The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

oifi ... adfiffifmese +s |should "stand. | Dt this was not always so. | X0TICES Oor MOTION. | e instanced the case of the Grand Junetion £ Tess | which was built and located by one contractor. \ The Attorney.--General--On Tuesday next-- | ;,L > had no interest except to build as easy a | Py respecting the administration of justice in } line as possible, and he did so, the result being | the districts of Algoma and Thunder Bay. 1 | & winding road, which was now being straight Mr. Waters--IBill to amend the Municipal | ened by the CGrand Trunk, which had taken || Acg : Bill to amend the Ditches and Water-- ! control of the line. | courses Act. | Hon. Mc. PARDEER _:.v.EAl that it seemed || Mp. Clarke (Wellington)--Order of the se s y ons i oeey oo . Ilewne should nCt || House for a return _\.f"m\'.';ll'.', the rumber ol \ be all--powerful in -- these matters. HMo !7 convictions returned by the_ clorks of the ( J i nderstood that Inws similar to, this : peace of the counties of the Province during |' | were in forcenot ouly in New York, but in I 1885 the -- number -- of -- such convictions | other Ntatea of the Union as well. He under-- | :"..",','.Jn\- made 'by police magistrates, ( \:«:v'. the hon, gentleman zl.xlfn.'..;\l p.- propose |' reevos acting as j'..:".it'wfl (f'- t'.it. peace 6c ( | reference to a special committee, Phere was | othcio and daly qualitied justices of the peace, ( | every reason why the Iull should be read the i and the 11:)]1;'1:(4-'_' in each county of qn ilified jus-- ' | cond time, and the c :";.}"" e would be able tices of th« peace ret civingy conies of the On-- | to decide whether the ma hinery proposed was [ tario Statutes during 18985. f ( I suflicient to prevent hardships arising out of } Mr. Leys (Toronto)----Bill to amend the Pub 1! the if'_'li- n of railways. 5 "l--' hasd .')J"\}Z"'{l to p lic Parks Aoct: ( | ""","'l""' y man oi VI€ SUVICCU, & ED 01, °x+ [|-- (Bill toamend the Municipal Act ; | perience, ore in whom he every Ii.:l'll conlidence, | Bill to amend the Assessment Act. | and that gentleman said he conuld see no objec-- || _ My, Bronson--Bill to amend the Municipal | tion to such a measure as this. P lAct. * | _ 'The resolution was read the second time, !| _ X¢, Smith--Bill to amend the Assessment ! and on motion of Mt. Wood referred to the N Aect, | ':' ""'.',""""' e \'!""t \' '!""" __Mr. Gibson (HMamilton)--Bill to amend the | dee, Mossrs, Mer h, Clarke (Woellington), 6 Mechanies' Lien Act. Creighton, Clancy, Moria, Hudson, L"-\"'r Mr. Nairn--Bill to amend the Municipal Preston and the mover, Act. REAL PROPERTY LIMITATIONS®S. | w mmamemmccommmmmemmmercemey ! of the bill end t -!f:.f.!'nlr'{\' l,u:;:;\": e | I tion A« e explained that under the system t iw limitations great hardships had arisen in I eases W1 Irom Vuriot uses the fence in | termded to separateadjoininglands had not been \ }' ieir proper division line, and this | mnui would give an opporinuity ol regqressing hardships which had arisen in many cases. Hon. Mr. MOW Al id his hon. friend had | given much attention to this question and had brougcht it before the House in provions sew sion )« t was free from some objection« able fsat which marked previous bills Neverthel could not but see that it wou! affect titles alt over the Province, and he be. lieved that the House would ask that if such a bill were to be passed it should be introduced l~}' the Government on its respon ibil--* i'._'-'. He had had communications on tluis subject some years ago, but nothing to szow that the cviev inces were more than local, t | There were localities where hardship might 'l.iu . arisen, but even <.w.JA;l1,':>_: that there were cases whoere benelit would be done, he | '1 feared that there were more cases, on the other | hrand, which would be injuriously and unjustly | | aftected. Every year the working of the ! Limitation Act became better. -- For these rea-- | sons he felt great difticulty in saying that the : bill was such a one as the liouse ought to pase. | _ Nir, GCRAHAM said that if the Government | | woul.d introduce a bill on the subject he woald | withdraw his. Hon. Mr. MOWAT said that he nad not said that. and repeated his explanation. Mr. DRURY esxspressed an carnest hope that this bhilt would not puss :o it would open the way for countless law suits, of which too many farmers in his own county had had + experience----suits growing out of questions of I boundary between properties. The bill was withdrawn. PRIVATE BILLS. The order of private bills was then called, and the House went into Committee of the V hole on the bili to amend the Act incorporat. ing the EKastern Ontario Railway Company, which was passed aud reported. The House : (Journed wl &.40 n'\:uck,