The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

- I ' .. -. - SATURDAY, MARCH l8, $7 YORK MEMBER .. SA YS J. M. WEBS 7 ER _-_----------" 4 Dr. Godfrey and U. F. 0.! even that "sort of thing when}; . . . . _ is not true. He was loath, he said. Man tn Direct Denial In to support l bill in the House. . A few minutes later Mr. Websttsv, House -- Confidential snealimg fraceanusly concerning the . mom \er or 'est York. intimated Records Made Public by théit if he (Mr. Webster) had known V' at was Roing on he might have Hon. Mr. Raney, Doctor "W , "---"--"-"-'""-Tr- I availed himself of the opportunity, Alleges as "m West York member seemed _._____....-__.--. to ha .4 a Province-wide practice. DETE T " Dr. Godfrey asked him if he meant C IVES ACT "preseriptiontr." MEETS OPPO IT _ "Sure," said Mr. TVebatev. S ION "You didn't get it," said Dr. God- ._______.__.._._ troy. . . . "I didn't ask." was the reply. After getting easily through see "You certainly did," said Dr. Got1.. ond reading, Hon. Peter Smith's, hi" trey. to amend the Private eDtectives Am "i has you pardon. I p/s-l"".:.;','),',',,'. struck trouble in Committee of the 21:1' 1,.',rd)l','it,',tf'if; 1r,Tlii,,,i,'7,?,'e"J't' Whole In the Legislature yesterday Ontario who can make that. asser- During the course of the argument don." Dr. Forbes Godfrey, West York. paid Business Not Suffering. his respects to the Attorney-General, A few minutes later Dr. Godfrey iand also got into a brush with J. M gathered that Mr. Webster was intit Webster, CF.O. member for wpst mating that tho doctor's buoiness lbambton had suffered. "The implioation is f . i that my business was disturbed be- - . Hints Coience Abused. . t'a11SP, of the little interfering on the The bill prolides that detectiie' "a" '2? _t11troArtpt2t:,vif"ee/,"r11i', 're,', , , ' . ' .l' es o 's' '. ' . W'.'""" must iegistcr the names of' hail no effect on my business tinan- their employ ees with the Provincial cially or in any other way. You Trttatturer's Department, and it "ac stand up in your place middthrow L, . . ' . e, I a t argued that these records. even jieitnrhtrt,i,eg?1t1',"f2,t.eJ,' as?" 33111 though confidential. might be scruti- rim concerned, ot'el'y word you say is I 2" .ly persons wishing to do t$0., , not true. bs implication or by state- I have had a little experience along' , memp . 3101 lines of certain records. confhien.. Hull. Howard Ferguson led the t{and otherwise, said Dr. God-: Opposition to the bill. vile main- dr°~'- He thoutrht they were confi-i tamed that, by the very nature of 1:?qu but in the Department of the! his business. secrecy was necessary t! orney-General they Were not? for " detective, and the bill was "Hated " conm"T.tul, making that impossible by requiring '12 What were they?" asked Mr him to be registered. Ne wanted 1'ltifi, . to know how secret service men . Hf... new. records of mesa-1p. under the Dominion Government tions. issued in the 'course of til: _iwould come under the bill. practice 96 a physician in Ontario [ i The Attorney-General suggested and ziien out by you to injure me .an amendment to cover the objec- socially, professionally and politi-: . tion, and after some further dis- cally, and for no other purpose,") cussion the bill stood, over. "id Dr. Godfrey. t Hon. Walter Rollo said that the Not at An " .. . bill would protect trades unions , " d y (Party. . from persons sent in by employers l 0 not or one minute w:sh to. and others to obtain the secrets of 0197088 what I home in my innermost meetings and deliberations held by thoughts today. said Dr. Godfrey, union men. l because this is the 17th of March, _.---------- it',"', it might possibly be implicated, in certain quarters that J had been,: :at a party, too, because there are' . ' some men mean enoulh'to insinnuia . Il----------------.-..--.,