The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

on *AAA he " thousnt " ThE 5 e en ppamscerry hould Be left to decldg it for them-- ~Oo1. ~Mathason*sait That ... . "%>% f 16e e t ui) esaaiaregs Mr. Hoyle «(North Ontario) doc?nd ments. . 2:1.: ire of d? as provid-- trading stamps a fraud on the busi-- ed would e the university lopsided. \ ness g«zx;zmg'nl:ty. and urged the' pass-- gge appointment r:fl pmleuo.rs g;' the [age o e s 1 vernment was ic wrong. The _ Mr. Reid (Addington) said the i:ro.d-.l feeling of th ecountry vyn.s a:flmt lllt ing stamp company had not had time and theére could be, he thought," no \to lay their case before the Legisla-- doubt that some of the ap;i'oln:'linents turet.h The bill should be left over for had been political. * + 'another. ear. # : hMr-. Pei'typlece (East Lambton) nig Faculty Does Not Ask It. | that the matter had been well threshe The ier | out in the' committee and in the lob-- Traeies Mald that the proposition | of the leader of the Opposition had been | bies, and that the lawyer who repre-- tried many years ago and had hot been ::'e';fdbe ':fi e;":'g::{ tgn;z ::tsztl bt\?:it a sudcceas. To revert to that now *1 would be to place appointments in the ness, as provided in the bill. hands of an irresponsible committee, Bome further discussion followed, d@uring which Mr. Whitney protested whereasbshe Government could be held * _ responsible. He repeated his assertion, ;ifi"';;i':'l'fi::'p:l'";" ggg'gfifie fi: i msde on a previous occasion, that He did not know a single member of the ::"l':'htaxat. T&"fig'."f&gglh l;l;;r}:l; !;l":_' 1'.'[?hcultyh v;ho favored such a change.! & k o There had been on one occasion a sug-- Carscallen moved that the committee gestion that the appointment of Prof. rise and report progress, and that the 7 bill be further considered. _ This mo-- Wrong had been made through political tion carried almost unat:ln:lous!y Dur-- {)nflluences. put Ttgatrhad"ti;een shown to & * > A e facuities of the amf-- j ing the speech of Mr. Pettypiece in C S btC * favor of the bill a woman in the salleryl liated colleges were also against the proposition. _ He repeated hts state-- hissed the speaker, but did not attract the attention of the officials in the ment, made a fow days ago, that o Ponnl House yenn; ba%{t--1893--he had sub]n&}ttedtto, s the faculty a measure providing for University Bill Amended. an advisoryj board, bubt !thhad b:en ;so' Hon. Mr. Harcourt's university bill strongly objected to by them that he was then taken up in committee and a hah(} ""v",g{te::;":a"l ';tl;': 'tvh:! }32335; @ 1s. number of amendments made. Among t | these was a section providing that the: members of the faculty that they had trustees should have power to lease no objection to the provision for an lands to students, associations _ or acvisory board, but had opposed .the chapels for.their buildings. It was also & |measure as a whole, He urged with made quite cléar that + the "l'}',pof"tl]':}e ear;\te'stne;sh iA reconnl&em- rental of _ $8,000 a ea t o s question. ere was strong paid _ by t);e' city _ for yth'; n::é opinion on the matter, and pernaps, of university park lands should not when it would be too late, the Govern-- be interfered with under the bill. The | ment would realize that they had been university would _ still receive that a standing obstacle in the way of the money in add'tion to the aid which the uq]{:e"rf}rye;'g;fie;%e Ranered. to ts guarantees. & Mr. Whitney thought that the bill statement that the facuity disapproved f :llelo:fi 'pro:'ld;e lfv?rl the support of the of the suggestion now advanced by Mr. R partment 0o ology. Whitney. _ He further desired to call | Hon. Mr. Harcourt replied that the attention to the fact that a recent meet-- | maintenance of that department would ing of the senate had approved of the mean an additional obligation of $12,-- | bill now before the House. > + -- 000 per annum. The measures already Mr. Whitney said that at the latter | outlined would be the full extent of aid meeting only 21 members out of some-- l for the present. thing over G0O had been present, lesg w than one--third. _ The expression of| M W::tts ;n ;Adv'is:ory Board. opinion from such a small prolport:gn r. ney at a later stage argued could not be taken as expressing the gl.tfa:)\;o:hot an ad\lrllsoryv'bou(-:t}\ to cfin- views of tl;'e whole. _ He vtvlas laltso az- e Chancellor, ce--Chancellor sured by those most directly interest-- and President, and the Principals of| ed that provision should be made for a ) ' tgg :;m':::',tetd untl'ver:f';'tlles 1)c:,ont:,emed in Dean of the faculty of arts. | ppointmen & Ar h | & ' Eppolnt therprofesaoru. the Lleut:n:':&qf No Politics In It. 4 \ overnor of course retaining the veto' his' ' power. 'This advisory board had been g{:{tzlx;exfinth:{tur'n%om:bpcflfi:xeggtx:g had urged by the Alumnit Association, the been made because of pofitical in-- Mail neveparets; and Rrom wiher wune M in on io: ecidt * *4 with the expression of views he Y te;{s'.m. Mr. Harcoutt issiG: there noa the professors on any question, s f been no difficulty in the ast in re'a.x- New Senate Refiresentatlves. to the procedure for a.;?polntlng 'x'n'o'tE p 1 ing the Composition 3 fessors. No appointment had been made Nn Saoke ehneolihe ed d pg that wkich had given rise to any objections. of the senate was amended so it 4 "The alumni had not exactly suggested every separated college may appoin that an advisory board should have twg r;embers'--Wnyllge. %td ul:xiiisggiltys [ the powers ken of t an nox ; évery federate i They had s Uegested that ."'i'chmé':r'li n Appoint, _ one . mmemben --Yictoria should consider the applications and University ; the Law Society of Upper then recommend three or four names Canada may appoint one member ; the ' " from which a final selection should be governing bodies of W colleges or # NHHHHNONHNrrrrrrrererrermmm m n mm en m esn