The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

March 4 f f Pending Parley 1.071 Beer Parlors g | w o_ s # At Their R 1 Remain in Ontaric ' 179 Clubs Also Sell Beer, epburn Asserts ___ twisawe is n es formed _ & we--------___--_= | All Documents Pertaining to Hydro Contracts According to returns tabled in the! i i i Ontario Legislature yest . j to Be Tabled in Legislature--Third Mem-- Ee e . yosinday. .. in k . & answer to questions placed on the| ber of Commission to Continue Debate order paper by Willian Duckworth and J. F. Hill, Conservative members, mpunourascanet is licenses for sale of beer and winc he Al # hav I N 4 4 EPRESENTATIVES of the Quebec power companies fotets aand sls qlube since w o will be received at Queen's Park within three or beer was legalized last July. Of that four days number fifty--three hotel authorities ays. were cancelled, and afterward fifteen This turn in the Hydro contract wheel was announced 'i'.;s"h'::'rc'"";fie;;f;"a"wd d'_"h"n prem-- last night by Prime Minister Mitchell F. Hepburn. The Liquor . Control Board's resulations Premier said that the representatives of the power com-- Six club licenses were cancelled, four panies would have opportunity to confer with the entire of them because of evasion of the Cabinet board's regulations and two because * the quarters were found not to qualify "At Their Invitation." C un:er the regulations. ; | t me led F "At their invitation," he answered hotels wg;fl}?nlyorlii)i;;'g'f Lki;gmq when he was asked if the move had authorities are operating b(\',.e.{.;'fg come from the Government or from rooms beca MMetv--six : . the companies. There had already ne,:'sthcir ?ffc,;;gs"t"' ;T,Sfidn': I';gim'): es Do eR 'tmaetks for a sonfar-- of clubs dispensing the beverage i: Icn' the House the Premier informed [ ie O r 20 hiter of the omiginal nc« -- UMGG. Leo poid Macatiay 1 Conservagl:cy f;lr;icms of authorities did not renew # & & h » m' Rt o Sn se ons hoh amin «o5 ie mapas * * a t es of the agents of by the Ontario Hydro Commi.ssion \\jxll the various firms. The preii;in fi:d?- ?:tug?ctegdat;e{or'crh:s 3';';'"& 1:;)3';56' j cated in the majority of cases there * s were no agents. All orders a: ay-- however, the Premier stated, which | lMMl lNIl I IY | ments arcgmadc b.'..l t%:ebr;a';d'ddg;'c: g::lecgzggm;?iii might not be able to | to the manufacturers. ; ay. | Wants No Delay. } MAY BE AMENDED The Conservative member Geclared | t himseilf as satisfied with the Premier's | iIcl: i ' promise, but stated that he could see )Roebuck DlSllkeS Denlal i no reason for délay in the matter as | i the documents had formed the basis | of Suit for Tort of the Attorney--General's lengthy ad-- | dress on Hydro affairs. ' P m o s \ _ *"Unless," Mr. Macaulay declared, { AME&D::&:' 0" them::n;:rh::" ' | "the Government still desired to secure ored rule denying of § ' information from these documents." | against the Crown is a matter | _ At today's "night session" the third | Queen's Park consideration. ' | member of the Hydro Commission is ' Raised during yesterday's debate, scheduled to take part in "debate" in |the legal matter is involved in & i the person of Hon. T. B. McQuesten. , |recent T. & N.O. Railway accident. He will follow J. H. Clark (Liberal,| |The railway was sued, Hon. Arthur [ l Windsor--Sandwich), and Hon. G. H Roebuck explained to the Legislature, \ Challies. and the plaintiff received & verdict, ' but it was not carried out because e e "0 ucers of the rule that the Crown cannot be sued for tort. "I don't like that," the Attornsy-- snn memesnmanbmmsncon General said. "The Dominion has al« More than two and a half million in * lowed a claim for tort to be m'd.' cash has been the meaning of the ; against the Crown. It may be that, Milk Control Board to Ontario milk-- after detailed oonsioeu't:lon. there producers, according to the board's w 'm;y"t;e m: '?lf%fiey-oeneul report tabled at Queen's Park yester-- n e day. amplified his statement by saying that The report--first in the history of 2 ;Iefoerr:d i(iln tpa;t':umtt:h the J- the ten--months--old board----dcprcczlics 0. incident, bu e prin-- any combines. In production and dis-- ciple of the law might come under {ribution there should be no combina-- review. licns, it is held, to exploit the milk business at the expense of the con-- cumer. eca The report stated that marketing % sgreements have been approved in 2 e cixty--two major markets, These "nave climinated or minimized a number of 7 unethical practices that were to the dgotriment of both producers and QS-- * lributors." * Admitting some price increases to the consumer, the board stated that it was to be noted that this was true in no case unless the producer securea benefits equal to or greater than the price increase. f s Listed records included issuance O« 1,335 licenses, and depeosits of 51'043.,'- 390 in milk--distributors' bonds. This. it was claimed, had a stabilizing effect, + and had already proved its worth.