« P f e ° i Moge = M 9 M w * s C & I .:.*v\__'n Prap Wakes f M P 7# *J s F March 3 . 4 culture declared. The simplicity 0.; | the proposed bili, he contended, was ' one. of its advantages. Colonci Kemnnedy briefly reviewed 8 J the Provincial dairy situation before i dealing with the proposed legisiation.: | Terming milk a unique food because , & of its importance and easy contamina-- I seppmameienimmems it.ion. ::':fik Minister stated the Prov-- * # nce's producers were also uniqu>; Evel'y Person Handllng com'lhe mentioned the two world records . Government Also Denies He A H 3 for production of milk and butter--fat . _modity Must Hold BORPU'S | which are held in Ontario f is English Firm's Rep-- '.l n 8 Answering questions from William P cense iNewman (Liberal, Victoria North), resentative # Memdiee e mm .Cololgel olfennedy g;&:;d the new act would not superse e present milk *«--~«mmotacas 4€6 ""| laws. _ A. H. Acres (Conservative, STAB l" THE DARK Carleton) averred the bill would pro-- GOSTS OF SETTLEMENT t ote-- en tec:d tl;e cheese factories now threat-- enb terarmaienn iitororainrnerts Hon. T. L. t ist en y the sale of milk to. large nntouiture. l;,pmfd'{us'\m{i "Goun. | cities. Opposition efforts to show that in-- trol bill yesterday to a Legislature| surance on Hydro buildings was held :emmcly fated tg deal mainly wl*t'h i ty a Hydro Commissioner came to aoh wideh the Minisicr Aumilied was nought yesterday, when the Govern-- something new in the annals of the ment formally denied that Maguire ?'mm'f;i was forecast ?y r;qg?tts and Cannon hold any of the busin@ss or opportunity for dsbate, Maguire i r made just before adjournment, by :o:.ue.s,uo:. m ;x:ien y t'fd:ift'texz Hon. Harry C. Nixon and Clifford Case * -- _ As+ 6 yeaully a » (Conservative, York North). was C. Alfred Maguire, Ontario Hydro > co}:élmxe pl;'yol thf 1?1';?0&2(' li:lw' Commissioner. In further . uestions, nn expla , provides j ; R W that & one 1 lling fluid milk in the Opposm'on'reae.»ed & z-'egame Ontario must hold a license from the answer to whether Mr. Maguire was board established by the act. The the Canadian representative of the legislation will not regulate prices, * Roeyal Insurance Company of Liver-- the Minister pointed out, but is de-- pool, Englan .ompany, signed to prevent bootlegging and the said Mr. Cooke, Hydro had $546,893 undercutting of prices. The latter was ir insurarce through Ontario agents, termed one of the greatest evils in | end the promiim pa'd was $2,691 per ( e ariolt®. ! * s roth t ial subject raised -- nother controvers § ECt raise To Bring Parties Together. } in «n Opposit.on question was the Oolonel Kennedy warned against | oase of one Newton--White, who al-- | any suspicion that inefficient pro--| legedly syndicated articles to Norihern | ducers and distributors would be shel. i papers boosting the land--settlement tered at the expense of the consumer.| scheme. Hon. William Pnlayson, To sum up the proposed bill, he stat-- ' Minister of Lands and Forests, admit.-- ed: "The whole thought is not one of ted in reply to a qusstion by T. P. having a constable or policeman over Murray (Liberal, Renfrew North) them, but of bringing togsther the that Mr. White was an employee of three parties: the farmer, the distrib-- the iepartment between May 12 and utor and the consumer." lus June 12, 1933. The department un-- After admitting that "there was no derstco that during hs service he C | background" for the new law, which did furnish certain articles to nows-- i he labelled "more or less a stab in papers. the dark," the Minister described sim-- The whole question of settlems=nt on ilar legislation in other countries, clt-' Northern land was raised in a third ing England in particular. Although | Opposition question,. Mr, Finlayson enthusiastic about milk control in the' stated that 356 heads of families had British Isles, hs declared, "Their been placed on homesteads in the ; troubles are just the same as our North. Of these, 315 were still there | troubles, but their solution will not fit and fulf.lling the settlement duties| Ontario." One reason for this was expected of them. The land required advanced in the Minister's figures for the project totalied 27,665 acres.{ | showing that the English proportions and of this area 2,976 acres had b:en | f of fluid and "manufactured" milk w'thdrawn by the Government. Total | were almost the reverse of the Ontario expenditure was $153,919, with $11,861 | figures. ga;'idi:y the Dominion, $87,166 by the ; Simplicity Deemed Advantage. ovince, ancd $5,489 by the muni--| Legislation in many other countries P rov l oo wike, apresien ons _ . ! has gone too far, the Minister of Agri. * nce were expecied shorlly.