The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

.ditllres and the "expendkttrts otoiir" s.'. _ - wr '=wm ' - ' _ - rid-m municipalities, civic or otherwise, _ " / ' - ."-'. "WV/1533373.; a. 1.1». , ull lt-avtlltn the same result. With ti2Si,'ltGlNiiil Il 5 - .T. 'ntt0. it iC . ' - "'9"? . all} nec. ence I 1m ite such cont tt-rtNr'"' Rhilp, " as . Tho Trcsnsurer'then referred to the 23:9", " I " arbitratiun nuw pending between the Supreme Co' _ IN - q ;-. . Provinces and the Dominion, remark- u " iiivorwtrm to' h, elMI, ing w. its lung continuance, nearly 20 . , idly other form of ttttt liit.ttitN ' . >ye.~:~'. He wet on with a. sketch of the _ 'account -ittfesti"itatd be" "r ' w, 'rGi'iii'P art, :rltioll. lie first noticed tho inter- 7 more 'ttvariieriiuuqtee', tn we est 'iur'stion, as it is called. the tir"gt the Dominion wu with»: to. (ttt all-2rd of which was published on the the account to -ttd RIM" or M933 2nd of Novemhew, 192. Hy par- The next imoortant "r,Niktl If J," agl'izll fl of this amid the by the arbitrators was the o ty (in, Niall "as: to whether 01' not tho Do- .Domlnlon. filed in tjctober,1898, m h I mig'un shall he allowed simple lntereat ithe late province of canal." ands-1:1 at lin- rate ot 5 per cent. per annum Province ot ontario " welt on be . q' on "my llalrlnt-e that may from time to of the'Ojibery Indiana to: ';. " tim.. Ino found tn c-xist in its favor in, ,annuitiea and increased nan - th,. .wl-aratc nmnunts of Ontario and: ,leged to be payable under the 1 L (Jib PM." was rcssrrrvt.d for further urgu- l Superior and Lake Huron treat ft; ttlr n: Argument un this.rerorved quus- sometimes called the Robinson treat " l mu «wk lllat'u at Ottawa on the 11th ' of 1850. The claim for arrears against and 12th of January, ISM, and tho de- the Province ot Canada from 1851 to cisim of tho ttrlrltvatovs thereon 0011- lh66 amounted to $102.000, and for in- tttitutws their second award, which ten-st alone to the end of 1892 8223, .3 . , bout: tliestre August M, 1894. The claim against Ontario aloe - . ' Th,, tivst "ward, that of Noremher 2, . ant-am and increased annuities twat 1893. direct: that Ontario and.uuly 1867 to the end of 1892 amounted to) shall ll..t~i-.-illl.1.l with the subsidy hat $3I4.000. and for interest to t169,000. ' yearly in advant'e, that the muduetiims These claims were argued in October, for interest on tlu, excess of ill-ht hf 1894, and an award was made on the the I'rovinuo if Canuda over $62,5llil.000 14th February, 1895. _ as uctuully RSPl'i'lilth'il in amount at. The first four Aye! otthuatrt .. .. l w each |Ie~:'lml shall he mallt- at the "1111 detelavod in efretit that if In any J l ot "in." war dawn to mid includinlrl sinn- the treaties in aueation were en- R 3 Januarv i, lts73; mm th" lirst of such I tort-d into (1851) the territory thereby , dednvtihns shall be made on the Ist of l ('Nlul produced an amount which would li Jtinuuvy, 1868. ' F have enabled the Government, without _ ' C?.) That in tho 1'rovinr'o of Canada int-un-ing loss, to pay the increased an- s: summit tin-re shall bis credited "y .trt . nili.titrs to the Indian tribes mentionv " l "3rd day of May. his. th" SIOUuNlJW' therein, then such tribes were emit J', Cd , emitted by Roi Vict.. 01133". nttd ""2 in Fuel) increase. not oxcersdirttt.84 f ' , . t here shall he no tlt'tIUt'lion trout thi, 1 gi'ilt'll individual tYom time to time by? bsiuytlwrss'at'tsr'. l ', "luring to the tribes entitled to t Pi r. (3) That on and from July I, its." ti": l _ " ntftt of this triuutie.c. Any liability to l PIOYIlil'vS shall lw "W411"! "1.t"viyl.' I My tho inrrru.ced annuity in any yv-ar t . Mdltinllnl subsidy grantml by C, (I 1:1 'l,, rim.- the union ls declared to he a , tty, 4. ll'nm-r this ar'l W" luv, "'f f/ ll xiv-ill m- liability which devolved mum l I titled to rr-tivts rn.tcr.t'It Hut 'Inc',."",',)':',',,' ,tr,. llnl'llniun uni-r s-'ctiun 111 of the! MI' ll .t.'.rytj.-'wcjyyl this llltl'lil: hill-'11"? l l'.\. A, :n-l, and ty Lo one of the mat- " . _iil.lll_\ ll-inl to us M" l"l.~ in ln- ink-n into amount in itscl il, " Dc") I. _.. ' u . p t'rht - C "l'iiillllg tlic' t X' v55 " di'llt frrit which I! l (4) Thnt.tcr) i","..','"."" wr it?" huh il'l ."fiilll'h' and (.lllo _ lire OHM-tinny ll-t " _ as ml 1iittrw July i, ' I; . . I' l a " tn C:ttrurl:t undvr sectlt-n 1l'2of tho , '. h r0 of autumn tirrrect'r111'"W mil ['.1l'.. i , it, N'. A. act. l, k . c, hasr int-i103" ..r vt,'"',:,.,',,',?.,'.'),"." L "A" i i In villi-r words. if. on lllvcstlgatiull. it l nd Milli wwsryti:tl "'4'." 1ashnl, M. [ i, i' 'llilil thnt the territory titied pro- i ' I (5) That the illlSi llllll l if.',',',', rrtvl trr-Irie-tir-r.. IV/i' to have en- 1 Gi . -atmi as intact in (,tl,:',?,r.'1j/.',,"t'." l/ii)-' l ili'l"li -lll-- (ini'v-l'nlnvnt of the old Pro- l 1'." . inter»! thl-rqvlil at a I,""',.,,,',",:,';.',;, IC, l Vim-.- nl' L'anp, la to have paid the ln-l "'. I yearly mil-llml in!" the if" . ' k , ('i'l'lt't'il annuities without int-urring' .' 'ounts Hi ""13"" atvl (lit' '0 ' l -\/-_l in" tht. illliialls are nllw cnti r, - ', 16) Thut my Pum'lnl't' Hf l and. i) 21- itireasrd annuities as: stipulated _ " count SHAH 1)" lnzidr lip ill ic,?,',""" it I -tv"utlos with Ilil'lll and Ontario' I -. 26rest lit c, Pct' writ. i"t' ""nl't'I ts c, of (uri-lv t' al'l- ultilnalelv lialle ttr,1ug": "", ', IT) Thnt in the s"rytr.tt.1?.t/, "q Pulitgi'lipll c, mi title inward rc'MA' ' 9"", ta,' atario all" '.tW'l'yl' tyt-.ycr)id I rm mc l "That ititc.srt is nut /y,,,rJ,."i..rLe' ' . cN, tttr11 by "lhrsvtu.l Siilllllu 'lillvl'CF-'tfln 81:3 any arm-arc of such annuitieé " c. Atahanri (ruin liliil to llilll' ,H'.t",.",l,",, J, vii-rt Hi this is in strike out ii once .,'h' he" fitVirt' "I i, yr',',"',',':),',,',',':.:"','."','.' 3.21.11 lln'ullallle: $273,0oo of the claim. l . other "in. bar lit-tn tau-ll») any. ('lli' counsel (-mltt-nd that during a' _ . to. P".l'l of tht. period for which the claim . T/ l APPEAL ilY Till) lllmlxlva. ls Taue, ay) speaking without Pre- l. Ut . . F _ F . "tpin ' Jilvliv I', vtttoiupc.iyu-rbulrly back to 1872, irsThe rlniilinlwn. ('l'JWllnla ti) Ct : ilil'i'luSvll annuities could not have ». .dings in tlu. tirit nwalrl that vi 5N- lm n lnado withwul incurring boss. .. .mb'q. 2, IF/CI, "PP' 11-11 to thts .'.".tl""""r"' " ll" "rfritrutors further hcld (Chan- ve" "an." fur tho li'lllHE'iiig "115.121? CL, ttl l-rllilr liuyd dism-ntinm that the Dom- ir ' ', r, (1)Tht-awalll 41-pin"- tsyrt,oiy,tJ,",,t,".Ct, 1 If mil n was entitled to inn-rest inn each :J' au exet'ss of il"1lt mi lhw 1 mum. il y'all-'3 payment of invronsud annuities "i . w da is to be "Huh-[.41 from the thrntt the time of each pawnmt thereof ". W-yt-arly FillvFlllit'F only at thes "nd when lll'npvrly made. savffrnm 1872 on , l = aarh hMLT-rag' spawn: ",faie.,,t,/,r"s' vstimatv and without prejudice -, --" metrsuctt alt-gc; y pay'. . I . . rt ' tIsle/il',.., uri- try tin "tr,eiti1.lli'.':'C:'r'iii " t)NTAItio'S APPEAL SUSTArNFm. 9 tea act directed in be tledm d to I Crntarlo aprwaled to the Supreme C . ?rovlnces. _ ._ .1 qt I,-! ('uurt fruln parts of this award viz ' To SH mln'll 1-! trt ("Mill 'E. .. l paragraph 6, which instvns the ultimate 'nes that thr ir,miniott h 3141' n; Isurdrm of Irltyttaent of the increased an- l In its mummy: with tllu l l ~_\'nl c, nintivs' after the unlnn upon Ontario , . e tvcclsur hull-yvarly I.'"',',',,"",,",?,',)'" alone, on the ground that the ceded ter- crest on tllw said "x"""':" ol d" , ritul'y became the pruperty of Ontario " at thr tinw hf the tilllOlL' . rd ttttder section 109 ot the B V A act ". o so lnu'gh of "h" 39'3": and that it was subject Cii iriiit fill: decides lilill - the l min" tho Indians; and aismto Gilt G'r?t of -_ of i:'1t"Tst on (jj/i, C'.,',',.' Paragraph 9 which says that any pay- r of (Lilli tin-m tht' .'tiil -yta'.'- menu; of incroasVd annuities properl idle-i: ts to l... bin-ed main surh l made by the Dominion 'ii,rii/'uli; ',','tf/f, , ot " u\'l-i' te'itro,t)t)i) as l" ar't- 1 are to be Phat-god against Ontario ar " . "ertoint'd in um Hint at val-ll 1 of the dates ot payment . _ P, _ of (it"lut'iil n. nun-ml at will}; This appeal was argued in May 1895 Fl " the t-Xl'l'M" I": lit-lit I" ",ryj'a,i.,1j,y: and judgment given sustaining the ap-' it: ted at the lilill' ot the par-'11» Drill in December, 1895. In his judg- i _ t 36 Victim t't.t. Ili). /Tcy1/,'/it,,t' Silent. delivered Dec. 9th 1895 Chiefi at in tlilll- i) ts o'lHrrt. us "ty Pt.. r "N ' . ' l ' tail ml tlit' part at the Do- by,".),'..?..?. Strong of the bupreme Court as aruuvd lull-['0 tin» HUNT-Ill? "This fl l eal m s t ' tl Ottawa on the 9tlc, 10th and the award1 3mm beuvaH-tfgd Egoz'fgs'11x'g bt'E?il's'e't. r. INH, JU'le"m Ivas Inr.,r for the 6th paragraph thereof the i,thtrtth of May, 1Me5, tlisniiSS- tollowinr,:--The ceded territory men- , meal with tom's. tlunod became the property of Ontario E . . under the 109th section ot the British . 0 HER AWARDS, North America act, 1867, absolutely 5 1 nil award, that of Mst Aug- "ll"V,gtcrtrgt'l any FMS!- charge or next i , P hich deals mainly with the well 131059" fa." {"5 the annuities. as "k - anon to which l have reter- deferred mg 'fi"tet, y payable as those , . that in certain cases the mentation of Eggeedyto be paid in aug- ' I ttall he allowed if Der cent. on the 1'2luydi/1r,1it'it"ry1 itnnultles, up- " r k, 'tioned. And. further t treaties men- , y striking out ce= = A __