The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

r We..." T V "'- " . . - equitable levy in the ' "W ipalities out ot_the [l M: . . u School but sending P", . " . ~ then called on Mr. H Fjtr3. J. 8F. an amendment to the tn-~' . "r:. my employees ot m AW' 1"'-._"_;"F " in; on roads shalt not be ., Wi" along with the mun- Ieiptuttr in. c of accident. Mr. Hard! seemed to consider their argu- ments favorably. The inadvmt omission of a ', word from tho report of Mr. Ross' re- imarks with teterenee to the school system in the issue of March 11 gives .them a perhaps unnecessarily harsh l sense. Referring to the criticisms up- I on the school systems contained in the ) paper read at the Ontario Educational iAssoclatlon, which Mr. Whitney had quoted. Mr. Ross stated that "the per- , son quoted may have had a. slight grievance against the department." not that he had such a grievance. The report in The Globe of the rc- marks made by Mr. Middleton in the course of the debate on the license question on Thursday last was so condensed as perhaps to lose the ex- act nature of one of the points which he made. After remarking that Mr. Marter's suggestion as to the control of the license system was without the endnrsatlun of any of the temperance bodies. Mr. Middleton recalled the fact that at the prohibition convention hold in Toronto early in June. 1894, Mr. Marter declined to give an affirmative answer to the last of the four ques- tions put to the Toronto candidates as to whether he would oppose the nu I'vrence of the control of the adminis- tration of thc liquor laws from the Provincial authorities as at present to tho muriirsipalitits, and was accordingly adjudged by that body an unsatisfac- tory candidate. Mr. Middl-'tun Went on to re.rtu. to the cxcvmlhuriy strong ground Mr. Martel- had takon in his spew-h at London and to contrast with it his well-known recanta'tiun of his views after the election. .