The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

' . _ new-1: " BVI'] ' h = . ' . L." . ' 'G.7e' tlemen .av- . . cumulative votiu SIBtl been Te b'"f,eas,,tlrht,tio/lre eligizinzgfgat cer- careful to limit it to large centres. ln should phudebe n stolen against a pub- conservative England they had gpnei,.t.ificaey a h ehad iii"G"GTGa; to on contentedly for twenty years under l lie 05:33 'li"voe his explanation. There the c.umulative system for educational 2',',",,t obiection to the motion; the oestrous. _ onlv obiection"was to the statements Amendments Suggested. made, which "should have come up in N 'bit moved an amendment some other. way. thgrthSFfbradtes and Labor Council be The motion was passed. Riven representation on thedbo'alrd. it"? Col. Matheson's Objections. tahngieyedec,vasi,Jgl 91:35.56 rletireseii! Col. Matheson moved forl a NrIeturn tativgslof the Separate School Board of .correlpondtce between Cam!" :3": g b ' . board. }politan Power Company an the 10v on/ly-' brih"wa5 reported, with some', ernment for a C§rant of land under the . ndments. l waters of the ttawa River. He OD- slight ame Iiected to the fact that Mr. J. Lorne Extending the High Court. l McDougall. jun., a partner of Hon. F. Col. Gibson explained his act to anti R. Latchiord, had hbceGn fillployletd fl"; end the judicature act, under motion tori seek a grant from t ed OiferaniSi ii; a second reading. He was not comr) which he had receive a ee o , l mitted to the bill, but it had been found l or $1,000. _. id C l M thew n wad that the Supreme Court should have. Mr. Df'ulS'S'aH Octal) T h l? another division in order to .cover the: {and of impi.titi2 motives, flt?. t etc: Jeit amount of work offering. His; and mother quarters. In .this -..,0nnce-g it," mind was not Cninpletely madel, tion he read from an evening paper a; fouls to the best course to be taken. i statement that the Public Accountsi although as to the tw.cscteity of inn; Committee rooy1.h.ad been tillccll "('11th 1creasinz the number ot Judges there ; Government oticials, "sn/r' . "3p WWI" i, could he no doubt. . l the remarks of Capt: DU ll\.3li.' _.,".. r.i I Mr. FOV ts. Toronto) said that, from l In"; :aid there wax not .t(l(10\~tilll:l an examination ot the dockets, he could i limit 01116131 prtrsent beyond L " C "l not tind that there was any need fort and thce,mcyie.nsrer.. 'r'% - trq . i !an additional two judges oi the High] Mr. bi. John said Frarok SullivanE iCc-nrt. The Court of Appeal was he-P was there. and lieliva< 1uuil/.cv.rntly. a; zhind its work. and any additional Judge ( Government C1llployee. (Aliinsteriali {to be appointed should DC an Appeal), laugzlitcrd' . "N . _ Nudge. . _ Mr. (_;r:;nant and Minivan was there, i," 'lhe hill received a second reading. a» a w1tncs, fuhpocnaed by hr,n. gen-: i Mr Latcluurd', bill respecting local _ tlciiit'ii "MW"to C).pplat:rr,) Tf i work; and improvements. and Mn. Mr. Davis. proceeding. mid: it Mn; Strattim's hill to amend the industrial I McDougall did act it was to defend; achi-mh :ict. were also glVen sec "IdlrightD which his clients thought f,tri readings. !had previously possessed. The I]??? . . 't _? i., 7o ks never consu Ct Supplies Concurred m. 1:331: ii'iim"i"/1i:y1t)r)so,1," the. matter: i't'l, Ito PM "MSW It" .ern cd '23 i had been argued out wholly on its own' Clinilinniii-(itc'il £333: 'il/dec)) chit "merits. There was no objection to. t e' - b . 3 . 3'"er Ill, Thew three "I?" 1r,:e"yrtl1rrr'i,i-Ci't, (Carleton) said the lease "5 _ _ t " Cr. F l 'tlt'-: . . I . . . .b. m. m... never _hit,vf been g.1ven b; {gr £1 id- '1'kfo/r ini<ccllaneous. Mr. McDougall) connection wltlt e V i'iiti'C-rlille head oi education Mr. s. firm oi Lat.chiord, Mcr.hoygall & Day. J. Fox (West Victoria) asked whetlr; :l'he motion was: carrifd. the" o" er anything was to be done to in?! 'Fhe Home ',"T',1.nff? l "Urn i)', ml prove the position of the _cchool T- prziatc lulu and adjournet at J.4 p. . 'ipecttnra, who now received very lll'i '.."e.s'?.Te'.ri..-=h'r=ri'T=7.i'= adcquare _,oluriec. Hon. Mr. Hnr, court replied that a bill now b S the Home would provide for a staiitiai .ncreaac in inspector,' salar- ies by way of traveihng txpenses. The Frontenac Shrievalty. Mr. r S. Gallagher (Frontenac) moved tor a return Hi all correhpoud- mire It'l'lllllg to a request oi the From tenac Crruuty Council for the dismiss- ai of Slit-riff lllitllla: Dawson. Ther, r.liftcrcncr, between Slicriil Dawson and', the c, unty Council was not merely', one truth"); to nipplim. as stated 'oy' the \ttnrney General. The Sheriff "as not a very desirable officer, and had taken a vcri active part in the last ehctwn. llc lSallC'l wmc 52 certi- hate. to nrrn-residcuts as agents tor the Grtrerttment candidate. One of thew: men named Carey, a boot and dine merchant of Kingston. put in one Irste where he was, agent and another in Kingdom. There were several other such caws. rhe Attorney-Gen.. eral <liould have paid more attention to the request of the County Coun- cil tor the Sherifi's dismissal. There should he an Intestication into the matter. Further. the Sheriff was em- powered to icrut, two certificates to '.1gerltt in each ~iibdivi<ion. hut in one: instance he had given three certili-l rates. and when the ballot boxes were' examined at 11tronto, under an order' for 1isrovery. It was found that the' ct'rtthcatr,s had been destroyed. He didn't believe they had been destroy-; ed in Kingston. Not Sufficient Ground. Col._ Gibson thought that. so far as', the friction between the County (nun-I etl and the Sheriff was concerned. iti waq out of the question to comply iiitlil the request of the Council. There Wi.-, friction in other counties. It would', not be ground for dismissal. even if the: Sheriff was wrong on a matter of that kind. If there was correspondence in any of the departments it would he brought down. If there was a grim ance, the election law provided for re?! dress. This was not the way to get}