The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

_ __ AA". . Id," . IC?. 'yt, .. T "\ ___._._._______ (---., SA ru RDA Y, MARCH igviiir-igzzi t ' ' . believed he was as e ' nd thit (ironN. ffhrrt-...,14,tig; the case was but another instance 'Huron B. (U.F.O.) ........; 15'615' of the necessity for the adoption of Kenora (Lab) ... ... .r. . -. 12'3"! _ l ts',',',' "Blue Sky" law now before the 'fd/f, E. (U.F.O.) .'....... 193m ome- ent W. (Lib.) 'o...-.-.... ' b l? CEMENT GONGER After examining the prospectus, Kingston (Con.) . . . . . t . . . . 3393:, Hon. G. H. Ferguson declared that Lambton E. (U.F.O.) ...... 15'381 F , the company had not lived up to Lambton "W. (ll.F.O.) ,,,-. 35'241i r the provisions of the Ontario Com- Lanark N. (U.F.O.) ..,,A.o' 14'529 ( panics Act with reference to the Lanark s. (17.1.9.0) . .. . . . . . ii/iii filing of definite details ot the inter- Leeds (Con.) . . . . . . . . . . .. 17:04:18 ests held by the directors, and that Lennox (Com I.-.'.'.".".'"..'.' iiiiii' An I -"--.---. 313:3 "in: le, been grossly violated." :{j'nchln (Lib.) . ' . .. ..-.. . .". iii',iiii' 5 e to remier Drury'tr promise on on (Lab.) . . . .. . . . . . . , , gyzes Prospectus and ot investigation. If necessary and ilft?ht1,1e1i,n (U.F.O.) .. ... $2322: . . D089 hie. sad the Premier, acti n . lesex E, (13,1110 . .. "i' CL, remfer thwy Promises would be taken under existing leg?s_ Middlesex N. (U.F.0.} . l".: 3:1}: to Investigate lation. tfid,ttr/ixpJi,,/)H'e.t q... 13,1'io'; -------- " Per Cent. for Selling, Says Curry. Niagara Falls iLiri l: . . . . . . 19,437 i DEBAT Ate explained by Mr. Curry, Nipisslns (Lib.) T.1 l .... gages; E m LEGISLATURE $1,20ih000 of the $3,000,000 stock Norfolk N. (unto; HT" 'hri'yy ._____/__ his? been tutrned 1'over to one indi- Norfolk S. (U.F.O.) .. . , . . . ii',ii"i; v ua n re urn or an int rest Northumh . ' . I Sweeping criticism of the methods the now defunct Ontario eCemehrt ' i'e'r1il1,ygtglt','d fi,.Rfif).', yl:ip/ Iand terms of the flotation of the To- gambit); Two other individuals Ontario N. tU.F.thy . . . . . f." 15:420 .3": Cement Corporation, ma. in 'c'tr1rt2tJofu/t,t.""gt,ft,1,2t'hey/,reiinnt.: 8353;? , an .'..r.... 31,074 r e (miniature yesterday afternoon der of the stock. Another turree- Ottawa W. (cont? . ..-. .. iWlf/l esuited in a declaration by Premier ment called for the payment of 7 Oxford N. (U.F'.O.l ..:_:::' 25%;? Drury that the affairs of the corn- Stagsglté '")pieitu/inet'mt/,', the sarsne in- feft2 S. (U.F.O.) . . . . . . . . 22:235 1)::th0uld be investigated and that east Toronto also quotead {form 21112.12: Parry ast,/fiiohln; l: .. . ' . . . 46,398 the Cf arter would be revoked should ter from the Michigan Securities, Peel (Com) . . .. . .. . . . . . £3,300 actio actsr of the case Justify such Commission which described one of. Perth N. (Lib.) . . , , . . . . . . ' "€261 ized n. he company has an author.. the men behind the company as "a Perth S. (U.F.0 ) .. . . . . . 1 , 1 J sclry'),t,',',1, ot $8,000,000. typical promoter." and declared that Peterboro' E. (UFO / . . . . ig'784i ro . . Curry (Liberal, Southeast To- he had been prevented from selling Petenboro' W (Latin: .... . ,648 i nto) raised the question by quot- certain stock in the State of Port Arthur iCtln )' ...... "'28" vilgekflrom an article in a Toronto Michigan. Prescott (Lib.) . ', .'.-... :23? I CO Y paper, which stated that the "The company is so loaded down," Prince Edward (bib 'y' . . . . . ii'. g I" mpanyf'; stock was so heavily he said. "that there is little chance Rainy River (Con l: .. . .. '806 watered that its flotation w a of success. The ion ole sh . e T . "...... 11,636 mpnace t as . l l 9 ould be Renfrevs N. (L.F.O.) . .. . . 23 889 If _ o the public. The member put on their guard with regard to -Renfrew S. (U.F.0.) . ' l or Southeast Toronto analyzed the the matter." Riverdale (ind) ..q'... iT/P/l Eggpany s prospectus and declared "High Pressure" Sal Russell (Lin, -. . , , , . . . . . . . 332:: ( tion' 31nd" the terms of incorpora- C . ".'s" d esmen. St. Catharines (Lao): , I' "_" . iiiCiiii' !ttt ' e company could not possibly ontinuing, Mr. Curry stated that Sault Ste. Marie (Lab t . ' . . 'ltltl if 1t?tteed Unless the consumer was the ff"W",T had advertised recently Simcoe c. (r'.F oh . .... iii'. I Tic! to pay dearly for cement. in the Lnited States for "high pres- Simcoe E (Lab j' . - . . . . . . - .384 . M This view Was upheld by M. M. Sure saleSmen," He understood that Simcoe S.- l'U.F.O l . . . . . . . 3320' B acBride (Independent Labor, South _ a ttonsiderable number of these Simcoe w. (Cont. _ , _ 7.. . . 17:57g ISanta). who said that he had in- liliesmen were now in Toronto. Stormont (Lib.) ... (ii'. sln%"l {germ time the affairs of the con- rcssed for a definition of "highi Sturgeon Falls (Lib.) . . "..'.',', {[229 :thenTwhich is being taken over by 'EiII-gmgiigd igletsmenr» tht sneaker Timiskaming (Con.) _.'.".'.'.' iii'iiiiir "Th Tlily company, and added: 'whg i id a the) were individuals Toronto N.E. (2 Cons.) _ . . .. iii'iiiii' h ey ave either got to fleece the 1" con sell stock in one inter- Toronto N.W. " Lib. 1 ' _ B areholders or fleece the public." ":12, :chout Kiving the prospect Con.; _ . .. .. ..... . . . . . gg 324 Opposes "Pmorvinq." cure telviccoe'."'ider the matter or se- Toronto SE ll Lib., 1 Con.) iiii'irG tog. Ihi"tle ff.h"pee,'cit.,t/vt Kings- _ buggeglier 1yrury---A professional $3631}: 2"; if.(F2'.CI)4)bs': . . . . 12:33: . . ewart (Liberal, 0 er. Vict i S. '.7 '. --... . . ' Southwest Toronto) raised vigorous l Mr. Curry-Well, you might well Watglgo jv/fi,'fi,f'i" . . .. . .. $3.895 protests against the action taken by say that. On the face of it, it is Waterloo S. (Lao) w-....... 33'698 Mr. Curry in airing " complaint on labsolutely impossible for the Com-. Welland (Lib ) . . . . . . . . . 3 ,568 the floor of the House. Mr. Dewart l pany to sell cement at a price which Wellin ton E: (Lift)- * . . . . . L896 glaimed that no member was insti- would have been possible if the 1vl4hil'rl'lt"lf, Si (Car) .i .... $3.332 theidhm pillorying" directors who company had to pay dividends onlyl Wellington 'iir.'"/icrrir'.d.r.) {2'733 '/ll'itlt. not be cognizant of a ..."... inJll.odWroaict/1,t'o1Lig1.c"t'itt1 This iii mm... N. (we, C] "ii'i.'iiiii . . C on, - _ . o e e . ' Wellington Hay, Liberal Leader construction will not be 1'htt'e11d'"ii'i,, leergoci'ng'me l(U'F:O:: "h 'it:il'l/l ffhunti1toynetdh2e Biol," against the Jic. 2i,/rlni",hgg, has to pay such ex- York E. (Con:i ..o.e..-...q nigg- a criticism of charter d , . rces. York N. C" . . '_-'...... , . Companies might preludica 'Ira",',',',',',?, f "ml." Drury-The Government . York TV. ((8311:) l..." .-. . _ . $2,083 ' for legitimate success. If there were has "(meg under Section 29 of the I C The P . . .. . V .. 1,509 l tr.tt.ryPr,ri..P?, they should be inves- Ontario Companies Act to investi.. ar . remler and the Government tigated by the Government, and if gate and revoke the charter. The Te m a rather awkward predica- 'df/il".'"' the charter should be dam mittgctzvilal he investigated. and if ment on the redistribution issue. '"lit '0 revocam'm re sutheient to justify a Should they do nothing but try out r. urry met his critics on th 1 ' we will not hesitate to proportional represent ti ow . e r take that acti tl on in To- ed gfsgouggé stated that he had act-, the moral is otnrie "hut 1meantime! ronto they will be faced with the consideration; that he} "Blue Sky" law. SS y for a, moat Vigorous opposition the Con- ,. m servativeg can put up, and postribly mv s' _ one or two Toronto Liberal mem- , . ..\ he: bets pay add their objections in an I .1, 'il , 4-13,"; , equally impressive manner. As has I vJciriCrt'jr'riai'i'i'd . I..." "been Pointed out previously, the UBBN S PAmg _ Ilil, 'ij, if,liiiial.r 1dp1fdfde, in his"? do... not . " J, KW, MRa l any .. . . members F r Ilii 'illi[; 1W" " RB! i because th ' t £118 Government is now believed -. JLiaatCSSbttt8aeEiB2e, 'system are ',uf,'t'efi'ltittttt',','1' aging: o 1'.'""iouslsrrerturssti over th totals are from the l .iWhOlesaio desertions from the question of redistribution U e census, and have 'heft Federal .lT.F.O. platform on P.R. are in sight a_few days ago it was almost p to ably since the last Provi consider.. (titt it Comes up in the House. For , We" determined that the pr den" "0": The list follow3- ncial elec.. thitt matter, the same thing may be tional representation ex opor-. "lama" (U.F.o ) . Bald of Liberals, though possibly would be tried in ';lt'hn't'J"tiigneet, 3g%?%(Ltb.) . . ...: . "Ne i3,324 not to the same extent. Should the other ehantres attempted, H01") Brant s. (EDP-'0.) ..,-. C: 233:9 Government bring in a general re- ever, the feeling is now w- BrockVill nd. Lab.) ...": 33-2 5 distribution measure it will likely that there must be tTowing Bru e (Lib.) . . . w , , " be open to the err d trib ti a general redis- Ce N. (TJ.P.d , ' -~-e 17.861 8 man or charge, th u on all over the Province it Bruces: (Lib.) . N.,..,_, 13,921 because no redistribution was ever e next Legislature is to be re r (133ch Mr. (Libj ... .-._ ..- . .. 14,21g enacted that pleased all parties. genital" of pttblie opinion. 1:13; e- 'deerte, (II-Fol Ifj"*ii 15.267. Then main. if nothing is done the ar ly be ascertained " yet 11:11 Dung!" (Ind. Lib.) I ..q 21.795l figures above indicate in themselves i???" this "in" haw is held T, 'tilll(lifl'lilg)r) ......QH £2139 l gisrrrmamter ot greater prover- in . . circles. because the probie Purhain E . (to; . . ... .-. q ":30: none than has yet faced the electors s more or less a personal one GR Durham iii (1350.) ...... ii,'iii'ir' of Ontario. Premier Drury and each member'_ The" Governing? Eltptn E. (find; '*--..., iii,'iiil' most of his Cabinet come trom that (',,",gfgee hesitate to exNew silly 1tt, w. (IT-Roi) ".diy.:7 17,306 politieal stock to whom representa- 1' 'IJ/hat, Present. in view ot the fit1'l'i' f (use) ~31 . .'. 27.678 tion by population ever has been a prom sh declaration of the Pre.. no" 'u'filfd'i,1,Ti) .....;j" i"hhq fundamental belief. What will the as: 1qthct,ttlt, in the an... f,iiir1ti'iilli'alltuy).o/ ~- r" his Premier do? . toar "lath Glen " We- ' lations of Ontario riding; at: gofll- ih'eiXthai'rg,'i,?y)o' - ' . r," .: 233.3: Incidents Yesterday. pressed home day one Birttt Grey C n.) ....,. . ' A ' Several little lucid T . r day a d . (U.F.o) , 18,s44 , ants in 'ester- the glaring inequalities AGI; t: grey N. (IT-Roi) 9-. ...... '? 16,250 :days House proceedings may have imperative need of redtatrtt, 9 ray s. (U.F.0:) . , . . e e ' . . , 22,405 I some political interest. a W W th mostc . l utton to Hammad "'--.. .. 20 idifi 1d q . id- e .e,181ee1.itiea1FiiTsiit Halton (U IJuno.) ... . 2 .396 . e (U.F.0.. North Ontario) _ In the column below The G . Ham" . .O.) 'o.... ... 0,tto introduced a private bill tor th T lobe ton B. (Ind La .-.., 24,399 1 -tit ' a tel- gives e population ot the Ontario Hamilton W. iUiit, b.) ,. . " 00 ow ember, to amend the Munici- ridintps, togather With th Hastings E. .) .,..-, 3 ' 4 pal Act. Aa the time li p - in population More Truff/f? o'.."".,'"'.: his - - " "vim. he w... . . - . o a . . ' o l . _ - . ' '"'oo... 16,669! If _-wr.....-- - . _