The Ontario Scrapbook Hansard

Ontario Scrapbook Hansard, 11 May 1922, p. 3

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Moreover, there was no a, NORTHERN MEN in Pt discussion. as ""331; tft an con were presents OBJECT T 01.3: the "Ours. d by-membe" . 0 bill covers five cla Bin-te-civil. 'r','iu',2',/11'T1V,',fd'g." electrical and mining. ' ' ' The bill sets forth th s residing in Ontario at the 'l/lube/I'?,',', .________. 28881381 of the act, who has f,I'd'/, 2:16 . . . 8.80 n engineering for - Fear Millwrights Will Not Be or more, shall be 'eUflUitvoe £5: Abl t B . . tration with the association with e 0. Ulld m 't.xamination, provided that he f,'.?,! Woods duces proof within one. year otpthe. passage of the act f . J' .. Tpl,"eati,,oenri O following Such~ _ u e penalties ' wt , mm id t CLOSE CORPORATION '? person. not being 'r')2ite,t.it,1iata,'yer, ________ 2,e,r,.elie'i, ot the association. on li- After a. discussion in the Commit- iii1iiifii' y the association, who (a) too f h , .1068 as a professional engineer- 0 t 0 Vi hole House which lasted (.b' usurps the functions of a Notes, nearly all the afternoon, the Legis- :wvtthli engineer; to) uses a title or lature yesterday decided to send V that stealth? will lead to the belief back, for further consideration by ,I(d) Jl,',etr"ti.e.,,Ti2ei/r"'e1, singing"; a. special committee. the act intro- ;sional engineer: (ey iGii in Bathe: duced by A. W. Gray, Conservative J/al',"',,':,',,',?.,,,,':?,'"', 'Om'lhe belief that mem ..: , . ' ( o the ome t her for Leeds, respecting pro g to. act as a professional Jnflf,'h"lro-r essional engineers. ' will be liable to a tine of not less The act incorporates the Astioci-I Egan."°° nor more than $200 for atlon of Professional Engineers of; ' l e 1t'rt Offense. and to a fino of not the Province of Ontai l ess t an $200 mm more than $500 r o. and the for any subsequent offense. salient feature of the bill is Section Sub-sections (al and, (bi were the 34,, which provides that any person.) 1"ltei',mtthtGenne)ay1"iy,'J. from the' not being registered as a member 'to let the other sla/i2dvlLT"""""' . of the association. cannot practice - . 1 as a professional engineer, nor usurp the function of a professional ' '. engineer. This part of the bill did t not meet with the approval of the Attorney-General. He said he though the engineers should be con- . .'. tent this session with an act that provided a penalty for a person practicing as a registered engineer when he was not in fact a, registered engineer. He was not so sure that " power should be given at this stage to prohibit a person from follow-, ing the profession at all because he: _--------- was not registered in the associ-) . ation. I Chief Inspector's Name Is (lop, New Brunswick. l . . Hon. Howard Ferguson. Conser-l Brought Into Investigation vativo Leader, said he did not think there was any use in setting up iii by MGCUtcheon standard for engineers ita. man could , .-.-..----r. _ go ahead and follow the profession " l as he pleased. Mr. Ferguson Bug- . TELLS OF ONE FRAME-OP"!; gested that the penalty clauses tor ___._______,. _ practicing, as now lincorporated in F T the New Brunswick bill, be placed tor another two and a half hours in the Ontario bill, instead of the yes erday the Public Accounts Com-' ones now there. Il "Seal an mittee of the Ontario Legislature lis- amendment to this e ect, ut ater 'tened to details of . . withdrew it when it seemed to be an A t Ontario Temper- the wish of the House that the b ce C administration as supplied special committee that had consider- Y II. H. McCutcheon, former oper- ed the bill should consider it again, . ator in the department, now serving hearing the representations of fl a Jail sentence tor conspiracy At sincere, and their arguments against yesterday's ses . . - the objections to the bill revealed! b tnon the witness by the discussion yesterday in the rought the name of Rev. J. A. House. l, Ayearst, Chief License Inspector, Another clause that /gi,turtt,tc";i,,,!," prominently forward, claiming Mr actions was one prov1 , 'i . :lOl'is to which the act did not apply. I Ayearst had given character evi- These. briefly, are: on any mining; dence for a several times convicted work: works. plants and appliances 2 bootleggcr, who now boasted that he l cgnsttxcttgdfoonthlgrégfiléeuslgggsrgtnbel j could get money from Mr. Ayearst'sl o n _ _ hteof the owner and his domestic es- 1 office any time he wanted it. :ablishment; construction on ,"/,1'Jt'ii, 'I'Nbe Ayearst's Orders. n other than a man's pr " e i :igyDeci'ty to a value not exceeding' i, _McCutcheon told also of a, pecu- " 000 and in construction of town- l liar order he had received from Cap- Iiii, I4mm, Under this act a regis- 1 Elm Collinson of the department. tot-ed engineer would not, by law. be L I was told," he said, "to investi- required to be employed on such. gate orders Bent by Mr. Ayearst to . tr have carloads ot liquor moved up . wor . _ ' . the track. I was told to find out Northern Men Object. what I could a out certain orders Members from the North spoke given by Mr. Ayearst to have car- strongly concerning these exceptions. loads of liquor moved up the track--- 7 Mageau, Liberal member for Stur- whether to be hitched on to another 'eon Falls. was particularly active in train or unloaded. I do not know, T his opposition He held that this but that was the information I re- would prohibit the employment of ceived to work on." _', mmwrights in the building of saw- o.----) gave that order? ill! and planing mills, etc., thus I A.--Capt. Coilinson. in the pres- m kin a hardship, There was also lance of General Elliott. "Quinton among many members , His other reference to Mr. Ayearst _ tf,'h' notwithstanding the exception! 'was a statement that the Chief " is 'm' act "practical" engineers. License Inspector had given char- V m t e , l 'ears' experl- actor evidence for a, man named who had had severa l uSlavin tte h h d b t who did not wish to rezls- a er e a een convicted once. bu ociation would Be de- six or seven times for selling liquor, , _ tor in the Mishei calling and the Chief Inspector himself had barred fromF 'd members scented . seized 60 or 70 gallons out of his V Some Tr. . f another "close cor- garage. "But he still gave charac- the creation 0 bill and were franks 'ter evidence for him," said Me-, pontion In the ' f - :Cutcheon. "He said he was a, decent Lt ly skeptical that it in any way BA e iman n minded the interests of the public. I .

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy