The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

nne‘ hen SEQ? 6. 00 15 00 16. 50 65.00 85.00 30.00 5. 00 10.90 ml 01 of mmmw, mm...“ it » 1m: wuuu: “a“: _____ 1M '1 :heretore it could not be charged that v:19 Government was acting hastily or ' xthout consideration. Jt being 6 o'clock the House rose for M...- Miinituhzi. Tho i‘rutosmnts of Quebec held the name viuw on the school question as "In i‘nthullcs did. hulcllng that tho? wvro viiully intvwstod in the merit mm, Mutualo their intvrosts «pend- wi on ”1v same part or the con-titu- iiuu m that undor which tho Cathollcn now asked (or redress. 1! Quebec wlnhml it could take away or seriously harm-n- with tho achoola or the Protest- ant minority. This would no; be done. 9m it I! was. the migorjty wpulq hgvo m m-vk the same aid that the Catho- lic minority now sought. In dealing with tiu- question at issue the GOV- ernmeiit hm strictly carried out the course laid down in 1890 by the moâ€" “Un Dmposed by Mr. Blake. and car- rivd unanimously by the House, by Which questions of interference ln mat- ters of education should be referred to the courts. He quoted the various acts or the Manitoba Legislature to show that previous to 1890 the school system created by that Legislature. under its constitution. was carried out on denominational lines as between Catholics and Protestants. Throughout the history or the movement for re.- dress the Government first referred all petitions and proceedings to the Man!- toba Government. The course was not at all drastic. The school question had Pfen .before -the country since 1890: “'38 to see that the right: of m min- -or1tlea shouid be protected. Moreover. "We who bad man strongly spoken. 101' such a pmvlalon w these re re- senting the Protest». of Qu 3- P’sz. be compared 2:: attitude 0! the Conner-nave. um but?! .to show that while tho Con-main. had followed a. consistent M throughout. the Luzon]: Ind bun nt- aerly Inconsistent. 81:- John noun-on 1‘.“ :3 “mm: ”3: 33:32:: at tn: ' 01! stand “M‘s!!! the gator 1943.30.90.09?! ny that. the Roman Catholic grievance in relation to education existed. The real question was that the extent 0! the grievance ought to be en- quired into. The Opposition dld not geny the jurisdiction or this House in the matter of the educa- tional legislative functions and the Lon-Lil Legislature, but a respect for provmctal rights in general should teach us how to interpret and exercise our poxvers or interference. He con- tended that the Government itself ad- mitted that the only way to apply the remedy was through the Provincial Gun rnment. The bill was evidence of that. Then, as to the best time, there was no doubt that this proposed re- nmly should be applied only as a last nan-t. The character or the remedy was a matter of opiniOn so far, and should not be determined upon with- out enquiry. Nothing prescribed that it was l’urliament’s bounden duty to zit-2, 01‘ when and how it was to act. 'Vcl‘)‘ fow except the Manitoba and it'orthwest members knew anything of thc condition of the schools up there, and it would be as reasonable to ex- pu't Parliament to deal with the lob- sm- lisheries of Nova. Scotia Without cx‘le't testimony or enquirry as to «ll-:11 with this question without in- vestigation. Thousands of dollars had been spent to investigate the evils of Chimse immigration and of lntemper- ace»; by Royal Commission. Contradic- tory statements of facts appeared in (-Vrly printed record of this school crisp. While the «lee was before the Privy (Mum-ii. a. witness. Mr. O’Dono- hu.-. tvstii‘l-«l that the Roman Catho- lir-s of Winnipeg Were satisfied with like Pubill' schools and would accept them, lmt the priests would not allow them. 'l‘h.- disputed facts as to the Bill of ltirzhts also required investiga- tion. ln conclusion. he said the bill was an unacceptable and a mistaken 4-nmnrumisv. which pleased “neither of 81:3 Mitch-{Shah Mm rnlfr.‘ 3' m Slr Charla Ribbon l' a - Foster. which he Q“ ‘n this: their an Inn down in , constitution '1‘)!”er film 3”" m we: recess sn- Adolphe Caron con- tinned the debate on the Remedial bill. He quoted at length from speeches at 1'3 din n: Canadian statesmen such Brown .Holton and other: at the time °t the lmugurmion of Confederation 0 show that all were agreed that the 5399181 duty or the Federal “Permanent no Aiken-nee or 09511311. ' The course has. ”sen talmwm and ueun. Scottie: nil Laverne mu stand by the Policy of Their lol- ond Lender. llr. unflewsu' Adolphe Caron Speaks on De- hnu or the Clem. Ottawa, March 4.â€"(Speclal.)â€"Mr. Edgar resumed the debate on the Re- medial Bill. He announced his entire agreement with Sir Charles.Tupper as to I“: momentous character or the question. He reared it might endan- 5:1‘ Confederation itself unless dealt with in a. spirit of broad statesman- ship and patriotic moderation. He was afraid Sir Charles Tupper’s long abScncc from Parliament had led him to advance many propositions for con‘ tradiction which the Opposition never :ubscnbed to. Manitoba, too, had ad- mitted the right of Parliament to deal with this question,nor did Mr. McCar- thy, arguing for the Provincial Gov- ernment before the Privy Council, de- FRENCH MEMBERS TAKE THE FLOOR Second Day of the Debate on the Remedial Bill. THE GREAT QUESTION fic’fimam £051. 25¢. MARSH )3. was. pose, was educated in a. Protestant school; my leader was educated in 8. Separate school. I give the House the comparison. (Laughter) Continuing, he offered as an objection to the bill the proviso making it optional for Catholics to support Separate schools. as the lower rate for Public school supporters would lead Catholics to support those. Mr. Oulmetâ€"No. no. Mr. Geoftrlon t) :11 said he would vote for the slx months’ hoist. because It was the only thlng the bill deserved. 7......_-_A an \AA\. Va.- He had no faith in the Government. but thought his own leader was better able to do justice to the minority.‘ The bill might please the minority or not: that should be investigated. It might be acceptable to some interested par- ties. but he would oppose it. ' _ "an: .- »-vâ€"‘- .i V that justice wa about to be done through It, through its liberal Protest- ant membership. too. (Cheers) He regretted some Conservatives, however. opwsed the bill. He referred to Mr. Maclcun, who used his.newspaper,'rhe World. to create public opinion against the bill and then said, "See, public oxinlon is against the measure." Yet tn;- hon. member was or a. $39 heart and broad understanding 9. er long he believed he would be on the 9 de 01 right and justice. That the bill was sufficient was evidenced by the tact that it was drafted after the model presented by Mr. Ewart and by the tact that Mr. PrendergS-Bt. the leading whom] 01 Multobahdeclar It was sufficient to meet e We a or e Catholics. He concluded by hoping that lovers of the counu‘Y. “it play “d justice would join hands and follow in the matter that would 7__._ -a n... nonunion m an Col. Amyot (Bellechasse) grew elo- quent over the freedom and Justice granted by Britain to her colonies and directing himself towards Mr. McNeiil (Bruce). rather of the recent loyalty resolution. said it was all very well to talk about loyalty. but all who were truly loyal and had any respect for the Crown would vote to carry out the terms of the law signed by the Queen. ((Yheers.) He took exception to those who said they would not vote for the bill because it was not sutllcient. on they were refusing perhaps the only ummuro or relic! they could ever not and the only chance or restoring peace and happiness in the country. He thought Mr. Oeoifrion's remark thlt Mr. Laurier was more able to settle the question then the Government was significant. Was there a communion.- tion betweeni‘lidrungurier and ‘lisr. 4,, I--.‘ Mr. Geoffrlonâ€"I was talking about schools as they will be under the bill. not as they exist at present. The only comparison I heard between PrOtestant and Separate schools was made by an hon. gentlemen on the opposite side of the House (Clarke Wallace). fie, I sup- ,;__A “UH uutvvcvu out. .- ..-- Greenway? Did Mr. Laurier lead Mr. Greenway or Mr. Greenwuy direct the policy or the hiberais? (Cheer-s.) Mr. Laurie:- had a. hoid‘on Mr. Green- way and tailed to use it to put a. stop to his internal conduct whereby con- sciences are violated he should be do. nounced before ail Confederation. It was a credit to the gouservative party -__A 4.- kn Jinn. t run: together for the an Investigation before action. id be- lleved the proper course to pursue VIM to show that the xrievuncea existed and then he was “tuned the mutton. Legislature would xedma the mem- cea which exilted. ' - claimed ~1..\.\.._,., Mr. Ceoffrion (Yercheres) opposed the bill, because he wanted justice done. but the bill did not do 1t.Con- trary to all practice at second read- ‘ngs, when the principle of the meas- ure alone is discussed, he dealt with the details of the bill. The bill would result in a Catholic being taxed $25. while his Protestant neighbor paid only 50 cents. This would mean inefficient Separate schools. Mr. Ouimct interrupted to ask it he was aware that these very inefficient schools were being attended in Winni- peg by 44 Protestant pupils; and these schools were being kept up by people who at the same time were paving taxes to Public schools. ., ,"A My contention is that it‘ is not the habit of our clergy to threaten. I know not what the threat to which he refers was. If he referred to the letters which have been published in the news- papers, I do not see how that could be construed into a threat. I speak here in the presence of men from the Province of Ontario whom I have known when I was engaged in Cam- paigns under the leadership of the great old leader of the Conservative party (Sir John A. Macdonald), and under the leadership of that other great man whOSe loss We deplore (Sir John Thompson). I tell these gentle- men that if they can be led to believe that the French-Canadian Catholics or the French-Canadian clergy are not as true and as loyal to the Crown of England and to the flag of Canada, I ask it to be shown to me. because I have had every possible oppOrtunity of studying their past history and the history of their present movements and I am unable to find an instance in which it can be stated that the elem Of Canada have been disloyei. (Loud cheers.) ‘ x Ilt'lu UuI. y un. ‘_,“_,_____,, , or did the clergy or Canada. take ? Even in that period of 1837, when the senti- ments or the French race were more moved than at any other period, when mme of our own people were fighting for constitutional rights, but ignored the constitutional way in which these rights should have been vindicated, what course ("d the clergy or Canada take ? Did no we see then the Arch- bishops and the Bishops publishing mandamuses all through the country telling their people that their duty was to remain true to the Crown and to respect the constituted authority. Why should we not follow such a. lead ? I do not wish to be misunderstood, and I am not insinuating Mr. Laurier at- tacked the clergyâ€"(Opposition hear, hear)â€"but carried away in the discus- sion. he said that he had been attack- (,d by the clergy. My contention is that it‘ is not the hohif he mn- olprzv to threaten. I know DUGUC Luce: ”.V‘M‘I-r- . rlest The only brother he had was a. p among the blacks in the West Indies. A short time ago he received a. letter rom his brother, who asked that the Canadian flag should be sent him to place over the house he had built be- cause he would like to see the flag of his native land flying on it. or such loyal men were the clergy and the Country was proud of them. Slr Adolphe Caron then said :In‘1812, when our people were under the sorest temptation to give up thelr allegiance to England. because of the promlses held out by the Amer-leaps. what course , A_‘_.‘ 0 Evan Kn lander had. on the athei- hand. in 1393. said that not a moment at de-‘ lay should be allowed in the settlement of the question. but toâ€"day he prongs- ed six months' further delay by mov- ing the six months' hoist. Later he said there should be an investigation, but now he simply wished to (m the bill out of doors. In the House he call- ed the Remedial Order an invitation. not a very drastic name. He quoted L3 Cultivateur. and other French papers. which reported Mr. Laurier in Que- bec. showing his speeches as reiterat- ing the declaration that he would re- establish Separate schools while the English Liberal papers were altogether different in tone. Referring to Mr. Laurier’s claim that there should be an investigation he asked what better evidence could be had on the 901!“ than that 0! Archbishop Tache and Sir Donald Smith. Moreover, when the proposal was made to secularize the schools all the Protestant clergy had protested against it. He considered Mr. Laurier’s reference to the cleft!)r as most unfortunate. Had the clergy no rights? They were sons of the families of the country and should the fact that they wore the religious habit restrain their trying to lead or per-~ suade their brothers? _ - _ m_1--a thg qqestlon, me' m 'contmxon or 01 {591315 1 He agn- on"-.. u. v- are well expressed in the following quotations. taken from an address or the GM. Bro. James L. Hughes. de- livered to this Grand Lodge. assembled at Chntham. March 13 1894: " ‘We believe in one national system of education of all the children or our Province as the surest way or giv- ing every child the inestimsble ad- vantages of a. thorough education physically. intellectually and morally. and the only way by which the chil- dren or all creed. end classes can be trained to live in harmony. respect- ing each other. remisint each oth- cr's rights and cementing thst mutusl interest that will qualify them for friendly and sympsthetic oc-operstion in the up-buildinz or their-common country. The men who have to work side by side as citizens of the some country should plsy shoulder to shoul- der es boys on the same school flflfllndl' I. Unusual interest is bolus tslten in the e ection which was concluded this st- eernoo‘ n. The regular bustness we; sus ended to ensbie the electioa to be hel . ss e. number of the delegates had to leave for home on the night trains. Notwithstanding the report. to the contrsry. there was no contest for the position of Grand Hester. Follow. in: is the result: Grand Master. W. . Lookhardt, Alliston: deputy GM. D. M. Jermyn. Winrton: Associate De- puty G.M.. John. McMillan. Toronto: Grand Trees. E. F. Clarke. Toronto; Grand Sec. Wm. Lee Toronto; Gnnd Chap.. Rev. J. 0. main. aunts: arena Lecturer. o. F. Wilkins. Bridxeburg; Grand Director of Ceremonies. Wm, Wilson. Brenttcrd: Deputy Grend Sec” James B. Scott Kinesrdine; Auditors. John Hewitt. create. end '1'. o. lo- Avoy,_ Belem. .- __, _ _V_ g t m‘-- ‘w- , , “Your committee further begs to re- port that the present danger impending over Protestant and British interests in Canada is so imminent that no word or act should appear in the pro- ceedings of this Grand Lodge that could weaken the arm that is reaised in defence of the National schools in Manitoba. and that thls Grand Lodge should express its unquallfled repudi- ,AWL -_ h.....: I... snuulu cog-nus»; n-u â€"-- _.._____ ation of evxery sentence an dword in the address which tend to put the Province of Manitoba in the wrong. or to justify coercion by the Federal Government. “The sentlmentspt. you; committee A _ JANAâ€"fin" “Your committee further beg leave respectfully to protest that the 101- lowers at Orange principles. as repre- sented by this Grand Lodge, do not meet to be lectured on tolerance and Justice. and that the repeated exhorta- tlons to be tolerant and Just, contained in the G.M.’s address. are at least un- necessary and poctlvely uncompli- mentary. - .. L,_, A- _- Uttawa. March aâ€"(SpeclaDâ€"Tho Hon. Mr. Ives resuming the debate on the Remedial Sm. said that as the rep- resentative or the Protestant minority 0: Quebec he had naturally 81V“ '- sreat deal 0: Study to the manner in which the position wn wected by the present question. He sue a. “me or the school lawn of. Ontario and One- bec at the time of. Confederation. show- lnz that-the Cutholio muority in Que- bec really controlled the machinery by which the Protestant nchooll were con- ducted nnd theretorg hnd it in their power to destroy the untame- at their schools by impodnt own-cunn- ohlo text-book; etc» upon them- In the Ichool inn 0: Ontario tho nun. detect m ohmohlo .- roam uh- genes gthlttgmrds 30:; tho pm- “We regret that the attempt was also made to compare the most dissi- milar cases of Quebec and Manitoba. knowing as we do that there are no National schools in Quebec, In the sense that they are in Manitobamhere the door is alike open to Protestant. Roman Catholic. and to Mennonite. with no distinction that should offend the nicest religious seruples. “The merits or the school case were not on trial before the Privy Council of England and we feel that the two hundred thousand British subjects, our friends and our brethren residing in Manitoba, can be trusted to do justice on the merits. We regret that the at- tempt to do so made in the G.M.'s ad- dress conveys the distinctly false impression that the Legislature or Manitoba has refused to render just- ice to the supposedly injured minority in that province. 0n the contrary the Government of that province declared their total ignorance. as we declare our total ignorance, or even the least real injustice done the Roman Catho- lic people of Manitoba. and they de- clared further their eagernesg to have the most ample investigation, and that whatever injustice, it 811?. might be brought to light by the most searching investigation. the Legisla- turgior the province ‘wouid remedy. um t6 tlon or the Rom-.1: Ctthollc ohm-sour or the Sepante Ichooll. Then the Lemma or the Province 0! Quebec. 1n punmoe or the prom!“ mine: 81:- Hector Longevln 1nd su- Goon-to n. Cutter paced on not utahthlns tho compo-man at tho Council or Public Intruotbn. the to ho gt a. «rum 9 r o: mtg-tong: ed the finished and elaborate address of. the RW. the G.M.. and take this Oportunity to congratulate this Grand- body Upon the able way in which that address has expressed the deep satis- faction that we all feel in the stand 8116137 and noble pride shown by the splendidly isolated isles beyond the sea. We feel that in the interests of the Empire and of Protestantism be- yond the bounds or Canada we are not one with the R.W.G.M. of Ontario West. We also agree with the 3.W.G. M. that all true Orangemen sincerely desire to promote the unity or the peo- ple of Canada. and they must deplore the introduction of sectarian issueS. which destroy national harmony and prevent the co-operation th t should be the distinguishing characte - istics of Canadians of an classes and creeds. ‘ “We must confess. however, that that some of the matter contained in the address does not to us seem strictly pertinent to the character or the as- sembly address and that in particular the multitude of details containing theories or school work would be liable. it recommended by this grand bodY. toibe considered an impertinent inter- ference with the educational machinery or a province or which we are not electors. “We beg further to report that the portion or the Grand Master's address which relates to the Manitoba school question appears to our plain and sim- ple minds to partake of what. among lawyers. is .termed special pleading. To your committee the declaration or the R.W.G.M. that we. as Orangernen, are opposed to Separate schools. taken in connection with the curious context by which that declaration is surround- ed, places the G.M. in an unfortunate position. We regret that! the (1M. should have attempted to make uSe of the purely technical decision of the Privy Council and should have at- tempted to lend so much weight to that catch word. “grievance: by which is properly implied no more than the legal right to be heard in appeal be- fore the Govemor-General-in-Council. London. March 4.â€"(Special.)â€"The Grand Orange Lodge 0! Ontario West resumed their deliberations at 9 mm. toâ€"dny. A‘large number of delegates came in yesterday evening and this morning there are 350 members in at- tendance. Great interest was taken in the report or the Correspondence Committee, who had to draft a. reply to the Grand Master’s address. As was surmised. they diner in toto with him- Atter a. protracted debate it was adopted with but few slight amend- ments. This is a, great victory for the anti-Remedialists. The report is as toilows: "KW. Sirs and Bros..â€"Your commit- tee have caretully pursned and vggizh- \vâ€"‘vd .n, Mr. Ives moved the adjournment of the debate and the House adjourned at 1.30 a.m. Wu...“ us vvpvuv-na ur- vâ€"v putting them on o. 11:- too‘tin‘. Wm“ not in the least Interfering with the Public school system. It was the duty of Parliament to go oh with the Act. 7311! if. at the present session. Ilia-n1“:- ba. by her own measure. redreued the grievances of the Catholiesgvery mem- ber of Parliament would rejoice in it. (Cheers) _ . J shléixtiJEq "ohjeétldni' '9'? gig @5501“:- A _I-I‘A CANADIAN POST, LINDSAY, ONTARIO, FRIDAY, Bun -. . _--.-_ duced. he would oppose the measure. was the House in honor bound to pan such legislation? There were no school: established by lsw in Moni- tobe. previous to the union. After the union Separate schools were instituted "N1 in 1890 the some power which cre- ated them abolished them. The Gov- nment was bound to hour the up of the minority but wsa not obliged to grant the appeal or issue a nmcdinl order. It wss their duty to consider all the clroumstnnces or the one. It the intention of the Manitoba. Act wns to prevent the abolition of Scpnretc schooll why did it not soy so? There wns nothing to that effect in it. The. effect of the arguments ndvnnccd in favor o! the measure wu thst it the Province hsd Sepsnte schools before the union they could not be abolished. Placinx the one in this my it won convincins’ to him At least. (”unused Mr. Geoflrion bod sold ho wou d vote uninst the bill snd Wt“ for the bet- ter one from Mr. Lourier. He would be it um dly come. Hr. osterhWhnt it can on help!" tort thst lender into power? , r. Crowâ€"I would be sorry to {0! him into power sud sorrier i: he n- troduccd n Occond bill. Proceeding. nr. Cult sold the bill j Wu (mild one. In tut. it was so. mild us could be and be a hill at oil. manner.) However. it contoincd the . grinciple at the ro-estoblishment of epmtc schools in Msnitobn nnd tho! . we. sumciont to condemn in. The- cue or Pretending-Forth schools ct Quebec was not id with mgr-e- sent cue. The public schools of ue- ' bee and Onurio gt! much. '0" E. a5 9. §§ , 8 ii a? 3. i g a 3: $25 $1.. E a; if 1 3 E E E t E ‘E “i {E htihui the privilege 0: Um. no w give out odnution. If they wish- ed to v. religion. cane-Mon may could do Io. but. 3: their own agent: Did the minority oufler? No. udx- inc from our own Province. in which mu ny Cnthona “tended 8:31!” “:3- troi their own ”hook and the touch- uution w Mr. McNeillâ€"Is it not a tact that when Sir Alexander Gait proposed Separate schools (or the minority in Quebec the reply was that it the min- ority of Ontario received Separate schools. Separate schools would be granted to the minority at Quebec? Slr Adolphe Caronâ€"No; it is not. Mr. McNeil! â€" I have always un- , den-stood that there was something in the nature of a compact or that kind. I have heard it stated in thi. House and it has never been contradicted be- .v- ‘- Mr. Craig said he had declued each thgion that while he W. 1d .W the general pancy orthe vernment. sun I} yemedlgljegmnlon m intro- ,____- AL_ _--_--_. tore. a‘g'reat deal more comfortable when they go home at Easter and we shall have this vexed question removed from the sphere of current politics» (Loud cheers.) 7 7 "Mr. McNeill asked it there w not a compact between Quebec and Ontario that it Separate schools were granted to the minority in Ontario Separate schools would be granted to the minor- 1tÂ¥_in_Quebgc. A. ;____ “A A-.. _-., â€"_ ‘fi , Mr. Ivesâ€"I am not aware that there was ever any compact. They were gqapted long befor? Coqtederauon. We do not propose to make those people n football or the politicians for- another year or two,and it Mr. Laur- ier's policy is further investigstlon why did he mOVe the six months' hoist.dur- ing which there can be no investigso ticn? Why did he not come out with his own motion based on the opinion of Sir Oliver Mownt and move (or his commission? Why indeed? Because his irreconcilable supporters in this House would not vote for it. When the two great parties in Pnrlismens so nearly agree upon this mutter u to regard it as merely a. question at when- whether .now or a few week. or months henceâ€"we should settle this question. I say it is the duty or nll parties to join together and agree upon 3 set- ‘ tit-meat or the question. (Cheers) Mr. Lsurier the other do. referred to ques- tions that have divi ed us in the past. ‘ What was the result in the case or the Jesuits' Estates Act? The combination of wise men on both sides resulted in limiting the number of those who united against that bill to 13; and when it we! round that the two parties united to settle the questionâ€"to do the proper thing in regard to itâ€"there was no excitement in the country and the whole matter was settled. (Cheers) It the leader or the Opposition end his followers would do all their consciences tell them they ought to do end as many of them are begging permission to do. that is. Join us in settling this question-:they would and themselves Does Mr. Laurier'wsnt for any poll- tical purpose to keep this sore open. thi. question unsettled? Is he raining by it? Does he and hil present poni- tiOn happy when he has nctunily to dragoon some of his followers into supporting him? Doe. he mat to so to the country with this question un- settled? Mr. Lauderâ€"No. Knivesâ€"I donotthinkhedoen. I donotthinkheiswiseithewnntl this question kept open. Surely Mr. Greenwny can guard a. remedy. Mr. Greenway’s Legislature in now con- vened; Mr. Greenwny is there; Mr. Greenwuy can adopt any remedy he thinks Justinnbie and right and proper and can pass it long baton we set out or committee on this bill. The Gov- ernment or this country are not nnxi- oul to interfere with this question. I admit with Sir Oliver Movnt that our interterence should be the lust resort; but we do not think. from nnything We have seen, that either Mr. Green- way or Mr. Laurier or the Liberal party who have been making a. toot- ball or this question for the last five years are anxious to hnve it Icttled. 'e think the responsibility rests upon us to do Justice to the minority in Manitoba. who inure waited nve yeeu torrjultice. (Cheers.) ' A? H. proceeded to may the utton o! theGovernmentlntheeom-ulthnd taken. nun Greenmhhd becam- ioul to remedy the Catholic wanna. he could haw; done it long no. (Eur. hen.) Whgt need was there tor 1n- veltlntmn? The French Liberals do not mt any Investigation, beau-e they luvs already undo up their mindsthstthe resent blflhnotitronx enough. The vernment do not re- glyrg my mgeauzstlop; they are» 3g!- toned. They hove rendered their Jud:- ment and that JudMent is in accord- anoo with tho Judsment o: the Privy Council. The lrt'eoondlnhlel In this Haul. do not not Any latex-motion. become It you were to p informa- tion into them for a. 1111de you! they would um be opposed to Sew» nte wheels; and would not what uny- thlnz dones Then who wont: further tarot-motion? For WM reason ahould further Mon-motion be obtained? We know. on the other hand. that I: thll question 1. not settled In thh House at this session it becomes a. question in the next general election; and 11 it deed. does not that Increase a. hundred- told the danger to the mono of Con- hdorotlon? mum‘ (no mm Denna: the Protentnnu and Hanna enthoiiot. Bo thnt instead or the Protestant: at Montreal getting but oncdourth’ nnd at Ontnrio but two-thirds of their con- tribution, they were then the whole out. Itwouldbeucn. chardonwhy he was concerned tor tho mnintcnnnce ot_the constitutional richtn. - g E: I... Eta-29: Evaâ€"5: 93.2.8 Va 4368 498 552. K... r213... 093g». I. 32842. an 68 in g v3.33; 5 . u not ".0pr now the Northwest cad other provinooo would be tho 3(2ch of stun-.2- nun. It won In the Interest.- o: the harmony of the entire Domin- lon tho: the caution should be put out of the House. and he won“ vol. tortuous monthl' hoist for tut Dur- pooo. The Government mum on :1: Mn out of the (or m- oonno. m m that:- prlv c. But to would ovu- ooottnuo to dam it m- u- rlclu to voto on «on! cum u it We. and SW- eers. (011} gee:- union. a. new Province sho'ild have 3. Separate school synem enmtted on it. was that l'l‘ovinm‘ never to be able to remove it? Once Senate schools were established must they exist tor ever? (Cheer-s.) The Manitoba. Act provided for the pro- tection Of the rights held by the min- ority "by law or practice" previous to the union. but previous to the union there we. no low establishing Separate school! and Sever-sue echools were not in existence. They had per- ochial schools end could still have them. Thin m the decision or the court- end so the school lew- ot 1890 did not interfere with any rights the minority hnd previous to the union. They not Sepnute ochooln utter the union. The support or the hill wan chimed on oonstitutionnl grounds. but constitutions were not ant-hume- “'e- The! were the only compeeu be- tween men end nation- nnd googhonl! The dusl system of schools W ‘ tlculsrly undesirable ln s Prov nee like Isnltobs. where the lettlement was so spurs. the: It mulred unltcd eflorts to keep u s. mule system. Out of the llsts o: t e Ichool ln Manitoba. nine hsd sn sttsndsnco M only ten Dublin. tht would the vault be 1! such sectlons were dlvldegl? _ Io Ion: u unable to the condluont And the m In which they existed. At one time n Cuhouc could not hold once under the British crown. but um had hm chased. The UnItod Bum changed In contutuuon with ngpecg topiary-y. M“! mmv- w ~v v , - 7 ed then. In w the civilized oountriea the moJority ruled and should rule. but it was now asked thnt the minority shouldhonndetorul. Thdemg-u lions st the time at the pause ot the Contedernuon Act showed that while Sepmto schools in the old Pro. be continued sun it vinoes were to templated that every “so never can Province thnt came into the union at. tog-ward; should haVe Sewatc schoou. uked to sand rec") owed‘éfi‘lgfe «3‘22” “vane- c -â€"- â€"â€"‘- â€"â€",,__ _____ hen-ted wort. and admoed lneaeo- tuel arguments. Where was The T0- ronto World ? Amyed smut the blll. and so were all the other lending papers. Wherever public meetlnn were held. whet wu the expmslon ot oplnlon? Umlmously What the blll. How had publlc oplnlon been express- ed la the electlone ? In North Onterlo the cendldnte did not dare. to say he would eup- port the blll. but told the electors they knew the course he had always taken on such matters. and thet he would follow the sane course. Had he enld he would vote {or the blll he would have been elmply hurled. (Cheers) The Government's course had been npudlnted ln Cnrdwell. Mou- trenl Centre and Vercheres. Even Cape Breton had been won only by Hercul- een error-t. When‘ the Government went to the country they would get en un- mistakable verdict. one which would show that the Government hell hope- lesely misunderstood public opinion on the question. (9353.) _._--_I _ -__‘n_..-‘ Perliunont to exercile its power In; Archbishop '1'“:th who conducted the i lice at the time or union. hnd been pro-i mined Separate schools. end thnt even ' it this we: not clenrly exprenlcd in the . mambo Act. the intention we: there. The bill before the House wu neonat- nhle because it restored the rig tn taken any by the Act of 1890. He thought the grunting 0! such Justice would restore harmony and peace in the oountw. Dr. Bproule mode a. vigorous attack I on the bill. He recretted he had to vote extinct his party. but he owed it u a. duty to the country as well as the party. In all cues or public pollcy the Government held meeting! I I 5 and othewile nixed public opinion. and then noted on this opinion. Bow I I could the Government Juttity itc course with respect to the bill or nt- tempt to any thnt public sentiment tn- vored its policy‘.’ Where we: the press . of the countryâ€"the Connervntive preu ’ Sandy any important I Conlervwve pcperl from the At- lantic to the Pacific defended the Gov- ernment'c nttitude. Those which did1 could be counted on five fingers. [ The Mnil and Empire 091,355?! helt- | _ A-.. he considered these less objectionable thsn the odlum “cached to the mu (Applause) He remtted he bsd to vote unmet the Government. whose Reflex-g policy he “19901104- A - 7 n A~---_ _-.,.g-4l oh- I: u 13, vP‘i‘OV‘nN “I w ‘0 “I Jurl-uuuuu over reilwaya. He laid down the doc~ trine that under a free government the remedy ot the minority in to axi- tnte and win over the muority to their way 0: thinking. To tnneter the ques- tion outeide and when to the Execu- tive at Ottewe was to import tnto the Dominion et lure the bitterneal of local attire. All theae azitetiona work- ed greet miechief. end he took it to be the pm at etatetamanehip to repreea nether then encourage the demon o: diecord. He reminded the Rom that Manitobe poeeeeeed the admitted right to eltehuah Solute school. in 1870. and that it wee admitted that in re- peeunc the act establishing tho-e nhooia the Province min exerciaed undoubted constitutional right. There only then remained the question he to whether an upped to Ottawa rhonld he allowed. that. on the ground that the Crown entered into a compact mmteeing ”an“ achooln: second. thetaeachoolectotlmwaerenuc- neat to Row Catholics. and. third, that the Public echooia were Protestant school. and violated rights or can- adehce. when were eeveral other quee- timdilpltedutothetactandthe three queetione named were question utotact. Now.eeidur. banner. up" voile! Ia to investigate theae question- end W the mm. The mutton Coven-eat have invited lave-thw- DWI. ‘- -.-__- «Mafia an Min. 7m.- :- Mr. mr- policy :3 «and by Myself. l’ou And-«a atoll-r saw Ind II- M W.- “no-I Ion-rad. YOUNG irmumm A WFL’L nun. Carp, lurch 6.â€"Lut night a drac- lul (an! accident occurred 1: Wood- lnwn. 13 mile. from here. by which June. Nahum and 13. lost his lire. 1-1. m working in Vlnce'u uwmm 3nd tn mo '3! cum in contact with tho 01mm uw. which Iu-uck his foot. «can It on. 30 then fell aw. which nun struck NI tmmm hilt w” in un ' m In “In. v'k u..â€" r- -. very clear on proceeded by s risin‘ inflection to s perfect climax. Never before Wu such s sen ed in English b one whose naive tongue was not msrksble thing about it is tbst his whole speech wns merely on mpflflct- tion or lbst oponin; sentence. it was delivered in s most eloquent manor sud with tbst dignity characteristic of Ir. Lsurier. sad in conclusion ms started with loud cheerinc. The line tsken by the Liberal lender is very easy to under-sand. He reviewed the history 0! Cards since 00 is! union. a. inst-need tho fierce con- flict ov the Now Brunswick ocbool Act in 1m and relieving your; the the Jesuit -‘ "‘ VWV“ â€"â€"vvvâ€"w Events on upldly eat-blunt: the mm ehoncter or Mr. Lour- ler'e position on the Ichool queetlon. but weaver doubt: any ext-t tn the minds of come a to thlc. there ere no two oplnlm u to the character ct Mr. Lnurler'l m It has never been excelled end cddon equalled tn the Canndhn Pull-neat. For lotu- nea of tone. hmndth ot wombat-lotto tenor end courage. lt no the meech lt would have been worthy o! the In- perlel Parliament. It we! n greet speech. both 11: the manner of ltn de- llvery end the mottcr It contained. It was courageous. hold to the polnt or rashneu from 9, Quebec potnt or View. unequlvocel. end concluded with the caught motlon tor the elx monthn' hot-t. Most el‘nlncnnt 0: cu. lt evok- ed the wlldeot euthullum tram the long. Such n scene has not been wltnemd in the House of Com- mon- for my arena. and the enthuuum used to be mostly on the other Ildc of the House. Mr. neur- ler'e openlnx sentence m a. zen-nuk- able one. It 00¢an so llnes In linu- urd. but wan Io constructed as to be very clau- nnd prgeeeded by 0 run: ot the minority. He was not positive u to whether they were Proteatant acbooia or not. If they were. he agreed with Mr. Laurie:- that they me not be impoaed on the minority. He hdd the run to be inadequate end inflec- tive u a. remedy. Sir Hector Lance- vin devalued that the bill wu a com- piete remedyandreacoredthe old con- dition at thlnca. Mr. XoNeul held that the disaentient achoola of W exitted by virtue at a certain agree- ment 0! compact with Ontario. and u a quid pm quo for Separate achooia in 0ntario.a proposition etoutiy denied by Sir Adolphe Caron. All theae dispu- tation: and doubta furnish the am- eat evidence of the necessity ton-an enquiry into the poaition ol'thiawhole subject a.- “vacated by Mr. Lauriar and Sir Oliver flown. _ - _ A Linrler's fioucy. V He cu 4):. did not know whether the mm schools can. 111 conflict 111th the con-demos uttawa, lunch Sâ€"(SpeclaDâ€"‘l‘hia I the fifth anniversary at the last gen- eral elections. and the Government iI inaworaepoaitionthanatanytim since that day. and they received to- day some of the severest biowa m prominent member. of their own party in i‘ariiament. Dr. Sproulo ha been prominent (nough to be put (ox-ward tor a portfolio in the Cabinet. To-day he unlparinxly denounced the policy at the Govurnment on the achooi quea- tion and warned them that they were about to meet an enraged electorate. Mr. Craig, another Conservative, m almost an emphatic in condemning that policy and predicting the moat dia- astrous re‘ulta from it. Mr. Lnurier'n speech on Toad-.1 LI “ii the in“: or the corridors. 111'. cm: unconsciously paid a. high tribute to it in his remarks in the House this utter-noon. and. moreover, testified by his “mission 0: went at intonation on crucial point. uLthe winging; m, ”VI-.0 Mr. Hammett moved the mourn. mont of the debate. The House adjourned at. 12.15. ”iiE'Lnâ€"ieuer (mm-u) declared the Remedial but I mockery and a, shun and would vote for the six montfie’ hoist. A _ _ u A.._ the remedial order We. withdrawn. There was no guarantee an to oonceuionl a they would depend merely on the good will or Mr. Green- way. The declaration at Mr. Prender- gut of Manitoba was evidence that the bill was acceptable and he hoped it would he pres-ed through by the Government in wite of the threats made against it. However, the bill nflarded a minimum or Justlce. and ersonally he regretted it did not at- ford more effective relief. He was prepared to support the bill whatever the result would be with respect to hit political career. __ _ .- , I. 1;-_-I\ ‘--I-.uul all- :- my van" "" "" 3 uned to be mostly on the of the House. Mr. unr- nx sentence was a. Bern“- 1‘ occupied 30 “Be. In Hin- wal Io ectluu"1¢t_°<1 u ‘9.“ wu Am actor Lange- wu a com- the old 00n- [oNeul held I: of Quebec mm: m- :arlo. sad at rate schools ouuy denied these d100- 1 the stront- lety for In or this whole Mr. Laurie: “manna-a " "" «I aim 011‘" Pm-tbuodwflluotbamdvmm ohmuuvmum FARMERS “IRIS IAOIINIBY BUN Smooth! and ohocply y. 8".- m. and m. m fuel. Mule by fine "VACUUM um 00. under the Vacuum m VACUUM OIL “U -I‘ “’0. my -m'u. “WA }IFARM FOR SALE OR Tom.â€" Ouhundud can mmmm; [AM-1.3mmfifi. IMâ€"N. ”mummy am Thu. IIIâ€"1‘ mica. AH!!!“ C. CHITTICK. flealEsIaIe Bflllfllll and Still! yd rugâ€"“Mum“ I am. at in; Vacuum Ana-flan Call and ”got Prices and In- spect work before you buy. ON COWGI’. Frames, Sash, Doors, Blinds, Moudings, Trimmings, Etc. 0)). Km, Davis 6' Son's Yard VAGUUM (Ill. 00., 15-50 W M 019mm Ton-dink. Quin-y, Group. on. I!» My oflhl- modidno in curl annu- Victoria PLAHING Hill LINDSAY. P..GPILKIE,LMS|!.CML| Pilkie’s Diphtherine 5 Uflunfi _ mmr __swaus. J. P. RYLEY. UBSCRIBE Eon ran POST; SA TISFA CTION G UABANTEED. A we curator 9119109!" “PEP"??? Ne w, Ad var women a. Gm WASIED.â€"A fog good lin for m D! ‘filflu m. gummy-than”. for :05. Conan:- mom pad um lntarmnuon (or firm-u nnd gardener- mu: man high- priood textbooks. Mull free. n. I. ran h 00.. Ill-an. on. u been 1- balloons. 3611.91.5th roar- .616 m‘ 'nuoa mason, WM" '2 mmmwm WM Mb; m"- rcro p Fads. known sud col NEW DISCOVERY. PLANTING I “@130“ Ali-1| ZP' RI“,- inuiot upon your dealer furnish-