Ottawa Public Library Digital Collections

Ottawa Times (1865), 8 Sep 1868, p. 2

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

e t e n oo oo ue k ness said "not at that .time of night." The others left him at Weilingtonâ€"street, proceedâ€" ing westward, witness going on down O‘Conâ€" norâ€"street, towards Sparkeâ€"street. When hbe got to Sparksâ€"street, and was at the corner, saw something dark at the door of his mother‘s house, on the sidewalk. Thought it wasa Newfoundland dog. It was not above * afoot from the private lodgings door. Witâ€" ness saw some person with a light come to the door, which, after a tew seconds, witness raw closed. Then called out to bis mother, and no one answering, continued up towards the Tiwss office on the opposite side (north side of Sparkeâ€"street, from his mother‘s. Went Hothe ‘I‘mees office, not knowing meanwhile e the object was, which ho had seen. up stairs in the Tixes office, and told * "F- working there@that something was ealled a mild night. mmm% hind witness. Looked when he got the gate, and saw nobody, but had left people in the hall. Came out of the main entrance. Did not see anyone mm.mw;umum any they had gone. Left the House with Mr. Godin, M.P., who left witness immediately overtook Mr. McGee in going from the Par: liament Buildings he (witness) n.letonp- nied by the two Buckleys, John and at, and by another messenger named Brice. To the Courtâ€"These parties. witnaess left at the corner of Metcalfe and Queenâ€"streets. Brice and Buckley were in front of witaess, and pearer to Mr. McGee. To Mr. OReillyâ€"They were all employees dunno-t,n:m parted from Mr. McGee at the corner of Sparks and Metcalfoâ€"streets. «Witness then lived at Mrs. Robitaille‘s, on the south side of Queenâ€"street, and turned tWitherâ€" '&B:kfik;'ec:dlmm Queeni the Brice going on straigh towards their home on Metcalfeâ€"strcet. This after leaving the terrace by the diagonal walk towards Elginâ€"st. ‘Then joined the Buckleys. Mr. McGee was walking sliowly with Mr. Macâ€" Farlane down the board walk in front, and witness‘ party, accommodating their pace in cvonsequence, walked down the west side of lic Works Department, West: Departmental Building (side entrance), heard a shot. Those with bim said they were shooting crows. Witâ€" 2dH‘ Smmet hKennedy {page) accompanâ€" liea him, all leaving . together. â€" ‘They left through the west door and went down U Connorâ€"street, crossing ‘-llinmon-a;ut, «came down the left side (east of O‘Connor. street. ) '.Eooppdhgon th Pabâ€" Wm. Trotter sworn and interrogated by the Judge as to the nature of an catb, stated that be was 13 years old, and would be liable to punishment here and atter death if he should gwear falsely. He then proceeded to z2ive evidence as tollows: Is a son of Mrs. Trotter where Mr. McGee lodged, and was employed as page in the House of Commons,. Was in the House on the night of 6th April ; leftabout five minutes after adjournment, which was about 2 am. Mr. Ross‘(clerk in Mr. Lindâ€" :3.’- °i.")’ !L.,Jtno‘- Connell (messenger), Metcalfeâ€"st. Mr. MacFarlane parted from Mtr. McGee opposite Hunton‘s store on the north side of Sparks st. To the Courtâ€"Walked down Metcalfcest., on the right hand sice. l;l'olil:'-. J. 4. ‘(:-uâ€"ul crossed (after " O Daebarlane had turned eastward) Sparksâ€" corner, -h-o‘fio‘pod-ifin’pund. Went uutho-odd.,tnvelliaghnndurthey left Mr. McGee at the corner. Parted with the others at the corner of Queenâ€"st. Did not delay, and continued to walk briskly. The place witness was then living was pretty nearly flfi&deg%Mc that, pace, i arrived at bis lodgings at about the same time as Mr. McGee at his ;, Mr. McGee walked as though lame, with the aid of a stick. â€"The night was bright moonâ€" light without clouds, and he coald see to a great distance. Did not return in consequence of hearing the shot. Looked round and saw nobody, and then went up to bed. At Hnnton‘s corner witress looked up _ westward and saw nobody in the direction Mr. McGoe was going. Doer not remember if the moon was near l’tmg . From the adjournment of the Housetill he heard the shot was about seven or cight minutes. Brice lived with Buckley. Did not see anything of Sir G. E. must have been about five or six minutes after the adjourament. In seven or cight minutes after (adjournment) witners heard a shot. hthypuudvnhlr.lc(;e‘o‘hn:a: , young Buckley said, * Good t, Mr. c lr.lccumd,"‘aood-omln‘â€" 2 Left the Buckleys and Brice at the corner of Queen and Metcalfeâ€"sts., and wlien he. had got near Mr. Steele‘s (next where he was boardingy heard the report of a revolver shot. Cannot say exactly how long after parting from Mr. McGee. It would hm Te may me Prvecrand:sewncd When he left Mr. McGee, thm.pwo ently in good health. Did not see Mr. McGee that night again, living or dead. topography of some of the struets referred to, plan of which was handed in. Withess continuetâ€"Mr. McGee proceeded from the corner alone towards is lodgings on Sparkeâ€"st. F To the Courtâ€"He was walking towards the Canada Gazette officeâ€"i. c. wostwards. The Courtâ€"Are these knildings marked on the plan, Mr. O‘Reilly ? Mr. O‘Reillyâ€"Yes, my Lord. They are there called Desbarats‘ Block, part of which is marked as in occupation of Mrs. Trotter. Witness continuedâ€"Mr. mcGee was alone. It wes a moonlight night. When witness To the Courtâ€"There are two fronts to Russell‘s Hotâ€"l, one looking to Sparks and the other to Elginâ€"sts, which ers at right angles,. Metcalfeâ€"st. is the streâ€"t which witâ€" ness came down. straight thence to his house on Quecuâ€"st. Mr. Mactariane m Mr. McGee just before witness did, at the T corner ofi Mctcalfe and Sparksâ€" ste., going towsrdsth= Russcll Hous~,while Mr. McGee turned up 3; ark=st., west wards. st. to the south side Tothe Courtâ€"When witness left the house he observed that Mr. McGee and Mr. Macfarlane were in front of him, having left just before. Parted from Mr. McGec‘s vicisity at the corner of Metcalfe gnd Sparksâ€"sts., witness going on To the Courtâ€"Was in the. House at the time of its adjournment. Meansthe Hoase of Commons of the Dominion. °. To Mr. Y Reillyâ€"Witness saw Mr. McGee a‘ter the wljournment, walking with Mr. Mcâ€" Farlane down the centre board walk trom the main entrance, and about half way from the building to the gate, leading t> We!llington and Metcalfcâ€"streets. Wituess was then beâ€" hind both gentlemen. > s Parl Frechette, swornâ€"Was in the city on the 6tn April last, employed in the Post Office of the House of tommons. Recollects the «¥â€"ning of the 6th. The House was then in sesah n, adjo»ning, as he thinks, about a quarâ€" ter, or twenty minutes, past two, on the folâ€" lowins morning. * his victim‘s soul should be that night in Elysium. These were the leading points of the evidence, which, if they believed, they would give a verdict accordingly, under the obligation of their oath, and the obligation of their conscience. * At the conclusion of the learned Counsel‘s address, the Hon. J. H. Cameron formaily reâ€" peated his demand for right peremptorily to eballenge the jurdr Hodgins. Mr. O‘Reilly detmurring was sustained by the Court, by whom ll/e‘poilt was tntered on the record. The subjoined testimony was then offered for th« Crowa, Mr. @Reilly examining all the withesses, the audience of Mr. McGee‘s last speech, and there publicly and andaciously pointing his finger and gnashing his teeth, while th» latter was pleading the cause of bis country, and probebly then and there determining that his anticipation. Beyond all that he would prove by awitness named Lacrois, a Frenchâ€" man, that the latter had seen the shot fired. This witness wou‘d describe th« prisoner as he who fired it, would tell the circumstances under which it was fired, aad would relate the entire occurrence in such a manner, as to leave no doubt whatever, in case they b«licved him, of the guilt of the prisoner at the bar. But, even if they choose to set aside this evidence there was stil" amp‘e to support the case for the Crown. The selection of the prisoner for a certain act ; bis close following on the track rlflo:m statesman ; his being among "Lo Mr. O‘Reillyâ€"Mr. McGee croased Sparksâ€" or Mr. Galt on the other side of the J. H. Cameron here explained the . Did not stop at the further The Kvidence, buildings between witness‘ hallâ€"door and the end of Desbarats‘ block. There is no gateway into witness‘ premises, nor any nearer than within about 30 feet eastward. Witnmess did not look out into the street when she epaned the door, nor did she see anyboily except the stooping man, s she had not done so until her second opening of the door.] ‘No one came to the door with a light until she herself did so afterwards. Did not hear any footsteps runniog away. Witness brough* the lamp immediately after seeing the flash, merely going to the further end of the diningâ€"room table. ‘The couch on which witâ€" ness lay was at the further end of the dining. room from the wind?w. There are four or five door which could not beâ€"opened by a latchâ€" key, and this bolt was shot on the night in question. The door was locked sometimes, but cannot say if it were that night. Witness admitted Dr. Robitaille herself, afterwards shooting the bolt as before. There was not so much as the breadth of the hallâ€"door beâ€" twoen it and the diningâ€"room door, and the hall door, when opened, would cover the diningâ€"room door. Witness was stanaing in the openthg of the lattâ€"r, when cpening the former partially. Could: not look round the door into the street from that position. ‘<Reâ€" turned into the diningâ€"room on finding that her son had notâ€"entered. Was not at all frightened at secing the flash, Did not considâ€" er the report that of a pistol. {Some misunâ€" derstanding occurred here as to the occasion of witness first observing deceased in a stoopâ€" ll:‘ go-édon, but it was finally understood that with Brice, "(a messenger in the House), thought that he, toc, was a messenger, and, as he was already inside, consented to serve him. Prisoner asked witness for a pen and ink (she had herself ng in the diningâ€"room) which she re give him. He then asked for a pencil, refused, and for another glass of wine, which witness would not give. Prisoner pointing out that witness bad pen and ink on the table, she replied that it was her privilege to give it or not, as she pleased. Then asked prisoner to go out, opening the door for bim. Prisoner did go out, and witâ€" ness saw him no more until the inquest. Crossâ€"examined .by Hon. J. H. Cameronâ€" Her house has a public bar where other people than those living there may drink. Knew ‘Brice, the messenger, with whom prisoner first entered. On the occasion of his second visit only réfused him drink on account of the lateâ€" ness of *: hour, not becauss be was intoxriâ€" Th: footsteps, which witness had he:rd pt.- sing the wirdow swiftly, ‘came from the diâ€" rection of the Russell House. Witness had directed her son previously to tip at the door when he came home, lest he should& by ringâ€" ing disturb the boarders. He had so tapped on previous nights.. Heard no other step at the time. When she first went out took no lamp, Heard no sound as of a latchâ€"key being inserted, nor any othcr noise than that deâ€" scribed. ‘There was a brass bolt on the ballâ€" To the Courtâ€"The blood appeared quite fresbh, not coagulated. e :+ To (Mr. O‘Reillyâ€"Believes that the coroner _ aad [ a doctor were sent for, but does not know by whom; has seen the prisomer before. . Saw him twice in her own house. One occasion was five or six days before the murder, when be came in after tea with a .man named Brice, cach having a glass of wine. Saw the prisoner again at her house some short time afterwards, pethavps two or three nights before the death of Mr. McGee. â€"This second visit was at about 11 pm. He was then alone. Witness was in the diningâ€"room. â€" Prisoner entered, after knocking, by the hall door next the diningâ€" room. ‘Witness, thinking the knock was that of one of her boarders, opened the door, and found that it was the prisoner. Prisoner then asked for a glass of wine. ‘Wituess said that it was rather late, but, from hbaving seen him one had been wounded. Then taking a lamp found blood scattered all over the floor inside. Then opened the door again, and otbserved that the figure, which was still against the stone doorâ€"post, was considerably more stoopâ€" ed than when she had first seen it. On preâ€" senting the light the figuro instantly fell backwards, and from the glinnpse of the face in falling, she knew that it was that of a dead man. Did not recognize it as Mr. McQGee‘s Then witness shut the door and called up Dr. Robitaille and the other boarders, who cams down and found thatit was Mr. McGee. His hat was on his bead, and there was blood on the sideâ€"walk. * N To the Courtâ€"The blocd appneared anite cated. ‘There was a light at the head ot the stairs on the night ot the murder.. Does not know what o‘clock it was when Dr. Robitaille eptered. Had no occasion to remark the hour that night.. Witoess‘ daughter was with her all the night lyinLg down in the diningâ€"room. TWls c M in cce uo g Ns L room to the ball, when the noise ceased. Opened the hall door about balf, sufficiently to admit the boy, but, Snding that no one enâ€" tered, closed the door slightly to ascertain the meaning of the hcsitation. Then a fiash pasged across her face accompanied by a smell of powder. Witness thougut it was a fireâ€" ctacker. Still heid the bolt of the door in her band, and, opening it somewhat, saw, on looking out, a man in a stooping position on the right hand side of the door. Not seeing her son, witness closed the door and went back into the interior of the house to call ber daughter. Thought that %:cmn she bad seen at the doorâ€"post had n stunned in some riot, andâ€"told her daughter that some tire for the night until her boarders had all returned. Waited for them in the diningâ€" room where she had a couch. Cannot say who was the first to return from the House. Dr. Robitaille (M.?2.,) was the last. He went straigkt up. to his room. Witness then lay down in the diningâ€"room again, she cannot tay for how long, when she heard as it were a quick run pu-ln‘ the large diningâ€"room window. Witness said to herself " That is my hoyc:mhg bhome." Heard then a tapping as at the door, like a person playing with fingers as on a piano. Called out,.as she supâ€" posed to her son, to be quict, as she was comâ€" ing to open the door for him. ‘The noise was not loud but quick. (Witness here imitated it with her fingers on the edgo of the witness box.) Witness went to open the hall door. Opened first that leading from the diningâ€" Mary Aun Trotter swornâ€"uives on Sparksâ€" st. Has done so for two years and aâ€"balf. Keeps a boardingâ€"house ‘and tavern there. Her house is in the Desbarats block: There are three eztrances to‘it trom Sparksâ€"st., by the bar door and by two private doors, Mr. McGes had come to board with withess about a month before he was shot. Not quite a moath. ‘That: was the first time he boarded with. her. Ho generally entered by the hall door next the bar door (which was towards the Russell House), from which it was separated by the large window of the dining:room. There is,.an entrance from the bar into the diningâ€"roo:n, and trom the diningâ€"room into the small hall into which ths hall door opens. Mr. McGee callsd at her house about seven or eight o‘clock that night, but had not dined there. He went up to his room for some papers which he said he wanted to take to the House with him. Cannot say in what direcâ€" tion he went on leaving. He was then in apparent good health. Witness did rot reâ€" To the Courtâ€"Some persons had gone down the west side ten minutes before witness left. To Hon. M. C. Cameronâ€"One of theso was ; Mr. McCarthy, a messenger. 6 ‘ was opened from baving seen. the light. Is certain ¢hat he was opposite the centre of the Publ,iZWorh Department when he heard the l!*ot Could not see O‘Connorâ€"street from there., Did not notice anybody outside the buildings on leaving. There were some peoâ€" ple going towards the Russell House, but witness could not tell who they were. Could not, from the ‘Connorâ€"strect corner, recog. nize what was lying on the sidewalk, and did not know that it was Mr. McGee until after having been at the Trmuss office. Recogniz+d the body when within ten feet. Could not preâ€" viously distinguish the color of the hat. Saw nobody on the west side of the parliamentary grounds,. When coming down witness‘ party did not stop to talk. Followed the west sideâ€" ‘ walk right down to the gate. f *â€"cxamined by Mr. ‘Reillyâ€"The second [lying at his mother‘s dcor. The men then came down with him, and they found Dr. Robitaille and other boarders outside his mother‘s door. Saw Mr. McGee !ying on the sidewalk with his head to the road, his face turned upwards covered, with blood, and his bat. on his head. There was blood on the sidewalk and in the gutter. Mr. McGee apâ€" peared to be then dead. Does not know who took up the.body for removal. s Crossâ€"examined by Hon. M.C. Cameronâ€" Has no idea how long it would take to go from the Department of Public Works to the corfter of ‘Connor and Sparksâ€"streets. Saw nothing at this corner but the black object descrived. .Coming down from the Public Works saw nobody on O‘Connorâ€"street. From the time of his leaving the others saw noâ€" body l;::’!l he went to the Tiuzs offic», and distur those there. . Saw no one at the door of his mother‘s house, and only knew it ‘ ter appeared to be trying to open the door. ‘_l‘:o first man was al the door, and his face fThe first man was at the door, and his face close to it, when the shot was fired. The second man bad come round in & semiâ€"circular way, and raised his arm when behind the first man. ‘Then witness heard the shot and gave a jump from surprise. ‘The first man fell backwards toward« the wall of the houseâ€" head first. [Witness then gave a pantomimic description of the falling of the. man, from which it seemed that the fall was forwards on oune kaoee, and sideways against the doo:ro-t.] The second man returned by abo the same course as he had taken in coming beâ€" hind the other, and striking on the smaller of the posts on that side of the street, exclaimed "Jesus!" ‘Then went up on to the " parapel " (sidewalk) and, going a little further, entored ‘ a gateway â€"on the sams side,. Witness was cuat, and a cap. . Heard a pistol shot fired. The men might have been fivo or six feet spat then.. ‘The man in the rear left the sideâ€" walk, made a circuit in the stroet, and came behind the first man, firing at him while the [Mr.J.H. Macaulay thenacting as interpreter examination proceeded.] . * Witness took the first street from the bridge over the creck near the Chaudiere. Does not know its name. Followed it until opposite the first Parliament Building when hs turned off, and took the next street. There were houses on this next street. One very large one at the corner. ‘There was aâ€"fence at the opposite corner, (the left) about a quarter of an .acre before you come to houses. Witners took the left side of the street. He siw something â€"â€"a man dressed in black with a beaver hat on his head walking on the other side of the stroet, evidently with the intention of openâ€" ing a door. ‘The man was going up towards the Chaudiere, The door was opporite half the distance of the fence and opposite the telegraph post. Witness was from twelve to fourteen yards from the tâ€"legraph post when he saw the man on the other side. He also saw anâ€" other person on the other side, about sevenâ€" teen or z:lmen yards from the first person, both on the same side. They were both going in the same direction. Saw a man (following the first man) with lightish pantaloons, dark Hon. J. H. Cameronâ€"*Néever mind ; you are doing very well." ty To the Courtâ€"The street into which he turned was the sccond from the Parliament Buildings. & 6 John Rogerâ€"I am, and was on the 7th April last, subâ€"foreman at the Truzs office. On the morning of the 7th of April, about 2 o‘clock, I heard a shot of a pistol, aad in a few minutes Mrs. Trotter‘s son came running up stairs, and said thero was some man lyirg on the sideâ€" walk, and he was aftraid to go into his mother‘s house. All the hands in the office ran over to Mrs. Trotter‘s and I saw the late T. D. McGee dead, and could see no movemient in the body. Ithen ran for Dr. McGillivray and brought him, and then went for Mr. Robertson, the editor of the Tiuzs. Jean Bfim Lacroix swornâ€"Lives in Ostawa. is witness explained that he spoke English imperfectly, and desired to be examined by interpreter. He was, however; examined at procecding in English.] Lives on Grey Nunâ€"st., in Lower Town. Last spring mliv{n‘ in the house where his father died, Deschapelles house, in Lower Town. Knows where the Chaudiere flats are. They are " up that way," in Upper Town. Had business at the Flats one Monday night in Arrfl last, but | cannot say in English the day of the month. The Courtâ€"Say it in French. â€" Witnessâ€"Sizâ€"Sept Avril. It was Monday evening that he went to the Chandiere, and ho returned about 1:30 a.m. Came back " this way." Does not;know the name of the street in front of the Parliament buildings. Came along that street for some way, until he came near the buildiogs, when he turned off. Does not know where the theatre is. Mr. O‘Beillyâ€"" You say you came along Wellingtonâ€"st., and then crossed over by some other street. Now where was this street by which you crossed ?" â€" Witnessâ€"*" T cannot speak well in English I wish to be asked in French." * the Sappers‘ bridge I met Mr. Lappum, a »member of the House of Commons. _1 saw the late Mr. McGee on the morning following about threeâ€"quarters past sâ€"ven o‘clock, dead, at;Mrs. Trotter‘s. s Crossâ€"examined by Mr. M.C. Cameronâ€"Did not hear the shot until I passed the Russell House, when I heard a noise like a shot, but I ‘paid no attention at the time. I saw some of the messengers when we were leaving the Houss, but don‘t remember any others. I met Buckâ€" ley‘s carriage with the grey horses, returning from Sir mn‘ A. Macdonald‘s, on the Sap pers‘ bridge. When Mr. McGee and I were going down to the saloon for ‘cigars I saw Sitr John A. Macdonald putting on his coat at his ward. rob¢. We only stopped a few minutes in the saloon, and then came up and left the House for our lodgings. Y Dr. McGillivray was here recalled by the Crown, and said the pistol wound was unâ€" questionably fatal, and must have caused alâ€" most instantaneous deathb. ’ bers of ibe House elected on the‘ * fair ~play" ticket, and that he never lost an opporâ€" \ tnnit{ of striking under the belt, and sai it was unfair to attack an absent member who had no chance of deferfding himself. The laty Mr. McGee wasin excellent health and spirits that evening,; and spoke with great animationâ€"speaking . ncarly two â€" bours. ‘The House adjourned about fire or seven minutes after two o‘clock. When the late Mr. McGeo and I left the Houss it must have veen about fifteen minutes after two o‘clock. SirJohn A. Macdonald had robed himself, and had left the House some . minutes before we did. Messrs. Cartier and Galt went out cf the House by the woeet door, and Mr, McGee and I passed out by the Post Office of the House, and out through the main door unâ€" der the main tower. We then walked down to the corner of Sparks and Metcalfeâ€"sts.â€"we parted theroâ€"I going to the Russell House and the deceased going towards Mrs. Trotter‘s. At the corner of the street as we were parting I saw John Buckley. Idid not see Patrick Buckley then, I then saw Mersrs. Cartier and Galt at Isaac‘s hardware store, opposite the Ontario Bink,. I looked back and heard John Buckley speaking at Hunton‘s corner, and on Parker. ‘The late Mr. McGee made one of his most eloquent speeches on that occasion, atâ€" tecking Ur. Parker as being one of tho. memâ€" Dr. Vancortlandtâ€"I am corozer and su‘gâ€"on ; on the morning of the 7th of April last, about 3 o‘clock in the morning I was called to visit the body of the lats Mr. McGee. â€" (On turning over the body on its face, I saw the wound proâ€" duced by a pistol shot which must necessarily have been fatal and caused almost instant death.. Dr. McGillivray handed mo the bullet which was found in Mrs. Trotter‘s door, and I handed it to Detective O‘Ncill by order of the Court after I tmarked it. No crossâ€"examination. ; Robt. MacFarlane, Esq , M.P.â€"T am a memâ€" ber of the House of Commons. On the eveaâ€" ing of the 6th of April last, there was an imâ€" portant debate in the House on the recall .of Er. Tixppe_i from England, on a motion by Dr.. _ Donald McGillivray, M.D., was called on to ) attend at Mrs. Trottar‘s at about halfâ€"past two o‘clock , on ths morning of the: 7th April, when ! saw the late T. D. McGee, and found the body lying obliquely about dour or five feet from the door sill on the sidewalk, and saw the blood flowing down the sidewalk into the gutter. Iâ€" found the glove of the right band at a little.distance from the body on the sidewalk. _ ‘The blood appeared florid and red, and appeared clotted iecently. ‘The body was warm. I discovered the wound on the tack of the head, immediately to the right of the #pinal column, caused by a pistol shot, and saw the mark of the pistol shot, which passed obliquely through the door towards the keyâ€" hole, a few inches above it. I also found the cigar. I performed the post mortem examinaâ€" tion, assisted by Dr. \#‘::lfl, and found the cause of death to be, beyond doubt, the pistol shot wound from the back of the head, and passing through the mouth. time that prisoner visited her house the bar '-Goolgc > it Eogineer. I mad e Pertryâ€"I am City eer. made the plan now produced. ‘The Parliament and ’othcr buildings are properly placed on that plan. < The rcale of this plan is sbout 66 feet to an inch. From actual summary, the disâ€" tance trom the main entrance to the Parliaâ€" ment buildiogs and Mrs. ‘Irotter‘s, is 1620 foct. The distance from the centre door of the Board of Works to the corner of O‘Connor and Sparksâ€"ste., is about 578 feet. | The defence did not crossâ€"cxamine this witâ€" nega. _ â€" Mich@®1 McCarthy, Chief Messenpger of the House of Commonsâ€"After the House had adâ€" journed on ‘Tucsiay morning, (7th April) 1 came down to the west block to Wellingtonâ€" st., and then continued on to the corner of'{ the Scotch Church; Upper Town, and then turned into Sparksâ€"»t. to my house beside Mr. Skead‘s. Met no person or hcard no shot on his way home: . No crossâ€"examination 1HE OTTAWA®TIMES» SEPTEMBER 8 P M CWeRuip whether he told Leveque and a man named Barnaby that he did not see the shot fired, but ouly beard it May have said s>. Did not tell anybody that he had seen the shot, until he showed Pinard the place. He did not tell Lapicrre. The first Pranol to whom he told this may have been Pinard. Pinard asked him, and ho (witness) showed him the place where down. The second man, immediately on firâ€" ing the shot, turned round and walked off fast without running. ‘The man was nearer the Sappers‘ bridge (further east) than witnessâ€" five or ten yardsâ€"when he turned into the sidewalk. Had no opportunity of noticing the mun‘s face except when passing him after the shot. The archway through which the man disappeared was on the other side of the street from witness. . Witness remained in this doorâ€" way three, four or five migutes after the man disappeared. Witness was too much afraid to go over to the fallen man. Afterthe man had fallen forwards on the post, he fell on the sideâ€" walk with his head to the door. From where witness was standing he could see quite plainâ€" ly the door which the first man sought to enâ€" ter. Did not see the door opened at all while he stood opposite, Lid not pay very parâ€" ticular attention. It might bave been opened. Witness stood on the first ltho( the doorway in which he was conceal+»d, but cannot ray if he were, higher than the sideâ€" walk. Going home he met a man in Parentâ€" street, on the other side of the French catheâ€" dral.: Does not recollect passing a carriage | and horses. Does not know the Russell House, knows a large house near the bridge, and the Post Office.. Does not know the hotel ; saw nobody after ho got home, except those who were in the ‘house, Did not say anything to any of them then, because they were all in bed. Did not say anything to them next day. Thinks that it was on the Wednesday that he first spoke of it to Mr. Lapietre. Heard some ‘mention of a reward, but not on the Wednesâ€" day. : Cannot precisely state the paiticular time when hbe first heard that a reward was offcred, nor what the amount was said to be. Heard several people speak of it, some saying it was a large, and some that it was a small roâ€" ward: Did not hear whether it was large or _ smali, [Great difficulty was experioncedâ€" in extracting definite and relevant answers upon this subject.] Theâ€" only person he heard mention the reward was Mr. O‘Reilly. In conversation with Lapierre about the late Mr. McGee, Lapierre said that a reward had been offeféd. That was on Wednesday. Cannot state posiâ€" tively whether the conversation took place on T‘uesday, Wednésday or Thursday, bat thinks Wedneuiny. Laplerre did not say anything to him about it. Lapierre told witness of the death of Mr. lc&o gclm witaees.told what he h:ll “e'l‘l;i h[:hm said nothing of the reward. [ & point witness affirmed.]) Lapierre remarked that it was ‘ great pity that the poor man should be dead, and ;lhefl:i"bit':u said that he had been very muc ned, having heard a istolâ€"ghot \ in coming from the Chaudiere, Lll:)lm did net tell him how Mr. McGee had been killed. If so witness does not recolleot. Witness did not tell Lapierre that he had seen anyâ€" body, but merely that he had heard a shot, not seen it fired. Did not see Lapierre again before he was first brought before thoh lllx‘i:ntq. Pinard was the person to whom witness spoke upon the matâ€" ter. Cannot say whother ho knows a man | named Paul Leveque. Cannot say precisely fired. Up to that time he had not noticed the faces ofcither. Never noticed the first man‘s face at all. Cannot say whether the door in which he stopped, on bearing ‘the shot, was open or not. It was closed. Witners crept in sideways to the door, concealiny himself. there, with his back to the door. Witness was about fifteen yards further down the street (nearerthe bridge) than the men when he stopped. From ten to eleven yards further walking or standing. 1t was o podJu this spot that he thrned down into the le’eond street. Did not stop at the corner, nor until he came to the door of the brick house. Cannot say how long it was aiter he had turned the corner that he saw the men. He had gone seven or eight yards from the corner, when he saw the first man. It was bright moonlight. e could see the color of the first man‘s hat. It was a black beaver. ‘The second man had a black cap. Witness did not stop at allâ€"until aiter he heard the shot fired, when he tried to hide bimself in the doorway. He had got a little past the first man when the shot was in the afternoon, and other houses which he does not recollect. Had no watch, but saw several clocks in the houses. Did not mark the time at any. . When he passed his uncle‘s door coming home, he asked the latter was it late,to which his uncle replied that it was about one or Lalfâ€"past. Had spent all the time in the strect and in houses making enquiries. Mect no one from the time he left his uncle‘s until reaching the Parliament buildings. Saw somebody coming down or standing about the steps coming from the Partliament hill. Does not know how many, nor whether they were __ Crossâ€"examined by Hon. J. H. Cameronâ€" Had been ten orelsven days in Ottawa at the time, since he came from below, That is from Rigaud, beyond (;r\envillo. Lived here with hbis brotherâ€"inâ€"law. \Is married, and hLis wife is in Ottawa. His wifs came up with him. Had been in Ottawa several times before, working about the Chaudiere for the past sixtâ€"en years. Knows the city quite well, but does not know the names ot any of the street». Left his brothorâ€"inâ€"law‘s house in the afterâ€" ncon of the 6th of April, but cannot say at what hour. Left home alone. Went straight to the Chaudiere to get a house, â€" but did not get one. Metsereral people at the Charndiere that day. Does not know the names of any, Knows ong@ personally, but not his name. [Witness being interrogated repeatedly regardâ€" ing this man could not give any . description of him, nor information as to the othors.] Witness was enquiring for work and for houses until ho left at halfâ€"past one in the morniog. Cannot toll the name of a. single place at which he asked for houses, or of ‘a sll:nglo inâ€" dividual he asked for work except Mr. Eddy and another gentleman. This was on Monâ€" day between four and five in the evening. Did nothing afterwards but ask tor. work and houses, Had taken his dinner before he left home in the afternoon between two and three ¢‘clock, but cannot say at what hour exâ€" actly. * He had stated before ¢in examination in chief) that he had left home in the afterâ€" noon. â€" Recollects being in his uncle‘a house To the Courtâ€"The second man came to about within six or seven yards of witness before he wheeled and struck the post. | , To Mr. O‘Reillyâ€"Witness could not@ee his face. Does not kndow whether ho nwglxlm (witness) or notâ€"thimks not. Witness afterâ€" wards saw the man 2 the office of the gaol. He was then d differentlyâ€"darkâ€" Iy. ‘Thete were _ others â€" with | him: The _ prisonet is the man. [Prisoner here ordered to stand up and identified by witness.] â€" Witness did not say muchâ€"about it until atter conversatlion with Mr. Parent. Worked at home after returning that morning, and afterwards moved to the Flats, to the place of a man named Lafieur, living near the small bridge over the creek. ‘Then went to work a day with Mr. Harris, below the Chauâ€" diete bridge. Afterwards worked at the Duâ€" chesne Rapids, said to be nine miles trom the Chaudierec. ~Went there to work for his liveâ€" lihood. Somebody brought him away from there. It was Pinard, a policeman, and someâ€" body else. They brought him to the town hall, he believes, befure a magistrate ; since | then he has been here. It may have boen ; geven or eight days after the murder. He l had been before a magistrate four or five days before this second appeatance. It was after being before the magistrate the first time, that he went to the Duchesne Rapids. The first appearance was fire or six days after he had geen the shot fired. The first time be was arâ€" rested for examination he was sleeping in his bed at the Chaudiero. The second time he was at Mr. Eddy‘s shanty at the Duchesn®, Hedid not to receive apything for giving ovidmor does he expect to do so now. He never saw the person who fired the shot before then, nor after, until he saw him in gaol, and picked him out there. Witness moved from Lower Town to the Chaudiere Fla‘s on Tuesday, the day following the firing of the shot. Did not see the prisoner again until be saw him in gaol. The sheriff was present when he pointed out the prisoner. There might have beon thirteen, fourteen or fifteen persons then present, all strangers to witness, out of whom he had no difficulty in identifying prisoner. l «& nUck house opposite. This house is nearer the Sappers‘ bridge than where the man was aff)t. Atter furing the shot the second man came a short distance towards witness and then turned round to the sidewalk» antilâ€" he struckthe post. When witoess saw this he started at once and went home. He did not cross over to see the man because ho was too much frightened. * standing all this time near a brick house opposite Thi Cannot say precisely Tar Montreal News has‘ cvidently taken "oo ‘much to heart the nccputkona of a cerâ€" tain Western journal against t.lee Premier of Ontario, to the effect that he w"nt away down to Halifax, to manage a little plat of his own. There is nothing startling in t1 e remarks of the Cornwall Freeholder since the return of the ministerial party from Hn*fax. Everyâ€" body on the press has of late been trying his ‘hand. at saying somethiag wike concerning Nov# Scotia, and ‘why inay not the Elitor of the fiuholder, never perhaps nt very ardent Confederationist, try his hand at the same work, without anybouy but the Globe sniffing treason ? If our memory is nit at fault the Montreal News itself has on more than one occasion spokenâ€" with exceeding great aftecâ€" tion of the Ndva Scotia Re lers, has in fact said more encouraging things to them than the ~Frecholder has lLet ventured on, and we do not think that the remarks of the Freeholder, or the Globe‘s interpretation thereof, can furnish any reasonable ground for supposing that the Ontario |Premier will throw any obstacles in the w+y of bringing i C aonlnarnts 3 So much of our space is ogcupied toâ€"ftay with the proceedings at the Assize Court, that we have lfttle room for other| matter. Our readers will find some points ol interest in the report, apart from that which attaches to the general result of the case now ; under considâ€" eration.‘ The mode of chl‘lenge adopted yesterday at theâ€"instance of the Hon. J. H. Caxrrox will probably be generally followed hereafter in selecting the jury in all im;%::: criminal cases. It will be seen by the that as yet but a few, though some of them important, witnesses for the Crown have been examined, and that the case $r the prosecuâ€" tion will be: resumed this morning at nineJ o‘clock. t ChrOttamaCimes _ here. h ie a A Public . Servicc at the Church. _ in reply to Hon. M. C; Can;tron-â€"Lost sight uf Mr. McGee in the corridor of the House. Most of the ‘parties he had seen before Mr. Galt and himself continued on the right side of Metcalfeâ€"st. He could not say whether any of them. turned off to the wectr 4 Mr. Starr was then called, but it being about 6:20 o‘clock the court was -ajogmd until nine o‘clock on Tuesday morningh the Judge diâ€" recting in the meantime that the jury should not be permitted to separate, but that the Sheriff take proper care that'tl?ey receive reâ€" freshments. | During the afternoon Sit John A. Macdonald, K.C.B., Sir George E. Cartier, Bart., and the Hon. Wm. Macdougal], C:B., eétered the court room and remained for some time. ‘ On no occasion will t Old Advertisements _ In reply to Hon. M . C. Can;i uf Mr. McGee in the corrido! Most of the ‘parties he had a Galt and himself continued of of Metcalfeâ€"st. He could not of them. turned off to the wecd | _ Bir Gcorge E. Cartier, Bart., Minister of Militia, was then called by|the Crown. He recollected the adjournment of the House of Commons about two o‘clock on the morning of the 7Tth April. When going out of the House he (Sir George) saw Mr. McGeo smokâ€" ing, with his overcoat on. Mr. McGee asked him, " Are you not going| out, Cartier ?" Witness said, " No, I am waiting for Galt.‘ He~(Sir ~George) then e Mr. McGee good â€" night, and in about â€" four . minutes Mr. Galt _ came ont‘B and _ they (Cartier and Galt) left the [House together, going to their lodgings on Metcalfeâ€"st. Left the House by the principal et’i'tmnce and went down Mctcalfeâ€"street. There were four or five parties ahead of them, and he and Mr. Galt walked slowly, bocause th¢ir conversation was private. ‘They walked on the right side ot Metcalfeâ€"st. to Sparksâ€"st., bzt seeing the parâ€" ties still going on before th m, they crossed to the left side ; stopped at thi corner of Sparks and Metcalfeâ€"sts. a minute or two to finish the conversation with Mr. Galt. By that tims some of these parties ahead (Efihim had reached the middle of Metcalfeâ€"st. â€" Hoâ€"(witness) then walked along the left side of Metcalfeâ€"st. toâ€" wards Mariaâ€"st., pretty fast, and reached his home, but heard no shot. He passed Buckley‘s stables, and then had to go to| Mariaâ€"st., when he turned to the right. | Examination in chief â€";relumed by Mr. O‘Reillyâ€"Saw the man from whom he got the house at the Chandiere on the Saturday, and also on the Monday.â€" His namo was Lafiour. At that time the mills were only commencing to work. He went to Hull on Monday after. noon. Re did not tell Lapigrre all about the affair at first, because he wfn not obliged to tell him. He just told him that he bad heard a shot ard been frightened in Upper Town, Did not go to any magistrate or the authoriâ€" tiés to say aoything about it, nor did he make ary enquiry about the rew‘rd offered. . Did not give hiinself any trouble in any way about the reward. ‘When brought down by the police officers there was no force used ; he had left word at his own house that if wanted he would come.‘ Heé had comé up to Duschere to work, He recollected xfore he saw the man in gaol, the kind of clothes the man wore on the night of the murder| ‘The man who took him to the cells did not tell him it was to recognize Whelan, When he saw Whelan he recognized him, withoct any explanation. He was not told for what parpose he had been | brought there. e had only desired to see him drossed for h‘s own satisfaction. Nobody had offered witnessany reward or recompense. He showed the parties who sccompanied him to the spot where the shot was fired, how the man came up behind the min who was shot. The prisoners at the gaol, have asked him qucstions several times ; wlTau they bothered him too much he used to go away from them. Bir Gcorge E. Cartier, Bart., Minister of Militia, was then called bythe Crown. He recollected the adjournment of the House of Commons about two o‘clock on the morning of the 7th April. When going out of the House he (Sir Gcorge) saw Mr. McGeo smokâ€" (zâ€"For markets see Fourth tion between the two men who accompanied him until they came to place of the murâ€" der. When he came to jail they brought him to the corridor whera the prisoner was. He saw prisoner in his cell| before ho saw him up staire. Prisoter was in his shirt sleeves. Nobody told him that was the prisoner. There was nobody in the cell but the prisoner. Did not say ho could not recognise him, but that it was difficult to recognise him in his semiâ€"naked state. Ho did not ask that prisoner should" be dressed, and does not know whether anybody else asked that or not, He recognised the man‘s face and mode of walking. In answer to a question why he could not recognise him distinctly, witness said he only saw him that evening, and was frightened. He had recognised the man, but asked that he should be presented as he was before. The ‘prisoner was pointed out to him by an elderly man in the gaol, who told him to look towards the outside end go forward, and.told hitmm to look into other cells, then he took him outâ€"ide, and asked him (witness) if he was there. He (wituess) replied, it was very diflicult to recognize & man â€"half dressed. It was after that he raw the prisonet upâ€" stairs. When he saw prisoner afterwards, he was dreesed in the same clothes as he wore the night he had scen him before. HMe did not reâ€" cogniss him from his dress,%he had recognised hin before by his appearance and mode of ~walking. He did not likflto say whether he recognized him al first not |knowing the peoâ€" ple who were with him. HL was under fright, both on the night when he heard the shot, and on the day when he was in gaol. Knows a man npamed Cosgiove, of Buckingham, and Richard Kane and Patrick %ne, of Grenville. HHe may know Andre D‘Aoust, of Rull, and he may know Olivicr Latour, ot Hull. Does not know a man named Brown in gaol. Did not gay to any man in gaol that he would receive a largs sum of money if Whelan was hanged, and4 nothing if Whelan got off. He bas remained.at the gaol for some time. * Examination in chief resumed by Mr. Q‘Rcilly‘â€"s_‘w }he man from whom he got the TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1868 NEW ADVERTISEMENTS. corner of Sparks two to finish the By that tims him had reached 10 (witness) then f Metcalfeâ€"st. toâ€" and reached his passed Buckley‘s Mariaâ€"st., when Mr. McGee asked out, Cartier ?" ting for Gailt.‘ e â€"Mr. McGee four . minutes and _ they e names of Congregationa Page. was no conversaâ€" respect, however Btiot further reduction in Autumn goods at Mages & Russell‘s. This fourt will commence its sittings this morning betore Judge Armstrong in the City Hall. â€" terly deny the imputation, and out corresâ€" pondent has shewn us nothing to justify â€" it, beyond the evidence of hisown misapprehenâ€" sion of its tenor, which, under the cireumâ€" stances, will happily have no effect upon the it. .But we do so, as we published such comâ€" ments as we have seen fit to make ourselves, iu the full faith that while an intelligent pubâ€" lic will estimaute our judgment as they do his, at what they may think it worth, or as they ‘believe it borne out by facts, those who are concerned in the trial will be guided exclasive‘y:by the law and the evidence, and alike indifferent to the varying phases of the popular mind, whether imanifested on the one side or on the Other. As to our having written asingle line calculated to obscure a just apâ€" preciation of the facts on either side, we utâ€" it. (4) In this paragraph ‘our correspondent labours to prove a distinction where there does not exist a difference. Ee is disingenuâ€" ous when he pretends that we attempted to put the jurymen on their guard, when in point of fact we stated that the natural results of the «"extra preparation *‘ would be to do this for them without our assistance. Orrawa, September 7, 1868. (1) We offered no " objections,‘‘ nor do we entertain any ; we gave merely what we conâ€" ceived to be a reasonable explanation of cerâ€" tain circumetances which KHad excited a state of public curiosity that we ‘honestly believed to be excusable, and which, whether excusâ€" able or not, as a matter.of fact, existed. (2) This is saying quite as much, if not more than the Tiurs advanced ou the same topic ; nor (8) did we ever dream of hinting that his Counsel were under obligation‘‘ to refuse the money raised for "the prisoner‘s As to our correspondent‘s closing paraâ€" graph we have only to say that its inuendo roakes us doubt whether we should publish _ I dare say I am doing something very unâ€" popular In{mk,infthm temrk:,nlfut I witl closs by observing that if there is any man who needsthe best ability to defend him, and t> whom all that the law allows him should be conceded most ungradgingly by ail enlightened lovers of fustice, it is the mun whom popular sentiment has condemned aiready. + I am, dear sir, $ With much respect, Yours truly, + Ruiapaxaxtucs. _ Were not all the papers last spring lauding up to the «kies the almost superhuman cleverâ€" ness of Mr. O‘R:illy in conducting the prelimâ€" inary investigation into this ‘caso? And with the same ke«nz indefatigable mind engaged in arranging circumstantial evidence of his guilt, is the prisoner to be left to the protection of some fourth or fifthâ€"rate lawyer, whose incapacity might blunder an innocent man‘s neck into ths halter? You observe yourself that "there is a mischievous notion «" abroad that a powerful array of legal talent « is calculated to defeat the ends ot justice." You repudiats the notion, and so do I ; for if it were true, it would apply equally to both sides of the case; and, knowing that Mr. O‘Reilly is a © powerful array " in. bimself, we might fear lest legal justice should beâ€" come, under his influence, illegal severity. I cannot think that the notion is any " libel on the character of the honest jurymen of Carleton," in particular; it simply shows how little many persons understand the true nature of a judicital trial. ‘One thing, I conâ€" fess, puszles me, and that is that you should almoit at the same moment repudiate the notion that a powerful array of legal talent tends to defeat the ends of justice, and yet proceed yoursslf to put the " honest jurymen of Carleton" orf their guard "against the extra preparations fot defence." l In the second place, as to the hint that the money came from Fenian sources, I would jost remark, Whelan is on trial, not for Feâ€" nianism, but for murder. It is a matter of toleraâ€" ‘blo certainty that bhe is a Fenian, but that does not prove that he murdered poor McGece. If Whelan were on his trial for Fenianism, i, e., if the thing to be proved were that he beâ€" longed to a certain set of treasonable men, then ‘to accept money which those men had raised for his defence would bo a disgraceful act, becauss the very raising otf the money would be all but pousitive proof that the man was what he was accused of being. The case is quits different, however, when he is brought to trial for murder. ‘The fact (supposing it to be a fact) that Foenians have raised money for him, simply proves that they have a certain iunterest in him, not that he is guilty .of the crime laid to his charge. (2) Therefore I vonâ€" ture to maintain that even had the Hon.J. i. Cumeron know», that certain money which was offered to him was made up of Fenian contributions he was under no obligation to refuse it,‘sa) so long as he was only asked to lend his aid to secure the accused what every man in the British dominions is entitled toâ€" a fair trial. A corREsroxpext sends us the following letter, and in spite of the, pressure on our columns we give it insertion, as we have no possible desite to act otherwise than with the utmost impartiality. To the letter we have appended a few brief comments, though we hardly think the tenor of our remarks could have been misapprehended by our readers : Te the Editor of THE TIMES. \ , Drear Sirâ€"Will you ailow me to say that there is something in the tone of your article of this morning on the Whelan. trial which strikes me as rathor unfair? Speaking of the counsel for the defence you say: "Such an. " unusual array cf professional talent may; "well excuse the public curiosity which exâ€" "i:ts concerning‘ the means which have « brought it about ; but these means no doubt «may be conveniently designated as consistâ€" «ing chiefly in money, and it may further be «surmised that this money is drawn chicfly " from Fenian or proâ€"Fenian sources." Now in the first place . as to money being the consideration for which Whelan‘s, lawyers . bave undertsken his case, I imagine that money is the usual considerstion in all such caser. | It is not often, at leut,! that we see an eminent lawyer undertaking a troublesome case gratuitously, and out of pure charity ; and besides, I can bardly think that, if that had been done in the present inâ€" stance, those who share your: objections to. money as an agent would have been any better pleased. (1) LOCAL N about a satisfactory understanding with the Nova Scotians underthe existing constituâ€" anp Quartus Smsstons.â€" that the Company are erecting powerfal crushing machines, and intend pushing the works rapidly on.â€"Montreal Gazette. ul netith css c css Beis 2 cometiiecsate: I 2 oz. 12 dwts. 18 grs., and Mz dwts. 14 grs. of very pure gilver. It was taken from the Thunder Bay Mining Companry‘s works, Lake Superior, and4 we are informed work, and having made large additions to their work shop are now bettsr prepared to exscute any orders with .which they may be entrusted than heretofore. Masomic jewels, geld and silver medals, and every kind of jowellory repaired. Purs Sicvez.â€"On Monday we examined a very fine specimen ot silver ore, extracted from the quartz by Mr. F. Traunweiser, manuâ€" hft.":i?f je;.veller, Ottawa. ‘The quartsz from which the silver Massrs. Youxe & Raprorp having secured the services of firstâ€"class working jewellers in ctruscan, filagree, plglnl fancy and solid gold . _ Autoxx.â€"Garland, Mutchmor & Co. bave received and opened out over sixty packages of new fall goods, comprising a complete stock of staple goods, and many. of the leading novelties of the season. In fancy goods, a large and choice stock of carpettings and house furnishings. respondent. This was an appeal from the deâ€" cision of the Police Court i:p. case of insgulting language. Verdict for appeliant setting aside the previous decision. + The Queen vs. Paul Levequeo for the larceny of a coat from the botel of Augustus Roy on the 8th of June last. Louis Roy testified to the loss of the coat, but the evidence was of an unsatisfactory character, and the Recorder instructed the jury that on such testimony as had been adduced it would not be safe to conâ€" vict, and the jury returned a verdict Not Guilty,. Mtr. Lees for the Crown ; Mr. Mosâ€" grove for the defence. ‘There were two other cases for larceny, for which we have no 1oom in the present issue. The prisoner was again put upon his trial, charged =rrith stcaling an iron llnf7 being part of a mortar mill, the property of James Adams, on or about the 6th of June last. J. D. Fraser swornâ€"Testifted that the prisâ€" oner brought a large piece of old iron to his place, for which he paid him two or three shillings. He could not remembasr cflfl?’. m.hmu Adams proved the property to 8. ® T Detective O‘Neill proved haring found the iron at Fraser‘s, and the prisonet‘s having confessed to him that he stole it from Mr. Adams, * Robt. Lces, Esq., for the Crown; P. J. Buckley, Esq, for the defonce. Verdictâ€" Guilty. Victor Bourgeois appellant ; Wim. Stewart Paul Leveque\Y‘: then arraigned on a charge of larecay, and pleaded not guilty. James Irvine was arrainged on a cherge of stealing a cow, the property of John Baptiste Babierre. Mrs. Sabicrre proved that the cow was her husband‘s property, and that she was in their possession on the morning of uglmh of June, and Mre. Dall proved that she bought her from the prisoner, who represented her as his property, a short time after she was missed, viz., on the same day. ~_ Detective O‘Neill proved having arrested the prisoner, and his baving admitt=d that he stole the cow andsold her to Mrs. Dall, and told the amount he had obtained for her, and also that money was found on him, which he had tailed to account for. [ Daniel Bucke said he knew the pr%ncr, and that in consequence of a wound on the head The jury then retired and returned with a verdict Guiltyâ€"with a recommendation to mercy, he became crazy after drinking, and be beâ€" lieved irresponsible for his acts. Robt. Lees, Esq., prosecuted for the Crown ; and Mr. P. J. ‘Buckley defended. Both gentlemen bricfly addressed the jury, and the Recorier summed up. ’ The following appeal cases were taken up and disposed of : Mr. Kennedy appeliant, Patrick O‘Meara respondent. This was an appeal against the decision of the Police Magistrate in an assault case. Dismissed on the ground of insuflicient notice. < Eugene: Martincau appeliant, Pierre Leriâ€" viere respondent. This wasan appeal against the decision of the Police Magistrat= in a case of assault. Verdict for appellant with costs ‘setling aside the decision of ths Police Jourt. Mosgrove for 'lppclhpt; Less for respondent. discharged. _ The Grand Jury made a short present ment, the only point in which being a recommenâ€" dation tor the suppression ot larceny by putting down pawnshops, where stolen articles were generally disposed of, His Honor thanked them for their att:ndance, and said it was competent for them to present any person who might be koown to hare violated the law in this respect, but said the petit juries would not convict on evidence that ought to satisty reasonsable minds. The Grand Jury were then The Grand Jury, entered with two true bil is against Paul Leveque for larceny. The Grand Jury retired, and after a short absence retuin d with two bills agoinst James Irvine for laiwceny. The Grand Jury were empannelled as fol. lows :â€" George Blythe. _‘ â€" Pcter A. Eagleson, Sr. Edward C. Barber. Famuel Evans. James Buchanan. â€"James Gordon. George Beament. Jas. Gilbson. David T. Browne. Francis Hallandal. George Bott. Hector MclLean. Robert Barry, _: Jonathan Offord. George Baskerville. â€" John Palen. Lawrence D. Barloy. Pierre Poulin. John Banaing. Nathaniel Robinson. Chas. Cantin. _ _ A. H. Baldwin. Robt. Dail. * P Mr. P. A. Eagleson was appointed foreman. His Honour then congratulated the Grand Jury on the fact that the cases to come before them were very few and of a trivial character. â€" ‘The Recorder‘s Court for the city of Ottawa was openod yesterday at cleven o‘clock a.m., in the City Hall, before John Bower Lewis, Esq., Recorder. » and converses with hiro, for\which she is reproved, when she retaliates ‘by promoting him. to the rank of Commanéderâ€"inâ€"Chicf and besiows ~ on him _ her\ father‘s sword. Fritz informs her of t state of his heart towards Wanda, but gdr all this she is resolved to promots him, and eleâ€" vates him to the rank of commander of\her ‘ army, gives him her fathei‘s sword, and he goes to the war, returns after un easy victory, un&\ in spits of the loveâ€"making of the duchess, marries Wanda, at which she of (Gerolstcin becomes so incensed that she conspires against him, procures him a thrashing, and degrad«s him, and then marries the imbecile Prince, Paul. Fritz returns to his native village with his bride, and the baron remains Prime Minieâ€" ter of Gerolsteinâ€" * saw last nizht muist be a born idiot, or the creation bf the author of the opera in question. The Grancd\ Duchesse is an orphan brought up by Baron P ¢tk, Prime Minister. He wishing her to marry some one who would not be likely to divest him of power, has fixed his choice on the inbecile Prince Psul, but she finds nothing atthactive in: him. Meantime, the Baron, anxioa:%keep her mind occupied, contrives a war,â€"and whilst reviewing her army, preparatory to th\-ir.leniug for the scene of action, she becomes violently enamored of a young buffoon of a Grenadier named Fritz, who is in love with Wands, a young peasant girl, for which his General Baum hates him. The Grand Ducheese calls the young soldier and converses with hiro, for\which she is .JO Gnlinininintind edniacate inintr nnedecicbeiiattitine Tust Wirileâ€" inss Atrs it Arocical the applause. The celebrated Dfes Luwi was rendered with great pathos ~and benrutifully acted,â€" and there can be no doubt, but the music is good, and the same may be said, perbaps, of Le Sabre de mon ere. The plot of the opera, however, is so remely ridiculous, and so ridiculously imâ€" probable, that it is painful to witness it, and the Duchesse who could surround herse‘!f with men capable of playing such ‘antics as we de Toto, which was a failure. One of the cardinal sins of the author is repetition of himwelf, and there &re those who charge him with a repetition of other people, too. â€" Still, in spite of all this he has his admirers, and a considerable number of them were in the auâ€" dience last night, unless,indeed, it was the finished exccution of Mlle. Tostee and some other members of the troupe, whieh elicited bach expected, For instance, it is not inferior to that of Orphec auz Enfers, and better than that of the â€"Uhateau gome other places we shall say little on <the subject. The musicis quite as good as those who are acquainted with the music of Offenâ€" RRCORDER*8 COURT.â€" was extracted, weighad only Grand Jury.® Pter A. Eagleson, Sr. Famuel Evans. James Gordon. Jas. Gibson. Francis Hallandal. Hector Mcl.can. Jonathan Offord. John Palen. â€" Pierre Poulin. Nathaniel Robinson. A. H. Baldwin. On motion of Wm. Finlay, seconded by W. Kehoe, cheques Nos. 302 and 436, amounting together to $724, and of which $359.95 were pa.l;k were cancelled, and the chairman autbhoâ€" . vi to sign cheques in tavor of F. B. H1y®, ‘T&q., Treasurer, for $242.20 and $25, and one in favor of His L ordship the Bishop of Ottew# for $96.35 in lieu thereof, On motion of J. W. Peachy, seconded by Jâ€" ‘ m behd" B.+ hy , praite nt,lofifih: rum of $61.40, u’:;' Tor Ieterect on a nots e sum of 80, signed by the ‘Trustees of the Board n“‘.; Accommedation note, and discounted at the Ontario Bank. The Board then adjourned. rose were deputed to make the necessary ACâ€" rangements regarding the same. On motion of Wm. Finlay, seconded by Jâ€" Laroge, the chairman was authorized to sigh a cheque in favor of the Secrâ€"tary of the Board for ten dollars, to cnable him to pay mistel laneous expenses incurred on account of 1he ; Ortrawa, September 3, 1868. Presentâ€"Mesers. Chas. McCarron, William Kebor, P. Dufour, Wm. Finlay, J. Larose and J. W. Peachy. In the absence of the chairman Mr. McCarâ€" ron was requested to take th6 chair. . â€"â€"â€" The minutes of the last mecting were read and adopted. s Several communications were read and laid on the table. On motion of Wm. Kehos, seconded by P. Dufour, the petition of J. Walls, J.W. Go#, ‘Mowfl’;}fllnbtlfi-do school in St. George‘s was received, and the prayet fl-mofrr-_-fi; and Messrs. Finlay and Laâ€" Terrible Traged Louisville, Arkansas» Maurnais, Tnl:,;emnber 5.â€"â€"A bloody tragedy occurred last week in Louisvili¢, Arkansss, resulting in the death of seven negroes and five whites. The negro had comâ€" mitted a terrible outrage upon a young girl, and the citizons hung bim. ‘The brother of the negro behaviog in a very insulting and riotous manner, was . also hung. The negroes in the town and ndghborhoos, numbering 50, made ageneral attack on the town, ~which was met by the citizens, with the above result. A.-T-h- and Cheyonne Indians made a dush on Fort Dodge, on the morning of the 3r4 instant, but were driven off after a severe fight, in which four soldiers of the Third Inâ€" fantry were killed, and seventeen woundsi. The Indian loss is unknown. Gen. Sheridar is now at Fort Dodge. ‘THIS MORNING‘S DESPATCHES, Leiavexw September !.â€"A special from the Hays Clty_:"_qwmau_np that a party of *n accordance with the requirements of the Convention, recently conciuded with the tobacco manufacturers, the Jatter have €eâ€" posited with the Government 18,000,000 Tivres as a pledge of good faith. Lovisvicus, September 5.â€"A German named Willich, with his wife and two children, residâ€" ing at fiudolph, near this city, were tound in their dwelling on Thursday morning, supâ€" posed to have been murdered by negroes for AMERICAN NEWS. on @ccount of illâ€"hcalth, and his dutics are proâ€" visionally performed by Count Cant«lli, Minâ€" ister of Public Works. .. Loxnox, September 7.â€"Mr. Murphy, of Mapchester, the noted public assailant o Romarcism, whose specches has so often bas Aitendcd with rioting, has offered himsef a one ot the candidates to represont that city in the House of Commons at the coming glec. tion ‘This makes tho sixth candidate t Manchester. On Saturday evening a mecting was called in the intereet of Mr. Murphy, x which it was estimated there were 600 present While speaking was going on the mecting was attacked by a mob of Irish Oatholic. who charged the platform, and dispersed th: speakers. A general fight ensued which last« nearly an hour. Clubs, stones, and oth« weapons, were used, and many personsâ€"were badly injured. ‘The police ut last succeedel in quelling the riot, and arresting several of the ringleaders. The city was greatly excited, and there were renewnls of <he dféorért o some extent during the night and Sunday. % Loxpox, September 7.â€"The Times, in is city nruci«-, says: That the annexition ef Mexico to the United States is desimble, but the time is not yet ripe. ‘Tire object could not be accomplished without endless cost‘of monty and blood. » Fronescs, September 7.â€"Minist=r Cadorai has resigned bis position in the government, Maxcnesrer, September 7 â€"Thirtyâ€"seven arrested for taking part on both sides in the riots of Sunday, were brought before the police magistrate toâ€"day. After a short preliminary investigation, they were remanded for further en’-huiou. The excitement still runs high, and a renewal of the disturbance is feared. Every precaution is being taken by the an thorities to preserve order. BOARD OF SEPARATZE THIS MORNING‘S3 DESPATCHRs Paris, September 5.â€"The Presse, the Aus. troâ€"Catholic opposition journal of this city bhas anotber editorial toâ€"day on the matter ",,' the American squairon in Tarkish waters The writer eays that the demmand t,; the United States war vessels shall pass.th» Darâ€" danelles was prompted by Russis, and that the Sublime Porte, encouraged by the English and French Mipisters, will refuss to comply Loxpox, Srptember 5 â€"â€"Telegrams fion Hone Koog state that the Japencee Goven ment have made full satisfiction to Frazce for the murder of a boat‘s crew trom a French frigate. > * 2 20 Paris Béptember 5.â€"Lo:d Lyons, the Bi. g:h Minister, gave a banquet to Lord Stanley, + e ‘English Becretary ot State for Foreign Affairs, who is at present in"this city. Â¥. Moustier was present. Specches ofa compli. mentary and pacific@cbaracter were made, and much good feeling prevailed. k _ The yacht race for the Prince cf Wales came off toâ€"day. Course to Point Dalie and back. Seven yachts were ent, red, wind being unfavorable i# is not ©xpected yachts will be back till lat». YXESTERDAY‘S DE8SPATCHES. _ The formation of a military ¢ been postponed till 1st October The dinper to Gen. Si‘sted on s“n“h' list was of a privats charact r, and intend 9 tostify the appreciation by the Ministors of the General‘s conduct, whilet filling the ‘Oflice a; Lieut.â€"Governor. _ _Thirtyâ€"five of Out leadin. men were present. Gen. Stisted respondeq to his health by the Premicr, and n“elluy py reply. _ $ f _ _A very sad catastrophe occutrred last night A young gentleman named Frq, Jacqus purser on the steamer Huron, left the #Cs8e) 1, visit his relatives. Shorlly ait«r screams (,,_ help woere heard en the wharf, but noboin could be found. This morning the body wa, discovered in the bay, He is thought to hay," missed his way in the darkness and beary riin prevailing. * Special to THE TIMES. Sortraxrrox, Srptcmbu; Saxzonia has atrived. o In the Church of the Holy Trip; a memorial was read from the Ap vincial Synod, protesting against , in the ritual or formalities of the cl a changeâ€"was said to be an @pproj gchism, not binding dn the cof members, and unnecessaty, even if; of the Synod t> effect it. A ; preached in favor of these tho, memorial was left for signatuare aft vice. * aatest bp Erlegrapy Protest Against Changes in the the Church of Englands««] Gen. Stisted«=Young Map A Party of Indians Attack a Fort. YESTERDAY‘s pEsp A Whole Family Murdered. m en e e es iomig Thiaen . WDrowen,. ede«¥acht ll‘ceâ€"l'--lp..y-,-l a the For-.tloln of the -uu.r, Ca o 1 4s PHP Triurre T "ap . FRCM TORONTO J. W, Peac#ay, Bee: tary. Toroxto, Septomber * Montreal Line ~«Pema@ Oe TB The Rir NAl of of E-‘l..‘_m. . haee W onenue ce tage c c mer 1% sSPATCHIEs C 7 it Y6bisks, he American Pig. ‘AiDst any chenge f the clure h, ?“ 8PPrOXimaetion is th'f'('flnldelflt 8 ‘\'enifim,g,em >‘ A% Sennm ‘ beview only c oL â€"The steamship Te entered, ii no* expested the camp here lms lftet{u Dalb lt + , 186q cap %a > 34 > an" _5 on T. Graeexe, 5 .& Alqo consig _ Coempany‘s pure * the undereigned . * 7\= mas civen A of it is ver ‘bet gince I iave 1 great value duric the 17th. ~â€" The betrothal Grand Duchkes » * as certain . . The proposed â€"_ CO A L Jook well. noxq edvertisement for THURSD A Y NEW AD e e y trely abandoned A Constantino} gutu that sakir bsen quite free ’-' a The editor of * tenced to three 1* “ da'(‘ "ho“.l «o the Govern®< g2nd says the 1! was beginpin£ t # 1""“" " O . nfins 6| apission sent «O flknblc and the following »* enE T ba l2 '-dl' strew n % B _ iPwenty~A} pemC unknown, the "‘ht ship, | Steam commuy L o d * > the genius 0 ‘..'-‘:.n..i. t Atlantic Cable h t goeen" °> c l of chan "G :‘-n':nJ ipt new wing offort EXERY Fom fine bog â€" _‘ whdowe / and selli miee" . i The «torm whi est coatt of I 2 N . e d 2,1%':' to the purity ler 9. Frane: &% form and to Tea 4 was

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy