The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

ithin one month after the contract is made. I may be wrong, but that | is not my understanding of what the | committee agreed upon." ' ; The requirement that the notice he | sent out in one month--after the first | premium had been paid----meant no-- fthing. If the notice was received be-- ';fnrv the contract was made and ! the first premium paid the insured | would have the importance of secur-- iing proof impressed upon him. | Mr. W. Proudfoot (Centre Huron) thought Mr. McKeown's statement lsorimls. The bill should be sent back to the special committee to ascertain | what had really been decided upon. i Hon. W. H. Hearst, who was the | Chairman of the special committee,| | thought that the bill before the House gcontainpd the amendment agreed up-- on. He was not sure himself of the ,ur'tual wording of the amendment. The officials of the Insurance Depart-- \ ment and Clerk of the committee had. | given attention to it. ' Mr. Geo. Pattinson (South Water-- loc) supported the Minister, while Mr. (¢t. H. Ferguson (Grenville) said \he had gained the impression that |the committee had decided that the 'notice should he sent out with the policy.