The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

t- t. Gabardines ..Gabar- dii....and more Gabardines! That's what yoiill se, on cleveri styligh feet this Spriiigl SW. present a qalezy of styles ini Gbardine wide sélection in colors. U.TIffOAT TIS -.-.-to Wear with Your Eate. tbat hma a tilowed air al is owui. Last week the st1 i? this colunin thal tion of the founde -ment that the .SUPI pass u pon thec Acts of Conigre ss. it was said, among while State Courts upon the vaiidity. tures under their review," -at no tiffi s .titutional Converl posai made toy plat the Supreme Cour Iproposà&I' .Severaýl friendlý kind. eno 1ugh to their disagreelu e their contrarY con in the . foilowing frn on ofthes giviflg 1 ni Imade . It is iâté 1m ýe n t w s a1 er forgverli- Jdc power,on the other hand. reme. Cou rt shoujd is exercised only when, a pai'ty brings. ,0nstitutioflity ,Of the statute into question in. a par-. In: substantiatioli ticillar suit. It is the powver to pass g other things. that upon the statut, r 1adcsitutandlt :s had been passilig rights and parties nasiadnt of Acts of, Legisia- genieral questions7of social policies. power of , "judicial It is onlyexercised In an actual -case nie during thet Con- wvhen it, is. necessary to decide what ition was any pro-ý the iaw is and Who should prevàil. ce a limitation upon The distinction between "éveto rt ini that regard. power"9 and "judicial power" can voted DOWfl best be made by an illustration:,,A ycritics have 'been, bill is passed by the House and the write to express Senate which makes% it a, crime to nt.The basis of criti ise ý the Conres The Presi- intio s set forth dent. has veto power and can, for tpclqiiotatiol, any reason he sees fit, refuse tosign se welcomie ietters: the bill. Let us assume that he the ,Costtutonal igns it and it becomes a iaw. Ths 87 James Madison.1 an Act of Congress ha' * en aeted nd others proposed and the legisiative policy determine(l. ition contain a Pro- Court Determines Legal Riglite Court the explicit John Doe ciiticises Congress. Ile the aliity f Ats s arrested and sent to prison. under h time that proposai to theActofCongress. He appeals to has eenthe Suprerne Court on the ground tatemient ha e nt at the Consttution gives hini free- zres 's this last .month. dom o peh h tonyGn 'ic 'part of the argu- ealof speech.iteStte on.ee ho believe that Con- .rlo h jie ttscnet - .. ___i t on the- -ground that Jobji_ Doe was exercises. sset,,ldcdsta h osiu Now PMIt of CoutroversY sistnt.leIthcie suthatte lCon stit- While no officiai spokesman l wo to.bigte"urm a~ is had husfarappare beorethe prevail. ani therefore render-s its de- Senate Judiciary Comrmittee bas dis- cisiOn il ao fJhnDe ege puted the power of the Court. to free, ail Act of Congress notwith- pass upon the validity of Statutes, standing. this statement to show a contrary That is the power of "judicial re- intention on the part of the founders view." It can thus be clearly seeii as to the proper functioli of the, Court that when the proposai that 'the n nnt ofthe preentCourt be given "veto" power %vas veto power c the Preside.it.' arable to at is very IILCtrs, MVissJ .uth Nornho< it BOW son, and John son I. iý;, trnéeçs.