The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

we had caught rhich lay flu]: “Wt” your 1 'tube. Then 1 bl! have to at 1. brick wan But T178 me 1 reckon curl t! “id km 118 waiting1136,;‘l3,L m‘ory.” B 1'8!!!on '8 J: ', nun, $16.70; ‘ |umj,$4.l*5. launsn-TO: , luufi, $4.05. without. costs. 1907, $1.70; ”1‘ “MT, SS 9‘)- lthT. $1.70; :e stiflened. 8min} out with Ian ,. rained himself. ‘ . mura’w .: tn cult?” “in: ‘ nedinn. ma '1‘ Mm tug. An I n the qutrtOM‘ 2. a a; S a P e a '9 -9m---ms< E5 Noah-t 10 my. apt-mini. 1907, $16.70; lam}, S-LUS. [9n7,$ll.70; loud, $4.05. .‘ilhout costs. ‘1907, $1.70; 9n 10900 e for the ithdmwn by table's costs. ’n Mm- 5 '07 ns'ble Mar. 'n Mar?) '07 ne 6; costs. ns'blo Mar. 'n Mm- ?) '07 ns'ble Mar. .hn't {0 Price. Reasonable ‘MMW SEEDING {G purposes. 21 "I A. n. numb. WW“. I Total Assets, :- "3.000.001 mg; " WATCHM A N :WA RD R. Rest. - - ' LINDSAY, ONT., THURSDAY, 14m MARCH, 1907. “m such an ~ ongen. hydrogen mnd nitrown. m tho ch‘on'iist tho Nhio statement: that “God formed ‘man of the dust of tho ground." has peculiar siu'nliicnnco. So also from the viewpoint of the biologist mnn is moroiv it highly organized animui ' iliut can wo truly eatimnto man from ”my a! the» viewpoints ? They are ltruo as far as they go. but they do not 'go in enough. There is an- lother and a. truer viewpoint irom iwhich to consider man. viz" the re- liigious. There is a qualitative as well as a. quantitative standard of values by which we must estimate man The mind, the moral faculty. Ithe’spirit. these are iagts and must nified conception of men as true or not. will depend pan the point oi View we take retarding him. If we view him eetronomicelly. as David once did (Pea. 8:8,“. we shall en- nwer hls‘queetion. "what is man 7" by replying without hesitation “man is an insignificant mote unworthy of consideration in this tremendous un- ivorno of infinite wetnes- end titanic i‘orcoe." Or if we view him from tho more chemical view-point we shall llnd him limpla an ingenious com- bination oi certain material elo- mentu such as water. phosphate end oerflaonete ol‘ lime. poll-alum. nod- lum. e iittlo auger. and different Now. whether Ire consider this dig- be accounted for as well as his ma- terial parts. There is this something in man that differentiates him 1mm all other created things and- puts him in a. class bv himself. We find in him a quality 01 life, intellectual. moral. and spiritual. that as truly relates him to the divine as his ma.- terial body relates him to the dust. This is the viewpoint of Genesis. God formed him from the dust, it is MAN'S PLA IN CREATION. '{gg In point 0! o r and importance sen man is the _ ‘wnlng act of (helfig creation pro ‘ In the ‘bible m:- 0! count the C " seems to have put the forth His sup effort to produce. in] man.‘ It is s' fieant that He saysjsciq "Let us make 11.” Have we here9bei; a. reference to Trinity. or does it’do mean that God ?called to His assist-mm ancc the spiritual intelfigences c! .1113. Heaven ‘to ohm with Him reguding‘ol the creation of man? In any case the itmmmi botheextremeimâ€" kin portance of the contemphted under-pus taking, and ,. further significant wa; that man Just in the‘creution ‘5 process. If is anything in the on: exoluflion t it would seem that Icei‘ worked up to mu law 1 creationr He is ties: evidently c ‘ to -be the Mus-Ame ter-Workman’a thusfierpiece. All else as was preparuto to this; thé house- my building and lb aeâ€"fumtshing, as it the were, for the omecoming- of the cea master and his bride. [the that man c process. If evolution t3 God, as it true, but He breathed into him something of Himself and stamped him with His own divine likeness and mat and in the image of God man "the roof nnd ' " The psalmist. says he is (earning! (1 wonde: tally made; also that the‘ tor has made him. “but =littla law then God." . Con- sider ,/ fie grown of Creation, The Formation of Man WESfflfl BflflK 0f Canada Chartered by Act of Parliament 1882 mmmtmu 128 brutal:- u! m in Cnuda. United LITTLE BRITAIN n in Inc can. m {3. ”fly Halal. Ian’s fies! mate to md lh ae-I the om rd his bfl'd hether e ception‘ of Yonroyumdtna. npnsm yo- tho 1m- “.3. MI. Look of Beginnings” by Rev. G. R. Welch. Series on “Great Themes from stamped with the divine [lune-I. a; Canthiubotrue? Dounotthouor- tun did wuon of our city alum h , and an baud dopnvity of mu bu has“ poop}.- am. my me): ex- her! and mum o! humanity? In it. m not calic- to balm magma b :- «Lilo origin Ho is crowned with (low-M110” 'And In none. oaoemrthor um m in tho mu 0! emotion not. only be- om In in the cm: of caution. AT THE QREATION. ;we remember that evolution, as pre- viously stated. only explains how God has done things, and in no sense dispenses with Him as Creat- or. floreover, we must explain man as he is, irrespective of how he has become what he is. Now, while We find that there are certain structural sfmilgities between the man and the spa yet we find that in other re- spects the diflerences between them are much more marked. How differ- ent they are in history and achieve- ment! The ape has ever remained an npwbnfl ""0 goes on progress- ing indefinitdy. What marvels he has wrought in Image. invention, art andreligion ! The ape is stamped withtheimageolthebrute; man may be too. but he also bears the imprint] 0! some other likeness. He hni an ddowment that the brute 401- u (wen u the men biologtcnl tents of his purely Men! «hint. We find Ihnt' in man. evodution 0r developmt. liswitched all in n-new (traction. m. pent-.1. nor-.1 and re- lil‘ionsWt been h§m_townrde vimâ€"uh mullet-u u: u": uuwu: it M be replied that it is no "" ""' ”""‘ " " ” ' were. to have ofiz‘inatpd from the mtertzur: mi: muff: iMX'AGflWIWMI College. Guelph, {or I ope than Rom dust. Carlyle “'lw'orlflnelity and divine her tivee least fl” years in succession. The! the former theory "the goupcl o"1 “an “8““ is not any ‘08:?an consist. of verietios from nearly a? dirt." but. to he helmet. {snot thoiaf Nl'ii‘i! but‘he in clue on intelli- parts of the world, some of whit charge more appropfl‘m to. ‘g-onco He h“. umind or i" .1 have done exceedingly won in t.) IC‘tEl‘. mt ("d 'the [‘0‘] man 0 ‘3' 1 ”h“. . ”God i! light 00 .u‘.‘ ‘. ‘fl- “rd“"y.°°ndUCt°d ex‘wrimpn‘s ‘ mete from either one or the other?‘ng,°m..co tin-Mom .in this "Lope“ the College. and are now being di Ii; depende upon what. We connlder 1“,", God end man. mi alike We trmutod free of charge for co-opernt con-Lieute- lhe real men. “but. in how: "our“! that this world in. the he oxperimmts throughout Ontarh the ooeontloi "th in man. m“ "”1." product and manifestation 0! an In- The following is the list. of co-opu or the spirit '? Wei hold the th-wf , ‘ntivo experiments in tgriculturc fc flmito Intelligence. eieo that mum .. tint the mm is molly the men “MM. of oil cmted W”. cm in- 1904 1 and the body- " merely M" t‘urthiy | tomrrt and appmiete the intelidgent No. Experiments. Plot. tabernacle. at Witt indieponsubie. n] . but. under other runoeivwhlo comii»'u verse in MM“ he dwelh. "01“ 1 â€"’I‘hree varieties 0' “a“ """"""" :rntionai being in e retxonei work“ 2“,;me “How.“ of “yum“; Hone not nocmrily ”0' “w “M 'He can think God's thoopfitm' 'ntter g a . man the" in thu “want. not the ‘03}"l‘fi'n. “Man“? he ‘. (‘0d’fl Child.! a)_;‘:2 5‘8;".tiééuu'6}...1.“:0_r(l);‘0d :znnogtlgrd‘tlrgnagn:|h:";:x:;. i:}:)i:;-m:hi;-‘t MM". ‘ifl “10 ”mo m man a“ in God ‘3 . Boriev ........................................ ' ' e r m, o ', '- _ .’. .3". ._ 33$. i: a“: ‘Hptim‘t‘ izvthltts faaefiitul 11:32:“ Us“!t $3.133?st 3311-1! hot‘i’t‘ 3 flyoununu 0f ”uuffh.m”N . u m . n nu n. , _ I" 3'. 3.. ............... : m» or u L13“:1.::1“v53..::::ui $‘1‘Li‘3:.€°a 4 13,2“ 0M1 peculiar organism and it in the links the divine and the human. in a 5 -'1‘wo varieties ofuBuckwheetT... 'life “at 1' ell-important. mm“ H” “common relationship. 6 â€"Two varieties of Field Pena... ”d" °’ "‘wm‘m“ "‘ mm’y in' We might further point to the will. 7 â€"Emmer end seen ........ ........ cidentul. Theretore. while the bOdylthe moral sense. and the aflections,in' 8 â€"'l‘wo varieties 0! Soy. 8035., may lie related to the ups or to the man as showing ‘1'“ be h” been ' or Japanese Beans dust. w. am! not accept m0 ”lilo m‘do in the image of God. 1133's 9 -mrm mietiu o" Ruskin; 0’1“an the spirit. The' atheiatic power to will raises him above 3°” Corn ........................................ materialist. has no ground oertain- ture so that to a mrmm degree he . . ‘ , . 10 -'1‘hree varxeties of Man els...... :37. to be 9% of has “009‘“! aim- is a. supernatural being. God willed”; -â€"'I‘wo varieties of Sugar? Beets an ancestry, b“ the Ipiritunlly- 9‘30 world into being. and men 0150 for feeding purposes................. “ma“ “"3““ 1‘“ “°‘ ““3”“ “In: a modified sense is u-creator Gui-112 â€"'I‘hree varieties of Swedish in] :uhiverse to the appropriate sciences of astronomy and geology, being satisfied with knowing, u. we do know. that God is ultimately the earthennnl all things, so in like WI... hand over the question 0! the origin of the human race to the science of anthropology and its kindred sciences, being content. here also with knowing that God in some way-lo our Creator. .Now. it we look to science {or an answer to our qyestion we shall re- ceive in reply an evolutionary en- awer. We shall also find more or leas.hostlllty against this nnswcr to the question. The evolution theory as an explanatxon of man is repug- nant to some people on the ground that it points to an undesirable en- cestry. the ape, and also lmperils the belle! that man was cmted by divine act and in the dwlne Imago. But in answer to the first objoction phere for us somewhnt it we place this question where it. belongs. In the past theology has burdened it.- sefl with many pwbtems that do not rightly belong to it. This is one of them. Just as we have remanded the problem of explaining the motor- WAS MAN CREATED OR EVOLVED ? This is a much .debated question. the mucussion of which not. intre- quenuy generates considerabie heat-~ Perhaps iv win clear the atmos- thus made man the climax of cm- tion. But just here the question arises be ruffled concerning the teaching of evolution. The second objection to the theory dlso loses its force when ~vâ€" We now enquire m whet this di- vine lflmness eon-(st... It certainly mnot be any physical resemblance. .God in spirit not flesh. Besides, ,outwerd resemblences are superficial ’tnyway. "True similarity between ‘personelltiee is a spiritual resemb- '11:: touch «mum mm». Mm vault-ml transformations God is working in the lives 0! MViduals and nations. Let us not dge God's work by its present co tlon of Wreckage, nor prenuturely before He he: completed His task of redemp- tion. There I: much to deplore in human nature .but there is this en- couraging teatime that there is a PM development of the m2 ‘0 .w.rda o, uobher reason and a higher lie: and this, also. tint while the [evil dies. xtho good persists. ”PM in the higher mil-ling.) "in: .100. Spiritual m to the m1 and o! the cannon pron-o. It in to flu. god that man Mimosa mat slowly. Ho bu ‘yot “poly ndu-Iul pouibm- We and. in the last! piuoe. that mu: is the crown of creation beâ€" cause he ha been CREATED ’10 A HIGH DESTINY. God nub mu mpme in nature giving him dominion over all thins!- Slowu.yut my, to mentored inâ€" to Ml mum. In this mum he The key to'themyatery then is found in Christ's revelation to the Samaritan woman "God’is spirit." “luminary thought of spirit is that it is immtel'ial. But man also has his immaterial part and is spirit for our Author informs us that God not only provided a body for man which he made from the dust of the ground, but that He breathed something 0! Himself into the pre- pared tenement of clay. Man, then, like God, is a spirit. “we is much we do not know of the nature of spirit. wt we know from our own experience that a. spiriu knows and tech and wins. So it; is along this line that we are to look for the di- vine likeness in man. Men is like God because he is a personality. He is a “manna and selt~directing intelligence. In personality there is gathered up all the complex threads of our being and these are woven into a. pattern of order. reason and beaiuty. This principle of personality is the great steble reality in this world of flux and change; friends. circumstances even fie body changes. but some- how the personality never loses its identity. In a modified sense it is like God. "the some. yesterday. to- day and forever. " Our personality is A greet mvatery end it is sub- llmoly sacred. It comes to us from God and nukes us lilm Him. and neither cute nor church has any created him. Likewise man as a moral being is linked to God. Every experience in life has its ethical sig- nificance-for him. He knows the distinction between right and wrong, good and evil. He can sin and he he! capacity for holiness. And per- haps .the crowning likeness between men and his Creator is found in the affections. The highest revelation of the Winity is that “Hod le love." We find this some attribute in men ; hehethecepeeiwmlove and be loved. Men made in God’s image ! So wonderful, and yet so true 8 We moat truLv value and appreciate our humanity, not by dwelling on the difference between God and men. but by realizing end cheflehing the truth of the common liheneee. The differ- ence between the one end the rush- llght in minke. no doubt. hut yet the light in the acne in both. made in the image of God. Man's power to will raises him shove na- ture so that to a certain degree he is a. supernatural being. God willed [the world into being. and man also in a. modified sense is wereator elâ€" so. {on he can mm his circum- stances and manipulate the forces of nature. He can even oppose his will to the omnipotent Will that SYSTEMATIC PRINCIPLES Should Ever Underlie the Habit of Saving. gre "kihdred spirits. " Dominion Bank one pmned to distribute into every Township 01 Ontario memorial for ex- poriments with fodder crops. roots. grains. grasses. clove-rs, and fertiliz- ers. About 2.000 varieties 0! (arm .crops have been tested in the Exper- .imental Department of the Ontario 'Agricultural College, Guelph, for It leant five years in succession. Those consist of VINGMOS from nearly all parts of the world, some of which have done exceedingly well in the carefullyponducted experiments at the College. and are now being diaâ€" tributod free of charge [or (to-Operat- ive experiments throughout Ontario. The followim.r is the list of co-opur- 'ntit'o experiments in agriculture for mâ€"hmmlxtmoimwd Clover. {orhuym ..8 The aiuolench plot; macho! the out twenty-seven experiments cad in Nolan-manna» be tworodl longbyollqmdwide.udinNo.28 outed-mare. MwfinOnux-iowhom to join in the work any undue guy ottthoer. ”dup- ply torthom. Thom-murfll umumainmm in which tbnppncatioumm until cums-mum. It might bowllhrnchcpplhnt to make lmchoico, 101'th the ant maximum. Au mm“! winhmrniahodenunlv tree 0! ”Quagmiant. and the will. of course. become the M at an pal-Ion who comm fib Wt. Ontario Agricultural 0031030. deh. m «h. 1907. (This is the last: of the series of sermons on "The Creation.” though Mr. Welsh is continuing! «he course taking up other themes.) man would realize what God intmdn ed him to be and what'he may be- come through faith in \J_esu§ Christ}; The crine of the ages is the spirit» us! vandalism that defence the di- vine image in which we have been created. The supreme privilege is“) work with God to the end that again we may be like Him. "Be yo- oerfiect even as your Father in 27 â€"Sowing muscle on the level, and in drills ............................... 2 zenâ€"Two var-tot" 01' Early Pota- Experiments with farm Crops The members of the Ontario Agri- cultural and Experiments! Um‘un are pleased to guns that for :{90‘7 they 19 280â€"‘1‘wo' variation 0! Tate Pots.- 20 21 22 24 Heaven 18 16 13 B. W. Somers. Principal Dominion School of Telegraphy and Railroading, fROM DRUDGIRY 10 $1.200 A YEAR hon long hours 0! uncongcnial work. with little pay. to pleu- out pocitions in railway offices. with Mime. ranging from $50 to 8150 per month. Clip this advertisement, mail it to us. and receive (free) our handsome illustmud book, “The Highway to Success.” 11 delddo St. Wont - Toronto This is whit. we are doing for ting young m of Capada Lo-dgy: nip: I. .......................................... â€"Sowing mange]: on the level. Wheat ........................................ 1 â€"Two varieties of Buckwheat... â€"Two varieties 0! Field Pm....: â€"Emmer und Sbelt ........ ....., ....... . â€"-'l‘wo variation 0! Soy. Soju. -â€"Field Cabbage and two --Three Wine of Field Beams 3 --'I‘hree varieties of Sweet Corn 3 â€"Fertiluers with Potatoes ......... 8 â€"-Fertilizers with Swedid: 'I‘ur- ties of Rape ............................... 3 â€"Three varieties of Clover ......... 3 â€"Sa.idoin, Dame and Bur-net»..3 â€"'1‘hree varieties of Mangels....... -â€"'I‘wo varieties of Sugar Beets for feeding purposes .................. â€"'I‘hree \arietiee of Swedish Turnips ............................. ......¢.1 â€"Kohl Rabi and two varieties of Fall Turnips ........................... yâ€"Parsnips and two varieties of â€"'I‘hree varieties of Fodder or â€"'I‘hre?§ wielded of Millet .......... 3 -â€"'l‘hree varieties of Sorghum ...... 3 â€"Grass Pea and two varieties suing Pom ...................... ....2 of Vetchee ................ Silage Corn .................... Five varieties of Gmsses .......... 5 Carrots .. ..... is our... on. NUMBER 11 4300 Clmulat ion 3! Hats ............. 3 of sixâ€"rowed ......................... 8 ‘of two-rowml ......................... 2 f Hull‘sn‘ hur- t Buckwheat....2 I Field Peas... .2 Ilt ........ . ........... .2 f Soy.. .801“... of Mangels.......3 f Sugar Beets toses. ... ... .2 of Swedish ................ “......8 two varieties ......................... 3' v0 varieties of ......................... 3 of Fodder or ....................... ..3 of Millet .......... 3 Plots. for W? 34.3 ,