March 2.2. Iracle School Control I ESTATE ONUS i fl Prod Frnsor Hunter-'5 hill lO'full pxihnt of the Contrarts irre. . plnurlo the Ltoor th'partmrnt with 'DPNIVG 0f tho fact that iii;, 'tu. rrt:Itiory control m-er trade _ donts may h." unahlp to continue as srhorls--"to SMe tho youth of thigls"lf'."""- These schools invariably country trom hm": 0\pioilod i'n"ul'i1'/nt1,'2u/ou",,eoc,',ing the full . _ . . . . ., ' u ' . 0 Sign)" "tao"i1,AA,"i:ratt/e,1t: as dhelmmsp. No part pg? JI',' bill "if; Judges Say In London Case ' 4 ' N a tllf'---was 0- ('ve ." bated to some extent yesterday. hut I Whiplash 93%?" "am." schools They Cannot Interfere was denied second reading until law g l the spirit of the With Will in? time as lion. M. M. MacBride. Former Attorney-General A W t l as: 'l"').,",',,?,.':;,,,",?,'," str/ls, 2i""ltr; hotltik (Be1lwoods) "iiiiGei"th'it' -------..- '. ' . " _ omen on t e hill as drafted went toof 'hi/i/ntl/ons, I . tttr powers, and that under "at: BUT BILL IS FAVORED ested 'i, rouse mild" Nixon ",,',ti.i,i,s,?e' "any Young lady teaching ----.--. F _ nr' potnt in the nd. music in tho front room f h . . u loomed argument that the riaisiipeliiiiiiiV would be it hl o er Sitting as Estates Commission- re sent to l", Legal Bills 'Com- '. he stressed. had 'd' 1':u"'Jt,',ati,fac'e' ers" in consideration ot the legisla- tT',,'."" st,',,,',); '/','it"' (y." "rmsiriorn. l definition of its application Ms: tion to validate the will of the late low" 'ii'1'll' .m" 'ol.1 'j,"d2", "" "" .1113th schools. such a: tho 'si/iii, Elsie P. Williams, Mr. Justice Mtyty. 'iiiiid' has, mm he'd-c? Hf Mr. Mac. Cy.ryTndor.oyo School. through ten and'Mr. Justice McTague yes. "TM "mm. (i', 'n n l. which, h". said, thousands of ('Omlle- terday. in a report to the Ontario bid" Col 1"//"'iitor1'1,'l1'i"" ot. 'h'f'm' pupil; had passed. might he Legislature, emphasized that re- "is'tn "MAT": d'sh' tho "NI-'9 Itreated unfairly and unjustly, sponsibility for interfering with a from "an". h, l "he" '"'or'ieiThrytt pupils. he said, would he the testator's right to dispose of his G/ts, mm ',N,ti)id't"s",11r maxim; i {Inst ',,"r/!,'.'hi'.'i't any action tending estate rested solely with the Legis- . _ i . ., ( o Inter cre with the . ': . lature. upon the students paying to the tion. 9 school R Opera Under the rules of the House, two Judges are required to consider and report their opinions on any bill respecting an estate that is intro- duced in the Legislature. The bill in question was proposed by the City of London. Left Park to City. Mrs. Williams, by her will, left the major portion of her estate to the City of London for the main.. tenance of a park at Windermere, ------- her country estate. The expend" H ' . ture of the income from more than e n r y S Recommendation $1,020,003 ff"i,atshec'Jy1',tae/1llyf tof a . . par w IC as een va ue a ap" Adopted in Committee proximately $10,000 was considered: Sta e to he impractical. As a result, a g settlement was arranged between ------------ the corporation and numerous bene- Direction of the powers of the friftiia/yiet'taattf,ttl1;2i,1n1t.is designed to .Milif Pttitrttriration Bill was vested The Commissioners, after a study in the Cabinet instead of in the De- "_.' .___A I', thle.l it)? andtatter hearing counsetl artm ' ' . . or a e par es concerne repor - p e.'", of P.'yth, as proposed tn Estimate 3 250 000 ed to the Legislature that, in their the o t h . . . t l f ginal ill yesterday m the N opinion: "It is not part of our duty Ontario Legislature, on the recom- eeded fo Complete tti' passf I',',tg'/git,') on) "r, 'tlt; . . . . . - ilit o n er erence e s- mendatton of lion. George S. Henry. Ogoki Diversion latury'e with the 1',',U.'sU'lh p51" Amng. 1.radrsr ot the Conservative ----.----r-- ciple of law giving a testator the Opposition. .Cost, of completing the Ogoki right to dispose of his estate accord- The hill, with this amendment diversion from Jan. 31, 1938, is ing to his wishes. The responsibil- pwwd thr . ' estimated by the Ontario Govern- [ ity for that determination, and for . rough commit!" stage ment at $3,250,000, according to fixing the limit beyond which it will before the Home, after both Hon. returns tabled yesterday in the not go. rests solely with the Legis- Harold J. Kirby. Minister of Health, Legislature in answer to a ques- i lature." and Hon. Harry Nixon. Artitti: pm. tion by l-lon. Leopold Macaulay, i Would Increase Trust Fund. nnpr' illdlt'zlicd their willinunrss to Conservative House Leader. Notwithstanding this opinion, the writ?" the proposed amendment. ofthe, government also estimated two Judges also reported thatzi| P matter was first brouuht he- pt t e cost of completing the "Havin re fiFiiGiirfTrthe interests fore the Legislature in second read- yvers.ion of Long Lac into Lake of the; digrectly ayffected in the mg stage when Hon. William Fin- Superior from Jan. 31, 1938, would endin liti ation we are of the l ' . , p g g t a3'sort Icons., Simcoe East' SUR- be 8T84,000. opinion that this should pass into gested that in a measure that " The Hydro-Electric Power Com- law subject to several suggested looted such a broad section of the mission spent $128,601 on the , amendments." public and carrying with it mm- Ogokl scheme and $556,000 on the One of the amendments proposed parattvely stiff penalties for viola- Long Lac diversion up to Jan. 31. was that the $250,000 trust fund tton_o! clauses. its terms should be 1938. the report stated. providod in the settlement for the . applied by Orrirr-in-Counril. upkeep of Windermere as a public Fred G. McBrien. KC. (Cons. park and museum should be in- Parkdale) claimed that the sm creased to $300,000- minimum penalty was too high The other major amendment was and sugveswd that it be /,iiipiii that Thomas G. Meredith and Judge to S5 action was refused 0 th Talbot Macbeth. executors of the recommendation. The ',','c"i'd','f,' estate of Mrs. Williams, should re. penalty is set at 3500. i main as executorsgL'Ehe, trust fund.