The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

* e eP e e C en P HEAD wnHOUT their constituents every day for nine | or ten months on the question. | Text of Letter. BODY After quoling clauses from the f = Superannuation Act, the letter, sign-- ed by J. J. Morrison, Secretary of n the U.F.O., contains suggestions as follows: "It appears that there is only one course that we, as an In-- lerrmre it us ic ue enc tariag stitution, can follow. Our motto P R says: 'Equal rights for all--special privilege to none.' Superannuation remler May Have tO Get and retiring allowances are class ivi i privileges, as we all cannot be civil Civil Servants Bill Through serv an%s. One of a pair of twins « % may become a civil servant, and W|thout U.F.O. Ald when he reaches the age of sixt» five he will enjoy thigs pension. The sms« es other, an equally good citizen, ANOTHER LET | must, all through his life as a TER OUT taxpayer, contribute to the fund' for the payment of his brother and | o e n esn on 'other civil servants, and }:vhen he | rows old either go to the poor-- Call Goes to U.F.0O. Clubs to house or be kept by his relatives & $ if he has not sufficient to keep | Oppose Superannuation himseif. Is it wisdom for a per manent class distinction to be . Blll . created in this «sountry, especially | by a U.F.O. Government claiming Sermmencay io mevieemntommmmee to be the embodiment of de If Far s yX mocracy ? ; s armer members of the Legis '"We have looked up in the pub lature submit to the views of the lic accounts the number of civil; head office of the U.F.O. organiza--. sc;)rvatnt:at (gt;inv-"it\t')etlln'r lhsx'g;, ; s igal abouts, together wi eir present| tien in Toronto. Ontario may wit--| salaries. Out of sixty--two that we} ness the Drury Government putting| found thirty--five are getting more > through the superannuation for civil| |\ _ than $1,800 a year, and twelve} servants measure with Liberal, ('on-f | :,':.2"?,,':"'{.'8,*53'\%2,3&2fif?g'-'. ?;hg??: servative and Labor backing. | ing provided for in the bill. What; The call has gone out to the Unit--| farmers enjoying such salaries un--, ed Farmer clubs of Ontario request ! "}1,"163' fl!'ft*rsuftyi-i'lw .\'regirs' of agbe ing that they ask their represema-l s S'J;l,?)gor&% |:$) u::' p:folplex'? L:;)ox'ee--e. tives in the Legislature to oppose the , \ _ over, when a man is superannuated | -- bill. 1t is the second time this ses--| |-- at $t2v§°°h.ah oorc oJ Aheg ow €l j T w RX thkgr created which must be fille y a| sion that the U.F.O., through its Sec young man at, maybe, $4,000 per| retary, J. J. Morrison, has stepped | _ year. Therefore. you are paying| into Ontario political affairs. The $6,000 a year to keep the position | * first was on the question of sessional | ?:lendfiim[islg'?' such an act wrong| 4 t 5 @ . ln«?emmties for members. On thai "If ymll) think so, once more we'! point the Cabinet itself was in ac--| ask you to get after your repre-- cord with the U.F.O. organization, sentatt)ivg as q}uickl}yias possiblel; re-- 7 ie 1+ m membering that this is your busi-- lit.hough * majority of the l"["("i ness, andgthat this means of di-- private members were not, because rection of your sitting member is they signed the "round robin" for in the interests of democracy, for P the increase. which our institution stands." Now the U.F.O. nas the daring to | nnnfereannt s appose a measure brought in by A Farmer Cabinet of its own making. | Most Farmer members, not having . expressed any views on the bill when ; ¢ it was last discussed in the House, : may feel free to oppose the meas--. _ nre at the request of the -- U.FP.O + clubs of their riding. TLiberals and 4 Conservatives are already commit ted to superannuation, and, indsed received the bill warmly when it was introduced by the Premier. It will *X be a unique situation in Canadian ' politics if a Government, forsaken » by its elected supporters, should be obliged to depend on the support of an Opposition to get the bill through Labor will support the bill. \| Opposed it Before. &\ J. M. Webster (West Lambton» took the stand during the first debate * on the act which the U.F.O. in its circular letter to the Provincial clubs is taking now. In the House > $ his attitude was the object of -- criticism. Whether or not he will be * reinforced in opposition through the influence of the parent U.F.O. body remains to be seen. i ' Whether it was the Cabinet action % on increased indemnitiee or some-- -- thing beyond that, the fact remains that many Farmer members are o adopting independence of action -- , in the Legislature, even at the cost | of Government prestige. Premier Drury last night would say nothing in reply to the Morrison letter. How-- aver, it may be taken for granted : i s that the bill will not be withdrawn, d nor will there be any change in the a ; principle of the bill. | ! There is a rumor at the Buildings | ' that there may be a bonus in the | indemnity for this session -- of the§ Legislature, and that the increased | x indemnity could then await anotherl ue session, and leave the members to se back to their homes and consult ' ) »