The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

; L 6c Deb J akes Reply in l')"utll'::eqx})):al?;mosfi turned his back e e SiHoh r when h e ate to Question of Re-- [feriioin He wae of Wantso. io know *3+ a s w | sponsibility of |ed to the S s speaking. He appeal-- y of the D peaker and | G rury to proceed in his nd was allowed i overnment : Object s own way, one ie .. $ toPProvmce CO rofiti f ue conservative . ; . Erofting on Liquor f # * cBride | REFERENDUM sumed the debate (ll?'rantrord) re-- | erennernrdfin c ie [afternoon, Labor ite ye@terday ,J R. C gadd%hmom real m:ogre:s sfald' o np in in es Ts fihes tand fln iPhadsifore _ ings Wil ; | The Labor members 1 t had before. i ern 1 Vote With Gov. | {12"3' else knewberst#:te"l" wiiak 24 ment Sittewiine + * en a curse to t}.'l iquor had .' Provincial prepared to go the country. He was C l bec.l'etary Make; Contri-- ltraff;%f gfi?e& V\tlgs stop tl';leerugt:g; | ution to 'When he was a another matter | the Debate I'f'}d{:ral affairs srl:e(t]hetoqfeflt'fe into | WitheteRHINP tninieticier tccacie argued that th i0n, | _ Replyi Government P e Provinci | ying , havi cial ibringing in thtg rets};? tCharges t i-?mi'fl"d fiotels to r;ithfi(cil tcl:fe Guor uti ; o 9 i a referendum by ion calling for nere i i;he same with the h?)umor' !| was not a private member limit -- the stocked. It could 'then an act of responsibl soid e 'avantity that 65 ernment, Hon. W e Gov-- | sold. He was critical could _ be neY-General . E. Raney, Attor-- ""]1(39 making money tf)f the.Pro- (Deeiiators 1 in the debate in the 'sx%to'tf;?-(i asked if the Province was ast night, c aking a backw e was anyone to try a vote fthallenged [Y-I}llade money _ on ai'g]:tep when it confidence 'and see if of want of ;Itoc:'l]t% b}f no profit Thgr.B There % 4. P » ., * (0) ment, was responsible I;:ea](s'ovem- Isurely thzd 'If;g'vi';']'lde powe:'isl:da:; 'it aS. his Opinion, And the o 'gi.iVe l:;(flu]zii] powers in reg('he]ati;ould ha\.e [of his depdartment, th f opinion it quor. He was prepa g the sale be 1921 at least » at it would > .hxs utmost the (;Ovcred to back before the Pr(;v,inand probably 1922, "*U(h legislation. . rnment in C Bon on 4 test ccae could get a de-- Control Drug Traffic » ® 3 se as to "vh * Bi¥h26dapp]les to Ontario ether l fQ;I('?Y!}::('th;)a?}ifeogd member made re e debate on the M C eC rug traffic s cCrea 0O« a | a better c : and urged lution is by no means fini ry reso ( Gove ter control. He asked if j C. H inished. Hon | 8i rnment had its ey the | * oward Fergu * s | situation its eyes shut to the L g Son, C')nSeI'Vati ! I)- * .['Ie agr | eader, and H. H. Dew y ve | ioneer that ame{x;\deed witl.l The | Leaa ' -- art, Liberal | made to th ments might be | be re:;' halwe not yet spoken. It will | clared, Wase t(l:;a'l;i A. which, he ae-- | sumed next Tuesday. | _ force he hardest act t \| y A of an o o en-- ICO]'lser\-au'-c Fav That's tx}', ln"th'fi world. I Th avors Resolution. The Gov:x?r'lm"itd uk: n | ere were few i niFlaaas" 1 changes ent should. ma ; l attitude of any of .'}le;")"ses in the ('ouldg exgggt %gt iIE right before kii icept that of a COhSerr\lzftr'nbers' C eni;)rcf, it Dl'opefls. icense Board to Cooke (North ive, J. R. b 2 was a be"e\;er ; E autt clared that he Hvsgvt.xixr;gs). who de-- m';;(})'gt?"flfl tolerant enct?xgglfi,orues' resolution. (A. | M Hankin _ «$ the minorilles rights The one in iners enac) said that, faili "ron-- th: subject t y , failing th % an others o rights more ) amendment, he would e Hill diers. H was the reéturned sol resolution. The onl support the form' e argued that if i c ol r 1 re-- members to speak y two Liberal far and uplift were aora O'Neill (Sou vesterday, John ar the inevitable w préesed foon { ' Cant, Intimaten" Chouthyent , Torun: | fire. 0 fis womething we ain mot duc| * 0), lined u i oron-- o. A8 > quoted figures fr ho C-- Amendment.p ggl;AtndJ the Brackin 't?(')-lohsmtuq of the i&e:fl?aoml}ari- son (Northeast T . Joseph Thomp-- o show the return swi n Union would support bOIt'gnto) said he (lu.l'l'];rn_ ng of the pen-- IM. M. MacBride, amendments e should proc » th * &A OLeed 6A¥ J s s %geaker of the day, ;ino;dy Labor He tfifgt to have a backward e:fe"f is;::'l:g?s 8$endment. The &%%;t ttvt;: about gzgufée';'i';" Drury's renmpx:ki ere Hon. W the H ree discussi and Hon. H. C. Nix ._ E. Raney ouse, and ion in I . H. C. -- thought d_ added _ that cial Secretary. _ B xon, the Provin-- ght it a right he | * oth put that h attitude. _ Af case for the resol put a strong e thought the P ie' _ ALAt odires. LWEst._Tork) is secine! & get a -- resolution which wodld 4e {;iflerendum, an&. will sspagainst a Hgg:::ble to all the meml;»er;')lialé1 ube 1 amendment port the * 1e ly, Th s ; With Mr. Cook + ? e Dominion Gov } « e 2 ov f !the number of supfggr?;: r;hfsolution, f::le];le of '"passing m?fifll}'{','.' (l)xe ac~-- | Iirncrease. The Libemls ;On the Hon ','\?"Ce question, and sai dnutlhei sfi;%rl%gutt}}: resolution are s&';'gfi:'! the. ides WR Rowell was father g;f O k i * ega a M nd 1t wOmgOes over another Weekg fall Mr. Ma.cB%i rding the vote lastl | seem that vin de said: Th | bers of the H most mem-- ce voted 'dry,' * is Pro-- 'their attitudes 0::e ";ish to explain question of tha,ty'toagd there is no | » we s --dGa '_" 'it by a vote. The gla.fis inditating « ;ng his attack on the }Fed Contgnu-, |crowded last night in eries -- were t;nment, he said: "If O el'a,.l Gov-- a division. expectation of ta.:'eeomfel'hProvlncews acce;ttat'iio 3nd of t e dic-- Mr. Raney Heckled. Mr, Rowellejn]t):,??i:nég';,gOVernmenct,l Hon, Mr. Raney. h | :I'i on tha:t, and all hisl fiflto pow--| making his maid . who was really | T en'('is will be advocati emperance | House en speech in | tion. ng his elec-- ' , as his previ the | c~-- | have been brief expl?;us ufterances | "Double--barre f i oaltiant | 00| o foparcmind ectively with Oppos alt ef. | e present y | . He was imem',',','f':;";'{' t<l::-lticianm__ House, he said, pfi;fb ..gefore the | e outset :'fc:led,"dwith the McCreax('))"lb:-e-bar.' tion an esolu-- j se the Sandy Bill. That dou--|