Kawartha Lakes Public Library Digital Archive

Canadian Post (Lindsay, ONT18610913), 1 Feb 1895, p. 7

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Su 1)- lank and rrfle bar- a best rant!) work EDY ILLS wea‘ ‘l’?’ NB. MONTREAL’S SlTUATION. Now, I ask every man here how best will Montreal take advantage of its situation. Montreal, situated as ehe is at the end of ocean navigation, and at the head of inland navigationâ€"how beet will she take advantage of her situation ? Will she beet take advantage of it by a system of protection which will kill her maritime trade, or will she not beet take advantage of it by removing the ahacklee from trade as far an it ie poeaible to remove them, and to the extent that it is poeeible to remove them ? I gave you, a moment ago, the namee of 8.: Hugh Allan, of the Hon. John Young, who have been the makers of Montreal, but long before the day: of Sir Hugh‘ Allan, and long before the days of the Hon, John Young, 200 yearabeforethemfiherej was a oitizenof Montrealwhohadhada‘ glimpee into the future of the develop- mentofthiaoity. I refer to the V"! famous name of Robert Oavilier de la Selle. He realized what would be the steam. of the city of Montreal acne day. Behadheardefaneat ain't: that of any other country the past ten years. That in the result, air, of a different system. an article recently published in The Boston Globe and very carefully prepar- ed :â€"“Fifty years ago England controlled one-third of the carrying trade on high seas, but now it controlls more than one- half, or literally possesses 55 per cent. of the carrying trade of the world. Its tonnage of vessels increased from 3,310,- 000 tons in 1810 to 10,230,000 in 1892, or 210 per cent. It has increased steadily with a greater ratio of gain than via the New York Central railroad or the Erie canal to Bufi'alo. Montrral is 250 miles nearer Liverpool than New York is and 83 or 163 miles nearerDuluth. From Liverpool to Duluth the route via Montreal is 333 or 413 miles shorter than the route via New Yor .” Let ua trans- late these distance: into dollars and cents and see what commercial advantages the Canadians will realize on the completion of the great eighty-three and a half million- dollar water route from the Great Lakes \ to the seaboard. That is the advantage of Montreal. Now, perhaps some one may tell me, “Oh, we can have all this with protection,” and some will say, it will come to the same thine whether we have protection or not. I say that you cannot have the benefit of that trade to the ocean unless you have return cargoes coming from Europe. (Cheere.) And there is nothing sure: than that protection destroys maritime trade. There is no fact that is surer than this. It has been proven by the ex- perience of all nations. Let me again quote the authority to which I alluded a moment ago. that is, the authority of Mr. O’Brien, upon the result of protection upon the American maritime trade :â€" “We have lost the ocean carrying trade. nations, and the bulk of our own exports and imports in our own vessels, but our shipping has dwindled both actually and relatively, compared lo that of other mtlone. until we new «lower! almost anneal; on run-lee ships; Sines labs the pmmmom of Mt? fertile“ trade (milled in mw vmels has dwindled time ill “H" m w v-w we we . umezamts, Shall we we anomaly and late our lakes and one“ unit-mug uluu i“ titti‘t'lall HABITIMI‘J Tit-{Uh}. ‘l‘uet has been the result of a difieveut system and a ditferent policy. In England, for iuetauce, let me give you the figurrs. I have given you the result of protection on the American maritime trade, and now let me give you the result of the freedom of trade upon the English maritime trade. I quote from We once carried a large trade for other I l ELOQUBUT SPEECH BY THE GREA T LIBERAL LEADER. (Continued from first page) mm ROUTE. Mr. O'Brien speaks on follows :â€""From Liverpool to New York is 3,040 miles. From Liverpool to Momresl is 2,790 miles. From New York to Duluth via railroad to Buffalo is 1,437 miles and via the Erie tonal 1,517 ‘miles. From Montreal to Duluth via. the St. Lawrence is 1,354. From Liverpool to Duluth vis Montreal and the St. Lawrence is 4,144 miles, which will shortly be unbroken deep water navigation. From Liverpool to Duluth via New York is 4,27 7 miles or 4,577 miles, according as the route be} LAURIER AT MONTREAL. Eh: @auaaiau gust ,4 uer’s Sarsaparillafor the blood: LINDSAY, FRIDAY, FEB. l, 1895. Are the Best AYER’S PILLS [llghest Awards at World's Fall:- For Stomach and Liver Ayer’s Pills all-round mm medicine I have ever known."-Mrs. IAY JOHNSON. 368 RM” Ave.. New York City. “I hue taken Ayers Pm: {or many years. and any: derived the best re- sults from their use. troubles 3nd (or the cure of headach'o caused by these donngements. Ayers rm: cannot be equaled. They are 88! to take. and Any. Remedl .as. rmzcnw mm; mm. Now, air, I may be told egein, “Do you pretend that if we were to abolish the system of protection thet our manufacturers on live in the city of Montreal 1" Why, it; I certainly do pretend it. (Oheert) I contend that the mnfeoturen of Montreal on do better under. revenue terifi' than they can do under protection. (Cheat-I.) I myself an not much of . mum. Innalutyer, and podnpa my advice willnotbotskenwithrelilhbythouwho senator thoumuind :- myself, and tariff. I say to the conservatives who may be present here that if they want to come back to the policy of their party they will have to adopt that policy which was told to them by one of the greatest of their then leaders. But Sir John Macdonald has disappeared. Sir Charles Tupper has disappeared also, and the men who are now in power made a lame efl'ort last session to remove, to a certain extent, the shackles which are now weighing upon the people. They made the efi‘ort, I say, but the effort was too strong for their strength and they had to come back. mm legs; The tieynever eemea in the was of amen when a protested industry w; aloud me its own legs. lean under: stand, wants is human naturei but when do out uudemaud is that thou: who introduce a protective twifl‘. 3““ who introduce it simply to! a time. a‘ lastgut intoxicated with the poi-on of their own doctrine. They ate jolt like the man who commences to drink moder- ‘ately and who becomes a slave to the habit, and then would vain impale upon himself and hia friend: that liquor is indispensable to his health. 80 it u with those protected manufacturers. (Ap- plauee.) Further, I insist that the policy of the conservative party was not intend. ed to be permanent. and a man who ought toknow, Mr. D’Alton McCarthy, who was deep in the oonneela of his party at that time, and who was then looked upon an the heir-apparent to the old chieftain, has declared over and over again that the leaders of the conservative party never intended to saddle for ever the people of Canada with a protective N. W. T., and on the other side the state of New York, the state of Ohio, the state of Illinois, the state of Wisconsin, the state of Michigan, the state of Montana and even the state of Dakota. And in the states and territories he would see millions of men at the Anglo-Saxon race, the great commercial race of the world. he would seea trade larger than the trade of the Orient, and he would find these water stretches which he travelled [in a birch bark canoe now traversed by all the facilities which modern scienoecan give. But he would find against all this that while trade is coming in naturally through this great waterway the people of Montreal are putting obstacles upon that trade and sending it back towards Europe. Now. it seems that for all these reasons you can appreciate that the policy of the city of Montreal should not lie in the way of the restriction of trade. The policy of the city oflMontreal should not lie in the way of contraction of trade, but in free- dam of trade. That is what I am here to argue and that is what I am here to propose to vou to-night. a man or msronr. Before we go further I would like to‘ place under the gaze of the conservatives ‘ ‘ I present a page of the own history, a pageJ‘ a page of very recent’hlsto'ry,‘ a page with reference to the introduction of the J bisystem of protection into this country. Now I appeal to them to speak out their ‘ minds on the question. Is it not a fact . when protection was introduced to the Canadian people that in the opinion, nay, in the very language of Sir John Mac- donald and of Sir Charles Tapper, and of all the authors of protection, that it never was intended that protection should be a permanent institution. Did they not tell us that protection was only to be a tem- porary measure in this country, and, to use the language which was then made use of, that protection was simpiy intend- ed to give a lift to our manufacturers in order to enable them to meet competition from abroad 1 Let me ask you is that not a fact? Gentlemen, you know that that is the case. I defy anyone to point out to me, in France, in Germany, in the United States, in any protectionist country, where the promoters of the protectionst tariff came forward with their policy, at the same time saying to the people that it was to be a permanent I institution in the country. On the con- : trary, every statesman who ever brought forward such a policy always said to his people : “This is only to be a temporary policy ; we must levy a little extra taxa- tion upon the people in order to give a start to our manufacturers.” This was always the first shape of the introduction of a protective tariff, and what was the second shape turned out to be the same in Canada and everywhere else. I defy any man in France, in Germany, in the United States, in any protectionist country. to show me any protected industry which was not Introduced as a temporary proteetlve industry in the first place, and about which it was not said meme” while it would stand on its 62-Fâ€"uncmAnn‘â€"-_.Â¥A the west, which he npposed was connect- ed with the system of the greet lskes, and which he slso supposed entered into the Pacific ocean, and by which, as he imegined,itwouldbe poseihle to bring the trede of the Orient to the city of Montreal. He went in sesrch of thst river. His surmises were nos found correct ; the river did not open into the Pacific Ocesn, but into the Gulf Of Mexico. However, he found en immense territory of lend of the most fertile nature under the sun, end his vision chewed him thst lend inhabited by teeming millions. end the commerce of thst territory much greeter shun the commerce of the Orient. And if he were to come beck to life he would find to-dsy on one side of the lekes the province of Oatsrio, the province of Msnltobe, the and they bought the cheap German eugara to manufacture them. (Cheen) Men of Montreal, what example will you follow 1 I will tell you what I would do about that, but befoteI tell you what I woulddonilltellyouwhatthe connex- vativea will do. (Laughton) The coil. eervatiyeearethe great loyal party of Canada, a you know. Mamet.) Whenever they are driven to the wall and baton in mm: they hanging-gn- mont oftheir ontonu upon their opponent-,mdthoy lay tome-n, “You mnotloyahnndnmthow logs! food, or is it the policy of Englend, which says, “We are ready to profit by the whole world, and if they give us anything free end cheep we will tske it"? I think the policy of England in the wiser one. (Cheerm) But what took place in Englsnd when the sugar refiners not this answer from Lord Salisbury ? The Inger refiners did not fine, they did not lunent, they did not weep, but as true Briton: they went to work and they converted theirrnechinerysoas to nuke it metal for the manufacture of jun: sud presence, t ed with sugar at a price below the cost of r production, Ido not think the English 3 people have very much to complain about t after allâ€"(cheers and laughter)â€"and if u the German taxpayers will tax themselwe in order to supply the English consumers , can stand it just as long and perhaps ‘. longer than the Germans.” (Cheer-e.) Lord Salisbury dismissed the sugar refiners with these remarks. But, sir, before I proceed any further, let us change the scene of action. Let us sup- pose that this incident had not taken place in England, but in Canada. In the city of Montreal there are some sugar refineries, and it is supposed, rightly or wrongly, perhaps rightly, that the refiners of sugar in Montreal are pretty deep in} the confidence of the government. (Laughton) N ow, if the city ot Montreal had been flooded with German sugars which were sold to the govt merchants of the city of Montreal at a price actually lower than the cost of production, 1 Imagine that the sugar refiners in the city of Montreal would have done just the same as the English refiners, and have gene to the government to lay their case before Mr. Foster, the minister at nuance, l have told what was “it answer of Lord Salisbury to the linulislt refiners» of sugar, but do you think that the answer of Mr. B‘tstsr. the Canadian finance minister. would have been the same to a Canadian deputation of sugar refiners under similar circumstances 1 (“No, no 1') Mr. Duster would have said, “Why, gentlemen, do you tell me that German sugar refiners have the auda- city to bring their sugarand sellitin Canada at a lower price than the cost 0! produc- tion? 0h, gentlemen. that will never do. Canada for Canadians, and Canadian sugars for Canadian mouths ; and we will have duties levied to prevent German sugar from coming in to interfere with a Canadian refiners.” (Laughton) :rn’n BETTER POLICY. Let me ask you. gentlemen, which is t the wiser of the two opinions, that of Lord Salisbury or that of Mr. Foster? ' Which do you suppose isthe better policy? i Itit |the policy of Canada, whichians 1 her people to give them a dear article of I a price below the coat of producti >n. Well, Lord Sufi-bury said in efl'ect to this deputation of refiners, “Do I unde you well, gentlemen 2 You tell me thnt in consequence of the export duties pdd by the Genmn people to the refiner: of German sugar that thin Gennnn anger is sold today to the English people ct e price lower than.- the cool: of production 2 If that be the cue," said Lord Snlubury. “if the English people to-day are suppli- Iwhomey'nytome, “omn- inn-1 well for you to soy so; but whet do you éknowebontthebneinessf’ WelLI heve reed something. I donot menufecture, ibut I heve reed something, end every morning I reed The Montreel Gazette, whichiescmething. (Lenghter.) You need not leugh, gentlemen. For my pert I reed The Genette every morning. I hreekfest upon it. (Iaeughter.) I will lnoteey am it n ehsolutely wholesome food, but I em like Hithrediteeâ€"I em 'poieon-proof. I hevereedin'l‘heGezette 9 the stetement thet i! you remove protec- ' tion rew meteriel would no longer be free. I eey thet if we were to heve 'e revenue I terifi' rew meteriels would be free. Bow meterielsere not free to dey under the protective system. There ere oertein rew meteriels which ere free. Wool is free. Ootton is tree else; but is iron free? But there ere two erticles which -ere the rew meteriel at every menufec. turer, end these ere coel en:l iron, end ere they tree? I! you heve e revenue terifi‘ the obiect will be to develop the ciuntry, end ell rew meteriels should he tr 0 under such e terifi‘. (Cheers) I think I oen give you, gentlemen, e little illustreti 1: es to the cii'oct of protection end non-protection. Germeny is e country efter the heert of the Cenedien protectionist. Germeoy for the Germens is the mooto there, and you know Prince Bismerok, who was in power for e greet my years, never did things by helves. In 1880 Prince Blsmerck undertook to 1 give still more protection to the refiners 30f beet root auger. He put enormous import duties on anger, but not setisfied wizh, thet he pleced upon the export of ‘Glrmen suger to foreign countries enormous bounties. He gave to the refiners of Germen eugen- enormous ‘bounties on every ton they exported. Thus protected with en import duty end an export bounty, the refiners of suger in bounw were eble to flood the English merket with German sugers, which were reteiled upon the counters of the English treder et a price ectuelly lower then the caste! production. THE ENGLISH 33113238. Now, I admit thet this wes a. very serious metter for the-English refiners of sugar. The English refiners put up their complaint before Lord Selisbury. They represented thet they could not compote ‘ with the German sugers, which were ectually sold to the English mechenic et CANADIAN POST,ALII{DSAY. ONT., FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 1895. ie the true princple of reformâ€"the principle of British reform, which movas gradually step by step, and which never fl=nches until the end has been achieu-d. (Cheere.) Irefertothat British reform which was very careful not to inflict any unecessary hardship on any industry; and in the language of the resolution which I quoted to you, “While not doinr injustice to any class, will promote domestic and foreign trade and hasten the return of prosperity to our people.’ (Cheers.) Today in the streets of Montreal you meet upon every hand men with long faces. I do not know whether their anxlsty is absolutely genulne, or whether lt ts put on. Perhaps It ls genuine. and perhaps also It ls put on. These people say to you 5 “ll the lllverals “Hutu power. and "it, probably they ‘ will neat tlme. they are role: to aim" h onotecnoa. and by abolishluu pmteettue they are going to create a panic. at lei-mm disturbance ot values that will hrum on a financial orleia‘“ Now. air. it that remuinu:meaua t oythiuu it would aluwly mean this =~that reform would be for- ever impossible, and that it it he the misfortune of a country to be saddled wtt‘h avicious systemâ€"l do not care of what kind, economic, political or any‘ other-then nobody should dare to touch i that system because the process of reform ‘ would cause some displacement of inter- ests. (Chen-s.) But, gsntlem‘n, there is a way, and a way of relorm. We are willingto go for precedents to the old land, which has passed through that ordeal helore us. In 1846 Sir Robert Peel carried England over from protectton to free trade, and he did it by a gradual process which avoided all disturbance of values, and which avoided all financial crises. Thatis aprecedent which, good for England, is good for Canada, and which ought to be still more sensible for Canada to adopt than, it was for England, because the interests involved arenotsogreatinflanadato-dayas they ‘were in England thenâ€"(cheers)â€"and the "op was a much longer one than the step would be here. Thestep in England was all the way from protection to free â€"â€""e'1w~ E : plainforthelihsrel party. (Gheera) I ; haveexpressedhereexaetly what we want. Upon the qnution of pu'neiple therecsnbeno compromise. West-rad1 hereegainstprotsdlcnndinfasor o! a mum-norm. Theoomnfivuhnnnlnyum mung-humane! that: Mud mm mun-study.)- the lay-17 ell tho eonooovetivo ocetou nytoyou. “0h,l!youorogoingtoxoduoothotort£, how one you going to get o :ovonnol Gentlemen, ltio not neeoooory to Inoho ouy vety oeriouo argument to answer thot qoutlou. We ere noted how no you gotno to roioo o revenue, end the enowo: iootnplythio, "by hovingo toniflfioo revenue.” The tori! thot wo he” in Oenndo to-doy io not o tort! (or inovenuo, end I could quote to prove thio tho wade of Mr. Footer, tho fimnoo ninlotol, whiohhenveuttenneetonotlotoo then hot oeooion of porlioznent. Mr. Footer then-old: ‘Theothorondthlxd method io the pxoteetive toritl‘, by which yon odeoteoertninliot of urticleo Ind plus uponthemeertoiunteoof importwith o view of nioingooortoin mount of annoy 1 for the mice: of the country, but more ‘ eopeeinlly with thio view, thot whilot you mine tho mount of money the; to neeeooery for the country. you Inuot otixnulote the development of the country." Gentlemen, you hove tt here ploinly ototed thot the object of the ME in not to nine e revenue. Thot in only on in.ident of tho protective tail, but the fint obieot oftho terifl'ioto xeioe money oo no to develop our intent induotrieo, thntioto ooy, to rnioe tnxeo nottoplnoeinthetteuury but to [than them in the poehoto of eertoin fovored olnooeojnud individunlo. (Cheat) New, reveroe the prieiple. Hove o tel-ill not for protection, but oimply for revenue, endittoquiteoleor.uoy, itioooploin no can be, thotwltholooeetunounto! dutioe you will hove more revenue then you hove nude: the preoent oyotea ot the preoent tune. (Hour, hoot.) rnn nusonnu cums. Now, oir, thene io mother end vety ooziouo queotion. I hove told you thot our object In to hove n cuotemo tnrifl' hosed upon the prlncipleo of revenue only. Howiotobecfl’eotedl Alter no the oettlemenl of thet queotion goeo we ore not between two extreme ooh of men. Weereznet by thooo who {our thot we will no too for, end by thooe who four that we will not go for enough. We one met by thooe who four we will move too ropidly ond by thooe who believe we will be over-condone ; between ltnmovebility on the one oide end revolution on the other. There in mother oound couroe, und thot _ hut! etchi- ”Inky? Wild-h tho butpoiicy for n- to sonar! In it an nonud common non-o of Englsnd which Win-uw'lnumltmm nt tholowatpo-ibloprioo o: danpoliay of Gummy which, in Older to maintain in 1mm industrial, uk- tho money on: of the pack»: ohm Got-Inna pooplo Ind punitinm the pooh“ oftho Gm Inga nfinou. There in no nu panning thnt Argument Any further ; the policy 0! England in the common unto one. (Chm-I ) “mamumma mwflbubm-Mbm “may. ‘- ouuufiquw. mg.- by uqund hint or Nudity. than old to. Budd-MW .uummmm; “gummmmm odds in mtmbyhhdpdflcofl’om Ynlulldhdvflblbmhmwm tun-mum 1a to on. m an: mun-u. 51,391, 3M “Swnnu's Gnu-um." No menu modloino malted- Cum gm,” Itch. all caption on the m m mom. lowing the sun eta-r. whit. III! healthy. lambd- andomuvem no mood 2.5m My. Ask drum}?! Svunu‘l Om 8: Conmm ”Escmmmmu thou-1y m. mmmmd them-pd .nxoslfisw ._ "'2.- At kmunwdo'fifi’uwmumum luv . mm]!!! We Minna m M was! um: Mud by wwu marina ”Man- on. who make «my tum of mud w. Buchanan tom-tau. am 5 Row Yon mummy. m ulna-d: In a». mum ulna-I baton awn- ha ban 3 mum mu. M m locum! In IWINI Md comm-mi (may prim. Gaucho-cunt thocity of mama. I luv. expoudmyou whut in thopm- mm of tho lihonl party. It in u pipinuitosubo. Ithuproatunmofor u m. tail upou u buds of unnuo sud nothiugoho. (Chou-I.) Thu in tho iuuo upon which to intend to fight. and tlut in the luuo upon vh‘ch l invito the eoudhl oo-opontion of the whole city of Manual nod tho whole people of Gun-d: st lugs. (Loud choodng.) no" ”a The”. Be am thut your celery lunches hive good drainage and are well pro- tected overhend. no thu neither but not m can touch tho toll-(e. Beau. annot- nd turnip- ln the cel- lum [able to chin! and become worthleu unle- ollghtly covered with all. mdl. ood- a I blanket. Protect onion: from com {realm Win-WNW” 11.; um legislature of Vermont nu chosen red clover u the m flower. fnoo parliamentary institutions that tho pooplo to-day ahonld ho loft in tho dark, as thoy an, autoohothorthoroioto ho a diuolntionof padiauontot not. Int ithoknownornotwhothor thoroiato hoadiaaolntion. 1 can not. ('Jhooa.) Whonovor ltoomoa woahall ho roady for tho tray. (loud ohoora.) Wo ohall fight a his hattloamlwowillwin. (Ohm) Undontaod no, I do not wish to to nilty of auoha low thing aa boa-Hug. Thaoianothlnzoouoooctain.aauirJohn Mould mod to oay. an an olootion, a houo raoaand a oock fight. (Laughton) But all tho alga-of to-day arothattho people of Canadaaro dotorninod tohavo a ohango at Ottawa. (Ohoora) Whoa- ovot tho “no. oonaa wo ahall ho roady lot-tho fay and wo will aooopt the woodiotof thopooplo of Canada withtho oonfidonoo which won manifestod in tho roaolntion from which I read an oxtraot a men; m- Wh-Ibmnmnbahdtormwru. mummmmwamh mummmwwm Few cmpdm bellow they no ten.)'Ithuooneslreedy likeethietnd itmyeoneqein. (Dachau) [great you. gentlemen. that the gout-hunt hie theeonetitutiouelpom to epply to his exoelleney the comer-gene“! for e dieeolntton, but they have nut the power todothethonnereceprlee. Theyheve thht power when they ehow amende- qmte. Why, sir, it in not for «nee ndeqwe tht the ooneerntive petty of hte years heve ever aked for e die-elation. They obtained the din- eoludon in 1891 on e hhehood. but with thst teleehood they matched 3 verdict fromthepeopleotOenlde. I uythia heaneelthinkitieenontngenpon our I o tho lond u! oound pmt nod oound com oonoo, old Inglond. (Ghost) Ithh-thntlundthntltoho ‘Iny thootloo. nnd upon thot Notion. hotwoon trlond And foo, touting houo to-uixht upon thot plodom, oxemplldod no I hovo told you, tho llhonlpnrtyol Onondo will fight tho noxt hottlo whou- ovor tho noxt hottlo any oomo. (Chan) M run or urns. Gontlolnon, whrn will tho tino of hottloooutol Thu I do not know. I on notln tho oooxoto of tho ungod- thot nit ot Othorâ€"lnuhtorâ€"hut. no you know, it in told in Butlptulo thnt dooth will own liho othio! lnthonighgonl tho government ot Ottown ropnooontl doo'll in mm oonooo thou oao. (Lough- question. Iuhtbommyu' man [actuation and the! 8'0““ at Manda» mama» mam-1 ‘5' MW. GondouonJ mutt" mhinpnhfionuthtslflmiopm" mentithmnmunfion de'ill mung-Mono. am. but “1' mammotthukindmmhnm but.“ than with but shoolub ooh- tempt. (Ohm) Famofm' uong for afloaonomlo Pfiwfl'fi I '° TA: 0141 Reliable Tabacwuist tap: all th My Brands of Foreign and Dona-tit: TOBACCO and CIGARS upn'caa: Law a: 1‘: Laura. Thanking my mm- m Customs/arm in the MW“ 4 We: of min/hm. d. RIGGS. mm ' Kidn Pills to cute my “3.1...“ ”36:31:. ”43: Dawsm has. lmpm’eua-mâ€"or money minded. TM in or an“ on Sold by nude-kn in medic e1 by ”-30- mdmwewwfi - ,,,,,,, WILL GURE YOU Clover 8nd wanted, for which the HIGHEST PRICE will be PM Fetch on your ”do and got your Farm Stock Insured at Ihorough-bred and Farm Stool: Insured at 0er Low Rates. J. RIGGS. DON’T DESPAIR LINDSAY FOUNDRY “6.0.0.0009. Lowell.” amgmwnndy forchfldmot nuts-W [WWW‘IBN mwmmwMermm mammalian-Win- mammmwm." mmwmwtmoflnm. m m syrup and other hurtful all- m the man. would!“ “b”@” “munmmm dail- dnn. XMMnmmmdiu Numfiwpu.” JAS. KEITH’S. WILLIAM STREET. Dodd': lodxctno Co LINDSAY. m in Dr. Senna! Pitcher: pmcription for nem- nnd 05mm It contains neither Opium, Morphine no: other Kmotio substance. It is a harmless onbutitnto for Rhetoric. Drops. Soothing Syrups. and Castor Oil. [tune-ant. Itsgnnrnntoo is thirty yenu'nae by 1111qu ofliothers. Cutoriadostro31Wot-msnndnilnn W Onstorin prevents vomiting- Sonr Curd. camel m and Wind Colic. Custom uneven «sun: troubles. cures constipation and fletnleney. WW thefood. regulates thestonnch nod bowels. giving healthy and natural sleep. Cu- m is the Children's fiancee-the Mother's Friend. JOHN MARINE. LEW-rid 00.. Toronto. 50 W Company. '17 Hum? ONTARIO MUTUAL LIYE STOCK OVER SEED. h. J. t. m 003m. A" AunGmP’I-o SUIT 01' OVERGOAT Richardson Cornell. Rlclfirdson 3: Cornell. One Door M:gt§.l:ofiwegngmry Boon. Mud-v AMI NEW GOODS AND PRICES TC SUIT THE TIMES. For a Nobby and Fashionable Jane: Kenn. John Mann. What is 088 $0111. MOI. [M A Hut-Ola: All for - 650. A Good “I." for - 10c. 01m: OMB for - me. 6001) mm for - 351:. m Innr‘l' Rattles for $1.25 moth 811m ‘1' P018 for 806. Ian! om ernm, $2.50 lb. low lo. 9 060K at VanUMIr'S, AXES and Cross-Cut Saws. Kennedy, Davis Son. 1.0an, amen-.9. mm. mm. stun. um: and woon, All Kinds of LUMBER. Organs and Pianog. orncl 1m.â€"ht ad 0! ! luau-at. luau mutant. mm - - $12 50 mm of all Kinds Cheap 3.889.355 438,8.333853 J‘Jgoogolokaggufia gluing-0:93.82 .59 g 951 has 93 5985? van 1.8806383555353588 +193 3 banâ€"2 nouonu 3......qu §»g§ooaelfilflho: KQngL-D‘ v18 «9 Son- “M‘unmummmu Immdltumiofloww baritone.” _ - . Maw 0mm â€"PIJCI YOUR om mâ€" Mills 31' Babes: (con. J. J- WBTHBRUP. â€".muâ€" W1111am-ut. Nortn 'â€"â€"wm m m 0!â€" SM New York any. Cum Bonus. J. J. Wgflurup. F. Van Camp 111 So. 0810M St»-

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy