always te to make ah i':lt"e-n f':'f,':.' Whole Hon. A. S. HARDY pointed out that the {i'o:\og)' 'MOW AT moved an amendment to report of the judge showed that in this case, s Nd+ . Ni + A int at least, the bank could not tell with cer-- he effect that the High Court may appoin ho d 3 * 6 ud f a local Court or the Master as tainty who drew the money., _ As to answe) the qudge of i afes of infants. Cartied. ing all the communications of the township guardian of the e ;flo it Sihgdane he thought as long as they made the kind of Fae Bill es 14 wpincih curred in communications they were doing they W°"1'}_' The a.memlmcm}: ':'\ '; (')GR('!{'m * 2 not expect replies. _ On fartmorelam:')g:tt;:t N * s repo . questions this Goverrlmifln cou C Hon. C. F. FRASER .Presentc(l th rt answers front the mominion Government. t the Committee on Bill No. 78. : Mr., MEREDIT H said t;hg misdoing of the toroxto TRUsts corpP ax. P i tirk Gevstoment " Aidliiended "ITTE F 6 i action s G nb __ * * * "Mr. M vust pald up e-dt'llm :&I';l':: ;tu tfiggmff tthat the Govyernment were liable for the ac-- | *4 amount paid up ; s ul * the arra tions of their officers, and they should have nolders; the name of President 1 t 'E?Z?A ')fnt}fe- borne the cost. -- He thought the Council had ment, if any, made under Rule onE not been treated with courtesy by the Depart-- ; Supreme Court, or ot.hlerwmf. ar:'d t"he a::'o',}.':)t ment. f j | y le aned out by the -- rAT_ s :(fmr:v?l('l'(".';\;u{' EF "'?"rt' (&0""'"")' thereunder, ri Ill'c:n. fl)'i\y'l())(}t'n'i\n'li'on'n(])?)l];t'r;n'fi*(;\!}tz:er:':igd:- stating amounts and rates of interest, Car-- [ in?z would be no excuse for us.Hand yié wi_l: med. | not walk in their footsteps. e said that i CostTs OF LAND TITLES ACT. : was _iuq.t' ']\s 'x'-ms(lyln:a'hle thtg.t th(}VflSho';l;l,.;;fi ATERS a return, show: resnonsible for a ie actions of the sh ; ltfr,',h';{%;';'fi&,'?&g%&; to each property-- and registrars, who were also appointed by i erier where pro erty has been put under the Gave --nment. It must be remembered owner, where pProp Titles Act, in the that the Government had the interests of the I tion of the Land Title + 1 | ie °pfe'?[}' ito, in the County of York, for whole Province in their charge, and there (i:ty C om'lin;z 31st December, 1885. He was no reason why the people as a whole :'a,iedv:?z;'e:? (many péople would be surprised should be oqnll}eltl\(;{\ Dt{" pa;iv thedcots'lls.t the Tt f it st. Hon. A. S, H# showe a he let-- tofie 7 th8 m"\l:lo("}"\%r'ryv::i'g c;)]:e information ters had been answered promptly, for they (;l;.be t an 1 in the returns to be made by wrote to the Department on the 8th June, x::au\(lactet:gp"l'iltnlm Lo . k which was answered c _ * 1llth' f z;t]lette(ll' v. o MEREDITHY --He total was written July 25 and. July 27th, an co:a113'%;"13';;)1&!':'(;{\' woaste, * l(\!t:'rs woere also written i th«_! Depart-- _ Hon. 0. f\llu WAT--We have no means of llvét"l;l ;g;é\\;fidbtz gt.l?th, 25ra and Sept. 12th, knowin« that. | , cord, her ney c memts Mr., WATERS then withdrew his motion. | UNIVERSITY EXPFNDITURE. WESTERN UNIVERSITY. | Mr. BALFOUR mp\'od for a return, gif\'ir'\g Mr. HARCOURT moved for an address to ' ;],'".'!""_"'.ef",am} Sfl',los;';::";:(;)ia:h&"? flj{,&? gf :'12 His Honour the Lieutenant--Governor, prqt;; ."l'fi'_""'"\"l" "'the namos and salkrics of the ing that His Honour will, in his capaci'« h . e in ow dn s Nows. ant o of Ini nrofessors, tutors, fellows, and officers visitor of the Western University of Londor, vol Hdaadl ) ity-- i S Iniv University College at the same date, specify Ontario, call upon tlllle Senate of said I'm\'eri Inc in cach--case " thie -- sublect--taught "or the t':g;':o'p':;.??':,f'}{:t fi';?vzi:?::teafiggg"i: oftice held, and giving the an:jout_\tv otfhremun: come received therefrom, in order that the "i'"'l')""f""_"'}'i"b'}'l'l':ge::3:': gg';' A ;'{':3 ?llilfi same might be laid before the Legislature, are (!'"""f'i"f"' t Y is eh'ould' l;x)ot be. nade of as directed by section 5 of 41 Vic. cap. 70. noisse wiky To! ""'(2 i rien Mr. MEREDITH was surprised at the hon. the ("pol\'v(ztt&l;'rii'l' (fl)'lf"; TuUpEx'ts entloman making his motion without giv-- NUB i OF © .N\ LiS, ?ng some explanation. It was in the pro-- Mr. BALFOUR moved for a return, show-- vince of the Executive to (-t(:.ll fort(llleretur?':, in# the total number of st ud:?'ms' in' l'ni\'['(i('. and if this had not een one, -- this sity College at the date of the order, The motion _ should not have been _ made ;lg({:nh:-r :if female students at the same date, | if it involved any censure on the University, and also, the number of students attending "Mr. HARCOURT disclaimed any feel-- lectures in each of the following subjects :-- l Nieneg domeslt Anterened ~In -- thamtnt en siger, Inghth. Prenotcpetman, tallan, sidering himse iteres 1 Uni-- ethnology. English, French, Ger i, Italian, l versity of Torontd, he had_no _ jeal-- 'ép.lx,:.\':s'h Hoebrew, Chaldaic, .b*."a?' logic. men. ousy _ toward the Western University, | ui and moral science, hiology, chemistry, | 8}""1 lilt wat'-z 9"""{'01 thilt'l' "t'e informlal ip{"l | mincralogy, and geology.-- Carried, should not be granted without one word. He | ip GHR SALES i on Seiesc ies \| | [IMBEKH 4 y l'l:x:ll ?\ngh"t'.})l ltzgtn:tatbl:(e ;:x'?orlu:xl:t'ig:lth Pu is ; Mr. MEREDITH moved for a voluminous Hon. G. W. ROSS, in reply to Mv. Mere-- return regarding the timber sales of October | lith, said he did not inspire the motion, and last, including i-hc upset or reserve price | the hon. gentleman had a right to ask for the Pllfisg 9;,' 'gl t}bfil{olt);'F Suggested that the ' information. & «& 4. D. L 4 c i Should } Mr. MEREDITH suggested that the motion / information of the upset price shoul l-'o,t' Ne \'vzgraD{'ensure on th'f-.z Government for not given. Otherwise there was no objection to | dofnk what'g.')'le)}'{tsgtsht y havle done.ha 1 [llltl:lOt\li)ltlilFDI'Fl{ said he saw no reason aiKt. MW. S inted out that the . NLAFIIS t se AB A(}-:ov?u entirely Dermp;:nsive. and that this why ntlgshgle%il:%% EZ(FL'}"'::,,?{ lf; &'»1"'){0")1'1):33; in-- to the limits dis s ;;::n:';?ol:.gul" mokns of obtaining the in still on h?"dt.l l_lef Buggtgste«l t.hza.tf t.h(:t true ! * reason why the information was refused was . THE LICENSE FUND. h'ecause thye regulations regarding examina-- Mr. MONK moved for a copy of the report tion and valuation had not been regarded. of a Commission appointed in October, 1881, Hon. T. B, PARDEE said he had no recol-- to enquire into matters connected with the lection of this informatioqy haviug beengiven. Hicense fund in the County of Carleton, It needed no ingenuity to see why this in--

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy