The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

APRIL 13 f Drew Demands Probe | _ Of Lands, Forests Branch Immediate investigation by a spe---- clal committee of the Legislature j of all matters pertaining to the ad-- ministration, licensing, sale, super-- vision and conservation of natural resources by Mon. Peter Heenan's Lands and Forests Department is being demanded by Colonel George A. Drew, K.C., and the Conservative Opposition, Formal notice of a resolution that would require the setting up of such an inquiry body was given by the Opposition yesterday. Debate UNlON RIGHTS on it may take place tomorrow af-- ternoon. a l © Colonel Drew declined to discuss |-- Legislation which would legalize the extent to which he desires to collective bargaining and furnish probe the HMHeenan administration, ; employees. with the free right to but it was reported that the Abitibi}| | . . . [ theif choice was reorganization, the Lake Sulphite| 39"" 4 UMO" ° , s collapse, and contracts with Pulp~| brought down to the Ontario Legis-- 2 wood Supply Company are matters Jlature yesterday by David A. Croll, of primary concern with him at the _ former Minister of Welfare and mp':mt.- '::'It' 2':4;"':0;:_' ;:;':'\;z:'; Municipal Affairs in the Hepburn mated the intention of making the Government. present government's timber poli-- The legislation which is entitled cles the target of attack. Yester-- "Freedom of Trade Union Associa-- day's resolution notification is said 1:"'1' :\'N.. is similar in scope and loTF'w th(g (n-,_t'.shm olf that &:tla!ck'. purpose, Mr. Croll explained, to leg-- »position -- also requeste f 4 s &8 \'Pstr;da\'lt';IPlinl:YIP(Iialt' rrnr?\'onin: islation alrrnd,\'. ad;)plorl M ":],:0:. of the pixhlir accounts committee of provinces. p .\\r'»'ul( P a'?x?'v'\;:f n i the House. Premier _ Hepburn """"'s'f ':'mkp_ nk :mld.\:, ':nt hnl'\ fi;,?: promptly met the request, and the (-mpln_\_fl .tn '",'o i <pitd o+ Al ade committee will meet for purposes 311?'::'" from seeking to join a U To Titiite" Shere ho uy lodieg.| [ Nihern rtnumigetion sor thoite tion available of the line the Oppo-- ml'n':\':fo ht';w-u:"r:pil:v:':fl\:':llrldal;wm;]i:! Sitionnwl:il takt,' he(?:"a'.':lsrfiog":":; 2h|}~, under the In;iisla!i(m.'m a fine :1009\.&'0\':: ax:;?nr:ci':;'.ms' '"kfl\,p';ehé | not ('\l'f'f'(".ng Sl(?fl or a ,l:nl. term * hrouzht'undor scrutiny. The Oppo-- not exceeding thirty days, in the N¥ ; Cc ragh i 5 o I _ case of an individual. In the case sitton discussed the 'situation sat a of a corporation the penalty pro-- neon cCauUucis neewe | _ posed is a fine not exceeding $1,000, with the responsible officers held personally liable for its payment.| Mr. Croll also re--introduced his rejected Marriage Bill of the 1938 session. It would compel all appli-- A « cants for marriage licenses to first produce certificates of freedom from social disease. Making his first appearance in the House since his serious illness, Hon. W. L. Houck, vice--chairman ® of the Ontario _ Hydro--Electric 'er Commission, introduced sev-- ut s 5 r.::'lwi')ilfi.nflr::o would authorize the Cn.ursc "f' "".' Toronto leglslatn'on commission to return to the muni-- secking validation of the anti--noise cipal corporation of the Cil_\'_('f by--law was promised further oppo-- Guelph the control and operaltiOn _ sion in the Legislature yesterday of the Guelph street railway. This when J. J. Glass (Lib., St. Andrew) line has been operated by Hydr0® _ served notice he would propose an since 1920. Another bill would ap-- amendment when the bill appeared ply the same principle nf_ x:ural before the committee of the whole | line bonusing to the Commission's _ House. ! Northern Ontario propert@os that The Toronto member opposed un-- applies throughout its various $yS--+_ successfully that section of the by-- !goms in old Ontario. law which would require authority 1 of the police commission to employ * loudspeakers at political meetings and celebrations of a similar nature, when the bill was before the private bills committee. He indicated his amendment| would be directed at the same' clause. In committee, he charged the commission had hbeen known tol be arbitrary in its rulings and held the permit authority should rest with a body responsible to the peo-- ple, such as the board of control. + 4