The Ontario Scrapbook Hansard

Ontario Scrapbook Hansard, 22 Apr 1920, p. 4

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

' v. ' ' " ' '.. Thr?"' M 'T"". .. " I" "'. 'r"' wrrr '1l1Rtltl.l8BlMBP" V V _ , "I... a r "an - , . l _ - . _V_ _ . i r "1. 'ds In. F,',' ' "y', . "if it. Triributit"ia"iR" could be t --.----Arr-rt I twr..----.------"), '5'; '_' _ worked in North Ontario, but he was _ i ' ' F l _ . . sure of it. in older Ontario. He ',' f Tq " Charred that Tasmania was less _ denae1y populated than many parts . . ' ' ot Ontario. and it worked out / splendidly there. . In conclusion. he asked that the l Government appoint a committee to i j investigate and report on its appli- I i I cation to Ontario. He wanted a com- l , 9 mittee with the power to can, wit- i i l "m . ' , z 'i, Premier Favors It. ----_. Illl , l Premier Drury said that the ar u- . g ii ' i, Joe/lst tor it under certain "fad _ Labor Members Puzzled Over; ll' = ons seemed almost unassailable.' - . . l , i The adoption of proportional rcpre" Ilanished Clause m Police C ( j il , . i1edhtl't"l', e, said. watgld mean a c . . h - _ , I s a ure o groups. uch a grou 3 l I I system meant that the House use}: 0mmISS|0nS Gt ' , ;" s':',,',',',',',:',',',,", 'Jtciir,tfio1ei,tv11,iot for ------ l I ', ' on, w cn was a w olesome l 'fl tendency. He would be pleased to OPINIONS ARE DIFFERENT B. t - grant the committee. I ',",, rThe rtdt,'.t,g2l/1',1.,f, declared in favor --r.l....-..---. ...' ' l I or proper ona representation. said . . . I ' j Sir. 1;)1ev.;an, Liberal Leader. He Munioipal Committee of the l I Il tnoug t t a good time to pre are, - . l . as the best time for its applicgtlon House Not unanImous ', ., would be at the time of the Do- . . . . . ' v'., ' minlon census, which would be Regarding Prior Sitting _ ; taken 'shortly. Mr. Dewart brought ' I j ilgnthe glulestioln origin] representa- ------_ I g ' . es, 1e sa , were entitled Labor members of the Municipal , . 'tc""" members than they had Committee of the Legislature, judg- I l , Hon. Mr. Ferguson said he had ing by what they were saying yes- " f ' _ no); git}? . y"nrto"g,ritd",'r'"t1,1 ropresenta- terday after the committee had con- : _ . O . . . l pas. Shel?" it??? ta1,"id1,'"ti,otl, eluded Ita mm for tho day, felt N , ", l up the matter of urban ""9"an that, somehow, something had been . l l". r tion.declaring that by representation ' . put over them. I ' I tt'iu'io'ito"'t,,t/io'/, Tloronto woqu be iii) At the prior meeting of the com- 1 _ Jo r nore mem ers. e ' . ". i, argued that representation by popu- mittee a bill was under considera-|' ' ll lation must be carried into the pro- tion, introduced by Mr. T. Teams, _ j portional representation scheme. of Peterboro', to make Police Com-5, l 'r"-f""rfr"'-"""""""r""""" missioners elective. Opposition to I . this arising in committee, the sup- . I porters of the bill say they decided , f i to accept. as a compromise, that the Commission should consist of , the , Mayor, an Alderman and the Magis- (i 'm i, trate. ' The bill came up again yesterday} ) I and the clerk of the committee read F . [ 1 a draft of a clause placing the esti- l ' l, mates of Police Commissions under "T I the control of the City Council. The ' ) clerk said that he understood that . l . was what the committee wished ' i done. h - '3 Undecided as to What Happens. l . Hon. H. C. Nixon, Chairman of; l the committee, had to leave, and his ; i l place was taken by Edgar IVataon ,7 ' . (North Victoria). A most-animated ' ' . discussion arose as to what really' ' ' happened at the prior meeting. One portion of the committee held that, the clauses relating to the change of personnel in Police Commissions ' had been defeated. Another por- tion held that it hadmot been de- . feated, but that a redraft was to be brought in, as well as the redraft actually presented. . Somebody called for the minutes, but the minutes were not there, and apparently could not be produced on t such short notice. Finally, after , much objecting and cross-question- . ing, the committee voted in favor of the clause presented and adjourned. l After the meeting some of the ' , Labor members said that they were B, _ certain that the clause changing per- _- sonnei had not been defeated, and they promise to do some interesting speaking the next time the bill T comes before the committee. if it V comes at all, which some doubt. _ r a At any rate the tight will be I transferred to the floor of the House, ' . and Labor men, from what they said ' yesterday, will make a determined , l effort to get it through in its ori- / ginal form. iis1'PS"d _ i . "11'1" . b _ J ' li; I T t M9,; IQ ' "s. a

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy