in the Commons, to impuse ."“'“l;’i.lmh.i" .euted in his own person with Pl"iuello“‘o-lnioQOm..u..u . .«st possible torm of corporeal pun diuon of things distastetul to them, b~ _ ment, and weâ€" cannot but think that an nwg'w-hb * J'_w'biehiolotyï¬qniudmï¬fdin inces. Shall wo ac~ _ emaller | the best disciplinary systems for the training snothe= of the manayr â€"pt this as of the ordinarily virtuous, might be applied, history affords of +* _ evadences _ which | °Yen with a little more shan ordinary vigour, whenever, byr â€" :.¢ tyrunny of minorites, | !o the correction of the notoriously vicious, is plae «ccidental circumatances, power without exposing our criminal system to the »" _ _4 in their hunda? Wonld it no, | charge of untiquated barbarism,. .+ anothe» of the manar â€"pt this as history affords of t** _ _ evidences . which whenever, by :. tyrunny of minorities, is plae «ccidental circumatances, power P*" _ «d in their hands? Would it not â€"ve been more graceful in the representaâ€" tives >( the Mariume Provinces to have acted on this principle: We do not approve the «Aual system, and we have rejected it; it you, Ontario and Quebec, do not like it, Brunswick and Nora Seotia to have atâ€" terapte1, as they did last night by their votes to get into a quarrel with Spair tor the sake of the insurgents, but merely desires to take all due precaution for the protection of American citizens. This 1s sensible enough, but it 1« a pity that insurrectionists every. where throughout the world, the United Btates only excepted, should receire so much wordy encouragement from the American press, and so many assurances of sympathy,, with hints or promises of material aid from the American people. ‘Without a doubt the / Cuban insurgents have courted largely on gssistance from the United States ; and there hmfywmbtbqwillhdm-‘ selves utterly deceived. 11 is better that they sabhou‘d le so, than that more serious troubles sbhould have taken place. : l and E. M. Macvoxarn, Esq., M.P: for Lunenburg, U.8. The Hon. J. 8. Macvpoxaro arrired by the nine o‘clock traimn last night, having been down at L‘Orignal, conductingâ€" the Crown business of the county of Prescott Assizes. He arrived at the House in time to record his vote with the "yeas"‘ on the amend~â€" ment to the second reading of Mr. Miuis‘s Bill, thereby affording a very practical retuâ€" tation to the assertion that the two posiâ€" tions are incompatible. a specific object in view, but for this mexcusuble discursiveness both sides of the House are about equally to blame. The six months‘ boist, moved by the Hon. Mr. Braxcucst, was Onally cartied by a vote of 82 to 57, and the House adjourned at 11:30. Tus annual ag of the Dominion of &-nll.Azb.vmhmï¬n- the 5ta of next month.* sbhall unot, by our votes, impose upon you, through the action of the Dominion Legislature, a restriction to which you, by the voices of your own Local Legislatures, have declared your unwillingâ€" neses to subimit. * Buch a course would have been consistent with respect for separate provincial interests aod teclings ; and such a course would have left their own provinces free to repeal the reatriction they had enacted,if they saw fit to do so. But instead of that we had the Hoo. Mr. Axorrs declaring that because this aftair, of purely Provincial concern, had been setâ€" tled in one way in New Brunswick, thereâ€" fore the Dominton Legislature should step in and tie the hands of all the other Provinces, so that they should be compelled, whether. they liked it or not, to submit to the same In the Commons, the first evening sitting of the Session was held.â€" A long dircursive debute took place on the BiHl introduced by the member tor Bothwell, to abolish what is now kaown as the * dual system." The deâ€" bate resembled that which might be expecieal to occur on a : Speech from the Throne, rather than ow a Bill with Ix the Senate yesterday, the Act relating to Patents of Invention was read a second time after a couple of houra‘ debate. The logic of such a concourse can be all the beter appreciated when the fact is reâ€" membered that theâ€"advocates of this Bill urged its adoption on the ground of conservâ€" ing the rights of the several Provinces agninst the encroachments of the General Goverament. Nova Scotia and New Brunsâ€" wick hare already adopted the prinâ€" ciple of the Bull. All right say its opâ€" ponents ; and so may Ontario and Quebec, if they please; but as the Dominion Legislature did not force the measure on New Brunswick and Nora Scotia, neither ought it to force it upon Quebec and Ontaric. It 19 m farce of the broudest kind for the advocates of the measure to pretend that they â€" were defemiing Provincial _ interests against the encrouchments ‘of the General Gorâ€" eramest. On the contrary, that the ecope and effect of Mr. Myr1a‘s Bull could aot in general terms be better described than as " the vetocipede can now make is to run itâ€" *self into the ground." Exorxt despatches from Washington inâ€" dicate that as usual with our neigh bours there has been a great deal of brag and shou‘d hbhave voted for! it, seeing that the issue it involves is one which shou‘d be dealt with, and decided, by each Prov‘ace according to the peculiar viéws of its ow 1 people. _ ChrOttawa Cimes ** an Act to abridge the privileges of the Prov.nces, in their right of representation in the House of Commons.‘"‘ The Bill has reâ€" eeived its quicius for the present ; but we are surprised that so many members Amoxe the arrivals yesterday were, the Hou. Mr. Minras, Senator, of Nova Seotinp the Hoo. Mr. Axorrs, M.P. tor Gluucester, N.B., Promenade Concertâ€"Mechanics‘ Ins RBouse t» Lotâ€"Robert Blackburn. Noew Publicationsâ€"Jonee & Holland. A Good General *Job Compositor Wanted at Tuz N. YÂ¥. World says " the best run which THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 1869. seeme to ua a most ungrateful act on NEW ADVERTISEMENTS. KFor Ottawa Markets and Interesting 1‘ Matter ste Fourth Page. Ofice : 38, Sparks Streot. the recognition ot Cubs. i apeg o0 "on y o Nce banil be on 1 _ Tede more Hbomatthan our former lnw, but punged from all the <clausese in which ".“:.'"'d “::‘:":‘“ liberal ~+ some '011 the phrase cccurs. . The â€" argument | claewhere wo is Housss ond others s m would desire, Uodet the p. ‘ against the _ retention .of _ corporeal | circumstances he thought it was th:m'::‘ punishment proceeds from its presumed barâ€" | th*y could evact. This law does not differ barity and brutalising influence ; and, no ;ut:hcm the h'i:. it now stand«. In the doubt, in former times, and in many countries, | sumed would be comsidered Ss tie o . "* ""*~ + cpnsidered asâ€"thy Bill this form of punishment was carried to “W‘.ï¬' Committee. In the om savage and most mischievous excess. But :::'::-b..":."‘;: t‘:‘hu years with powe; is it wise to jump from one extreme to anâ€" | patent is 15 years â€"that .Bu.l.‘:':f" Cra other? May there mot be cases wherein a tuke out a patâ€"nt for fre years â€" _ 4*0" ©AY form of punishment inapplicable upon any | If that time bate it exg»* _ , and at the end sound principle as the years mote . At the â€"ued for five or ten a consequence of con | have time to s . end of five years he will viction for robbing a hen roost, would yet be | * WR * .:"'h.:::c.hhpunl is wo::i reasonable equivalent M | time â€" . and & can then bave the ;-...h :", ,“mm“'“tl" «xtended tor five years, and at the end ment for crime is not only differeas * .. that time for fire other yâ€"ars. All the degree according to the exteat of ;»â€" 10 ot:er provisions of the law are found in t!'l“ diferent in im s . | Oifferent clauses of the law now in force. C ;:‘ the in kind acgordiv~ *°"08i| would now speak of the 31st clause, in us the murderer who p»~ & l0 ita nature: | which an ameâ€"ndment was made. during possible crime age»~ â€" â€" ..petratesthe highest | last Session. He bad made an alteration in low man, is 1 «st the person of his fe‘= it, in order to meet as tur as possible the the hig)~ in hit.awh h views of the . gentlâ€"men, who were in C -‘."‘. person ~Wwith | favour of th« ndiment, and he boped it in . .<st possible ftorm of corporeal pun | would give safisfaction. H« thought the Bill _ ment, and weâ€" cannot but think that an | W*# much desired by the public. Under the ' geo '“'“.m N quilp 4 1 in r::::::«donolchm 31st, which is as folâ€" this form of punishment was carried to | !® savage and most mischievous excess. But :; is it wise to jump from one extreme to anâ€" pa other ? May there mot be cases wherein a :;‘ form of punishment inapplicable upon any | »., sound principle as the consequence of con | ha viction for robbing a hen roost, would yet be 'u: smfloquinhuulo-oothrwimt;..: against _ he _ retention . of _ corporea! punishment proceeds from its presumed barâ€" barity and brutalising influence ; and, no doubt, in former times, and in many countries. Now, it so happens, that in the Bill inâ€" troduced by the Mrx1eren or Joatics respectâ€" ing offences againast the person, the same provision for ‘**whipping‘‘ is introduced, permiseively, as part of the punishment for precisely® aimilar crimes to those tor the repression of which it has exercised such a salutary influence in England. Some memâ€" beraâ€" objected to this while the Bill was in Committee of the Whole, and it is understood that the Hoo, Mr. Dow1o® will move that «* with or without whipping‘‘ shall be exâ€" pusged from all the <â€"clauses in which the _ phrase occurs. The argument Tus London Cansedian News of the 15th inst. has the following : "The tide of emigration is now setting in toâ€" wards the Dominion of Carada with a stronger current than we bare known it any previous year. At last the groat masees of the emigratâ€" ing classes from this country seem to be alive to the fact that Canada at this moment preâ€" sents more real inducements to migrants to settle in her midst than any other of our coloâ€" nial possessions. Nor is it in this country alone that this fact is becoming generally known. From the continent woe hear that large numbers are arranging for a permanent settlement in the German s«ttlements of Onâ€" tario, and we hbare no hesitation in saying that if the mandat which is at present in torce, prohbibiting the issue of ©Through Tickets," were rescinded, at all events so far as the Grand Truck Railway is concernedâ€"a comâ€" pany that takes special care of all emigrants him to sell his paper at 230 per cent reducâ€" tion from former prices. We are glad to recognize the principle in the establishment of smmall profits and quick retaurns, Call and fore being able to recoverâ€"themselves, the garroter had in most cases Jisappeared with his booty. + This was not straage, for coming up behind his victum, he was generally unâ€" seen, or seen‘ so indistinetly as to elude identification thereaiter, and, unless caught in the act, his chance of punishâ€" ment . was . small. 1t was no wonder that for a time the frequent occurrence of such robberies created inten@ alarm, and quickened the zeal of the police for their deâ€" tection. The robberies continued, but the authorities becoming expert began to be more successful in making captures. The ordinary punishment of imprisonment at hard labour was tound, however, to be toâ€" tally inadequate to check the new art of plunder, and such wase the general indignaâ€" tion throughout Eugland that the proposal w supplement the ordinary punishment due wo the larceny or robbery from the person, with flogging or whipping the culprit who resorted to the process of garroting, the use of chloroform, or other stupefying agency, was hailed (with universal satisfaction. No sooner had this new . provision become law than it was vigourousâ€" ly pukt in force, and, to use m common phrase, it worked like a charm."‘ The * catâ€"o‘~â€"nineâ€"tails" had ‘terror gor those who only laughed at a few months, or a few years, of imprisonment as a very good joke. The once beâ€"fAlogged garroter abanâ€" doned the valuable ageney in the prosecution of his trade forever ; and many who had never undergone the punishment preferred to give up the practice of ;mroting, and conâ€" fine their operations to pocketâ€"picking or other ordinary modes of thievery. Garroting, though not abandoned entirely, has gone much out of fashion, and for this thanks to the lash. strives to maintain himself and tamily by his own industry. ‘This is carrying the doctrine that "virtue is its own reward and "vice its own punishment‘" many degrees further than we should wish to see it recogâ€" nised ; and though we should heartily depreâ€" eate the introduction of a barbarous prison discipline, we think that a little more dare for indigent honesty would better become the modern pbilanthropist than his zeal for the comfort of viee. Norwrrustaxping the dullaess of the season we ars gratificd to learn that Magee & Rusâ€" sell‘s sales for this montb, so far, are fully 60 per cent. more than last April at the same time, This should satislfy the wiseâ€"acres, who prodicted they were leaving the shilliog and guing to the sizxpenny side of the street, that it is uow the ciAtcenpenny side, and proves that the public are not long in finding out where they get well served. sonmections with large wanulacturers in Manchesterafford advantages which enables F. and. m" T nngtment uf Heate Puromarng T. & W. Hunton hold the largest stock in the trade. Waâ€"potice at the establishment of R. Eaton, Elginâ€"st., opposite the Russell Housâ€", large arrivals of room papers upon exbivition ; they nt styles truly" creditable to the pnprt::h selection. We understand his passing over its lines,â€"the settlement of German emigrants in the Dominion would be tenfold what it has been in the past. The numbers that are proc=eding by the Allan line of steamers to Quebec are greatly on the increaseâ€"no less than 3,000 emigrants having taken passago within the last two or three P en "Pr .::n/"'b remember the great exciteâ€" [}‘ Created in the British metropolis, and e principal cities of Great Britain, by the very general introduction of the system of garroting, or suddenly choking and overâ€" powering unsuspecting wayfarers, for the purpose of robbing them. The street robâ€" bers tound the inew system attended with immense success. Their victims, usâ€" able to give alarm, or to make resistance, were fain to submit to having their pocket® rifled, and the contents carried off ; and beâ€" There ate many sensible, kindâ€"hearted men who thinkahat modern humanitarianisa menuces society with evile no less destructure to social order than was the extreme severity of our forefathers. Already it can be said with truth in England that the criminal in jail is better provided tur by the public than r ininpiiedins. ic uies ~or en mt in Pressmsa aand Pn snn ns become void. This he consider+d was #a good principle. He was prepared to admit there were some good principles in this law that were not contained in (he patedt law of Nova Bcotia He would now .come to the last point referred to by the Minister of Agriculture, the extension of existing provincial patenis, and he feared confusion and difficulty would result from it, It is proposed by the second subsection of tain patents to persoos residing in the Province, thus encouraging <p ople to come into the country, He aid not like the patent law of New Brunswick, as too wide a duor bad been opened for obtaining patents by foreigners. If persons were to have these «xclusive rights, they should be given them for as limited a period as . possible. There was another privciple in the Bill which had hot been adverted to : that was, if a patent was applied for and taken out, but was not acted upon within a limited time, it should It will be seen from the forrgoing that any one who has taken out a patâ€" nt in any one of the Provinces of the Dominion can bave the same extended to the whole Dominion, proâ€" v‘ded he is * a British subject, or a resident in any Province of Canada for upwards of a year," for the remainder of the term men. tioned in such‘ patent, on the conditions therein contained. He did not see that any injustice wonld be done by not granting to the patentee the extension of this patent to the whole Dominion. When they procured their patents for New Brunswick or Nova Scotis, they thought they were sufficiently rewarded for their labour, and he did not sâ€"e what right they would have to come and ask to bave it exteaded beyond the Province in which it was originally grauted. It must be remembered that a patentis akind of monopoly, though he did not mean to say that the word monopâ€" oly should be taken in its fullest seose, but nevertheless it is a monopoly, because it gives to a man the right of manuflacturing or vending alone, an article useful to the public ; certainly there was great reason tor granting this monopoly. It was to encourage men of genius to work for the benefit of the public by rewarding them for their Jabour. znt when on:o such discoveries are ma«de, he d at right a person who has made tbomlu has to P::ono and ask to have that exclusive tight extended. When he got his patent for a particular place or province he was circumscribed, and conâ€" sidered bimself sufficiently rewarded. l‘u hoped the Bill would recelve the favourable consideration of the House, and be would now move its second reading. Hon. Mr. DICKEY contended against granting Patent Rights to all, but assuming that some such law as this sbould pass, he liked the general scope of the Bil!, and conâ€" sidered it & well considercd measure, His hon. Muddlr. Chapais) in dealing with this measure to assimilate the r«ent laws of three diffâ€"rent Provinces, and he had endeaâ€" voured to bring them into harmony as far as pos«ible. He has adopted a misdle cuurse between the extrewes of the differenat laws now existing on this subject. © It was the first inâ€" stance in which the legislation of Nova Scotia bad been made an example for them, and he hoped it might be followed by ‘oti : cases. He thought the patent law of Nova Scotia was good, as it confined the right to obâ€" #Auny person having been a resident of Caunada for at least one yoar. next before bis application, and having discovered or inâ€" vented any new and usetul art, machin«, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement on any art, mauchine, manuficture or compysition of matâ€" ter, not known or used by others before his invention thereot, and not being at the time of hisapplication for a patént in public use, or on sale anywhere with his consent, or allowance as the discoverer or inventor thereâ€" of may, on a petition to that effect presâ€"nted to the Commissioner, and on compliance with the other requirements of this Act, obtain a patent granting to such person aun exelusive perty therein ; and the said patent sbali ::u.““ the seal of the patent office and the signature of the Commissioner, or the signaâ€" turs of another member of the Privy Councit in the absence of the Commissioner, and shall be good and ndl' to the grantes, his heirs, assigns or other legal representatives, for the period mentioned in such patent, but no psttt shall issue for an invention baving «n illicit object in view, nor for any mere scientific principle, or abstract theorem." _A message was presented from the Goverâ€" norâ€"General on the postal arrangements with the Granod Truok .Railway Company and the steam bout lines. A message was presented from the Gover~ norâ€"G: neral enclosing first and second reports from the Commissioners on the Civil 8â€"rvice Commission. _ ® s # By the Hon, Mr. STMPSONâ€"Of G. oâ€"ge W. Jones of the village of: Port Perry, in the county of Ontario, praying for an Act to disâ€" solve his martlags with Aun Cathcrine Martia. The Hooa. Mr. CUAPAIS Sl English) exâ€" plain«d that the present Bill (Patents of luv.ntion) was very nearly similar in its provisions as the one he had introduced on the same subject in the last Sesaion of Parliaâ€" ment. He claim.â€"d that it was amended and improved in gome very essential particulars. Under the law as it formerly existed in Canad«, the B.itish resident was the only person rt-mod to obtain a patent on an invention. n New Brunswick every person has a right to get a w.-mnm Nova st-oth it was open to every Bri subject. In this Bill we have adopted this principle, viz.‘: * Macpherson, John Crawford, GGeorge Brown, Edward C. Jones, C. i:wanlJ, Edward Blake, Thomas Galt, &0., for an Act incorâ€" poratiog them under the name and style of * ‘The Domision Mutual Life Guarsntee Asâ€" surance Company," # Aud it shall be lawful tor the Commisâ€" slonâ€"n, upon the application of the patent e named in such patent, being the discoverer of or inventor of the subject matter of th« patent and a British subjâ€"ct, or a resid nt in eny Province of Canada for upwardsof a year, if tue subject maiter of the pstent has not been known or used nor on sale with the cons nt of the patentee, in any of the other Provinces of the Dominion, to issue upon paym>nt.of the proper fe«s in that bebalf a patâ€"nt under this Act extending such Proviacial patent over the waole of the Dominion, for the reâ€" meinder of the term mentioned in such paâ€" tent." . By the Hon. Mr. BUREsUâ€"Of G. Â¥, Mondor of the city of Quebec, praying that he may be reinstated as a messenger of the Sunate, or be granted indemnity for the loss he bas sustained in being put out of his situâ€" ation. _ Wreoxesoay, April 28. The SPEAKER took the chair at three e‘clock p.m. t After routine ; The following petitions were pres nted : By the Hon. Mr. SHAWâ€"Of George Harâ€" rvison anod others of the Bouth Riding of Grenville, praying that.a duty be imposed on hops importâ€" d from the Urited States, CANADIAN PARLIAMENT. By the Hon. Mr. ROSSâ€"Of the Hoc. D. L BEOOND BES&JON : FIRST PARLIAMENT THE SENATE. 8ECOXD REBAD|NG a matteer of this kind. It renders residence necessary ; this may have been Ins«1ted for the bencfit of individual intâ€"rest, but it is not the legisiation we want. We I should manifest & liberal spirit, and place our patent laws on a level wich those of other countrics. * He did not think they should be | legislating on half measures ; if it was wrong to have patent laws let them ray so, but if it was right, then let them grant patents in a liberal spirit, If we enact that pat ntees shail establish their manufactories within a certain time in our own land, that is a proper check in the matter, and will answer the end in view. It will prevent any fraud being | imposed upyon us by foreigners bringing in theirfoventions here, aod obtaining patents, thus _ preventing us from , using them. This, while it effectually chefke any fraud | upon as, also arts to our advantage by sâ€"curing [ within our borders the establi«bment of manufactories for their production. He would accept the Bill if he could not de better, but if he could get it amendbd he would endeavout to do so, His bon. friend who had introduced the Bill deprecatd the position inwhich he aud the Government were placed in not being able to avswer the desires which prevail in the community, and which he seeme to f:ol are proper and reasonable. He believed that | at some future time this may be done, but | at present there are ubstacles in the way. He | (Mn, Fanborn) thougbt these aiticles were not | iu the country, but where they were, he would + like for those who had a place in the Council | Chamber to decide. He would leave it to the ‘ country to say whether the obstacles are such | as to prevent us from obtaining what is for the benefit uf the country. If we limit the Bill | to a yrar‘s residence in the country, we are I-ylu the patent shall not be given unless the person is a British subject, 1f we say this ment to the author, In one case you create | a higher style of manufacture, you encourage inventive talent, you attain a degree of proâ€" ‘ greas, by the stimulation which this fasility affords, which otherwiso would never be ob. tained. In the other case you encourage taleat, you produce a higher state of literature, and every kind of mental effort iy a couatry where that engouragement is glvln. Is not that tor the benefit of the public? | e had on a formerorcasion referred to the Un tod States ; if they have excelled in anything, it has been in their improvements in variogs kinds of machinery, If they have had great facilities for progress, it is in the almost nameless apâ€" pliances of labourâ€"saving machinery in every art and manufacture, Nocountry in the world has given 10 great encourageâ€"ment to inventive‘ talent as they have. ‘This fact proves concluâ€" sively that it is the public interest which is serv.d by granting patents to more than individual interest, While we seck this privilege to be open and free to every inventor, we seek not the Anterest of the inventor alone, but the inâ€" terest of the public. What has been the history of patents of invention? We need not louk to this or to that Provinc«, but to the civilized world. Let us, look at the countrics of Europe and see what progress has been made there. (Eogiand has made grâ€"at progress from the time of James I., when the law of munopoly was «nacted, up to the prâ€" sent tim», in extâ€"ndinog the patent rights. It has long been toe law ther», that toreignoe s «an obtain patâ€"nts as well as residonts, and ulicos as well as subjects, There, all legisiation is not in the inte:eâ€"t ot individuals, but is tor whaut is culculated or supposed to bring home to that nation â€" gome material benâ€"fit He l then referred to the facilities for obtainiug patents in Austr‘a, and said> be did not think we should be behind that country in this respect, when our prospects were looming up‘so great and grand as we are told they‘are.. He then spoke of the law in Bavaria, and in Belgium where the owner of \ the patent must work it one year bâ€"fore ob= taining a patâ€"nt law, instead of requiriog a yeur‘s residence in the country â€"by the person desiring the patent. No perâ€" son, he thought, woul!i go into a foreign couutry and reside a year, for the purpose of, getting m patent, unless it was going t be of extraordinary valce to bim. In Sardinia inventors, whether native or foreign, may obtain patents, the patent becoming void if the invention is not work«d within a given time, He then referred to the Patent Laws of France, Hanover, Holland, Poland, Prussia, kussia, Saxony and Mexico, as being very liberal in their provisions for foreigners obâ€" taining patepts ; but here in Canada there was an exception to this rule for granting patents to all alike, whether foreigners or reâ€" sidâ€"nts. Now these facts should show that the ground taken confining patents to resiâ€" Cents of Canada, should not exist in our legisiation. It should be open to all invenâ€" tors ‘to obtain patents. In refusing this we are cxpunln.{l the opinion that we are wiser than ‘ the civilised countries of Europe and America We soy they are wrong and we are right, and we place ourâ€" selves nndlo.r the uo:ldty of mul;lbnlg that position. Is it e, or even probable, that Those nations should all be mistiken in‘ this matter of patâ€"nts? Are we surs that we are rot in the wrong? This reminded bim (of the definition |;lnn of an insane man ; that there was a diff:rence of opinion between the insane mah and the rest of the world ; weare placing ourselves very much in the position lof the insane man in expressing a different opinion from the rest of the world. ‘The 6th clause and the 3lst clauso appear to have __Mon. Mr. SANBORBRN did not look upon the Bill before them as a compromise _ and assimilation of the laws of the several provinces, but the adoption ofa policy re. garding *‘ patents of . invertion," â€" for the Dominion. He did not know why they should be lufluenced by local considerations in regard to the principle they should â€"adopt. This bill so far as it makes provision for obtaining patents, confines it to the Departâ€" ment of Agriculture. â€" A law on this subject is very much desired. _ Under the present law it is exceedingly difficult, or almost imâ€" possible to obtain patents over that portion of the Dominicn which was tormerly Canada, and the same rule must apply tothe other provinces, as it is doubtiul what interpretaâ€" tion courts of law would give to patents obtained under the circumstances then existâ€" ing, applied to & diffâ€"rent state of things which now exist. Therefore it was necessary we should have a lew extending over the whole Domiuion ; in this view ho was preparâ€" ed to sustaia the Bill as ho was on a formeâ€"r eoccasion. He hoped the Government would not be so0 factious in their opposition this Session, (laughtâ€"r,) as to stop wholesome lexislation (which was in adrap:so of views exphssod in this Bill. We were ready to accept the Bill, and it would be only fair on the part of the Goverumâ€"nt to accept our amendments t> it, if they could not do auy better. On aformer occasion he had the henour of expressing his views, which views he stit! whh.red to. He had be!ld those views for a uumb r of yearg, and they bad been strongthâ€" ened by the investigations he bad since given been inserted from certain local reasons, which â€"ought not to be considered in 8 & the 31st clause, that partics having cxisting patents in either of the Provinces may apply tor & patent eonl'lz the whole Dominion, providing the man of the article patented has not been undertaken,or the article sold with the conient of the patentce. Sup. pose a patent has been taken ont in Nova Scotia some ten years ago for the manufacture of ‘a certain article, Since then _ the _ knowiodgo of that invenâ€" tion may have come to this part of the Dominion, and a manutactory established for its production, and it may now be sold, but not with the consent pt the patentse, In that case, if you pass this law, you interfare with individual rights. ‘That was an objecâ€" tion against this clause in its. present form, if he understood it right. . And: upon the whole, he thought if we were to have paâ€" tent rights, and our patent laws assimilated, the attempt has boen successf@!, and the Minister ot Agriculture doserved great credit for the present Bill. He hoped the House would give it a favourable consideratipn, as it was an important measure. | THK OTFVA WA TIMES, APRIL 2 Mr. McKENZIE s#§pported the Bill. He argued tuat many more reasons might be gin: ‘:‘ for the Bill, and its discussion embraced a wider range thanghad yet been touched upon. It affected thei%constitution of the Governâ€" ment, and whole exâ€"«ystem of government. He was surpiised, however, to listen to the hon. Buronet, tfot his sarcastic allu sion to members on this side lbnuionil;g their principles. He was glad to f his hon, friend appreciating the enormity of the crime of deserting principle and party, especially rince be and his colleagues had succeeded in seducing a fow weak members from the Reform tanks. [Mr. McK»nzie then became facerious on the circumstance of Sir George E. Cartier and the Hon. Mr. McDouâ€" gall baving become members of the Reiorm Club in England, and resumed.] Nothing but the influence of such a system ces. They had the power to create the disqualifiation. ‘The Local Legislatures could deciare that neither senators nor memâ€" bers of this House could sit in them, which this Parliament could not do, ~After replying to other arguments of the mover of the Bill, Bir George hoped that ‘ths hoon. gentloman would withdraw bis Bill, Mr. BELLERQSE enquired whether it is the intention of the Government to provide for the construction of an inclosure wall for the prnitentiary and the asylum at Rockâ€" w9od, near Kingston, and if so, when ? Sir JOHN A. MACDONALD, who was indistinctly beard in the gallery, was underâ€" ktood #o say that the , provision . for these walls was made by statute. PRIVATE EXéCCTIONS, Mr. MORRIS moved the second reading of the Bill to provide for the earrying out of Capital Punishment within prisons. The prac. tice had been adopted in England after the most elaborats investigation,. and had giveh general satisfaction, In 1866, a Royal Comâ€" mission was appointed in England, which exâ€" amined the whole question, and tho result was the grecominendation of private execuâ€" tions. He thought it would be wholly un necessary in the present state of public feeling. to take up the time of the House imarguing in favour of the Bill.. The system of private executions gave more real solemnity to the sentermce, and prevented those scenes which were sometimes the reeult of the assembling of great crowds. He moved the second Mn& of the Bill. Mr. BOWELE, seconded by MroBRO WN, moved the second reading of * the \Interest Act of Canada.*>\ x Hon. Mr./ ROSE hopot chis hon. h\l&nd would allow the Bill to stand. The question of interest of money was at present under the serious Considâ€"ration of the Government ; aud as the Province of Nova Scotia was peculiarly situated with respect to it, it would be necessary to devote some time to the question. The Government, however, would announce their policy regarding it as soon as possible, The Bill was allowed to stand. THE DUAL REPRESEXTATION®. Bir JOHN A. MACPONALD said the Bill might be read a second time, and then taken into considcration in ~connection with the othes Criminal Law Bills before the Housc. The Bill: was read & second time and referâ€" red‘to Committee of the whols on Wednesday next. > was a slight difference,‘ however, between this Bill and that of last year. Last year the hon. mover proposed to interfere with those sitting in the other branch of the Legislature to which he (Sir George) bad made objection. He was glad to see that his hon.friend had a good memory, for he had avoided this objec. tion in the present, shewing that be had beâ€" coeme wiser, and he (Sir Gâ€"orge) now proposed to remind him of other objections to the Bill, which be hoped his friend would reâ€" member for another year. Besides the obâ€" jections made by the hon, member for Montâ€" calm, which were good against the Bill, he woudered that the mover, who professes to hold very liberal principles, should attempt to circumscribe the liberties of the people in the free choice of their representatives, But even if the Bill were passed this House could not restrict the choice of the Crown in making a Senator of a member of a Local L« gislature gccording to the provisions of the British North America Act (from which he reud.) Since then this House could not exclude members of the Local Legislatures from sitâ€" ting‘in one branch of the General Parliaâ€" ment, why should it be aitempted to exclude them from the other? ‘The spirit of the Constitution was against the principle of the Bill, If the hon. gentleman~ was deterâ€" mined to expel the members of the Local Legislatures from this House let him work up the public opinion of the several Provinâ€" Mr. MILLS moved the second reading of the Bill (No. 4) " An Act to render members of the Legislative Councils and L+gislative AucmblLlcl of the Provinces, now included, Mr. DUFRESNE believed the principle of the Bill was wrong. ~It was quite rtight that m n in public employment, receiving the public moncy in payment, should be éxcluded‘ but to pass this Bill would bs to exclude those who were the best qualified to legislats for the p=ople. The honouravble member said the pâ€"ople were against the double represenâ€" tation, Mr., MILLSâ€"Hear| bear Mr. DUf'REBNEâ€"-WolI if the people are against it, let the people vote it down. (Apâ€" plause and laughter.) As he bad -ld( the principle was wrong, and he did not think the arguments ot thy hon. member would conâ€" vince a single member of the House to the contrary, He hoped the bill would be voted down. + Bir GEORGE E. CARTIER said he would rewind the House of what he ‘had said last session concerning a similar measure, There Mr. CHEVAL addressed ths House in French in favour of the Bill. or which may hereaiter be included, within the Dominion .of Canada, incligible for sitâ€" ting or voting in the House of Commons of Canada." Mr. Mills went over the old arguâ€" ments against the dual reprosentation, conâ€" tending that it was injurious to the indepen~ dence of the Lotal Legisiatures. It had been said bâ€"fore that this was a.matter belongâ€" Ing to the constituencies for decision ; but if that were correct, why .deny the constituâ€" encies the right of electing Judges of the Superior Courts, or aliens, orâ€"any ° other parties incligible by law ? Parliamwent , had already undertaken to limit the choice of the constituencies, and it was as competâ€"nt to do it in this particular as in any other. He then argued that the members of the Local Lerislatures sitting in this House could be unduly influenced by the Government. For the reasous given, he moved the second readâ€" ing of the Bill. (Applause.y > Hon. Mr. F answer to this answer to this important question until the budget came down, (Laxughter.). Mr. BENOIT enqguired whethor, with a view to the effective protection of our manuâ€" factures, and in order to give an impetus, such asis absolutely required to the establishâ€" ment thereof, it is the intâ€"ntion _of the Government to raise the duties on foreign manufactured goods, and more particularly on articles, the raw material fotr which abounds in the country ? . Beveral petitions wore presented. three petitions were read and receivod Hon. Mr. ROSE moved that Mr. Merritt be added to the Standiog Committee on Bankiag and Currency.â€"Carried. _ > + QUESTION® AND AxswERs. Mr. BENOTT enquired whethor it was the intention of the Government to cause the construction of the fortifcations before the city of Montreal, to be commenced in the course of the present year ? Sir GEORGE E.. CARTIER said the Imperial Act, giving the guarantse for the loan §> be raised for the construction of fortifications bad not.yet been passed. _ _ The SPEAKE o‘clock. R took the Hon. Col. GRAY gave notice that ho would move aAs an amendment to the Criminal Laws that the accused may, if he demands it, be sworn and examined in his own behalf. Hon. Mr. ROSE moved that the 1 Messrs. Wood and Dunkin be added to Committee on Public Accounts. we ailirm & principle which is retrograding rather than progressing. HOUSE OF commons. IX TEREST OF MOXEY, ROSE l_ald» ho must defer the (To be Continued.) Weoxzsoar, April 28. presented. Fortyâ€" chair at three Hon, ) the tions, The Hon. Minister of Militia and the Premier of Quebec had also appealed to the Province of Quebec on precisely the same grounds, and the result was the same. The dual representation had nothine at all tem should not be disturbed. As to the elecâ€" tions in West Y ork and Kamouraska, though it was true that the present representatives of these constituencies might be presumed not to be supporters of the present Government, yet the circumstance was not rema;:kable. They had recently seen in England that Mr. Gladâ€" stonce and two members of his Government had been defeated ; yet no one woul1 pretend to say that Mr. Gladstone‘s Government did pot enjoy theâ€"confidence of the English peoâ€" ple. Sir John A. Macdonald was addressing himself to other matters referred to by the member for Lambton, when it being six o‘clock the Speaker left the chair, Aftor Recess. Bir JOHN A. MACDONALD resumed the debate, referring to the circumstances under which he"and the member for Cornwall had gone b:fore the country at the geneial elecâ€" aual l;sl)ruonwlon had nothing at all to do with the appeal, to the , country, nor SirJ, A. MACDONALD raid the very fact that the constituen:y of West Durham hbad overruled the judgment of its representative was one of }he strongest reasons why the sysâ€" Mr. MoKENZIE contended that the electors had been deceived atthe general etections ; and appealed to the result of the elections in West York and Kamouraska, as a proof that the ceuntry had changed its judgment, H¢ said it was quite natural that the electors of West Durham should sâ€"ek to retain the serâ€" vices of the eminent member who 1epresented them, and so with the county of Bruce, but that hon. gentleman himself was against tie dual system. + Hou. Mr. HUNTINGDON eaid that the logical conclusion of the principal argument against the Bill was that the Local Legislaâ€" tureg should be abolished altogether. (Hear, hear.) The whol¢ cry about barmony was but another form of the reasons put forward in favour of the Bill. The harmony of making the Local Legislatures subservient to the General Governmeht was not the harmony he desired to see. ‘This Bill, if adopted, would tend to secure the indâ€"pendence of the Local Legislatures ; and though tor the present it would no doubt be voted down by alarge wajority the time would come when the House would be compelled to accept it. | wiLRGraW Di@{Dill, Mr. YOUNJG, after referring to previously advanced arguments, and giving his version of the circumstances which led to the result of the general eleol.ionl‘ said he should vote for this Bill, as he should for any other that would tend to diminish the growing power of the Crown in this House. ‘Too much power and authority were being placed in the hands of the Executive. € Bir JOHN A. MACDONALD said it apâ€" pearod that \the gentliemen opposite were continually seeking excuses for their having failed to carry ‘the general elections. The appeal to the people had gone against them, and they wore ever seeking excuses for this fact, It had been said> that theso elections were carried by a conspiracyâ€"a conspiracy was a thing conceived inthe dark ; but they had gone to the country in. open day. The member for Cornwail and himsslf had gone openly betore the people, from constituency to ‘constituency, ani advocated â€" harâ€" mony _ between the Local ‘and Genâ€" eral Governments, It had been said that the country was against the dual\systâ€"m ; but what was the fact? Why, when the memâ€" ber for Bruce, in the Local Legirlature, who represents West Durbham in this House, asked the e1 ctors of West Durham to relieve him of the double responsibility, they refused to do so, therâ€"by showing that, according to their interpretation of R form principles, the dual system was unobjâ€"ctionable. The prinâ€" ciple of the Bill was not one which shbould be legislated on here ; but by the Local Legâ€" islatures. In Nova Scotia and New Brunsâ€" wick the Logisiatures had already declared that their mâ€"mbers should not sit in the House of Commons. It was quite competent tor them to do so,. But bow was it in Onâ€" tario? _ Whby, at the last meeting of the Legislature it was declared by solemua vote that the two dutics were not incompatible. Now the â€" Legislature represerted _ the same‘ constituencies as those represented from that Province in this House, and its deâ€" cision ought to be accepted‘ as the #d‘ment of the clectors of the Province. hy then should the hon. membâ€"r persist in forcing a measure which had already been condeinned by the Legislature of his own Province? He boped the hon. member would cousent to withdraw his ;/Bill. Hon. Mr. CHAUVEAU briefly addressed the House in opposition to the Bill. Mr.CHAMBERLIN had opposed a similar Bill las: year, ou the ground of want of exâ€" perience, and he would do so again. It was true be had seen some things that made lim think less in favour of the dual system than he kad dons; but we were yet without the necessary experience to warrant us in upsetâ€" ting it. It had surprised him to listen to the arguments advanced by the advocates of this Bill. Their whole complaint appeared to be that there was too much harmony,too much unâ€" animity, too much good feeling in this House. They desired to return to party warfare; to wranglings and disputes. They advocated this Bill, because of much harmony between the Local Gavernments.of Ontario and Quebec ; but in his opinion it would have been far betâ€" ter had every member of the Local Legisâ€" lature had a sâ€"at in this House. They would then have Ciscovered that Canadians were not such as they had been represented. Another reason for opposing this Bill now, was that there was no immediate necessity for it. ‘There was plenty of time to consider the effects of the present system, and he would like to see the good old.English pracâ€" tice.of not rushing too hastily into chaunges. manent it would probably lead to evil conâ€" sequences. But he regarded it as a temporary arrangement, which, in the natare of things, would not lastlong. He should, therefore, vote against the Bill. Mr. JACKSON said that in establishing the proper relations between the Local and General Governments created under the Imperial Act, the dual ‘ representation had been productive of ‘some benefits. It bad contributed very materially to bringing the Legielatures into general barmony. Were it to become: perâ€" Mr. MASSON (Terrebonne) said at the commencement of Confederation it was found dexirable that in the Provincs of Ontario and Quebec members of expeiiâ€"nce should be lound to carry out the new Local Governâ€" ments, New members who had sat for a year or so in this House, did not eren yet know the rules, and how could it have been possible for sixtyâ€"five new mâ€"mbers to have managed the, Legislaturs of Quebec. He looked upon the‘question as a practigal one, without caring whether it was Conservative or Reform, and be bâ€"lieved practically the double system had been advantageous. 6 Mr. BODWELL argued that it was absurd to contend that this House could not propérly exclude members of the Local Legislatures,seeâ€" ing that so many class=s were already excludeod. And as to restricting the people‘s choice, that choice bad been‘restricted already. He conâ€" tended that tho maintenance of the dual system was dus to a desire for a retrograde movement towards a Legislative Union, He maintained that if the people were deprived of local controlâ€" of local affiirs, they would be deprived of one of the ‘greatest boons conferred by the new Constitation The Bill met the general approval of the country, and the principal objection against it had been that brought by the Ministcr of Militia ; but if that objection were to be susâ€" tained, then the doors of this House should be thrown opâ€"n to judges and all other classes at present excluded. as dual representation:could havre led the members for Cornwall and Brant to become the supporters of gentlemen on the Treasury Benches. He argued that the system desâ€" troyed the independence of members, and if carried to any great extent would be producâ€" tive of most disastrous consequences. He supported the second reading of the Bill. Mr. BLANCHET contended that the dual system was in conformity with the general practice of confederations having general and provincial legislatures. He reforred to the Noith German Parliament and the Austrian Reichstath, froin neither of which were the members of the local legislative bodies excluded, Jt was only in tho United Btates â€" of . America whore thero was any provision against it, and there the double representation was prevented by an article in each of the State Constitutions. Aund so our Provinces had the power to prevent their nniombers from sitting in the House of Commons if they saw fit to do soâ€" He conâ€" cluded by moving the six months‘ hoist. F put.. â€"{Applahse). â€"â€"_. â€" _‘ ; â€" _ â€"â€"_ _ Mr.â€" BELLEROSE spoke in reply to Mr. Mr. JONES argued against curtailing the rights ol the people in the choice of a repreâ€" sentative. ‘I‘hey had heard the ‘member for Shefford aHuntlngdon) say that the comâ€" bined influences â€"of the General and Local _ Governments _ was > irresistible, and the membsr for Lambton quoted instanâ€" ces of recent elections where the influence of both had been set at defiance. Hs depreâ€" cated the remarks that had been made about the Hon. Minister of Public Works. â€" It bad been said that he had been seduced, but he had joined the Consâ€"rvative party under the leadership â€" of Mr. . Brown. Now if Mr. Brown hbadâ€" . bâ€"en reduced, and if the late member for Woest York had been seduced, what guarantee was there that the hon. member for Lambton might not himâ€" self be s.duced. (Laughter.) He believed that thoy must have been consenting partiesâ€" that noaction for seduction could lie against the Premier. (Râ€"newed laughter.) There had been too much siid about party, but there could be no distinction of party without distinction.of priveiples, (hear, bear,) and even the member for Lambton endorsed the goneral. policy of the Governmont. He (Mr. Jones,) cared not for Consâ€"rvative nor, Mr. MoCONKEY had been invited to accept the double seat, but had declined. As to the remarks made during this detate about the bad faith of the Government, he had seen nothing of it in his constituency. He agreed with the remarks of the member for Halton, %White), in his remarks about the Minister of ublic Works,. He had confidence in that gentlemman and his collâ€"agues, when the Govâ€" eroment was formed,and he had confidence in him still. He made this explanation be. cause he intended to vote againet the siz months‘ boist of the Bill now befo:e the Mr. WHITE said the people of* Ontario were not in favour of the Gual representaâ€" tion. He regreited that the measure had been discussed from & party poiot of view, though he was a believer in party governâ€" ment. Yet he still more regretted the course pursued by the member tor, Lamwnton, in condemning the Minist=r of Public Works, whose past services in the cause of Reform should not be forgotten. Hs also hoped to see the reconstruction of the Great Reform Party, and that it would win over the mMinisâ€" ter of Militia, Hs hopsd the measure would prevail. Hon. Mr. CHAUVEAU repoated thitt@ had not made the statement attributpg33%5 him by the member for Hochelaga. CA Hon. Mr. DORION said he had sGtpS y he had been informed ; and congiudcUsLy argument in favour of the Bill, by steting that proportionally there were more p â€"n in this Mouse than in the English Fious» . of Commong, and with such a stats of things the proper independence of Parllan%xt could not be preserved. f * _ Mr. BLANCHET said heâ€"did not hear the Prime Minister of Quebec making use of any such argumâ€"nt as that aitribut«d to him by the member for Hochelaga. <As 8 er of that House he would have rememb f-ï¬i( he or any other member had made such #stateâ€" ment regarding the Federal Parliamâ€"nt being the propâ€"r\Legislature to dispose of the quesâ€" tion of dual representation. * I:fERGUSSON spoke in favour of the amendment, A Bill ha«d been pass d in the ‘Ontario Legislature excluding Loc.#kten from sitting in the House of Tom .‘ KHe regret‘ed, therefore, to.hearthe censures that had been p-ua(g upoun the members for Cornâ€" wall and Brant. ‘There was nothing unconâ€" stitutional in a constituency electing one member to represent them in both Legisiaâ€" tures. â€"He regreyted that they had not had any members of the Local Legisliatures ot New Brnnswick and Nova Scotia sittings in this House, If therefhad been the harmony between these _ Provinces â€" anad. the . Dominion would hbave been much greater,. ‘There had ~been nb complaint from tHe public regarding the dual representation, although they found that every small grievâ€" ance was made the subject of petition. He was satisficd if the question were*left to the people, they would décide the question to" their own satisfaction. Mr. POZER said he was a momborE&Hl Quebec Legislature, and he could corro the statement of ths hon. member for Hoc Hon. Mr. CHAUVEAU said his hoh. was mistaken, he had never stated an of the kind. P Mr. DORION argued that the contrmuance of the . dual systeimn was destructive to the independence of the Local Governments, inasmuch as while the nembers â€"of the General Government held seats in the Local Parliament they could bring an influence to bear upon the members of the Local Governâ€" ment to comgel them to support the General Goveroment in ‘the Dominion Patliamést. He charged the hon. membe: for Qu°% inconsistency in opposing this Eill, beca in former times he belonged to the most * vanced wing of the Liberal party, and & warm supporter of the independ £ Parliament. He argaed that the Ontario had shown that they were &PDosed to the dual system, only two members from that Province having been elected to both Parliaments for the same constituency, the other membe»rs holding sâ€"ats in both Houses, being each a representative of a separate constituency for each House. The hon. Preâ€" mier had said this question should be left to the decision of the Local Parliament, but"at the last session of the Quebec Legislature the Premier otf the Quebsc Government bad arâ€" gued when this quâ€"stion was before that body, that it was a question to be decid‘%:by the Federal Parliament. _ Mr. MoKENZIE continud, contending that the couniry had begun already to los« confidence in the Gorernment ; that discopâ€" tâ€"nt prevailed at one point ; that annexa was cropping out atanother, and that Minister of Finance was on a fair 0 fioding himself with a large deficit. : claimed that the Liberal members * hered to a principle, and that even â€" thou in a minority in the House, they deservred least the credit of being inspired by lxnirf\ peachable motives. (Applause on the left.) Mr. FERGUSSON ros« t a question ot ord ‘r, He wished to know whether these g ntiemen wetre in order io taking such a wide range of debste. He did notâ€"see what connection there matters hai to do with the Bill before the House. *A » Mr. SPEAKER ruled that the member for Lambton was in order. Mr. McKENZIE again rose to explain his views on Coalitions. H» denied that the iâ€" sue at the gencralelections of 1867 was the success of Confedâ€"ration, It was trus that the honou:able IPrewmier and his colleagu«s bal . gone to thé country _ with _ tlhis ery, and had endeavorred ‘to persuade the clectors that the members of the Libesal party were disunionists, because they «id not susâ€" tain the Coa ition. On Mr. McKenzic‘s re. ferring at some length to Englis‘s politics, did it affect the‘result of the elections. IHso regretted that ths hon. memberfor Lambton, who had sanctioned the Coalition of +1864%, formed between men who had oppo==d each other for twenty years, had not sustain=d the Coalition of 1867, to build the saperâ€"strucâ€" ture on the foundations laid by the Conâ€" lition og 186 1. If ever there . was acalim and deliberate verdict of the people exâ€" pressed through a genceral clection it was at the election of 1867. Bofore the Jast sâ€"ssion of the old Provincial Parliament it was known by everybody that there must bo a new election when the Union Act came into â€" force; _ and the > people â€" calmly and deliberately pronounced their: judgâ€" ment. The union of, the Provinces involved the abandounment of all petty provinâ€" clal quarrels in the General Legislature, and the quarrels and disputes of Upper or of Lower Canad: had no.more right in this Legislature than thos> of Nova Scofia or New Brunswick. The new Dominion gave them all an opportunityy of forgetting their differences about a Clergy Resorve quesâ€" tion, or a Seignorial Tenurequestion, or ant other old issue, and rise to: what he believed was the higher and purer politics of the Doâ€" minion. As to the responsibility attaching to a Minister of the Crown, even Mr. Bright had warned his constituents that he might be compelled by a soense of. duty to go into the lobby,; and to vote on the side which he hadi formerly opposed. After referring to some other puiï¬u which had arisen in the debate, Sir John conclud~d by hoping ths member forâ€" Bothwell would withdraw hbis Bill. , so long as a sound policy was carried oa omcs 4 ebec fWith | me , bevaud i most & »’u.:rg 3 and y .‘"‘,' deste P Seodoue! 0 *4 tihhe. 4o« sed 7 discopâ€" | he w e xal f held that the r ' 0 | to a s : | woul * of it, thou 0 be rvred ove & nnigr!; M r Bon and J. Darie & son, Gentre 20"" | srick, Lower Town ; and Waâ€" Hall, pper Town ; and from the Commit tees of the Institute. fl Further ioulars in future prvecd + C will be Feceived 1J0F “ THE ERECTION OF TÂ¥ Wednesday, the~ 12th will be received for Single tickets, 50 scents; D#P" * cents. To be had at the stores ##4 THE 3018 1NP*~ : Undersigned will farnish *. (â€"%#i 1 terial. '."'J Plan may be seen “’",‘ ‘ COCK, Eeq, Elginâ€"st, OtteW# 40â€" | r i gaYÂ¥OOCK _ THE NMNECHANXICS INSTHIUT ‘AND ATHENZEUM AnEntortainment included in the O# Social Programwe is honour ¢! the G#m#* and Legislature of the Dominion, _ A good general JOB (COMPOSITOR can frd steaay ;nployrent (day work), und the highest , by a ing to 3 .:“ 3 .pP,A,__ TRHE TIM® orfice. Jos:l & HOLLA®KD Bave received Anothber 1t of that FIVE CENT MUSIG dgermNo. 11. To LET, 7: v § AT NEW EDINBURGH, A BRICK DWELLLNXG of Eight Rom«w Kitchen, with good yard and stabling. Resti® Possession immediate. under the auspices of LOUISâ€"MOLLUE having left my emply.t> trary to the terms of his agreement with me, ! hereby forhid any person or persons from hir% or harboring him after date of this advertisâ€"mes B@rrnney Corner. ‘ Boston Pilot, &¢., &c. - ZBB" Also, Reade‘s popular Novels, it pye: Maryatt‘s Phantom Ship, &c., &e. > April 29, 1869. ; ?ET’S amendment, th‘tâ€"ibe_il_hu; cond time this day six months.â€"Carried . , Yeas 82. Nays5t, The Bill ‘was therefore lost, and the How adjourned at 11:30 p.m, _ Corrox Goods have advanced is Englud, but 7. & W. Hunton are selling any kind o Cotton Goods at lower prices than they him been sold since 1862; mnd 8ee; TO PRINXTEMRS. % t Gextusues can get superiot garments made to order at Magee & Russell‘s, from thebost West of England Broadcloths, Silk Mixed and Venetian Coatings, Scotch, English antd Do minion Tweeds, &c., &c., and at modenk prices he was o CCC s 14 ll"li!.'l"w fog the Local : h«ives being in stund how th» dual representat Ts C% \â€"y}"l‘). Te Mr. D. A. MA@DONXALp argued thy dual system interfered with the N~ moetings of the L('gi.lltul‘t. He felt ~' long as leading members wcnflqg‘ thig House as we} 88 in the Local l*h ture it would bs impossible to gep: Legislatires to sit at h same time N‘ same season was the most convepient * both. . For this reason only Mï¬'& to support the Bif}. Hon. Mr. MA(‘DU('GALL denieg Catty, rinciple of the Bij} was one whi &orn advodated ty the &‘or.h:,"u;: principle awas ons for the Ie8trictign C th privileges of the people, and l‘e"""hfl be entertained, it must be shewp that sop, great abuse had grown up under ig But the wa&s _ the ~ambuse * Why, that w ud been all »~ac ting (ogrtnet & M This sureiy ~â€"â€"was _ no * ipitiess... A PA WRC P anth, . been â€"all acting togâ€"the This sureiy ~â€"â€"was _ no contrary, it was of the ut that this harmotiy shou}d least, until the work of 4 been completed. }â€" truct» CoNMITTEE: His Worship the Ilyfl.l..l,".-' Anvdrew Drummond, E8. J. L. Orme, Eeq., James Fraser, K4QG4 . G. Kennedy, Secretary. W. Whyte, Eeq, A. 8. Woodburn, E44 D. W,. Coward, Ksqâ€", D. l‘w, En-' [\llnlll s FOR CLUB BOAT "“, $ TENDERS _ Ottawa, April 28th, 1869, NITIZEX®! iN THE SKATING Otta#a, April 28. â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"-/ best oOKIAG STOVES o &* £sM w Edinburgh, April 26. Mr AUTION. ; PROMENADE w w ack ay wiont W l‘“"_ gharwon | Apply to ho is a ‘:‘ egislature $Â¥%0ur ; he ho is a‘ sengie "od heBoy ho is a SEDALOT, ag «»gislature, x". ~~ fxyour; he conld not UBGq, whole could ‘be o iï¬'\'- (lpphne),' inst nlby!f(“t? ME -‘~ wat | had ,ï¬â€˜:"::lu at glt]l““’ec‘ sm bome )n-nxonp' the 1 “. eheficial Â¥4 .""% u !flcmtm' Utmost Trhe weekry 0| PE W an. Eoglisp papor Jn «idered it doing very amount given for rel April, 1868, to April, 1 or £480,sterling, but beside the £3,017 of England is «till ahcad Simg,â€"For the en friends of St. Aiban‘s, the belief in the. volun you to insert the anco To the Editor of THE T M.A., was obliged to “ devolving the care « Rev. C. W. Roberts, B charge. It was ar should keep the end the curate bad £70 gin with. ‘Prior to 1 kept in repair by the c of £100 had accumu of things when Mr. work. His fust step. rates, and substitute a churchâ€"raves had m'vJ the sew offertory reali twelve months, £306 i in the third, ending the same three years church needed a new 4 and a new beating~ 1&i~ed jor these obj besices £175 towads Yor a j eal ot bells! the cofderâ€"gation «th rosity. _ One aitâ€" m reating the nave ; memoial window. thom that they ought wtipend. An eveni ‘Sor that epecial than £169; The c ubolish pewâ€"rents al of the first six whit we may styl«‘ exceed in it« results| trotm the offertory, dowment combined. clusion, that the voluntarily for congregation el| Bt. 1865, to August, 1 Ortawa, April A recent number 0 supplies us with a go voluntaryism can A&Acc of Englavd. St. Mary‘ parish, The populat altmost entirely of ‘he lodgingâ€"bouse keepe ehurch bas ano cndown pewâ€"ronts used to | ï¬'elhd £120 for the r« te. ln 1865 the re Mosc or tas H band played on Iw nwon, in presence of . people, who freque Th s is the time for « proposal we made last »tand for the band, #o be still more eflective Avcmor Saus or auction sale of tural net Warchouse will ing at ten o‘cleck. Manchester Ezxaminer. the attention of Porcriar Reanme readings will be beld this evening ; and, as will greet those who Cagrers a8p Ho Mutchmor & Co. speciality ; they hi vomplete stock of Gurtain Materials, B crétary, John 1 ul(lll'lhl*i:b.-l:ln Lacsosss.â€"A t a 1 Limcrosse.club, held ham Hil!, on Tue following were year, Â¥iz. ;«â€"P elected ; ~ Capts the affay was en ‘o:enc.dll. But, it »â€"y have good ront thein were arrested was not found. _ found drunk. .Case The adjourned c called up. An old . the defâ€"ndant, and | Both claimed the t« duced in court, and that the heos belong was shewn that Sart Kzw Dow:msox B nual meeting of 4 held last eveniog, men were elected o Board of Directo sax, J, Sheldor, T asâ€"ault.d men, how passive recipicnts 0 them aluo t as good all accounts, the am his house with bread evidence the Police he did so in the beli¢ property, and dismis A case of petty â€" las bu: the ciroumstance that the magistrate L offender to jail for of Assavurixnc No# night three youug t wound themselves chiâ€"f, by meâ€"ans 0 men, engaged in t the head of the De Is said, in a most " A Work or Azrst : Intely seen a most frame, made of leatl of this city,. The «l and the paitern is 0 gant design, perfeeth s 10 w end of the frame is . tiful cluster of June CPPZPACâ€"CV!, oT us If they -mlu:.:u might weli t ?J.:’&runhk,odd coloured, Theâ€"wose wellas the frame ; b material can be mad forms, is known onl Lhame, or wreath, is lar framâ€", and surro: most «mizent men | ada. This work, we Parliament Library, The works of Mrs. C and in waxs, are well country, and tion .t.(he m derstand that this 1 The officer did not him for the underta were executed with had been furnished : It is doubttaul," he have enabled him t for the young runa wherever they went, seemed to be know ities, &c., as to the endorsing the cons enable him to exec: and so the fugitives “{ww'_“ elopement case, whi mother, pursued by His instructions we Viceâ€"P resid .ntâ€"â€">) Recrrtaryâ€"â€"Â¥ . W Treasurerâ€"A. BR TL A. for 25,