The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

' m'smfin l Was-mt would be to"! advised as'to . at, _ m to _ m that was going on 'Ne, school. 161 'f y and. The-Premier laid and whether the mute ere being Ethos 00:11de the clauses lithe: made "cause at. . ' wanted to. but to pass them now and - - .1 Tir' il . , then repeal them would be a dishonor: A Cry " V . ' F, title that. .The School of Mining was Mr. Whitney said he understood this F deserving of aid. but wttetre was the ' nt to be an tP/tr.',",',',,',',',,',",,,',',' the need of such a tortuous Ind crooked, mama world that the House mane- way of arrivirg at a conclusion? ' omut the mmtgugeeg of che g'tftl - under any circumstances. th prote - House Hat, Control. ed. against bringing in such important Hon. Mr. Harcourt said that there matters in the closing hours of the ses- was no tortuous way or dealing. The do; It was a crying evil. question had been fully discussed in r. Carsoailen (East Hamilton) said council. caretully and deliberately. and the objects and purposes of the school to anyone who could read English the were not' defined. and there was no resolution was perfectly plain and clear. security that sectarian instruction, The Government. would watch the might not be imparted. needs of the School of Mining from time Elan. Mr. Harcourt said the bill pro- to time. and aid it further if required. _vi ed clearly against that. . The Pt',',',,"',',' remanded 'e Blouse that The committee reported progress. not ce o e amen ment ad teen pub- lished in the votes and proceedings ot Those Questions and Answers. the previous day. Mon. Mr. Gibson moved that the fol- Mr. Carscalien (East Hamilton) con- lowing rules be adopted as part of the tended that the grant should be lim- rules, orders and forms of proceedings ited to, say. five years. He was heart- of the Rouse:-- ily in favor of assisting the school. ' "Rule 89 (a) Such questions and the Col. Matheson (South Lanark) said. replies theretb shall bein writing and that, under the clauses of the bill,, shall be entered in the Journals. instead ot being an annual grant of "Rule 29 (b) Whenever any question $6,000, it was a straight grant of $200": requires by way ot reply thereto any 000. He did not object to the aid to bei statement of facts or records ot sta- Kiven, but he did protest against thei tistlcs of a lengthy or voluminous na- manner in which the question was ture, or other material which in the brought down the day before the House' opinion ot the Minister whose depart- was supposed to adjourn. I ment is concerned should be made the Hon. Mr. Gibson said that st' am subject of a return, the Minister may. measures were , be discussed at iengtiil instead of answering such question. it would he be ter to have an under- require a motion to be made for s. re- standing that the House would be in turn. session for a week or two longer, a "Rule 33 is hereby amended by add- statement which was greeted with loud 9118 thereto the touowirur.-'No motion applause try members on both sides of shall be prefaced or preceded by re- the House. citals or preamble.' " I Rules Compiled With. I Mr. Toitney Suspicious. T The Premier contended that all the i Mr. Whitney declared that these rules rules and Parliamentary procedures put it within the Power of the Mittitr. had been followed in giving notices of tertt to burk any question that may be the resolution. He vigorously protest- asked, and that the House would be in ed against any insinuation that he had a worse position than they were before. attempted to conceal anything. As a Hon. Mr. Gibson pointed out that all matter of fact, he had endeavored to sorts of matters now presented in the be as clear and explicit as possible. shape of motion for returns might be Mr. Whitney considered that his hon. put in as questions.. in order to get friend seemed desirous of avoiding the them recorded. He autrtreated that the straightforward English way of dealing words "with the consent of the with the question. No good explana- House" be"intrerted after the word tion of the manner in which the reso- "Minister." . ' ' lution had been brought down had yet The Premier said he never knew the been given by the Premier or other Government to decline to answer any ' lGovernrnent members. question that could reasonably be ask- Hon. Mr. Gibson said no clauses could ed. . be -more direct. simple, plain or selt- The motion was carried as amended. explanatory than those in the bill. The V leader ot the Opposition was making Calls Trading Stamps 3. Fraud. ", considerable noise over a small mst- ', When the House took up Mr Grad ter, and overlooking the main ittgtte. ham's bill allowing municipalities to Erection ot Bulldlnxs, prohibit trading stamps. Mr. Carsoai- len (East Hamilton). declared that the Mr. Foy said that there was no word House should take up the question in on the bill making it compulsory on the earnest, and declare definitely whether school authorities to erect buildings, or this business of trading Stunt". which to continue the existence of the school. he characterized unreservediy as a The school would also have powers to fraud should or should not exist. mortgage grants, and place the obliga- iii." Graham tBrockville), said in trvu',gtfitt.the responsibility upon the, some localities the people were against The Premier thought that the Pro-I '. Vince was sumciently well protectedl under the clauses as to visitorlai pow-v . en of the Lieutenant-Governor,- and' j, the fact that no money would be paid' w ttnleqr' on order in Council. The Gov- II