ree lar 1d. 0 Wh, Ners j Sion, w ners > q Streots the â€"~_ _ _mne°nt are in a position to perâ€" form. ‘That is, during their present term of office,. By looking at a map of the city it is apparent t MM'M%% i“‘â€"““â€"*ept-â€"ï¬th’wr’â€"emm _the state in the interest of safety to the traveling public and the public welfuare, ~. ... > ~_~ 12 + The cost of any highway that must be improved. with â€"extra heavy and extra wide pavement to serve the public â€"in carrying through traffic ‘should be paid for by general taxaâ€" tion to the extent that it serves the public in â€"exeess ~of the increase in value of the property specially beneâ€" fitted, ; Whnthn, | 1. ~ 3 " . "f CVAtH L time after the bridges are and while the officials who agreement are in a positi tore: That is during th ‘of 0 ( of tha nito i+ :.B ):_lg?lflng be performed, while others w present ‘state that it was an . agreement to be carried out city. Admit there was no fix of performance by the city : and reason would imply that to be performed within a rea "W“Fod, a state highâ€" «way and recently made passable by the construction of two bridges of large capacity for the sole purpose of carrying the through traffic as origâ€" inally designed and so continuously used for years, should be completed ba:eording to an admitted agreement tween our city officials and the present admit the agreement, but say there was no limit of time as to when it was to be performed and therefore llnc‘_em.,lhetha it willâ€"arâ€"chant*} â€". _ The following letter written by At. torney E. S. Gail regarding the proâ€" â€"â€" posed _North â€"St.Johns â€"avenue imâ€" provement, speaks for itself. At a recent public hearing on the project Attorney Gail represented a number =â€"of objectors. ~He saye i=~~â€"â€"â€"â€"~â€"â€"â€" ie of the property specially beneâ€" ‘d, whether it is Sheridan road, proposed North St. Johns extenâ€" + which is only removing four corâ€" ;“. or on Gmn’B?y road. Yflotnuwveorenamtwoeor. in Sheridan road north of the three: are discharged through Highâ€" wood on. Waukegan road. That a fourth super highway to diâ€" vert the traffic from Sheridan â€"road into this bottle neck, passing two subâ€" jection at the bottle neck, would necâ€" essarily increase the normal hazard to lifeâ€"and property of the residents and traveling public. That the improvement was not essary as there are now three : to carry the through traffic and charge it through two at most, as Sheridan road is now routed three are discharged thraw~l T Your article in regard to the proâ€" posed North St. Johns avenue extenâ€" gion is very meager and does not conâ€" vey to the public the important objecâ€" tionsâ€" urged by many at the public hearing. .. Among . theâ€"â€"mainâ€"reasonsâ€"urged: were the following: | Highland <Park Press Highland Park, 1IL. Gentlemen : Points Out Objections and Outâ€" li Main Thereâ€" nes Mam "Mensons in carrying through traffic be paid for by general taxaâ€" the extent that it serves the h excess â€"of the increase in the property specially beneâ€" N. ST. JOHNS PROJECT | ##»®."me Thursday, Feb. 6, 1980 and 1 interest of satety to | it was an ab@iii; carried out by the itâ€" ce : others who were vas no fixed time the city the law Highland Park, 1. February 1, 1930 traffic and disâ€" ‘o at most, and now routed, all that it was a reasonable ‘e put in use io made that : tne proâ€"| _ The estimated cost of theâ€"proposed enue TMâ€" | pavement (5000 lineal feet) is at the e project[rate of $47.50 a lineal foot for conâ€" a _ number '%MMM uow D er avenue, say at the expense of | object? $238,000. ‘The same concrete paveâ€"| â€" Fron ment would, cost no more when used improve nnshefldul'o.dlndwou!dnmthc carry t purpose : and <also carry into effect | railroad this agreement, maintain established | is self eonditiomanddojuï¬eoforull,pm- large p mote public safety, welfare and econâ€" 'l_).ell: cen mc 8 7 i ® I * NO TOLL PHONES Pleating pmsuned ï¬lmy maâ€" terials . . . whatever the cleaning need . . . you‘ll find new satisâ€" faction in this extraâ€" ordinary serviceâ€" and best of all ‘you’[] A Prowne Carr Successors to Krauss Cleaning Co Line cleaned togs in the wardrobe w it h new things . . . and you‘ll find it difficult toâ€"d ecid e between them . . . intricate â€" . same thrill as Betting new ___ Alice ... € 6 % 0 e clothes * Snore Ling/CHeancers soil erased..style restored...;" =© wWHLMEzTTs ..........::: 32e C. L. Rogkns, President _ ~ WIL Brme Our Truc« To 256 . ooeept that there "will be a large public Oh;..flt.,mfl?.h 50 per cent or per cent of â€"cost. muin‘ s t iorins ns us ectary ed b’ a tax W,m,.n e is therefore interested. It is a constitutional Yight of neo« or petition to From the fact that the improvement isâ€"a~super hi carry through traffic, and P mlmv which cannot ha a. F (F expenses only asuper highway to ; and parallels a Whomldnocl 1215 Wuhin_;ton Avenue proposed , it m:: known their opinions and wi-hl’- mmmmm&m and a large assembly, with only a few favâ€" oring the proposition are informed by youruflehthatth'eowthopn for objectors. ‘These numerous petitionâ€" ers and people assembled had hoped and still hope that their representaâ€" tives, uponâ€"consideration of their peâ€" titions and protests, will not force them <to hire attorneys and spend Your Door '(} Ernest S. Gail 15 «3 xp