The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

_ - is: . _ _ _ . .. my; " 3. . . , " . FR Y. miamiNtllt!t 24. -41911 8f MIA --r---r------ . T _ . '... i Toronto). one of the Milk Commission. , HE PBUVINGE himself was with them on the main point of contention. The bill was car- ried through committee without any ---.-. amendment of importance, but when Hon. Mr. Macliay tite whether it . would come bac ' and t e Prime Min- '. Liberal Leader urges Amend. ister replied that It would be put t t N A through,'"then," said Mr. MacKay. . me . "the House will he divided on it on n 0 ew tlt. the third reading." . When the House went into commit- . .._._.__._._.._ tee on the bill, Hon. Mr. Duff ex- plained that it was largely me- out- WILL DIVIDE THE HOUSE come of the investigations of the Milk . Commission. Mr. Reed pointed out F that as the bill stood every municipal- ' -- _ lty could have different laws for the . handginghand care of milk. Why. he, . . . . . aske ' s ould not the Government Multiplicity of Standards IS take the responsibility of making a , Provincial law, and not have every Threatened. srijv.i1tC1tto.1ttr Council or Board ot! .Healthxs'etting its own standard? ____._ Two Sets of Regulations. "3111 ' Hon. Mr..MacKay asked why have " to Do Away With Bonusing Syg- two" tests and two sets of "eg,tt"i,"di' . tem " 2.. Where a producer was sending is Had a Short Fxistertcc--mit milk into two different municipalities? - to Make Standard P-'A.-Y.-E. Car ' _Mr. McNaught said if one munci- Goes pality wanted better milk than. an- to Committee. other was getting it should have the right to get it, while Mr. Nickle -------.-----, (Kingston) held that the municipality A that consumes any product should Provincial stand . . . . have the right to set the standard or . the point around my?" mil/t was it. The bill would enable the farmers Mon upon th no the discus- with cattle of a higher grade to get a f C new milk bill raged " higher price for their milk. or two hours in the Legislature VPS- Mr. J. C. Elliott remarked that the! terday afternoon, The tight to - k present Government had pronounced the regulation " ' P" tft itself as being against "checker-board matter and I milk a Provincial legislation," but this hill was just of i . pot one for Pvr'ry muni- that character. Mr. Neely endorsed C pality in Ontario to deal with indc..; entirely the position of the leader of pendently was lpd by Hon. A. G. Mac- l the Opposition. I Kg,iand while the leader of the my, Department should Make Standards. 2m t on failed to convince, the Gov- i "l have more confidence in the Min-i ment of the desirability of amend- I ister of Agriculture-and his experts"; in the bill, his convincing arguments said Hon. Mr. Mat'Kay, "than in thel ' . , . l . i . . . . q . . -! Tld.',',',.,',",',,:)",',',')':,):,', of a number' 1:33.13? 'g1e"1c,io'triit"tr', 1nleth/,1't' 3123' has members. The fight clause dealing with the multiplicity of! not been given up, and wheni regulations. hut this was lost. the bill comes up for a third read- . Mr. 'Reed contended that it Would; ing the Liberal leader will divide the be in' the interest of the producer; House. as well as of' the consumer to have a, The l . uniform standard of such height as to . f auSe which precipitated the, insure wholesome milk. discussion was that which provides . . _Hon. Mr. Duff claimed that the that "The Council of every municipal- i 't1ate,rgirt,t/.,""i'cped 1: 0w? hated a: . . . t . . ', ' e ' u , 'fd," xherelb}, authorized to..enact by- thought. no fear of Councils eplac- ecu ating the granting of li- init the standard higher, as they would canoes to producers and to vendors to incur displeasure. sell milk, and shall have power _/e) "Why J.Ptigt then to a Provincial refuse or cancel such licenses," and, handyfert' asked two or three voices 'that "No person shall sell milk in] red _ . any municipality where such by-lawsf Where is the Minister Driving'? are in force without tirst obtaining) ' "'Cah't the hon. Minister see where -a license therefor." i tt is 1r,itiirp,',1',','sti"fded,, Honk Mr. 'dMac- , . ay. 66 y s ou a mi - pro ucer lConfusion Will Result. 3 have to take out half a. dozen licenses These two sections, t t .. ' I if he happens to be supplying to as later one 1hich . oge'her with al many different municipalities?" 1 id ' W c gives (3?ch muni-l Mr. Nickle thought the end was c pa ty the right to appoint Inspect-i gained by the Minister having to ap- ors to enter premises, no matter; prove the standard set by the muni- 'wlhere located of ever-V person . ' cipalities.- I . ., 1310-. . . . .. 't . . . , 'Then if he is oina to ake one _ ifucignnvlk for salt "l the municipal- l standard." replied 5so/r'.1"ssrtau1rv',' "why l tr which he is inspector, were not doit under a Provincial law? The lgiven considerable attention by Hon. 'man who wants better milk as shown IA. G. A2yr"N'. lie described the .by tests may get it, but don't make .confusion which would. result from "the poor man pay more than he can the power .given municipalities to afford to simply because the munici- pass by-laus regulating milk pro-', pality sets the standard higher." duced outside its boundaries, and de-: Mr? w. I). McPherson '(West Tor- ",1't'ir', that number-less standards of: onto) attempted T5 explain that the shim illéould1 be fixed. A tarmcr (via clause did not give the municipality ppe milk to tour or five mum-E power. to' go outside to inspect pre- cavalities would have to take out al mises where the milk is produced. license for each one and he suhy'ct . "'If that is so. then it is the hollow- to the standards fixed hy each mun- eat bill that was ever brought in," re- icipaldty. He might have. to produce marked Hon..Mr. MacKay. 'gtrt'tu't'tiftr/tnfif milk} 111th Pe; Hon. Mr. Dutt hastened to explain ' f . rts ure ll t its start that Mr.. McPherson was wrong in his o expe should, Hon. Mr. MacKay interpretation contended. set the standards and ttxt '. l . . has 1rr1,et,i,re,e', under which miikl Anti-bonus Bill-Withdrawn. :9 on . l _ _ ! e pro uced The,bpnusitur system is safe for ,leerals Favor Standard. some time to come. The bill intro- I _ . duped in the Legislature by Major J. "rh."ir,fit,US'fcf,ksoou/hsoTti',utea1), J. Craig of East" Wellington' to do Mr ir C Elli tt"" b er ' 83V." with bonuses of anv description and iii,. Mening 2); at: wiggles". received "short shrift. The member ale f . htTo th 5 ' e ngton . for We11irurtpsvigorous1y "supported 0 on; r e I rovincial stand- 11i'F bill buthe had hard1sriLkt hi ard. and Mr. G. w. Neely (East Mid- 36m, .-'anér Gia/ii, the; ". n 3 diesex) agreed with'their position, reading when Hon L. Van _ re',',', while Mr. w. K. McNaught (North ed, and, with _,e,onn/crfidiy,s'.r1riitsTt'; - _ _ 5"A ' withdraw. There was noissi,i;rjkhf.t Mr. Allan Studholme terms, thitlfAlsi -