The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

The mass meeting in the Academy i of Music last night in the interests: of local option was splendidly at- tended. Those present listened to ad- th‘ee pry: ical and convincing dresses 0". the great issue before the peopleâ€"the abolitiOn of the open bar. The spea‘wrs did not play upon the feelings of the audience by the nar- mfion of touChing incidents, but ra- ther impr:ssed upon them hard, cold indisputable facts and arguments to prove their contentions that the open bar was the greatest menace to the moral and social welfare of our people. Mr. W. B. Spar'nng’ 5 address nad the right ring about it, and was a. clever exposition of the issue. The three reasons advanced by the speak- {on W. B. SP ARLING. Mr. Sparling said he had been ask- ed by the Citizens’ Committee to ex- press his views on the question of lo- cal option. He was interested in the great issue to be voted on in Janu- ary. He had his opinion formed on the question, and believed it Was the duty of every citizen to take an in- terest in all public questions. Mr. Sparling took up the . question from an economic standpoint and asked his hearers whether the open bar was a benefit financially or not. Do we get anything from the open bar ? Yes, we get a revenue of $1,680 an investment of $100, 000, (less than two per cent) and we lose the capital. Who pays the revenue ? Not {the license holder, but the consumer iâ€"the man who is least able to pay. .er Why he was opposed to the open E Under local option conditions the l bar were cleverly presented, and were man who is best able to pay will ’iorced home on the minds and conâ€" victions of his hearers with no un- certain sound. make up this revenue. The question of accommodation was (next referred to by Mr. Sparling, who PAGE POUR. three reasons advanced by the Speak I â€"â€"the man who is least able to pay. er Why he was opposed to the open g Under local option conditions the bar were cleverly presented, and were‘ man who is best able to pay will Tiorced home on the minds and conâ€" make up this revenue. victions of his hearers with no un- The questioh of accommodation was certain sound. ‘ns-xt referred to by Mr. Sparling, who Mr. Alex. Horn, of Horn Bros. ‘ claimed it need not necessarily cost Woollen Mills (the largest employer 1 us more under local option condi- of labor in town) made an appeal to g tions. In proof of his contentions he the electors fortified with telling referred to the Dunsmuir hotel in facts and arguments that were both Vancouver, 9. modern hostelry in ev- pointed, practical and convincing. ery respect, with rates the same as Rev. Beverley Smith, of Toronto, prevailed elsewhere. This hotel had an Anglican clergyman, who figured no bar, and it was paying good div-i- Jargely in the successful fight for the fiends. SuPposing it was necessary to abolition of the bar in Toronto. pay more for accommodation under Jct., was the speaker of the evening 10Cal option. then as honest men and his address was both logical, andl and British subjects, we should be convincing and-replete with unassailâ€"I willing to pay for it. able arguments against the existence‘ MF- Sparling then dealt With the of the open bar. He made a deep imâ€" Question from the standpoint of the press-ion on his hearers by his comâ€" economic value of man. The man ’ad- men-sense arguments, and efficientlyi dicted to liquor is incapacitated from punctured the many wild-eyed arguâ€"Z Work, and therefore loses his value ments advanced against local option * 8-3 an 90311021116 asset. The real issue, by the advocates of the open bar. EMI‘. Sparling said, was the moral is- TL ._-_ L-â€"A1_. _Mnnn-m +A Lnnnk Mr. Wm. Flavelle, the chairman, ably discharged the duties devolving upon him and in his splendid opening address clearly placed the issue be- fore the people. 1.1;» Lug yvvr-vu THE CHAIRMAN Mr. Wm. Flavelle said they had gathered to hear discussed the ques- tion of local option, local prohibi- tion, or abolition of the open bar. The surprise is that there are two sides on this question. He could dn- (lei-stand those in the liquor busmess fighting the measure, but was sur- prised to think that a portion of. the community joined forces with them. There is no one will deny that the open bar 'is our greatest curse. The only reason why it is so predominant} is because of the money in itâ€"vmoney easily earned. The objections raised against local optiOn are very amusn would ‘ ing. The contention that it spoil the town is absurd. Fully one hundred or one hundred and twenty- five thousand dollars is spent over the bar every year, and we get about $1.6000rgofamillasaresultot this awful expenditure. That is only the economic side, but when we look at the curse the local bar is to our community, we can view its terrible «Data from a dinerent standpoint. f Mr. Sparliug then took up the re- cord of appeal votes on local option in the province. In 1909 there were 97 Ontario mu- nicipalities where repeal contests were possible. Bar room advocates were only able to bring on 29 con- testS, and they were beaten in 27 of these. In 1910 there were 111 possible re- peal contests, voting was brought on in only 12 and local option was sus- tained in 10 of these. In 1911 there were 134 possible re- peal contests. Repeal bylaws were on- 1y voted on in 3 municipalities. Lo- cal option was sustained in all. In 1912 there were 17-8 possible re- peal contests. In 163 municipalities the liquor interests could not muster up strength enough to bring on a contest. 15 places voted, and all sus- tained the law. There are some objections to local option, said Mr. Sparlingâ€"l out of 126. Mr. Sparlin-g concluded an admir- able address by giving three reasons m Nigét’s Sgieadié £32133 Meeting in flue Eafierests of Local fiption In order to slam) with comfort and enjoy the best selection among our gorgeous showing of Suitable Christmas Gifts WE ADVISE EVERYBODY TO SHOP EARLY! M 1880 Fancy Goods S‘Campbell Kids” with unbreakâ€" able heads, girls or boys, dress- ed in rompers and fancy dress- es. durabZe gifts for the little folks. Prices. each... ...50c. A large assortment of dressed dolls, light or dark complex- ions with fancy colored dres- ses, shoes and bonnets. These dolls shut their eyes when re- clining. Take your choice at each...... . ... .. .. 19c arge jointrd dolls, 23 inches high, with real hair and eye lashes. Those go to sleep. A really handsome doll. Price each ..... 7 ......................... 1.00 . beautiful assortment of dress- ed dolls with fancy dresses, bonnets ar -:1 shoes These go to sleep: umal gifts for Xnias trees. Price each ............ ,.25c 1 Mr. Sparnng tnen dealt with the question from the standpoint of the economic value of man. The man ‘ad- 3 dicted to liquor is incapacitated from I work, and therefore loses his value i as an ecanomic asset. The real issue, iMr. Sparling said, was the moral is- i sue. It was hardly necessary to touch ’it. We see-it every day, and it ap- pealed to him that local option ‘Would do away with the terrible éeviis due to the open bar. Mr. Sparling took up the. question from an economic standpoint and asked his hearers whether the open bar was a. benefit financially or not. Do we get anything from the open bar ? Yes, we get a revenue of $1,680 on an investment of $100,000, (less than two per cent) and we lose the capital. Who pays the revenue ? Not the license holder, but the consumer no bar, and it was paying good divi- dends. Supposing it was necessary to pay more for accommodation under local option, then as honest men and British subjects, we should be willing to pay for it. In 1909 there were 97 Ontario mu: nicipalities where repeal contests were possible. Bar room advocates were only able to bring on 29 con- tests, and they were beaten in 27 of these. In 1910 there were 111 possible re- peal contests, voting was brought on in only 12 and local option was sus- tained in 10 of thefle. In 1911 there were 134 possible re- peal contests. Repeal bylaws were on- ly voted on in 3 municipalities. Lo- cal option was sustained in all. In 1912 there were 178 possible re- peal contests. In 163 municipalities the liquor interests could not muster up strength enough to bring on a contest. 15 places voted, and all susâ€" tained the law. and ................................. 50¢ Dalls’ Brass Beds with fancy muslin comforter and pillow. These beds fold up and are sure to please the little folks. Prices each $1.00 and ................... 25c ome and visit our zoological display of Teddy Bears, Mon- keys, Donkeys, Dogs, Cats, Pon- ies and Elephants. It will tickle the little folks. Prices $2.00 down to each ............ 25c beautiful range of dolls dress- ed in gingham, muslin, velvet and satin, with fanCy shoes, stockings and hats. Any of these will delight the little folks. Prices each $3.00, 759 for his support of local option. Firstâ€"To help the {man who wants help. There were lots of them. Lots of men want to go home from work at night, but cannot do so because of the open bar. Secondâ€"0n account of the young men and boys who have never start- Thirdâ€"Because the liquor 'traffic is the great curse. Mr. Haverson, soli- citor for the liquor interests, had admitted this. We are allied to itâ€"a partner to it and on our polling day I intend going to the poll to Sign off my partnership. I thank the gov- ernment for giving me the privilege to sever my responsibility with the liquor tramc. ALEX. HORN. :of the actual state or anairs, auu i In the early days in Canada there [suppose that scarcely one tenth part was little or no restrictions for sellâ€" I of the disorder and misery produce-d ing intoxicating liquors. It was sold 3 by drink traffic ever reached the poâ€" l l i r 1 out of the grocery store in jugs and cans in much the same way as coal oil or vinegar are sold today. As time went on, however, the baneiul influence of ontoxicating beverages beCame more and more pronounced. It was found necessary to restrict the sale not only in quantity but to time and place as well. And the Gov- ernment in that the evil should be curtailed, charged a fee for the privilege of sellâ€" ing liquors and this privilege given only to a certain number, cording to the population. for the result of the business, being partners in the traffic. Of late years the Government have said to the peo- ple of each municipality, we do not wish to retain the privilege of issu- ing licenses in your municipality. We prefer that you would settle the mat- ter for yourselves. In other words the Government have rolled the reâ€" sponsibility on to the shoulders of the people and have made it necesâ€" sary for us to either refuse the issu- their wisdom in order was ac- In this way the government was responsible lice court, or is recorded in the pub- lic report. We cannot close our eyes to the evil eflects on indaividuals, upon families, and upon business in- terest. 2nd. The $1680 which we receive as our share of this partnership is not a sufficiently large sum to justify us in contaminating our town and surâ€" rounding country with the misery which flows from those licensed morâ€" lal cess pools. It has been estimated that over one hundred thousand dol- lars annually passes over the bars of Lindsay, and our share in the profit is $1680. This money spent is abso- lutely wasted. It is worse than wast- ed, for the buyer receives in exchange for his money that which does him = harm. The loss to the town through the idleness of men who are kept from work through their own drink- ing or the drinking of others am- ounts to ten times the amount we re- ceive for license fees. Three years ago our partner in the liquor busi- ness used the argument that if we dissolved partnership with them our ing of licenses for the sale of alco- I taxes would at once be raised. and holic liquors or to sell for a consid- oration the privilege to dispose of li- quors in our districts. Three years ago by a minority vote the munici- pality decided to continue the li- cense system, and we are still part- ; killed the town, the license that the grass would grow an the streets, that closing the bars would kill the towu. The partnership has been continued, and one thing we dc know, if local option would have system ners with the liquor dealers. We are 5 has been killing the citizens. What 2 therefore quite as reaponsible for the evil arising from the sale of into (i- ‘cating drinks as the man who hand- les the glasses across the bar to his customers. I mean to say that every one in Lindsay whether he consented to the agréement or not is a partner in the liquor business, so long as we accept the license fees paid by the liquor dealers into the funds of the town treasury. I want to be clearly understood. I believe that the man to whom we grant the legal privilege to sell intoxicating liquors over the open bar is no more responsible for the misery, the poverty and crimes which always follow in the wake of the pernicious tramc, than those of us who have entered into an agree- ment with the liquor dealers by di- long train of mourners have followed their dead to untimely graves, and all we have to show is $1680. The 3rd reasOn why the town 01 Lindsay should dissolve partnership with the liquor traffic is because the bar corrupts the morals of the com- munity. Bars cannot run without bow, and if the bars continue to ex- ist in Lindsay it will be the boys 01 Lindsay and vicinity who must be the toll to run the Whiskey Mill. How much is a boy worth? Is hi worth $1680 ? Would you like to sell him for that amount of money? What is your daughter’s future worth ? What amount of money would compensate you for seeing Your daughter {married to a drunken sot ? Is there enough money in th1 Brass Goods We have a. beautiful showing of Japanese and Dutch Brass Goods in handsome designs. These make an ideal Christmas gift. Japanese and Dutch Jardinieres, in plain and hammered ellects, all sizes, suitable for ferns, palms or plants. Prices each, $7.50, $77.00, $6.00, $5.00, $4.00, $3.50, $2.50, $2.00, $1.50, $1.00, 75c and ........ 50c viding up the profit. Now as we are partners in this business we should have something to say in the run- ning and management of it. If our partners, the bar tender or liquor seller, will not (19 as he agreed 10 do we can dissolve partnership and both parties can go out of business. Now this is What I propose the Town of Lindsay should do, and for the fol- lowing reasons, viz: lst. Our partners in the business have not been keeping faith with us. Section 76 of the License Act, which is one of the rules of our/ agreement reads as follows: “If- any person li- censed under this Act permits drunk- enness or delivers intoxicating li- quor to any drunken person or per- mits and suffers any drunken person to consume any intoxicating liquor on the premises he shall be liable to a penalty or not less than $10.00 and not exceeding $50.00. Now travellers from other towns and cities remark that there is more than the usual amount of drunkenness in Lindsay. Our public records are a barometer of the actual state of aflairs, and I E ed, for the buyer receives in exchange ; for his money that which does brim : harm. The loss to the town through the idleness of men- who are kept from work through their own drink- ing or the drinking of others am- ounts to ten times the amount we re« ceive for license fees. Three years ago our partner in the liquor busi- lness used the argument that if we dissolved partnership with them our }taxes would at once be raised, and lthat the grass would grow 0n the streets, that closing the bars would kill the tOWn. The partnership has been continued, and one thing we do know, if local option would have ;killed the town, the license system i has been killing the citizens. What a 'long train of mourners have followed their dead to untimely graves, and all we have to show is $1680. an. The $1680 which we receive as our share of this partnership is not a sufficiently large sum to justify us in contaminating our town and surâ€" rounding country with the misery which flows from those licensed mor- al cess pools. It has been estimated that over one hundred thousand d01- lars annually passes over the bars of Lindsay, and our share in the profit is $1680. This money spent is abso- lutely wasted. It is worse than wast- by drink traffic ever reached the po- lice court, or is recorded in the pub- lic report. We cannot close our eyes to the evil efiects on indaividuals, upon families, and upon business in- terest. The 3rd reason why the town of Lindsay should dissolve partnership with the liquor traffic is because the bar corrupts the morals of the com- munity. Bars cannot run without boyS, and if the bars continue to ex- ist in Lindsay it will be the boys of Lindsay and vicinity who must be the toll to run the Whiskey Mill. How much is a boy worth? 13 be worth $1680 ? Would you like to sell him for that amount of money ? What is your daughter’s future Worth ? What amount of money would compensate you for seeing your daughter married to a drunkem sot ? Is there enough money in the THE LINDSAY POST. Brass Trays, with or without handles in round, square or oval shapes, all sizes. Prices each $2.00, $1.75, $1.50, $1.25, $1.00, 75c, 50c and ............ 25c We have a magnificent assortment Sticks, Or'naments, Vases, Pin Trays, etc., any of which would make a desirable gift. Prices each $6.00 down to ............. 25c of Brass Tobacco Jars, Candle Bank of England to compensate the fees of people of'Lindsav for the awful de- . men are gradation caused by this unholy 2.1-l thought liance with the liquor business dur- that we: ing the last three years. The untime- had onl: The following is our police court record during the 11 months of 1912: Convictions of the License Act in Lindsay, 37; in- 5 more cases the par- ties absconded; drunk and disorderly, 39; 20 convictions for causing dis- turbance, due directly or indirectly to drink. 1y deaths, the sorrow and remorse. the wretched homes, the blighted hopes; Perhaps we can raise the price of blood. FFor the past 30 months in Orillia, under local option: Infringement of the Liquor Law, 2. Last eight months under license: 5 men to Kingston, 6 men to Central Sentence aggregating 19 years. REV. BEVERLEY SMITH I want to assure you that you will hear some things tonight you heard three years ago, said Mr. Smith. The same sentiments prevail tonight, on- ly I will add three years’ history to them; While we gather here 1 cannot forget that my church is greatly mis- understood. It is claim?d that it is too apathetic On all great moral questions. All our bishops have ex- pressed themselves strongly on tem- perance, and have called upon the people to unite against the common enemy. The Synod of my own diocese had come out in favor of the aboliâ€" tion of- the bar. Social and moral reform, Mr. Smith contended, went hand in hand. The eradication of any evil tending to the degradation of any commun- ity had its efiect on the social life of the people. Toronto Jct. under 1iâ€" cense had one of the most famous gambling dens in Canada, but it was wiped out when the bars were abol- ished. Local option was not total prohibition or the Scott Act over again. It was nothing but the aboli- tion of the bar, which was the- cause of nearly all the evil in our land. It is not the gray haired drunkard I am particularly interested in to- night, but it is the boys. It is the youth of our land, and if we can save the rising generatiou and remove the institution that produces the drunk- ard, we remove the greatest curse of our country. I have not uttered one word against the hotclkeeper. It is the institutionâ€"the open bar with its product of ruined homes, broken hearted , women and children crying in their rags that I lift my voice against. We had men in Toronto Jct. who said if we only had the license may be obtained at the same place. Remember, next door to Anderson , Nugent’s. e. ; "'3 “fl“. PIANOS THAT ARE PIANOS, not only in shape, and name, but in qual-‘ ity, finish, tone, durability and all that goes to make a. first class piano in every respect, are to be seen at Brown’s music store, Kent'stH Lind- say. And the prices are low, and payments are arranged to suit the buyer. Intending purchasers would consult their own interests in exam- ining these instruments before buying anywhere, and there's a considerable variety to select irom. All sorts of musical instruments and supplies ‘ t Porrin's guarahwed Kid Gloves in all shades and sizes; fancy stitched gusset fingers, put up individual pair in - a. dainty Fine Kid Gloves, Perrin’s make. in a. great variety of shades; put up in individual Xmas boxes, all sizes. Per pair ...................................... $1.00 Long 12 and 16 Button Length White Kid Gloves, for evening wear, all sizes; put up individu- al pair in handsome box. Per pair ............ $1.50 and $1.25 The famous “Kayser” Glove, in 16 button length, fancy em- broidered, .shades of white, black, or champagne; all pure silk; all sizes; put up single pair in fancy box. Per pair In. a. o. to on 5" Gloves box. Per pair ..... $1.25 ..- .~ a. no... .0. scoot-oo- fees of the past few years. Such as a, result of :5 men are like Judas. They had no The chairman I. thought of the little pairs of shoes meeting to a C10: that went across the open bar. If we support of the (‘3 had only the llcense fees for three in the fight again years, they send, we could pave our referred to the I" streets. They had the open bar in To- list and st: ed 1 ronto Junction $0: forty years, still nonents of {om no streets were paved, but since the bars were abolished we spent in three years $112,000 on paved streets. In regard to accommodation, the speaker asked: What has the bar to do with it ? Not one necessary hotel has been closed in Ontario as a. re- sultof local option. I go to a certain hotel in your town and get accom- modation for one week. I come back in five years and I get the same ac- commodation. My bill is larger, and I am told by the proprietor that he has not the receipts of the bar. The sot paid for my accommodation five years ago. The question of accommo- dation is settled by the law of sup- pi‘r md demand. Ask our doctors and school teachers in Toronto Jct. if there is as much drinking as there was some years ago, and see what their answer is. Tne statement that local option would kill the town .was used in To- ronto Junction. A hotelkeeper ad- vanced that argument and when the bylaw was passed he drew $70,000 and invested it in a corner block in the town that was going to blue ruin. The population has increased from 7,000 to 16,000. We had two banks under license and today we have eleven. Today there is not a mer- chant in Toronto Jct. who has a collector for the purpose of collect- ing bad debts. Before the bar was abolished, I believe nearly every merâ€" chant on Dundasâ€"st. employed a col- lector. 1 Rev. Mr. Smith cloéed his. splendid‘ We have 3 address by narrating a pathetic inCi- beautiful fancy dent in his own ministerial experience Higinbotham’s T '1 L18: 3L5 n Apt The whole question, it is claimed, .mOI‘ed mi?" «~ is a matter of sentiment, said Rev. the mar few-“€- Mr. Smith. The Toronto Street Rail- lth‘e “1310? is conga“ way Co. are not a sentimental, Miss B. Macmillan. 0 crowd, but its rules are that any has been visitin: her {:16 employe in uniform found in a bar M. Campbell, duri room is thereby dismissed. The same Incidentally she a rules apply to the C.P.R. Mr. White'evening on Friday night- of the C~.P.R. prayed that prohibition‘ Mrs. J_ Myles, of Mes». might sweep the bars out of Winni-'iting her broihCI‘. 32:. So peg. I know the eflects of moral sun-'1 Miss Sophia 3 ‘. sion, but moral suasion cannot ai- - visited Mrs. Neil 1:1“an . fect a thing that is backed by money; Miss Hannah Liz-n: interests. Why did not the people re- I ville, is visiting 1;: ;..~..:: , sort to moral suasion in the Unit-ed nie. States to settle the slavery question Misses 13. :.:;,~7.1;11..:: rather than spill the blood of tens of bell, SPEH‘L’ suggfing ' ‘ thousands of its best men? The Rev. my 1;. r ;: story goes on year in and year out helgful dasct: 111‘s? 1.1:. of the terrible ravages of drink and “The Greater? stgorx yet men and immen sit quietly by of t‘12 World." 11;:- tr-x: . and display their apathy and indiiâ€" in II Corinthiani 2. ference, while scenes of sorrow, deâ€" mzp, refermce m ssvcn gradatiOn and misery are enacted in cm 13, which might be their midst. seven modern Wonders Of In clOSing a most convincing ad- but the great supernatura‘ dress. he asked those present to con- Christianity. By patient sider the following questions: ital work scientists claim What necessary connection exists produce a grain of 'vvheat between alcohol and hospitality ? {the natural grain in all)?e What connection exists between al- composition, but it W111 cohol ;and accommodation ? 3great essential qualitY'";h Of what economic value is a bar-l life. So Christianity is F” rogm in any community ? . ’reug-ionâ€"the religioa Of 111 ha I (T I O ’1'} How many of us in this hall have never been touched by drunkenness 2’ What one good thing has any bar- room done in this world ? $2.50 LINDSAY, FRIDAY meeting to a close appealed for support of the Christian coma in the fight against the open bar referred to the padding of the u list, and stated he believed the ponents of local option'in this; had overshot the mark. During the evening Mr. C. Wee-ks rendered in good voice,“ the Boy," Mr. Forsythe acting a companist.- The meeting closed with the tional Anthem. IHARTLL'X , In. Law (Specml to the Post) M of Dr The rain of yesterda, took 3‘. our snow and now we have the , m. John again. It is not our nature to {w a. fe?g plain,but w ith scan" cue day I”. mud the next, it is hardfor , Item‘s. V. young men of our Eurg to tell gm. of Q1 ther to take the cum-r or the b 'il'tors in when they go for a: eight or ‘ m. -13. mile drive. = Wand, Last Friday nigi members of the A and League drove Mr. Wm. Maxwell enjoyable social e1 Last Saturday afternoon E. Thornbury had a very shooting match at his hon here. The shooting was 10 ued. and some good shots corded. Among the most was Mr. Colin H. Campbell tured three geese. It is ' that Mr. W. A. Barker int ing a. shooting match here week. In connection witn we ' Hartley Epworth League, mored that a debate will the near future. Particuh the rumor is correct. Miss B. MacMillan. of 1’81 has been visiting her friend. M. Campbell, during the Past Incidentally she attended the evening on Friday night. Mrs. J. Myles, of iting her brother, 1‘ Miss Sophia MOS! Visited Mrs. Neil B: Miss. Hannah Mt ville. is visiting her Rev. W. H. .‘XIâ€"CUC‘L helpful discourse la: “The Greatest Superna of the World,” the text in II Corinthians, 2. Duwuus “(iv “an, -_. some good shots were Lmong the most 6M mm H. Campbell. Vb” 3e geese. It is W W. A. Barker intends! otinz matCh here earl? [3031111321 and M. G ,turday 'u Lizasafl R. Archer gave a‘ last Sandi} 1: Supernatural W] Perfume wonders 0f the ‘ supernatural won By Patient expel . DEC. 6th , U1 Wv""' 1‘, Mr. John C“ Keynes. Of GM 1 Brown 011 Sm McArthur of 1 Particulars t his home non g was long of! mi shots were he work 01 zue, it is will be M ging $1160 Wand, r u. Mr. [31‘ in Lindsay Tu i the guest It. and Mrs If Robins need our If: FIB) can beat w wntnbutlr m in the for Go ye. i the crops 8 Our young P I a: pnpamg “ W 0‘ pd out However h customs :1 fi' an increaa filame period Its. Gordon mmfl’x Ira. Lawrenc. u of Dr. as. It put of‘ mYear is ”with Swift ptionally '. Weslex~ is report PURELY '._ of W04 e. Inland l I: double This is D: '0‘ as goc Mitions 'OMS simi INLAN Br, 1912 r 1911 Emmet Back to Swain mtirin . Me?!