The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

0mm. Hey 6.â€"-â€"The Speaker took the choir et 8 o'clock. After routine. The order being read for the second reed. in; of Bill No. I53, to readjust the repre- sentstion in the House of Commons. and for other put us. Sir John endoneld said on the introduc- tlon 0! this Bill I explained at length the mode of reedjustment. end the changes repelled to he made in the representation fn oonsequenoe of the census. I now move the eeoond reading of the BI", and no doubt in 3‘ (ull_ discussion otuthe changes proposed the Government will be quite prepared to listen to all the arguments that may be adduced on either side with respect to the reaintrihution of the regreseytetion. 'v ._v --_.--, Mr. Blakeâ€"I rise to a question of order. The Bill which is just now placed in your hands is not the Bill which was introduced and read a first time. I object to the reading of the Bill at the present time. By the Bill which was presented the other day and read the first time. certain pro- visions were msde as to the component parts of the various electoral districts of the Province of Ontario. and in point of fact that was the object of the Bill. By the Bill as read the first time the township of Clinton was taken from the county of Lincoln and added to the electoral district of Menck. By the Bill now proposed to be read the township of Clinton remains part c! the county of Lincoln. and is not part of the electoral district of Monok. By the Bill which was read a first time the village of Beamsville was taken from the county of Lincoln and g3“ into one of the ridings of Wentworth. y the Bill new proposed to be read Beamsville remains in the county of Lincoln. By the Bill read a first time the Township of South Cayuga remained a gut of the County of Haldimand. By the ill now on the table it remains part of the electoral district of Monok. There are other changes in the Bill which is on the table ascompared with the Bill which is read. but I have specified these to you as adequate to the purpose of pointing out that very material alterations have taken place in the Bill read the first time as it is now proposed to be read the second time. The law upon the subject is contained in â€"..n May’s book. the oldest edition, at page 500: “ After a. Bill has been presented and read a first time it is not regular to make other than clerical alterations in it. When a member has introduced a Bill to the House it ceases to be in that member’s hands and passes into the possession o! the House. No essential alteration of that Bill at any stage may then be made without the dis- tinct order of the House.” The Bill which the hon. and gallant member now asked the House to read a second time was not the one which he was allowed to introduce, and therefore the only course open to him was towithdrew the order for the second reading of the Bill, and toask leave to in- troduce a Bill in substitution for it. Sir John Mecdoneldâ€"In answer to the hon. gentleman’s technical objection, which was taken only for the purpose of delay. I have to etete this, that the practice pro- posed, which was objected to at the time by the hon. gentleman on the first reading. has been the uniform practice in Canada. As regards the particular case he cites of alterations in some of the clauses of the Bill,for which he refers to my speech. it there are such alterations it is open for him to take his objection in Committee of the Whole. Mr. Meokengieâ€"The question is ex 1y whether that' 18 the Bill that was remsge. first time or not. I called upon the hon. gentleman for 3 copy of the Bill. He said he would send it to me, but the Bill never come. There' is one simple way of ascer- tuning whether this is the Bill or not. Let the law clerk be called and examined. MnBlgkeâ€"The report in the Human! shows it. Mr. Cameron (Huron)â€"That the Bill was altered after it was introduced is beyond controversy. I paid the greatest attention to the statement made by the First Minister, as I supposed he would make some alterations in my ridingL. _ Mr. Millsâ€"The terms of the “Bill as introduced are pretty well known tothe members of the House. because there is hardly ething contained in it which the hon. gentlemen did not tend. He had the gelley proofs in his hands. and from them he read the description of the limits of the vex-ions counties and electoral divisions bein changed, and nearly every member of t a House noted the observations he mode. and they are in perfect accord with the right hon. gentleman’s speech as it appeared in the Hayward. New. sir. we have before us a Bill which is not that Bill, which does not contain the some descrip- tion of the electoral divisions, but snother and n different description. The ri ht hon. gentlemen is ssking to have this ill reed a second time as the Bill he submitted some days ago: There is no room for two o inione on the subject. It is Eerfectly e ear that this is another Bill an not the Bill reed the first time.and it is not treating the House with proper respect to make alterations in thissurreptitioue way. I say surreptitious because we see we are to be governed by a conspiracy rather then by a Government. and the pro eition now made is an illustration 0! the_ set. _ Mr. 8 alterâ€"There is no doubt that the point 0 order raised is a very important one, because it will settle forever the prac- tice in this Parliament and the rocedure in introducing and dieeueeing Bi Is. It is true until now the practice has been, to a certain extent. to allow Bills tobe intro. duced eometimeein blank ‘it the question was not raised. but there is no doubt that the rule in absolute. It in one of the privi- leges oi this House that when a Bill is in ite possession it ought not to be altered. I think when the point is ruined it is better to follow the practice in the British Parlia- mentâ€"that no change exce temell Alters. tlone shell teke piece in e ill when once introduced, end that the pro r course is to diecherge the order and re ntreduce the Bill dc nova. ”git“ 216133 A. Moodonnldâ€"I beg to move for lenve to introduce Bill No. 163 to rendjnat ihe representation in the House 0! Common. The Bill wee rend the first. time. Bir Rioherd Col-wright uid before the [louse tonolvod iteeli inm Commitee of Supply he desired to on" attention to tho inuy4_ ‘- AL- --n----jl_--_ BOMINION PARLIAMENT. {uaovaéiiioh 7:0 the entwrdinuy THE SENATE. to the dumin y rapid increase 0! expen- diture. In 878 the expenditure wee $26,500,000. The expenditure for 1880 wee 824,850,000. ad the eetimetu for 1882 were 026.47§,000. These eetimejee angled expenditure dandy «tinned for in this mutter. They were gobs on from Ind to worn. _Lut_ ye}: wo_l_n_d drawn emotion vv vâ€"‘ ._7 to be granted to fishermen.’ to Mani- toba and in aid of a ship railway in New Brunswick, so that about 928,400,000 or nearly twenty-eight millions and a halt Will be required for the service for 1883. This was not including the expenditure (or rolling stock and on account at Dominion lands now charged to capital account. but which during the time of the late Govern- ment formed part of the ex uditure chargeable to income. If he inclu ed these. and for the purpose of comparison with the expenditure of the late Government they ought to beincluded. they would have an additional estimated expenditure of 8865.- 000 (or rolling stock and $490,000 on account of Dominion lands. making altogether an estimated expenditure for the ensuing year an extraordinary large expenditure. The estimates for 1683 amounted to no less than 027,999,483, nnd they were 5130 asked to gxpend M}0,000 linthe shupo of sums I'A_: of 829,224,000. (Hear. hear.) The' hon. gentleman opposite answers that it mattered not whether they took three. four, five or six millions out of the pockets of the people, because they said it went back into their pockets or into the Treasury. He denied that a great roportion of this money went back into t e pockets of the people. When it found its way has}: into the Treasury it went back, if at all, into the wrong pockets; it went into the pockets of the friends of the ‘ hon. gentleman opposite. Apart from that. it was a bad economy to take more out of l the people in taxes than is required, no matter how just the taxation or how well distributed. It was peculiarly unjust under the present fiscal system, where besides the enormous amount paid into the Treas- ury large sums went into the pockets of private individuals or corporations. A sign of the times was seen in the fact that civil servants were complaining that their remun- eration was not equal to the increased cost of living. There was a marked increase of late years in labor strikes, and the fact was forced upon all observant men that the tendency of the tariff was to hear much heavier noon the laboring than upon the wealthier classes. He would not detain the House at any length, but simply move “ That the Speaker do not now leave the chair, but that it be resolved that the expenditure for 1878 was 823,503,000: that the expenditure for 1881 was $25,502,000 ; that the estimates of the year ending 30th June, 1883. amounted to $27,999,483 independent of several large amounts proposed to be added to the annual expenditure involving a further outlay of 8410.000 more ; that many of the items charged to capital account are of a character which might more properly be charged to income; that a very large proportion of this expenditure consists of fixed charges of a permanent character which when once created are either incapa hle or very difficult of reduction; that recent engagements and existing obligations will result in a steady increase of fixed charges within a few years ; that experience has shown that the consequence of rapidly increasing charges is to produce great embarrassments to the public finances; that the House views with regret that the Government proposes to expend for the year 1883 the sum of 82,906,926 more than the expenditure for 1881, and 84,906,525 more than the expenditure for all purposes in 1878." Sir L. Tilley in reply contended that the estimates did not necessarily show an expenditure of equal amount. and though the hon. gentleman’s figures might be cor- rect they were misleadin . A considerable portion of that increase expenditure was not necessarily an increase of taxation upon the people. He accounted for some of the general expenditure by the exten- sion of postal facilities in Manitoba, of the canal system and the expenditure of an additional sum on Toronto harbor. In reply to the statement that it is unwise to -_‘-, V, take more money out of the pockets of the fieople than required for carrying on the overnment. he thought the feet that bed bov‘ernment, he thought the foot that bad times were sure to return again should be met by putting by money now when times were good. He remarked that from the speech of the hon. gentleman (Sir Richard Gertwright) it was evident thstihe, st all events. would make opposition to the Notions! Ifolioy s plsnk in his plstfotm. Mr. Mackenzie said that 'what they charged the hon. gentleman opposite with was increasing taxation to an appalling degree. The Government proposed to take 927,000,000 by way of Ousotms and Excise and minor revenues from thepeople for the next year. He held that the prevalence of labor strikes was significant. It evidenced the derangement of the labor market. He remembered the time when a mob of work- ingmen in Ottawa were encouraged by members of Parliament to go up to the Parliament when the late Government were in cflioe. There were no strikers at present in Ottawa because all the working- men were driven out of Ottawa. (Hear, hear.) He remembered also when men were incited to walk in a procession in Montreal. in order to embarrass the Govern- ment. which was then in power. There was ‘ no sort of lawless or revolutionar proceed- ing to which hon. gentlemen h not been ready to resort and it was always a matter of difiiculty to restrain the Tories out of office from resorting to such domonstra- tions. (Hear. hear.) As to the National Policy. for his own part nothing would restrain him from expressin his views on thatsubject. apolic which econsidereda national folly an a national crime. Nothing would restrain him from putting forward his views as to the fixity of taxa- tion when it was possible. Where a particular policy has become the law of the land no incoming Government would be 'ustifled in violently interferin with exist- ng) interests. When in o ce he had pu licly er ressed the same view. Every one who b any love for his country must protest against a policy which was destroy- ing our national trade abroad and bringing us into discredit with the British Em ire in which a different policy prevaile :a policy which was bearing heavily upon the industrial classes of the community. making the few people rich at the expense of the many ; a policy which reinsed to give the slightest Frotec tion to labor. and which imposed al kinds of restrictions upon labor. increasing the taxes of those who toil and earn their bread by the sweet 0! their brow. It was easy for hon. gentlemen opspslto. for those who had large incomes, an those who had large meant-stories. to land a iollcy which imposed taxation upon the wor lug classes. but the time will come when farmers and the industrial po uletion generally will resent this inter erence with their just rights. end call the hon. gentlemen oppo- siteto account for the manner inw ich they have abused the power theg by acci- dent obtained efew years ago. ( hears.) Mr. Ross (Middleaex said it was easy to see defeat already in t e oounteusnces of the hon. gentlemen. as they strove to bolster up the waning fortunes ohtheir‘ party. It was said that they were gomg to‘ snatch a verdict by an early .fiful to the country. Was not that an ev once that} they were alarmed and desirous of precipi- tating the contest before their condition became more chaotic than it was now, and before the people would realize the full extent of the political- infamy or which they had been guilty during the last four years. The apologetic tone of the Minister of Finance to-night assured him that he for one anticipated that ver- dict. (Oheers.) Rumor had it thathe was not going to lace the music, but theta idistiuguished gentleman from England (Sir A. '1‘. Gait) was coming to take aseat on the treasury benches, and that the present Minister of Finance would take the position of High Commissioner to England. No doubt the position was a very comfortable and distinguished one, but was it not another instance of rats [crashing the sinking ship ? (Cheers.) He was satisfied that the amendment of the hon. member for Centre Huron would command the sympathy of the people of the country. that the electors would re- uire a strict reckoning at the hands of a vernment that had increased the ex- penditure so enormously. (Cheers). ‘ hum-Means. Anglia. Bain, Bechard, Blake, Borden. Bouraasa, Brown, Burpee (St. John), Bur-pee (Sunbu ), Cameron (Huron). Curb- wright, Casey, asgrain. Charlton. Cockburn, Coupal, Dumont. Fiset, Flemin , Flynn. Geof- friou, Gillmor. GInn, Guthrie. addow, Irvine, Kmam, King, McDonald (Victoria, NS). Macdon- nell ([nvemeas), Mclsaao, Molouln, Mills, Olivier. Paterson (Brant), Picku‘d, Binfret, Robertson (Shelburne). Rogers, Rosa (Middlosex). Rymal, Smjth, Sutherland, Trow,Weldon, Wheler,Yao ‘ The House then divided oh Sir Richard Certwright's amendment. wind: was lost on the following vote: Yep; 48, mayo, 99: NAYs.â€"â€"Messrs. Allison, Amyott, Arkell. Baker, Barnard, Buncheane, Benoit, Bergeron, Bill, Bolduo. Bowel], Bracken, Brooks, Bunater, Burn- hum, Cameron (Victoria), Carling, Caron, Cimon IChicoutimi), Colb . Cougblin. Course}, Currier, Cuthbert. Daly, wust. ansonfi DeCosmos, Demulnier Domvillo, Dugaa, Ellxott, Farrow. Fortin, Fu ton. Gigault, Girouard (Jae uea Cartier), Gixouaxd (Kent), Grandbois, Gui let, Hackett, Hay. Henson. Homer. Hooper, Hur- teau. Jones. Kaulhnch, Kilven, Kirk~ mulch Kranz, Landr . Langevin, Lantier. ngley2 yuchnggd ( jugjsl,‘ acdonald (Sir I.â€" _...qu_ _ I... bangle;i Mncdonam (King'sp, macuonam wu- John), cDonald (Cape Breton), Macmillan. Mc~ Callum. McCuaig, MoDougald,McLelan, McLeod, McQuade. McRor , Massue, Mex-net, Methot, Mongenaix, Mon plalair. Mousseau, Human, O'Connor. Ogden, Patterson (Essex), Plnaon- neault. Plumb, Reid, Bichey. Robertson (Hamil- ton).Rooheater, Ross (Dundas). Rouleau, Ryan (Montreal). Bykert, Sproulo, Ste henson. Tasse. 'l'ellier, Tilley. T hltt, Valin, allee. Vanessa, ngle, Wallace ( orlolk), Wallace (York), Wright. The House then went into Committee of Supplx. " "rr‘u ' 0n the item. immigrant buildings west of Brandon, Sir John Macdonald. in reply to Sir Richard Cartwright. said that owing to the floods in Manitoba arrangements had been made to delay somewhat the flow of immi- gration. keeping the people back for some days. so that when they got there there might be no diflioultysg D‘ijé’fllfimma'i OTTAWA, May 8.â€"The Speaker took the chair at 3 o'clock. A motion was made and adopted to remit fees on the Bill to incorporate the Temporalities Board of the Presbyterian Church of Canada in connection with the Church of Scotland. At 3.35 p. m. Sir John Macdonald moved a second reading of his gerrymandering Bill. Mr. Plumb. by pro-arrangement. got the floor first and proceeded to bewail the wiping out of the historical district of‘ Niagara. tracing its history from 1792 down. He thought some great public necessity had caused the taking away of a‘ seat from Niagara, and the same want of consideration of personal interests had characterized other changes made. He stated that resolutions had been passed at a meeting of the electors‘ of Niagara against the proposed change. which he had sent to Sir John,; accompanied by aletterirom himself. He‘ i(Mr. Plumb) had made every possible iefl'ort to save the constituency from the doom which he felt to be impending. He had contemplated placing his resignation in the hands of the Speaker. but had been induced to reconsider his determination. He would not be willing to do anything which would embarrass his right hon. leader. He believed there was more dis- satisfaction at the measure on his side of the House than on the other. and he declared he had known nothing of the con- tents ot the measure untilit was laid on the table of the House. He intimated that he would no longer take partin the councils of the country anywhere, and generally made a sort of farewell. "-oâ€"'â€"'7 u...â€"._r.. __v The committee rose and reported pro- gress. and 91° Housgpdjopme‘d at_11.‘25. ‘ Mr. Blake took the floor at 4.85. and commented on the (act that the second reading of this Bill had been moved with- out any remarks and without any indica- tion of the course pursued. It was pro- posed to change the election law by placing the nomination of returning-officers within the entire oontroloi the Government, in- stead of requiring the selection of men who from their position might be supposed to act in a judicial manner. He pointed out the fact that the language in the pre.‘ amble oi the Bill did not justify the swaep- ing chan es made. and then proceeded to indicate ow the increased representation necessary might have been given. Addi- tional members might have been given to the counties of Essex. Kent. Lambton, Bruce and Simcoe. and a member given to the county of Dufierin. This would have given six seats without the upsettal of the county bounds. Such an operation as that. or anything like it, would demand but a slight change in the map of Ontario. and require no such cutting and carving up aswas proposed in this Bill. The bases which the hon. gentleman (Sir John) laid for these widespread changes were too nar- row altogether. and it was apparent that the political map of Ontario had been altered in such a manner as would be most had been prepared. and in scathing language ridiculed the changes made even after the introduction of the Bill to bolster pp the _T9ry me_m_l_)ers of y‘arliament. I ,,,x‘t.. Messrs. Rykert and Henson challenged Mr. 1 Blake to meet them in their constituen- cies, a challenge which met with the reply that they were brave men to speak such words after having had their constituencies fixed to suit themselves. The Bill was not a Government Bill for the redistribution of Ontario. but was framed for low party ends. and aims to use the majority for party purposes. It was a sad commentary on the boasts of the last four years. This Bill showed that the Ministerialists did not feel confident and were seeking by legislation to make up for the loss inflicted by the misdeeds of the last four years. A similar attempt had been made in 1872, but it had not suc- ceeded any more than this would succeed. He was convinced that the people of ‘Ontario would resent as they did on the l well known previous occasion an abuse of a high trust. The hon. gentleman would find that though he might transfer men's bodies he could not transfer their minds, and that though he might transfer voters, in many cases he would transfer their votes against himself. It was his duty to appeal, not to conspirators who had concocted this measure, but to gentlemen from other Provinces who knew the ties of county boundaries, and to ash them -._w â€"- v-- to apply to the Province of Ontario the principles they would like to have applied to themselves. The county boundaries by the Bill were violated most flagrantly. He again quoted the remarks made by Sir John in 1872 relative to the desirability of maintaining county boundaries. and said the right hon. gentleman declared he still held these views. but justified his present action on the ground that Mr. Mowat had not followed these principles. The excuse would be absurd even if true; but the argument was founded on an utter and entire misunderstanding of Mr. Mowat’s Bill. which had recognized throughout the principle of municipal county repre- sentation. Mr. Blake afterwards took up the plea of equalizing popu- lation. and showed that while some constituencies had 12,000 or 13.000 of a population others had upwards of 25.000, and this some times in adjoining counties. in other cases the population of the very smallest constituencies. such as Mcnck. Haldimand and North Leeds had been reduced. He went over in detail many of the changes to show how it was proposed to ‘ “ hive " the Grits and strengthen adjoining constituencies held by Tories. giving the political sheet of eachchange. As instance after instance of the iniquity of the Bill was brought out the speaker was loudly cheered by his political friends. while his opponents, with the ex- ception of an odd interruption from Mr. Plumb. maintained a melancholy silence. The shameless gerrymandering in Bruce was particularly condemned. and it was pointed out that not only Sir John’s pre- tended principle of equalizing the popula- tion was shamelessly violated in the arrangement of the north and west ridings, :but in the latter constituency, by drawing from North and South Bruce and North } Huron a riding which, on the basis 0! the .election of 1878. would give a Reform imajority of 1.000. In twenty-five cases 3 were municipalities carried from one county ‘into another. and forty~one out of fifty . changes had been made in Western Ontario. .where it was expected the battle would be principally fought. In ten constituencies lwhere the Reformers had been “ hived " the Reform majorities would be as follows on the basis of the election of 1878 : North Brant. 723 ; South Oxford. 688; North Oxford. 1.165; West Ontario. 683; East Bimcoe. 658; South Middlesex, 581; West Bruce. 986; Centre Huron. 446‘; West Elgin. 463; Halton, 290 ; a total in these ten constituencies of 6.453. or a surplus of 8,000 votes as com- pared with an equal number of con- stituencies in which the Tories had been kept together. The object of this legisla- tion wu to make a Tory minority in the country a Tory majorit in the House. Honest men could not a ord to vote for a measure dishonest and fraudulent. The Government dare not attempt the same thing with the other Provinces. and be appealed to members from those Provinces to deal with Ontario as they would wish to be treated themselves. B_ut all this was not enough, and the Government had taken care that they should have the power of Imprinting their men as returnin officers. an to do their “dirty work." e drew a vivid picture of the recent Tory dinner, and c! the handwriting which ought to have been seen on the wall letting the Premier know that his kingdom was finished, and that the constituencies which had returned hie eupportere in 1878 would not return them again. The leader of the Government had determined on appointing creatures of his own an return- ing-oflicere,ec that they could accomplish what his legislation had failed to do. He closed by moving an amendment. . ‘AnA olosed by moving an amendment. Mr. Blake resumed his seat at 10.30. having spoken four hours. He was atten- tively listened to throughout. and fro uently greeted with loud applause. While 6 was speaking the galleriee were crowded. but there was a raspid clearing out as soon as he finished. ir John was observed taking notes while Mr. Blake was speaking. and it had been the understanding beforehand that he was to follow. He apparently. however. felt that he would appear to bad advantage before his followers by direct comparison with the leader of the Opposi- ticn, and especially when the latter had such a powerful case. He therefore put u Mr. Bowell to do some round throwing. an that entleman was fully equal to the tee . He commenced by repeating stale charges anent the circumstances attendin the defeat of the Sanddeld Macdonad Administration. and then charged the leader of the Opposition with having need information secured in conse- quence of his late colleagues openings tele- gram in n mistake. In usin such infor- mation he said Mr. Blake h shown him- self wanting in the instinctsof agentleman. He also made some insulting allusions to Mr. Huntington. and spoke of the records in court; but when dared by the gentle- man assailed to repeat those charges him- self or to go on With hie insinuaticne. he quickly dropped this line of attack. Mr» Bowel] then proceeded to defend the gerry- mandering scheme. contending that on the whole it had been sought to equalize the opulntion. The leader of theO position ad failed to call attention to the nstauces where the four constituencies had been spared. while not having the requisite pulatione. He defended the small popu» \ atiou left in North Bruce. At the close of Mr. Bowcil's speech Mr. Mackenzie inquired if he was the gentleman charged with opening a telegram intended for the last spea er and divulging its contents. Mr. Bowail said he was. Mr. Mackenzie indignantly denied the charge. saying he hoped he had not eat for twenty- five years in Parliament to be suspected by any one of such a mean trick as that. He was unaware of the contents of the telegram until he saw a reference to the matter in a newspaper. n !,, “2 ‘ , A“: n,,iaÂ¥,_:_|,a n_ll-__:._‘ __..I :L Sir Richard Cartwright following. and it was quite unnecessary that Mr. Mackenzie should have risen to make such an explana- tion. as he was too well-known to the people of Canada. Sir Richard condemned the measure in the strongest terms. Sir Richard spoke at some length. and was followed by other members. The Norfolk (Va) Virginian of January 16tb,1881 referato the gramarkable cure effected by St. Jacobs Oil in the case 0! Prof. Cromwellâ€"known the country over tor‘his gagqificent Art Illustrationsâ€"yin) had sufieer excruciating tormenta from rheumatism, until he tried the Oil, whose effects were magical. Special inducements are offered you by the Burlington route. It will pay youto read their advertisement to be found else. where in this isaue. Loan Rosxnznv, the popular young Scottish statesman. made aoharacteriatic address when he unveiled the statue to the poetBurns at Dumfries the other day. He dwelt on the geninq and character of the poet, and observed that it was emphatically because he was a man like one of ourselves, because his mainspring of action was a love and sympathy with sufiering mankind, that Burns’ memory was to the people of Scotland that of a dead brother. His Lordshi drew an eloquent contrast be- tween t e peasant poet and the Prime Minister who was born in the same yearâ€" Lord Chatham. Prior to the ceremony, the noble Lord received the freedom of the town. The statueis the work of Mrs. D. 0. Hill, a sister of Sir Noel Paton. It mea- sures 9ft. 10in.. weighs about three tons and is in Sicilian marble. 1111b ect and 1116 trut is an excel- lent plan. and ”whether it be in 1 ( nestlons of Imncc or fishing. or any tn )iocr what- 01 cr,cl‘.‘t m:- icnl. always cop con! and to“ tho tnnh. Hon’cmr. there is a cer- 411111 margin al- lowed for lying. 3 when it comes to flshln .thaus 101'- - mule in noot nor k subject. and no doubt our {Honda in the picture are indulging in that s me 111 employ- mam aswen.Reu1-- mas tnalt scientific swoon- “13. Their bodies and tom rs are hot and t e 1111 is cool'nsthcyshould .bc, butarenot.)nnd they are apparent- ‘ lyln thccondmon when it Is much easier to catch rhcnmutlsml than 11511 In whirl louse . it would bc ‘1ch for them that meg ho p'rmlded Mt 11 bottle of 81‘. J 1100133 011.. Great _G9rma_n lent plan. and ”whether it be in i uestlons of uauec or fishing. or any to do what- e\'cr.ei‘.‘i or wilt- ieai. always Top cool and tell the tntth. However. there is a cer- .tain margin al- lowed for lying, i, when it comes to . fishin .thatis )0!"- - mitte iu noot ter k subject. and no doubt our friends in the picture are indul lug in that spec nl employ. ment.aswell. r- haps. as in a i tile scientific swear- ing. Their bodies and tem rs are hot and t e air is . ,cooitastheyshould . be,butarenot.)and they are apparent- ly Iu theconditlon when it is much easier to catch rheumatism than ilsh. in which ease . it would be well for them that the he provided wit a bottle of ST. , Jacona 0n..tbo I' Great German Rentedy for-this asweli as other painmi ailments. il'l-I’LI. NA It, ITS COLORS TO THE MAST. "iieiio, Denny! what. is the trouble?" "Oh. I'm all broke up." was the res use to the in- quiry of an old shipmato of WI iiam G. Dennis- ton, one of Farm tt'a war-worn veterans. well ltumvn in the soot tern section of this city. who came lim in into the American oliiee yesterda . "i thong it Would go under the ha'eins th s time," continued Denniston. "I never nude so much iumy life. I had the rheumatic gout so had that i could not getoii‘ the bed or put my foot to the floor. and would have been there 'et ifa friend had not recommended 81'. JM‘Ollfi It. to me. I hesitated some time before getting a hottle.thlnltlngltwasanother one otthowadver- tised uostruma, but was finally induced to glee it. a trial. and a luekyda‘y it was for me. \\ hf' bless mystarsl after but ill! thellmhthorough ); with theoil i felt relief. am mv faith was piuuet to St Jacoa and his ()ll anert'hat. i freely sa thatlfithad not been for SrJu‘onaOH, i shonh , in all rohahlity he still housed. Mr foot pains me huYiittit-mnd theaweilln haaent reiypmed away. it beam anything all re kind 1 have ever heard of,aud any Person who douhtu it send them to me at 1924 Soul 1 Tenth aLâ€"l’htludclphtu Tm i Cuffs are small. Shot silks are stylish. Rushes rival pleatings. Small mantles prevail. Terra-eotta stockings are new. Panier polonaises are popular. Spanish lace continues popular. Brooades are fast disappearing. Watteau overdresses are revived. Jet remains in favor with Worth. New hats are laden with feathers; Gainsborough hats are out of favor. Apron overskirts are always in vogue. Sioilienne is used for elegant costumes. Redingotes are new for summer dresses. White barege is used for evening dresses. ALWAYS KEEP COOL. Important to Travellers. For the Ladies. IA rt and 0“. 711°. §ti€k '0 99F!