The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

March 9 n leerin mieeenesinrmnmmmencmmmrinings Second--Hand Mattresses. , The other bill which occasioned | I most discussion was that, also spon-- $ | | sored by Mr. Tweed, which would } | | prohibit the use of second--hand mat-- | | f tresses or bedding material from hos-- | pitals or sanatoriums in the making j ' }mt; PUP'LS LLS TWEED BILL of new mattresses, and compel any | new mattresses made with second-- l l l hand material from other sources to be so labelled. | * HT lN BlLL NTARIO HOUSE "With the low cost of new material * 1 it should not be necessary to use old -- I ie omm Simorimmommmmmmmmmmmy mattresses. It is a very filthy prac-- % s s z. . tice," said Mr. Tweed. | _ Sinclair Favors Setting New _ Would Change Qualifications |,, "Would not it be possibe to do ts + . .3 this by departmental regulaticn?" Limits of 6 and 15 for Nominees to Munici-- aorpi fithres Sbjuide (Conservative. i ne). | Years pal Offices "The local Boards of Health have e s . e s power," replied Hon. J. M. Robb, Minister of Health,. OPENS FREE DlSCUSSlON MATTRESSES D'SCUSSED ' "I have received a letter from the Local Council of Women on this mat-- fovge in mm Soemmmnmnmmemmmmensmmeme ter," said E. F. Singer (Conservative, Children may not attend school Qualifications for candidates seck-- sltu Aifidrgxr'ii)c}pml, ar'?*hl;l {'?('.gfr.;?f ftrrz(; -- until the age of 6, instead of the ng municipal office are to romain as that when they buy mattresses they # minimum age of 5, as at present. and at present, the Legislature decided | Are buying a blm? article. They E may leave school at the age of 15, . |yesterday in defeating, without a vote, . | SA S ODOD i} to See what is in J This where the adolescent age is now 16. the Pill sdonfored by S. C. Tweed: 's'&trgt?i}ecelsnnfnh(t"h;lg lzfledgflui/.'so;}émer | if bills being brought forward by Lib-- :,.l:lb'i{al]' A\Jiterloo , North) _ which inconsistent," stated Dr. Robb. "The eral House Leader Sinclair pass the ,'1; inte rondered it necessary fo"| |first clause says that no mattrosses Ontario Legislature. The possibilitv o none c'a ndidates to have an income ol from hospitals or institutions be used of changed statutes is containsd in proper'y assesement of $500 in cities| (| ind the second says that where sec-- notices of motions presented vyester-- o oooeis, Abd §000 in vilages Of| | ond--nand materiai is used, then it day by Mr. Sinclair, who seeks amend-- tcf'msmp"' To Earl Hutchinson. the | must be stamped. The qfim"'on arises ments to the Public School Act: the Esi.xgle Lapor member of the House.[ as to what is se.acond-har{gi"m.'atv"riai~ 2cd€lescegt alr;d School -- Attendance g:;f;t' %'; :gg mfiinmcrtefét for the dis--| |1tt is true that when we see an old . and the High Schools Act. e manner, | t ing r he street d Changes in the last--noted statute Aiter Mr. Tweed had explained the| Igriltésr?ss ag(;lexétl,ingogfnabltx{x):'reimi-;u"ulg would provide that a fee be charged :;umose of the bill, Hon. William Fin--| i maintain the ones fro'{l t'né '1;)\._ those pupils, known as repsaters, who |laveon. speakinz for the Government, pitals, if they are injurious to health fail in final examinations and must 'ad".'."'.wd t.her.g migzht be some merit | or ar,e unsanitar shou'("i~ not be m continue at high school another year | to it in prinsiple, but took issue with the hospital * § * or more. ' the manner in which the clauses T PiWAi-- 4 [ '"Fmere nas been a demand from were framed. Mr. Hutchinson then | No Worse From Hospitals. ' several school boards throughout the rose, and, after telling how it would "In hospitals, one patient follows lprovmce for changes in the ag« bar certain worthy citizens from another with all kinds of diseases. , |llm1ts. Mr. Sinclair explained to The aspiring to office, claimed that its But the hospitals know how to take _ \Globe. It was felt on one hand that passage would provide ammunition care of the mattresses. I maintain children started to school at too ten-- | for agitators. When the bill was those from hospitals are not any y der an age,. and, on the other, were | put for its second reading, it was worse than those from homes." forced to remain in school a year lost in a chorus of dissent. Investigation in the State of New B :Jc;'e't'ee rthtel'il:nedv';'::ug:cessary (e Cot | o Resiore SGus Lfleatiotts. T3 Yiy 511}?? 'nltmt,%t Sufc e legisladtiqn : * | & * ; was ve cu enforce, and in f The Liberal Leader added that his | ,M'-' t'r\\de:(cii explained that the bl»" no caseryhad there been a conviction bills would provide for a free discus-- was infended to restore property quai-- from a public health standpoint ; sion of the age--iimit problem which 'mcatlon; i efrecth'about. a decade "The Minister of -- Health -- ap-- ' has vexed many of the educational . |88° A"4 persons holding municipal | zons it from a legal rather than authorities. office would have some property and the point of view one might expect, Of course, in changing the adoles-- stake in the municipality. that of health," stated W. E. N. Sin-- cent age limit from 16 to 15 years it Mr. Finlayson agreed that at one clair, Liberal House Leader. "He ad-- would not mean that pupils would time a property qualification was mits that it is not a very nice thing be forced to leave school when they _ necessary, but it was then changed |to think of, but relies on the bac-- arrived at the new age limit. There that residence was sufficient. But teriologist. I do not imagine any one was nothing to prevent them from the way the bill was framed, he said, of them chased up an old mattress continuing on, say to the age of 21; removed the provision that a person with germs to see if all were elimi-- the change moerely provided that they being a taxpayer in the municipality, nated." must continue until they were 15. mit living within five miles from its After considerable discussion, Dr. excepting where otherwise provided border, might qualify. Mr. Tweed ; Robb said Mr. Sinclair was arguing in exceg!.i_.__ons 'fn.dff_.tp.' ack._ stated that this was not his inten-- Ifrcm a health standpoint. tion s Is Sent to Committee. 64 l nmmenrmemmrnnammencmert for'l;'l'lgrcpr'&c'i'mg% 5ks bul Apfoers | 'There was considerable difference U. OF T. CONSTRUCTION the Minister of Lands and Forests. of opinion, both as to the bill éu'ad the 1.3 "But my friend does not want to Jsxtuatlon the bill was intende to '98MR 193132 reco:mizg the tenant'classi. I'hisfwmixld ' ;cg(r:gct, D%l'ilfgéi gg;oéttfi;rilgb"b%t;n%r:z # * | P | * A s '79599"0 of This CaP'tal 'fg 1')9a3c1k"t° the quaifications :of JBrI0F been brought into the House, and * both times it has been found impos-- | } | Amm"'.t From Founda-- Scen As Direct Slap. | | sible to translate it into legislation," | tion Funds "This bill should be killed here,"| | he said. "While, in a way, I favor| se atmmamamee m mmgaces s a said Mr. Hutchinson. "It should not| | the bill in principle, it goes too far. |__Total capital construction cost for go any further. In a railroad town | | I think it should go to the committee University of Toronto buildings in the many officials move in, but they 'dO for consideration." And so it went to years of 1931 and 1932 was stated in not know how long they will be able| | the committee. . ; the Ontario Legislature yesterday as to stay. They serve on Hospital and Second reading was given to a Cxt;; $989,216. The information came from Library Boards, buf, this would pre-- of Toronto bill, _mtroouced by E. }:: Attorney--General Price, in answer to vent them from sitting on Councils| | Singer, to amend the {*.ssessmept Act | an inquiry of C. 4. Robertson (Liboral, because they do not own property. I| |so that persons residing outside of Huron North). A feature of the reply am in favor of prohibipng Eenants | Ontario, who have to pay income tax, &brought out the fact that of the ex-- who have not paid their rent from | | would Have to pay the tax in the mu-- * |pended amount $795,940 was provided holding office, bqt not those who have l ' niclpahuy'where it was eax:ned. Mr:. from various foundation funds. Th paid it. This bill is a direct slap at || Singer said this was. to take Ca{e.(:x E. C. Whitney bequest provided $490,-- the better class of tepant. . | ! an omi.fsion_ in the gxesgnt act, w m_c:1 138; the Rockefeller Foundation "It is not a good thing to stir up ! | d'id not stxpplate \\h.exe such ta.\«E $188,732, and the Massey Foundation any more agitation, and I believe this|| would be paid. It was sent to the and Hart House Fund $117,070. would throw a contentious 'qlxcit-l?ln ' ' Mtlxiniclpal Coxgmxt.tee. R,athgr a Hon. Leopold Macaulay answered J. into the hands of the agitators, ei descate dmatter!,n sax_d Mr._mnl_a;.?on. A. Sangster (Liberal, Glengarry) to . | concluded. . ervative, Wind--|| another City of Toronto bill spon-- the effect that the cost of removing |\ _F. W. Wiison (Conserva l"o.ld hn ' o4 D F'r'};l {){ oronto bi fD; iA snow from Highway No. 2, Windsor, | sor Fast) agreedhthat it \;nou 1tna¥>% %o: o ngal )e AtcBrlen t(Con?erw'nfn, to the Eastern Ontario end was $15,-- en mc / "Mic. a'nda id it "hadl ,-:'fmentes in preseg-l f on'.t%cal. es Abe during the present winter. 'The . |the fact that Mr. Tweed Sait 16 had || PMoveeni y is ce drides and would contract was let on a day labor basis, |the endorsation of i mmaril de}-' not have to co tribr tmes w Mrighy and the firms paid only when there }n"%lpalmes' i o t ! the lanes ar:orxlxc;tf go;stigegeg cigs the m mtg:t tooerertmi 'ove'a'l';'g:,'agggsex"";g: eRISE petitions for or against the lane. Chief matle when the contractors had uL) Justice Ross had recently ruled that stand by tlfle{hwiire inrt;ggsted parties, as som® 7 c o. eir pro y might have to be "They would hdave t.o s;tatngagz with taken, and their namgs must be con-- umbrellas these days," sho Lib-- sidered. This bill also will go to the eral House Leader Sinclair. committee.