The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

-"""'-"-'-'-'_ _ V 7 "--fi by this bill, would register all sueh pieces end u only the nominal owner of the. property might, if they're? tit, /1ty {gash-Anal; d), x1,entltg.1tr,shtt to tii't"t.,ecyttp, 2,'J"1t, to ill! record Won d " 'ept o tie c u . ren an m o tie ram . e enun or on: house would be open for inspection. The re- amount he pleased, leaving the tenant to taio cord would state who brought theehildren,how the initutive and net the.action aside in Bonn ' long they remain and what becomes of them. Way. 1 his was not 'true in any other class 0 " Provision was niuue for coI',g:'it'iin,'gt'tti"tit,td l case;- l it was .saidf that the} House hilt cases exec t where a medic: practi toner no rig it to inter ere with contracts 2 eertified thift it was unnecessary. Though the :1 Time was no proposal to do so for contract: ad necessity for the bill was most apparent in ', ready "tvaleuusuldt.ot he interfered with. Thi large cities, it would apply everywhere in the change was good, horiuse it Was in the interest Province. ot Ellcdullttliz. At present the tenant's good, The bill was read the second time. and " trite a and children's goods might h . DISTRESS FOR RENT. - ---- Hon. A. S. HARDY moved the second read. taken uwny, and not only that, imi_ the goods 3 in of a bill relating to distress for rent. The of it third party might in tnlUtn. lie gum tri- ', l,'i'fi, he said, wus largely a copy of one intro. stances of this last, claiming that it we; meet l, duced by the gutorrieyAleneral in .18.79, but ou'"',ag.eoe:'t.tlsratlyrt1l party should lose in?" l not carried through because the public had not goods in thir, u'uy. This evil would be remedied i linden opportunity of examining the mutter ..,y.n.e.Y present bill. In the second place; thoroughly. At t e present semen the mom ... th.'s bill was I ber for West Bruce. (Mr. 91-'ouuot'). had intro- is run iNTk'.RPsT or murmur. CREQITORS. f duced a bill which had received many m'lhe landlord could sell out for 850 tor rank! complaints from the press on account end an ordinary creditor with perhaps twwe'us j of its brevity and on account oi large a hill had to get his money as best,ile _ its com rehensivenees. It went the could. This also would be remedied by this whole Enigth of abolishing distress bill. In the third place the landlord, he be for rent. The Government did not iieved, would benetit. Under the existing law think it advisable to go no tar, at all events." the landlord was liable for action for "will ope step 'll'lu'l: bill would prevept fthe distraint 'ie,",:,?:.:,';'.;',",':, in ifdpioet evtery pit-1p It: nigh-e311 o gum a w MCI). are now exeinp ruin seixure "i u e Ion 0 us ten . 'Y. "ga c.'. under execution: Then it was provided that (useenvere constantly arming in the ttu/yr,,',',', ( the goods ol third purtics or the premises this Lind. It was said this change " as in he i should not be distruined l but in order to pre- interest of the lawyers But the fact that they ': vent frauds it was provided that this freedom cases wo.uld ho d.one away with showed that it ', from d1stcaint should not apply to 1yslutiy.es of was against the inter-cot of the lawyers. . but l thi: tenant, Ior to t,',rioth,c,hi.itti'ut" py gift or - 't1l2','i.t',',e', lull-t0;- 'lla/ll,',', t?g.ePtr,-v"irt'.', 'l 2: so. e, from t o tenant, or ' vii tue o an execu- ng ms rig t e iem ugr . . l tion a ainst the tenant. 'C case of an nssign- House desired precedents he could give .Peru. went fl) the benctit oigt.ty.l.i..t.et1 the leiidloid - g" almosln y, the 'ii'1"),t/i'.iic:tatl"il,')i,ot drug's: lo. . tit! sd to l istrain us niininst t t or rent in wen not: is tet . lei-o was in t _ l 3:234 dl."..,':,'?",',"':,:,'. rent and "iii more. - country a. feeling imported from England than Then, as they were in u measure , priving the ' there Was 1oet.hinwsacr.ed abytttheownersyip landlord of his right to ilistruiu, it became iin- t, hind. ll'Tlltl lilo man. loft 1tl",i.g/e"'y'lt, altos; a . I t o . . . F . 1 . lo a 's'itli,yfwtl"fu1'ric.lav'c','2Cd should have noun tth1C'il,h) Jl'ul,,t1l',"d,'.,"Ja/,'tr/Q'dt, his in- yossussiox or THE i'nnuisizs. I rcstnicnt only. He was glad that the Govern. It was therefore provided that the tenant memt had pedenwd this measure. He hoped leould claim the exemption given by the Act that Ionic day the House would adopt the onlv i. on giving up possession of the pre' 1 uicumire he had proposed and abolish distress mils. . the. tenant would have the right to altogether. The Hoveruuieiit's measure had iset oil against the rent any dvlst due to him, his hearty sympiitliy. He would support it, i by the landlord. biome_ landlords might think t but he thought it only ronuiiou cpurtesy ly the bill went too tat', inasmuch us it pructie the iio.vcriyyent should reciprocate and sup- l ally exempted all the goods oi the poorei t port "T. (Laughter.; . ' class of tenants living in tenement houses. l lhc hill was read the second time. l 1eilntlty.'ertns might" admin}; li'/d"tg,t.ait t ASSIGNMENTS oy JNs01A'HN'1's'. l enoug t. was l " i i . . . _ . . . "' _ .- " . H. Ber.'. . pou'ur given to a "mum who dis l . Hoy. Mr. .).11N A'l , not mg the tit who ind- iiraiued was too great and liable to abuse tf tng ot the bill to make further provmousie- l Yet he thought ." would he found that tin C speit'uigltflji'll'lpli'int'a13101";gagging f,:hi,", ll power was not otieu unused: that there we" h ots, "U t . " g l F . mu ur 'mu no l tot mun . cures of distress where no rent Win control over ittsolteucy " such, the ilovern. tine The lulu-diam who distrained wrongfully '? went believed they had jurisdiction in respect , was under severe penalties, and he we: usually 1 t ':il"l'iilt,',"i',t,ti", gig?" My}: 'tti 1iftihti't il a responsible pawn, trotn whom damage: (fl; ye'",! Il',',',,'?, 'i'"; e.xis "'5 trim} 1'1 _ I could be collected. On the uhole he thonglu ) " "~34 ttt 914 tf 0 Willow. list it "an. i that under existing circumstances the be found that sometimes assignments Were made , ' would do the nmtiinuni amount of good. ,3 P 991.2609" outside the) Pryiyy "I'll beyond ll" I Mr "mgr-H mentioned the bill which h, . jurisdiction of the Provincial otlieers. Ihis, , hail iiitrinluced on the same subject. and ex l of course, should not be maintained, and the. '. pressed himself its opposed to the entire alsuli , bill provided le: venturing the ",111ye.t'e,t.t bo r ticn of distress. be made to poisons tesident in the I Povince. I Mr (D'CUN NOR said he agreed that i' , It had been found that the law was in l . _ _ . ' .. , ' ' would have been well had the tlorernrnetr ettef.t "oiled by the purchase of . a E taken up this question years ago, not thit I portion ot the $0043 and the handing .. Government only, but prior Governments overof the prom-eds P one or more creditors, The law Wits a. wrong, but was no more wrong yerlawlngum them 'll fllll- ltAl clitlilse was in- now than ever. The Government's bill mu rot UC'0t prevent ICS. ' W )een cou- swod, but did not go far enough. The wrout tended, and he believed held, that when iii- "ti; in the fact that in a "no in which he "Fat onlvents failed toninke assignments within the I interested the landlord could be judge, jury, thirty days, ..cftdite,rt might be given payments l plaintill and bailiff. .The landlord. who thigh Vim, impunity. 1 his would be prctented by l on explanatory clause. As it was given as an ,