The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Sitaal, â€" â€" Wantedâ€"Address= * Houseâ€" keeper," T:iuzs Office. Fancy Fairâ€"Gowan‘s Hall. Rink Music Hall â€"Alexander Bros. Lady‘s Maid Wantedâ€"Mrs. Robertson The Senate transacted a great doal ol business yesterday. The Bill respecting Public Lands was read a third time. ‘The Bill for the repeal of the Insolvency Laws wasrejected by a majority of 11. ‘The Treaty Bill :s order of day for Tuesday In order to allow everyone connected with this establishment to join in the celebration of Hor Majesty‘s Birthday, no paper will be issued from this office toâ€" next. A correspondent writes us respecting the inadequate pay of members of the Civil Service. There can be no doubt, that the salaries paid, more especially to the Deputies and Heads of Branches, are too small, and we believe that the public generally would like to see the condition of the Civil Service improved. & be Ouava Cimes "The Grits seem bent on offering every possible insult to the members of the House of Commons. The Globe intimates was bribed to do so, and last night, Mr. Blake stated that ho would "stigmatize" every member who â€"did not coincide with The rank and file of the Opposition have good reason to complain of the lack dnfi’ywwmmdu party.. Their line of action in reference to the Treaty was not only unpatriotic but exceedingly impolitic. They have placed their party in a talse position, one which few ot its members would have been inâ€" elined to occupy. had they not been misâ€" led by their leaders, and by the organs in whose utterances they have been in the habit of putting faith. But lack of ability on the part of the Opposition leaders is not by any mean* tme only reason why the strength of â€" the _ Opposition . has _ passed has increased, ‘The dishonest practices of which the members of the Ontario Administration have been proved guilty «during their brief tenure of offhce, hare done more to weaken the Opposition than anything else beside with the exception his views, as .one who desired to resort to corrupt practices at the next elections. the Government. The Proton expose has had all the effect upon public opinion, both inside and outside of the House of Cormmons, whick weo . expected it would Mackenzie, and their colleagues hare proved recreant to those political princiâ€" ples which they have for five years been professing, been without its due efftect, The Opposition seemed surprised on Wednesday evening when the Premier made allusion to the principal acts of corâ€" ruption of which the members of the On« tario Government have been found guilty. They appgear to \haxye supposed that the The filtyâ€"third anniversary of ~Queen Victoria‘s birth will be . universally .0b served throughout the Empire. Perhaps more enthusiaam and even warmer tee!lâ€" ings of love and loyalty than usual will animate Her Majesty‘s subjects toâ€"day, as they remember the sufferings and anxieties which their Sovereign has endured during the past year. They will bear in mind, how with the cloud of aâ€" great and undying sorrow .still overshadowing her, she was called, while in feeble health, to what all feared was the deathâ€"bed of her eldest son, and we, who to some extentat _ all events shared her grief and anxieties at that time, can form some conception of what Her Majesty underwentâ€"and the enjoyment of this day will be heightened as we remember with gratefual hearts that â€" by what seemed almost a miraculous interâ€" position of Divine Providence, the Prince of Wales has been rastored to health, and that the shadow of death, which a few by themselves ; and that while it was perâ€" fectly legitimate for them to bring all kinds of unfounded charges against memâ€" bers of the Gorernment, it was not tor one moment to be expected that thohblo‘ should be turned, or that the members of the Administration should venture to make an attack upon the immaculate " purists " of Ontario. Dr. Tupper‘s out« spoken straightforward remarks respect. ing them anA their acts of political disâ€" honesty seemed to take them by surprise. The idea of a Minister indignantly repell ing a false and libellous accusation brought against him by a "Purist !‘ Such a thing was never heard of! According to Grit notions, one of the principal duties which a Minister of the Crown has to disâ€" charge, is to act as a target at which . the â€" Opposition leaders and OUpposition organs are to discharge alll the envenomed arrows of their maligâ€" nity and en That condition of affairs has, honvvor,)n have good reason to AST DAY OF THE FAaANCY FAIR: m(:odsm.ndlhmt and > rnment supporters, no longer content with standing upon the detenâ€" sive, _ will carry the war into Africa as they can well do. The Fancy Fair short months since cist a gloom over Bovereign and People, his past away. It isnow, within afew days, thirty five years since Queen Victoria ascended the throne. Thirtyâ€"five years comprise a long period of time, yet there are those amongst us, still in the prime of life, who ean recollect the bright interesting face of England‘s young queen as it then was, and can remember how many generous and chivalrous emotions were sroused in the minds of her subjects, when in all the ERIDAY, MAYX 24, 1872 A CHANGE OF TACTICS " AWWERTISEMENTS. THE QUEEN‘S BIRTHOAY. THIS EV ENING deal of mourned so deeply, remembering as we all can remember, how closely their lives were interwoven into one ! Can we blame her because ever since that dark Decem» ber day, the pomp and pageantry,of royâ€" dqhnnbondmfnltoh-,mdlho has permitted the more gorgeous ceremoâ€"= nies of the Court to be performed by others, while she has contented herse!f with discharging the less showy but more important duties of her position? | Let us rather trust that though nothing we can do can bring back to our Queen the happiness she has lost, or awaken to life once more the sound of a voice that is still forever, the love and loyalty of her subjects all the world over may comfort and sustain her, and help to render our Sovereign‘s future years tranquil and We know there are people who sneer at this sentiment of loyalty which is so deeply seated in the hearts of every true British subject.. We know there are some who think, or affect to think that it savours of snobbery and flunkeyism ; but the loyalty whith, exists among . the British pooplo\ghy is utterly devoid of anything of the kind. We love Queen Victoria because she is worthy of our love. We revers her becaure as Wife and Mother, and in all the relations of life, she has afforded an example which may worthily be followed by women of every nation and of every class. We love her because the memories of thirtyâ€"five years endear her to us, and because we have learned to look upon her as our friend as well as our Sovereign. But we also revere her and held her name in honour, because she is the~representative and head of a ‘mdmz'mupmâ€" tutions which we hold y precious, and which hiwe tended to make not only the Mother Country but the whole Empire great and glorious, and have saved us alike from monarchical despotism on the one hand, and uu\ tyranny of a mobocracy on the other. We pray "God save the Queen" toâ€"day, and we do it with all our bearts. But when wo utter those words we mean something more. We not only implore Heaven to save and protect the Queen, but also to preserve to us her people, that unequalied form of liberty and those poâ€" litrcal instututions which have stood the test of centuries and of which she is the Thus inspired not by sentiment only but also by the teachings of experience and common sense, let us celsbrate with loyal and grateful hearts the fiftyâ€"third anniâ€" versary of the birth of Her who now so worthily represents the majesty of the British Empire. Let us trust and pray, as all true Canadians m#st suâ€"ely wiil do, that she may yet be spared many years to reign over us, and that when at length she exchanges an earthly crown for which is ‘incorruptible and fadeth not away," she may leave behind her, children to rule over us, of whom it may with truth be said "These are worthy descandants of good Queen, Victoria.‘"‘ © ()ur Canadian correspondent gives an interesting account of the circumstances under which the guarantee is given by the Imperial Government to the loan of â€"£2,â€" 510,000 for the Pacitic Railway. During the negotiation of the Washington Treaty, the Government of Canadaobjected to any further opening of the Canadian fisheries to Americans, unless some mpo-ding‘ advantages, such as the restoration of ‘the Reciprocity Treaty, were sconceded by America. When the Treaty was signed without this m_h:‘.un Canadian Government notified to Imperial Govâ€" ernment that it would not accept the Ireaty. The Imperial Government urged ghniuhmldbomphdhthi-m of the Empire, but Canada refused. After some show of resistance of this kind, howâ€" ever, Cauada notified the lnsperial Govâ€" erament that if it would a loan aamann,u.,mpm Railwa«y, the Treaty would be accepted. The Imperial Government replied, otiering to guarantee £2,500,000, ana Canada closâ€" ed with the offer. Uur correspondent says that the publication of the papers has had s'r-tefioctilthoeohny,-nddm Iodnnoot the advocates tor independâ€" We clip the following editorial from the Edinburgh Scotsman of the 3rd instant, referring to a letter of their speci«l corâ€" respondent at Ottawa, which appears in the same paper : ence. It must be admiited that Canada has made a good bargain. Just as this news reaches us from Canada, the docu« ments are published in this country." A+we before remuked, we are not surâ€" prised that the Grit:leaders in the House otf Commoas exerted thomselves to the utmost on Wednesday last to prevent Mr. U‘Connor from reading certain extracts from the Gilshe which were calculated to expose their master‘s gross inconsistency. What a laughable instance of: Grit impuâ€" dense and inconsistency Mr. Browan‘s behavi to the Roman Catholics of Onhr&ldl- Last year he addressed them in the most friendly terms, comâ€" mencing His letter with compliments and apologies, and ending with *« Yours‘ faithfully." Bclow we giveâ€"a fow more extracts from some of his articles respectâ€" faith, Wherse is the man, be he Roman Catholic or Protestant, who can have any faith in such a transparent trickster ? â€" (From the Globe July 9th, 1856.) " That is the Romish doctrine and Dr. Charbonnel is evidently the man to use all his authority. If any one should dare toopyonlli-doen-.l“-ly the cul« prit himself but his innocent family will umjerzo the ban of excommunication, they «which" opens hell and closes heaven." Monstrous doctrine ! yet it is that of the rulers of Canada at this moment. We mbond:._-lmb.nhwbb knowledgo h? cringeâ€" to a frail, tallable mortal, as if he were a god.> The Government dares not disobey the orders nd next we see her plighting fore the altar, and unifinll marriage to that ‘wise and | Prince who has well been‘ uk tha Kinait" O(Of all the, GR T CONSISTENCY the Mother Countr} | o |app pire great and glorious, m ; alike from monarchical ® e one han4, and the g‘:’:'.i; bocracy on the other. may apj ve the Queen‘" toâ€"day, 'flb"m‘ h all our bearts. But | Parliam those words we mean “T‘::i We not only implore ‘ the â€" Pr are some "F it savours p. but the ng the y devoid| â€" A < H re Queen k our love. C Wife and | to be THE OTTAWA riamME8, makX <24, . 1819. of the Bishop and until we have a thoâ€" rough expression of the feelings of Upper Canada we are tied fust to the chariot wheels of Rome ooo l o i o To n ol 7 . and it must be that we are expected to recant the most imp rtant article of our creed; to concede the â€"very principle agiinst which. in other forms we have fought for years and all to please a few Romish Priests." .* * * Theâ€"Public schools of Lower Canada are almost wholly in the hands of the Priests. _ This statement of itself will satisfy those who know anything of Popery that these schools must be Popâ€" " Theâ€"Public sc are almost wholly Priests. This #! satisfy those wh Popery that thes ish." DISPENSATION®. . (February 9, 1856.)â€" ©The destruction is. made by Rome to enhance the power of the priests and n’o the supplies. Protcstants believe alPsin. to infer condemnation by the pure and holy law of the Almighty; and their hope is placed slone on the Saviour of sinners. If Papist priests were to incu!â€" cate t::- doctrine, the half at least of their income would perish. > _ J "*n-eu and old bones, old rags and relics would at one be rejectedl by the: faithful and Popery would die in its own: rottenness."‘ * RE PICKINGS FROM THE PASTORAL. (February 15, 1856.) 4 If the Bihop has never fallen in with that |ingenious tract, + the anatomy of d enness,"" we would sedulously urio him to procure a copy of the same. It em delineations of the various at of alcoholic fever, and would furnigh an invaluable rade mecum for the clergy, when expiscating cases of a ‘dhrop tso much.‘ Fortilied with this scientific authority, . Father Bruyere would be enabled infallibly to dole out the censures of Church in © hard cases,‘ and inform the t Paddies whether they had drunk themselves into Purgatoryor Tarâ€" g%fiini_oufi @irliamcnt. reyy Ot motion of Hon: Mr. CAMPBELL, the i Notes Bill was read a third Mr. WARK read the following a, of which he had given â€"notice on a previous dl{: . ; an humble address be presented to His Exceilency the Governor General, praying that His Excellency will be pleased to |appoint a Commission of competent whose duty it shall be under the of the Minister of Justice, to inâ€" quite into the operation of the Insolvent Act, and recommend such amendments as ababta‘ s‘ t Rit 6 "te snpencted. to em in a Bill to be submitted to Parliament at its next Session. _ . The hon. gentleman gave a brief roviow‘ of the history of the Insoivency Laws, in the ; Province of New Brunswick.* He argued that it was the wisest policy, not to repeal a law because it did not â€" work :fioch-rmll, but to consider how it ight be amended so as to promote the public inmt:.’ thHo‘ found t.hs(:Mdt.h.; pnblicopinien e country was . io en maresenentinnst in the ; and under those circum mitw-notwbotot:&d it altoge â€" ther. The result would lead to a stite of things far worse than could possibly arise under the law. He did not wish to see any creditor in a position to harrass and crush a debtor who. was acting honestly. When a man fuiled honestly the law should step in and distribute his property among his creditors, and then he should be allowed to take a fresh start. Hon. Mr. SANBORN arose to a point of order. An address.was not permussible with reference to the subject matrer of a _ Hon. Mr. WARK consented toallow his motion to stand. G e M The order of the day, the second readâ€" ing of the bill to repeal the Insolvency Laws, was then taken up. Hon. Mr. SANBURN went on to say that the responsibiiity which rested upon the House was of no little momoat,mdm to be exercised. The House was upon to consider a %nuuon on which there had been given during two sessions an expression of the sentiments of a maâ€" mof those who lmoont _more «diâ€" the people of Dominion. : In the mflnm of Quebec and .Ontario the law been in force for eight years, and the vote whiohwutizene!uwhcnontho question may fairly considered to illusâ€" trate the feelings of the majority of the m. of those provinces. His hon. who had just resumed his seat had stated that he had Leen at the birth and‘ death of three bankruptcy laws in New Brunswick ; a very significant fact inasâ€" much as it showed that in his province, as elsewhere, such laws are of a temporery nature and are simply created in the first instance for the purpose of doing away with exceptional evils which grow upon society. . ue had been surprised to hear the hon. gentleman, who was generally so accurate, state that our Insolvency Laws were so perfect that they had been adoptâ€" A rou i Hon. Mr.mBELL moved that the ker issue his warrant tor the arrest of o nt, the witness who had refused be examined before the Divorce Com« i and thereby commutted a breach the privileges of the House. Carâ€" ed word by word by: the United | : States, 1t was hardly probable that | the law could be adopted word for word |! inasmuch as there murm:‘r'ilhll â€" in it which could not be very uhrni" to the United States. The Act of 1841 | was enforced in the United States, and | that was long prior +> the enactment of our;law. He was not prepared to say what amendments had been made to that law, but at all events it recognized the inciple of voluntary assignmientâ€"it was nocrp(lllld into their system of E:n â€" catureâ€"all the bankruptoy p gs were conducted in the ordinary courts of justice under the checks and guarantees wbich the courts are calculated to give. With reference to our law it was nothing of the kind. In the United States a perâ€" son could not make a voluntary n-‘g ment unless he made it under cath t was to ay, he made an inventory of his assets and lisbilities under joath. Under our law any maih who was a tradesmanâ€" and it required very little to constitute that ; if he ran a water cart, it would be suflicientâ€"he had only to go before a Notary and make, an asignment of his Estate. lHe bhad known instances where that Estate had been so insufficient that the Bankropt had been obliged to get a subscription raised by his friends to enable brm to meet theâ€"fees ho hxl to pay to the Assignee. With iegard t> the imperfécâ€" tions of our law he uight say the assignâ€" ment was made without any other formalâ€" ity. True the insolvent was called upon toassist the Assignee in ‘making ug the Inventory. He wight be examined y the creditors as to whether be has made a gllun'pn-t, b\;luutmsnuhow bankruptcy. A thosncn‘u s went on with the Assignese in many instanâ€" ces many of them were extremâ€"ly informal, and there was no check upon . them. | The result of the present state of things | was shown by the Gazette. So numerous were the applications for a discharge in | bankruptey ; and in almest all cases those | applications were from the Insolvent ‘I‘ne ) | Attorneyâ€"General of England said in 1869 â€" ) that. ‘under the old law which was véery , | much like ours, that it had got to be conâ€" . | sidarad necessary for the credit of their Wrepxesoar, May 22. SPEAKER took the Chair at one BREACII OF PRIVILEGES INSOLVENCYV‘LAWs DOMINION NOTES T E& SENATE. enE eC uk id go through bankruptcy once in six years.| !* But we had got far in advance of thatâ€"| D# many had gone through bankruptey twice | th within six years. (All this went to show| te that the influences of such a law must be | C injurious. What he wished to imprees | A! upon the House was that this law was Of | C such & nature that it could not be | © amerffded, but we must proceed to the | ® basis and reâ€"enact anew a law it it should | #! be necessary. But he believed that in the , 0 present mpemuq condition of the counâ€" t try we no occasion for such a law.‘ k With ur:{)oct to the discrimination to be | f exercised in giving credit, those who sold | b had the matter pretty much in their own | Y hands. A great fault now lay with those d who forced too miny goods upon the | Y market, and he regretted that the system | d of trading between the large centres and | & the country had so entirely changed with»â€" | C in a few years. Formerly the country | C traders sought out the goods they wanted, b but nov they were waited upon by a class | C of persons known as ©"commercial travel: | lers‘ who forced goods on them. Let; 3 those who carry on business conduct it on | t sound commercial principleâ€"then we | t would be safer than we are now. Every | man should meet his obligations, and if | C there was any other principle preferable | ® to that he would like to know it, If those | who were in trade would take pains to | find out whether it was fraud or misfor, |! tune or recklessness that had led to | t the bankruptcy of a part‘cilar man, they | 5 .would soon establish in the community ja | ! sentiment which would give rise to a|‘ wholesome trade in the country, and | f prevent nine out of ten cases of Insolyvency , that at iro;oenl exist. Now a man enterâ€" |i ed into business as if there was no great | ‘ responsibility connected with itâ€"no more 1 than railway contractors appeared to feel. | If there were evils thit might arise in |! connection with preferential assignments, | ! let there be a law enacted that would reâ€" | move them. When the question before | the House came up in the other branch, || last session, there was a majority of 31 |‘ from Ontario and Quebec in favor of reâ€" | peal. This session, on the final vote on | this question, the present Bill was sup~ | ported by the large majority of 36 from | OUOntario and Quebec. It was true the Maritime ropresbnutxv:u B'lel“;; for the most part, opposed to the Bill, but neverâ€" theless it l‘x’nd ‘passed successfully. He read from a newspaper an advertisement of a trader who announced that he had commenced business again, having uns dergone repairs, legally and morally,"â€" showing how callous people became under the existing system of Lnknlpwy-oon- | sidering it rather a matter for amusement. He also read the conclusion of the memoâ€" rial of Montreal merchants, who declare that the law is ‘‘injwious to the interests of the country generally," that it is so s | complicated by amendments from time to | time that further amendme:mflqr i | wmill only tend to further emb nt," â€" | and thas it was better to eunact a new law h | * so that settlements may be arrived at â€" | withouts the intervention of Official Asâ€" signee or third party." There was, he continued, another petition honbxon- treal, purponin‘toboligmd‘byl 0; but ,, | he had received two letters.from two fi d | tlemen who has signed it, declaring t they had not understood its nature. One of them stated that he hud been induced _ | to sign it by the Ufficial Assignee by the statement that it was in favor of the smendâ€" f ent of the law. re alto read another letter to show the evils that arise from the ; | oxisting law. In conclusion, he apologized % to the House for l;h:vxlx:og mwboe ‘so long on its astenti t n apposed 3 | to the law in 15¢9, andnow that b¢ had . | some experience of its operations he felt . | he was trerfocuy justiied in his opposi~ 1 | tion. e opposed it because he believed ,g | it was sanctioning and perpetuating a ,, | system of m% immorality throughâ€" .p ) out the comutry, and that the only reâ€" medy now . was to repeal it dmthu. & | Then the Government . could ‘the p, | matter into consideration between this % and next session, and: come down with a y | measure which would meet the difficulties y | of the case and be as permanent as any * | such law ought to be. . â€" . _ | Hon. Dr. CARRALL said that he rose with a feeling of much embarrassment to Weom ' to assume a position entirely antagonistic to a gen:â€" tleman for whose legal gcumen and arguméntatiqe power he felt the highost respect. He need not tell the House that there was a time in the History of the worldâ€"not a very remote time ; when a condition of impoverishment was one of obloquyâ€"wher imprisonment for debt was in vogue and the word .©" bankrupt‘‘ was synonymous with the words rascal and rogueâ€"or to quote the more expressive language of his hon. friendâ€"with *« comâ€" mercial immorality.‘"‘ It must be remem:â€" bered that there was formerly considerâ€" able difference between the proper appliâ€" cations of the terms * bankruptcy‘"‘ and insolvency." Insolvency : covered & wider rangeâ€"bankruptcy only ‘ extended feight bo comidered. spuogpmeuns, , Hh t us, . His hon. friend had quotodmmonl statement to show the former oxrrimoo of things in England, and alse referred to the experience of the United States. With respect to the latter countay he found that first they borrowed the bankruptcy law of England and put it into opération for a limited term of five years ; but the law was not continued but suffered to go by default. In 1841 the United States, in their wi found it necessary to reâ€" enact a new toy law and that surâ€" gi.vod ..tgl' f.ylenn. 1867, the United tes still felt compelled to pass a general en enee o it great Anglo Saxon m:;fi: been in the direction of enacting laws for the nfi: tion of bankruptoy ; and in face of like those it was idle for his hon. friend to say, and endesvour to fortify himself by quotations from Lord Eldon to try and prove that there was no necessity for syoh enactments. When England herself, the standard bearer in every prog:luve movement, had enforsed & bankruptcy law,â€"when the United St :tes found it ad. visable to do the same, the hon.: gentleâ€" man would erase all laws from the Canaâ€" dian Statute Book and in that way go conâ€" trary to the experience of the wisest comâ€" mercial ufiou‘g the world. He (Dr._’c.} believed that princti oppooex 0 -tbhvmmmo&b;d frateornâ€" ‘ity, of which his hon. friend wus so disâ€" tinguisbed an ormament. He did not think, hawever, that the agricultural interests of which he was as strong an adyocate as any one inâ€" the House, ?froved of â€"the measure that was now under consideration. His hon. iriend, when uforrin‘ht: the votes on the question elsewhere, kept carefully out of sight the fact that there had been only a mn)ori of three altoâ€" gether on the division fact, it was a mere snap vote. He did not wish to go back to the condition of things that exâ€" isted before we had a bankruptcy law in d aprend io Ner Abhesiiy ind\ Mebly; is A 10 AGt y r : been actually driven across mer on account of the harshness of their creditors. He did .not wish to see any system in operation, calculated to harass and oppress any ypright man who had been simply unfortunate in busiâ€" ness. It was said that rogues rushed in and took advantage of the present law, but would things be®any better, accordâ€" img to his own showing, if it were swept off the statute book altogether. Those -wbomen‘znd in business would have the same interest as ever in disposing o! their goods, and would be as easily deâ€" ceived as now by unscrupulous traders. He felt suré that the House would pay no heed to the sophistry and appeals of his hou. friend, and would give a vote in favor of the necewity of having at all times an equitable means “-tblu\g:nen to carry _ luk un C cce aoue la castama on legitimaté business, o;:m.s‘o‘lv- when they fail ad. .9 &. * 2. Hon. Mr. SMITH said that he must en: dorse a very large portion of the remairks. that hai fullen trom the hon. mover of the bill with respect to the injurious efâ€" fects of tho pre #04 | :@~ «ll6éâ€"wa‘s in favor o"a vink.uptey doe it‘we‘¢in obtaia one that will not ecucourage lascality +m â€"ng the commercia! community. The law, as it now stoad,. had certainly that tendency. There was a time when on account.of the failure of the crops and over importation they have honestly it was nflrry for anumber of unfortuâ€" nate men rtabmtriptcy law ; but that time had passed. The law was inâ€" tended for an exceptional order of cir cumstances which no longer existed, and ; nn{ who should happen to get into diffiâ€". culties would be enabled to obtain relief even if the measure is repealed. We were now living in a very ;{)rooporoun state, we had a larg: amount of money at our disposal, a&nd believed that with the assistance of Providence the Domin ion bad a long and prosperous career beâ€" | fore it. When we had on the statute book a y which en@bled men to take ad« vantage of ‘their positisn, and become dishonest, hbe felt it his . duty to vote for its repeal. . He showed how a dishonest man could come into a village and enter into competition with the mer« chant who had been there for many years, carrying on a safe and bg‘timsto business, but who would soon find himsel{ unable to compete with one. who started with borâ€" rowed capital which he would soon refund, and cared nothing for consequerces. That trader would eventually 50* into difficul« ties, offer his creditors 20‘ cents on the dollar ; and if that was refused . at the outset, he would threaten them with an assignment, â€" when fxobsbly they would receive nothing.. Of course, the creditors â€" would have to yield, and a few days later he would come out with a flaming adver tisement headed * Bankrupt Stock for. Sale at 50 per cent. below first cost." The natural consequence would be that the honest trader would find himself under=. sold, and probably in the end irretrievâ€" ably embarrassed by ciroumstances arising from an iniquitous law. The spezulat »rs who went into business for the purpose of reâ€" maining only a few months were the class of pe sons really protected by the law. It was understood throughout Onâ€" tario that the bankruptcy law will die out next year, and he was quite positive that there would be an immense number of unscrupulous dealersin the interval, who would go into bankruptcy ; and he intendâ€" ed keeping a list of such persons with the view or showing the House next sessionâ€" in case it was not now repealedâ€"the effects of a measure which encouraged rash, disâ€" honest speculation. For these and other reasons he would support the B.ll now before the House. _ © _ N e ayn Hon. Mr. WILMOT did not believe that any man should be oppressed when he was unfortunate in business, and that would in ‘his opinion be the effect of a system which did not give him an opporâ€" tunity of dividing his property equitably and getting clear of his liabilities and commencing anew. His hon. friends had relerred to the prosperous condition of the country, but .“fapm a monétary crisis should occur in London on account of a drain of gold to pay the French debt, money would go up everywhere and we would find ourselves very much embarâ€" rassed in this country. He had known the price 0° lumber and ships go dow 1 to lrulnoully low raes in consequence of a panic suddenly arising in the British money market, and the people of New Brunswick were suddenly large losers at the very nioment they thought they were . in & prosperous condition. In legislating for the country, Parliament shouid guard against contingencies and not be carried away by exfoom.iom that m&ht prove delusive. If Great Britain had found it necessary to keep a bankruptcy law on her statute bookâ€"if the United States had thought it advisable to do the.same, the ‘Dominion of Canada certainly sheuld have some means by which the mercantile comâ€" munity can make arrangements for the settlement of bankrupt Igll'l. irs, The Board of Trade ol St. John had come to Parlia ment with a petition asking that the law be not repealed, and he believed it would be prejudicial to the public interest to take the steps they were now asked to pursueg. * Hon. Mr. SMITH again urged the repeal . of the law, and said that the Official Assigâ€" nees were a class of persons very expensive to keep up, He would trust a bankrupt stock i1 the hands of theâ€"Sheriff and a lawyer, rather than to the Assignees. Hon.: Mr. MACFARELANE was anxious to do justice to the honest. trader, bllth.‘ was not Mâ€"c{ srguments ye used Ldn advocates of the Bill that it would have such a tendency. e beliered that viewed in all its aspects it was better: to let the law remain on the statute book than repeal it altogether, and allow our business aftairs to become embarrassed in consequence of the want of legal 1egulaâ€" tions. ‘The law had been engdin operaâ€" nonlorthmyurhu:‘h not wish to see it strangled e the time of its legal expirationâ€"a yéar hence. It apâ€" peared to him that the country has already one of the â€" best | safeguards of commercial morality, though he was aware many persons did not approve of it; he referred to that lgltom by. which the standing of every business man in the community could be mscértained in a moment. He‘did not believe the law was by any means perfect, but it was better to let it remain for a few months longer thnfiobwkhs.nmofuwhhiynd comp 'ottion&:nd for those reasons he would moye that the Bill be read that day three months. se Cl [ Hon. Mr. TESSIzx followed and spoke with mnch m&uxs in French against the adoption of Bill ‘which had â€"been moved by his hon. friend from the Welâ€" lington fimnon, and which he believed would tend to injurious results. He comâ€" bated the arguments of the mover, and concluded the arguments of the mover, and concluded by seconding the motion of the hon. member who had just sat down. > ‘The debate was then adjourned. / _ BILLS FROM THE COMMON®. A message was brought from the House of Commons .by their clerk, with Bills intituled: An Act to make provision? for the continuation and extension of the Geological survey of Canada, and the Geological Surve7. An Acs, to idemnify the members of the Executive Government and others, for the unayuidable w of Public money, without rliamentary _ grant, o_ooadoned by the undm&ofmq”dl. tionary furce to Manitoba, in 1871. An Act to incorporate the St. Lawrenee _ An Act to incorporate the Thunder Ba; Silver Mines Telegraph Company. 4 _ An Act to incorporate the Mail Printing and Publishing Company (limited.) _ _ An Act relating to the Treaty of Washâ€" ington, 1871.; f An Act to amend the Act relating to B‘::I and Bankin .tbo tou h Act tomoml C seren of the Starutes oLlS:,I, rpl:l,a,n'_jo Savings Banks. _( . _ _ .. The Bill relating to the rre.t‘ of Washâ€" ington was made the order of the day, for Tuesday next. o The House then adjourned. â€" Teprspay, May 23, 187%. * The SPEAKER took the Chair at $ .M, 8 A) number of petivions were read. + Several bills were read a first time. r. MoDOUGALL (South kenfrew) mo\fodfonunddnuforuflfl'of fees un der| Chap. 46 Consolidated Statutes of Canada, now charged to lumbetmen for Mr. MoDUGALL exrhimd that he believed that the principle of making reâ€" ceipts equal iture was a just one. He complained, however, of an increased, and as "-:Elund, anp unpecessarily in creased tariff, the result of ‘the emâ€" loyment ‘of _ too many cullers. k ac y K 6 loyed, who cu a a day. ’ !:{'o thought mf‘;n;r cullers could do th,o whole work, but as thero might be delay from an insufhciency of cullers lpd"zcm- tication clerks he did not ask for a reducâ€" tion so as to interfere with trade wouk. _ He t.houih: that a reduction o Siralr paon thed e nak tpoton 1g ). Every person on the »ubject was of opinion that zoafl lers would be quite lu:flfll“. People beâ€" came graduilly incapable. A ‘man at 30 was very much more active than a man of «s timber arrived irregularly. Whepn there was a rush otf bysiness a culler sometimes made $400 for a fortnight‘s H0OUSE QF COMMONMS. THE TREATY 60 years of age, but by the present system yont.hmd;f‘:’wdrg:{woduponthonme footing. e thought the specification clerks should be dispensed with and the clerks should bfldi.‘goma with and the cullers made to do the duty. He thought it was somewhat unmanly to go out: of one‘s way to attack people, who had no gPportunity of .. defending â€"themselves. everthleo:s he left it to the Governâ€" ment whether some of the older clerks might not be superannuated. 4 Mr. SIMARD ‘said ‘that he understood that the honorable member did nut seem to complain that the fees were too high, but the number ‘of culle;s were too many. Mr. MoDOUGALL said, in explanation, that he had no pbjection to a culler ob â€" taining $1000 a year, but he had to an un â€" necessary tax upon the trade as the result of too many cullers. . + > Mr. SIMARD was well acquainted with the business of the city of Quebec, and felt satisfied that there were not too many cullers. It was true that the merchants Erefemd some| cullers to others. The ule was to take them in rotation, but when the feet arrived in the spring there was necessarily a demand for cullers, and supernumeraries were actually necessary. There was a greoat difference in the income of the culler.: The averative incomes might be $400, but some men, who were favoured b‘y fsrficulu' merchants made as much as $1;400, while others did not make more than $300 | i *% i# f Mr. CURRIER believed that the hon member for )(Aatuw, wasquite co:rect in what he said. Four or five cullers would be quite sufficient to do the whole timber measuring of Quebec. He wanted the fees reduced one half, and if a culler could not make a living he could fall back upon some other businees. The tax upon the lumberman was excessive. _ Mr. SIMARD spoke of the circumstance of one hundred veszels arriving in one day and of the necessiry rush of work on such occasion. He thought the cullers should be selected by ballot, and that merchants should not be permitted, so to speak, to select their men. % * Mr. CUKRIER said the ballot system would not lessen the culling expenses to the Inmber merchant. a Hon. Mr. IRÂ¥INE sail that the system was a bad one. ‘He thought it very absurd that the law was such that a merchant in Quebec was compelled to have his timber measured by men in whom he had no confidence, there was no guarantes for impartiality. ‘I‘he merchants were fre quently obliged! to protest them:elves by haying _ their ; timber _ reâ€"measured. He felt quite certain . that there were. twice as many: (Government or licensed cullers that there was any necessity for, Deals were not culled at all. They merely passed through a cerâ€" tain form of inspection. Every minufac turer was interested in keeping up the character of his own‘ district. '!I)‘hene 'hr:iuld be no castâ€"iron rule in matters of trade. $°|â€" Hon. Mr. CHAUVEAU did not agree with his honorable friends from Megantic, Quebes,. Ottawa and Renfrew. . There should be an inspection of timber as weli as of fish, flour, bil or leather. He thought the Gorernment measure was the best possible.. He thought that inspection was necessary as a guarantee to the pu:rchasers of both quantity anu quality. Mr. TOURANGEAU thought there cerâ€" tainly should be some Government super â€" vision. Clerks didâ€" become more or less incapable by age â€" He could see no gre«t objection, however, to the number o lhcensed cullers being reduced to 20 | _ Hon. Mr. MORRIS was indebted to bis hon. friend from: Renfrewâ€"for having brought the matter up. The object of the system of rotation was to prevent favour~ Mr: RYAN (Montreal) agreed with his hon. friend fy,m Megantic, that a comâ€" pulsory law of inspection was injurious rather than beneficial. â€" § Hon. Mr. IRVINE said that the merâ€" chants could not sell on the Govyernment measurement, &nd had to get their lumber remeasured at an addititional cost The timber was. unsaleable on the Government IMOakUHremient. I .._._.ic.«â€"***** nc .o 0. "o0 Mr. CURRIER denied that this system of me surement was an inspection, L. was measurement and nothing more: The motion was carried. Dr. GRANT moved for an address for a° return of reports and> estimites relating . to Bay Verte Canal He ::;lhl M;:lq::n:fng. l tl: country through which the canal was to pass. It would be about 21 miles in length and was to connéct Cumberland Sasin with thobyoltun&y. On the one side there was a tide rise of 8 or 9 feet. On the Bay of Fundy side the water frequeritly rose 50 feet in spring tides. It appeared to him there were somediscrepancies between the Reports and Estimates_ The motion was carried. Mr. SMITH &dklrk) moved for an adâ€" dress for correspondence relstive to the introduction into the Nerth West Ter:itory g-xiJ'" § Sirs H t.bot'nmb. s mtoxicating liquors." He thought that as the introduction of intoxicating liquors had been prohibited to British lnb)m the Americans ought unot to be permi wA;m‘_:u !-’,‘ .â€" EoE ECCCEA * % a # _ Hon. Sir GEO. E. CARTIER said this Mr. MASSON {Soulanges] read from the Liberal a letter from John bobhults -g:'g; that he had not made claims on the * ernment for rebellion losses, while ommisâ€" sioner Johnson had lllmd that he had m.. dk:mbr $10,0 mflp himself been t a Of, at on hfl.l,'d & mnofw,w:;mdn.fidw mhboqn board Howuhfl.omd false pretences, as the British Gor, eroment had virtually admitted that they h1:d been in the wrong. ‘The member tor Lisgar wanted $1,000 a day for his board. This was not fair. _ _ $ M e Mr. MASsUN '(fembonno&thought it would be better to leava matter in the hands of ithe Commpittee on Public Am“: gou .E-.... A.n'n" ww is r3 in # _ Hon. bir FRANCLS H[NCKS said that, of course, only the papers that were now before the Committee of Public Accounts wouid be buo:_n’htdon. PDr. SHULIZ said that his letter was a sumgie denls! tf the A26â€"ral of an al age e t n EOE s tion by another ne that he nad received $30,000. ~He :5 made a claim, not altogether for imprisonment but for loss of business, in connection with matters o(zomhho’a; t . CARIWR!IGH TE moved the second ,,.din;ofnn Act for the better protection of navigable streams and rivers, and reâ€" peated what he had previously said on the first retd::s relative to the mischief done by sabé saw«dust. He read from the wo{ the Minister of Marine and mw-howuoi{:{t:rydonowmvis- able screams by manufatturers of lumber. Mr. CUBBEQ moved the six months hoist. “u:‘l.ion.-~ Mr. f.Al:(zWfi recomme nded t the measure inss â€" dq:s the &ummom were sbou:i:; appoint a commission to make into tlnnm;hu of things W.:l“'" tain what remedy could best he «dopted m‘t.h‘ P.n.b.l.-':mm\m-‘l Â¥ * % x _ one jed by sawâ€"Gust by which thelr mouths. mere "s0 â€"cboked ‘up" that dredging had to be resorted to, to"keep the harbours clear. i _ Mr. CARTWRIGHT said that after what :i fallen from the hon. Minister of blig'uqb,ého vz n:mdcm of Mi meaâ€"ure to & reading. Mr. WHITE(of Halton) said that saw dust could be consumed by fire and couldl â€" Mr. MACKENZIE BOWELL said that the honorable member for Ottawa seemed to think that the river Ottawa was the | not see why the Government should purâ€" sue such a policy for the River Uttawa and another for other streams. The law was enforced on certain rivers and not on others. £ _ Sir F. HINCKS said the Government had no intention of pursuing a separale policy concerning the River Ottawa. . _ ‘Tbe motion was withbrawn, and it being 6 o‘clock, the House rose. AFTER RECESS. Mr. MILLS moved for the second read ing of his Bill for an Act to render memâ€" bers ‘of the Legislative Councils and Legislative Assemblies of the Provinces now included, or which may hereaiter be included within the Dominion of ‘Canada, ineligible for sitting or voting in the House of Commons of Canada. He strongly ad« vocated the passage of his measure. It had been alleged that action in this mat ter would be an interference with the liberties of the people. Nothing could be more incorrect. All law, if that objec tion could be maintained, would be an interference with oJnypulu' liberty. He was firmly persuaded that the system of dual representation should be abolished. Mr. BELLEROSE‘8 attention had been called to the remarks of the hon. member for Bothwell, and ‘he did not agree with him. He moved the three months‘ hoist, and it was hoisted accordingly, yers, 74 ; nays, 55 Hon. Mr. BLAKE mored the second reading of & Bill for an Act to provide for the trials of Controverted Elections before Judges, and for the prevention of corrupmt practices at e‘lections for the House of Commons. Mr. BLAKE said that ex necessitate reiand a fortiori, and because it had been adopâ€" ed in England, trials of controvertedielecâ€" tions should take place before the judw. The practice saved time and money. We of ha i some experience of how the present | 2 system worked." In the Hocheloga elec ; ; tion c:f two sessions elap:ed before the | ,, right to sit was determingd. As another | ; example there was the Manitoba ,double | , return case, in which it was found that | ; Eooplo would have to be brought down ere at immense expense to give evidence | , before a Committee of this House ; they | , would have to be brought, in fact, trom the ends of the earih to enable the House | , to determine maitters. Bring ng witnesses to Ottawa was virtua ly denying justice to | j both the elestors and the elected. The | , rich man might be able to afford to bring bhis witnesses here while the comâ€" | j paratively poor main would be comâ€" | j pletely unable to do so. A locul | ; tribunal would find the witnesses on the spot, and justice would be cheaply renderâ€" | â€" ed. The present plan was to toss up for a chairman, and the House might just as | , well toss up for a decision as to the electâ€" ed party, whose rights they were to decide | : upon.. The feeling of party on both sides | , ot the House created jealousies.. Uur lives and honors were intrusted to the juaigs,, who <were beyond corruption, and beyond suspicion. and could we not entrust to them the right of docidl:iin controverted election. A law, which is not acted upon is an imgosmre on the oou;g. He wanted an effectine mode of resisting violations of the law. â€" Hon. Sir JUHN A. MACDONALD said that the t.ne of the honorable gentieman would not feel a responsâ€" in the country or in this House. He stigimatized, as he said, the people, the country, this House, ind the five members of this House, selected by ballot, and sworn to do "‘their duty, as being capuble of perjury. and corruption. _ He believed that the Committee on Privileges and | Elections hadâ€"given as fair, as honest, as correct decisions as it could be possible for any tribunal to give. It was for Par: | liament to respect its own legislation.. The Senate and the House of <jommons had last session passed an Act for the Govâ€" | ernment of elections, and were they to throw their own leT]Al' ation aside even | without a> trial ? ntil there weed | Dominion u‘-l{udgu svtci ra law would | be altogether wrong. ‘The judges at preâ€" | sent were appointed bytholool[a‘l!:h”- | qures and this duty of trying controverted elections as affecting the Dominion Parliaâ€" | liament they had no right to me. & ' if they could be off the § bench to go "erust and west to try conâ€" troverted elections. There were, say, 200 | members in this House, and. there might ‘| be 50 controverted election cases, and ; would it be wise or expedient to take from their ordinary and every day duties : fifty judges to investigate, try, and decide upon such cases? There were no more ; ,jdmth country than the country ‘| required for its ordinary bu:iress. . _ _ _ â€" Hon. Sir JOHN A. MACDUNALD move 1 that the Bill instead of being read a second time, be read this day three months. . Hon. Mr. MACKENZIE said that a wrong was no sufficient reason MmmE‘Mm He thought tb.:g:::mtof&bo Honorable Miuister of J was fallacious and improper. He thouzht the House had a right to impose duties on the Judges. He thought that aioJud&mlght try half a dozen cases. As for proposed seven Judges of a Supreme Court at the agihl. being exâ€" pected to go on circuit to ritish Columbia to try a controverted plection was ridicuâ€" loys. ;iiim Sir GEORGE E. m&m was Englanad shortly after passage of the law relating to thke trial before Judges in cases of contested elections, and had conversed with several English Judguistothoopnflmofllnhw,nd they were unanimously of opinion thet it was bad policy to divert them from their proper duties. The measure in Englind was merely on its trial. When it was ascertained how it worked there, someâ€" thing, in a similar direction, might be : done in this country. It was expected that a law would certainly be adopted in flpmtlo‘hhm&ombluhsuihm law for the Daigl‘u: ‘with reference to elections. When mung:w made for the Government of Manitoba and to erect it into a province it was not exâ€" pected that we should have the pleasure of so soon receiving British Columbia into the bosom of the Dominion. After a few words from Mr. RYMAL. Hon. Mr. IRVINE wanted to know how there was an Act on the Statute Book, which was so inoperative An Upposition‘ candidate was always most desirous of unâ€" seating his adjyersary. Yet nothing was done, usually, under the m’pn-«z":nt a man could not be unseated for pt practices. _ These would prevail no matter what law should be enacted, even if that which the hon. member for West Durham propores came into effect, He himself knew of no case in which a member of this House had been unseated for corâ€" ruption. Hethought the presen: system of trying contegted plections was not & good one. Hodid(nott'hinkfi“l r lectian Comumittee was a proper tri to try such cases. It had been sait that the proceedure in England was merely on trial. He t that there the law was pmodln:b:filn”uy. It merely was the duty of Judges to carry out whatever laws were passed here. If the law had not been carried out. it was important that somp tribunal should be ooqmtmo?upt would carry it oyt. Every specie of corâ€" ruption should be put down, as much as possible. 3 Mr. STREET saiid the question was one | of principle, and if it were desirable to im â€" pose extra duties on the Judges, they sb uld receive an extra allowance in ponsideration ‘of these extra duties. It ~certainly, in his opinjon, would be an exceedicgly expensive mode of procedure to , bring . witnesses from British Columbia hither in tho' case f câ€"ntroverted elections He was in f.yor o! the meaâ€"ure introduced by the honourable gentleman opposite. â€" He thought the Bench 0i Untamio was so exâ€" ceedingly pure that he would have no hesitation in instrycting the i::pl with the trial of controverted ions. He mfl:flhflo of :;no oriepce, a measure of this importance, but that it should be procseeded with at once. The House divided, yeas 66, nays 49 . Hon. &r“.lo'g. A. n:’c&mgw moved that when House adjourned, it eartied. Rose Second reading of a Bil extend the r';glsn of .ppl:.' : Act q cases, and for other P“M-.,N RISON.â€"Carried. _ â€"Ha Mr. COSTIGAN moved ing of a Bill for an Aag:hm:d Yead bers of the Local Legisiatures pet Province where dual representatio, ;, 8 allowed, to resign their seay w.i® becom‘ng scandidates for .*,.* Dominon l‘ arlhhament. "«~~ ily becond read nz of extend the ow as 45 gerou> weapons.â€" Carfied, _ " _ *_** * Mr. BODWELL said ‘that k nights ago the honorable u had himself roted against the M( his own Bill. He could not see wBy ty House could belexpoct;d & favor 4 B licable to only one rovince, whi :),e\gn refused to the Doaminon. Which bng Mr. SAVARY said, in Nev, Soot [ a members of this House were not qualife until they had resigned their BCOA in House to offer themselves for election u[ _ the Local befiiolutun. â€"~He though; course . should I'pply, and he support the Bill of his honorable frians "f Mr. GEOFFRION thought already decided the matter, that the Bill be read this months, Mr. JACKSON said somet} was inaudible to us. He said he would vote for the Bill. Hon. Mr. ANGLIN s#d it person:il1 matter. â€" The Kon?:u. right to interfere with the proceeding the Local Legislatures, in what seeme him to be personal legislation, " 1t merely a bit of"personal spite on the of the mover. * I Mr. MILLS said the House wou tifyâ€"itself if it approved of this tion. Mr. YOUNG read the Divison Lig the Bill last Session to show the q sistency of hon. members. _ He did believe that honeuaable gentliemen ¢ site would stultity themselves in y for this merely personal measure. Hon. Sir GEORGE E, CARTIER said was only following the example of member for (iloucester last year. Hon. Mr. ANGLIN said he was not aware of the nature of the Bill, Hon: Col. GRAY said that every meap. ‘l?or from New Brunswick liust yeus or precisely the self same ..a by the same member. ldl, a Mr. Ds COSMUOS would vote against ty Bill _ He Was 0 Ahe tion. pposed to decentralin _The House div.ded on the amenime; Yeas, 39 ; naye, 65. e f *It having been stated thit the hon member for Kin'sswn had not voted, Hon Sir JOHN A. MACDOKIT 14 he had paired off w.th Sir George R. Cartier (great laughter). The Bill was read a secon i time. It was moved that the House go i Committee on the Bill on Monday., __The Housé at 20 minutes to one adjsursed until Monday at 3 p.m. MR. FORTIN‘8 SPEEI4 I® nuCsE OF COKMONXSs oX WASBINGTON TREATY. Mr. FORTINâ€"Afiter some intredusto rewmarks, said the sentiments he b expressed, when the Fishery question 1 under discussion last year, would form i basis of what he would have to say up the present occaâ€"1on. 1e had then a that ‘"it the fisheries were to be given : a policy that he was not prepared to commend, he expected that we would | in return a compensation directly be fiting the maritime population." Before procseding Jurther he would J a sketch of our fisheries r:ht -1 stand on the sea comsts of British Amer.ca _ By the conquest of Oamada fisheries became the property of . British E:rln, and the inhabitants of ‘ 1 c .um them. But the American out in 1775, and‘ the rebe!l Cole tore down . the British flag . renounced fonv:. their cfi and & to Empire. ve inforred that by that aot they csas have any right to our British fishe 'l?:.t"fiq advanced the extreme proten because they thad assisted in gress of Canada, and th=y had in those fisheries during the time were British colonists, they had right to themâ€" even _ after | had â€" become â€" foreignem to . and by perseverance and dippmd adroitness, and, no doubt, from proper representations on QUt they succeeded . in n“& treaty of 1784, the nm interpational law could give ing, in common with British all the coasts of British North Ameria an extent of â€" nearly four miles. * R The war of 1812 abrogated thas according to the law of nation. when peace was being signed, the sions of the United Statce were and it was not till 1818 that the was settlied by a qgompromi®e 1,500 miles of coast to.fb lsnd nndtounmucfislhi'q“‘ of the British fishermen. _ . .. ‘This is the way matlers on are asked to day t:(*-!fm' will give about 2, """‘: coasts in exchange for about American cousts. Now if Amerios® ermen are allowe!i to fish in C#M mCMMnflO’ tion equal to what we give up,. #9" oonponuuon-houldh se benefit of the maritime among the advantages that he fwwmfimw.“ t on the coasting trade, and the regit of Canadian vessels in the UN! By the Treaty of Washington not gei that compensation. _ . Gsheries, especially in the 45# i ery, and‘ he feared the Treaty old e e aignefi way the interets of g k tion of the coaste of Can@@® _ _ | O Of ln,m“lfl h Some gentiemen hid MEA L p Magdalen Islands, but # Americane had acquired the * ing in the waters w# Convention of 1818. _ WHA MB market that was offered Stetes for our fiâ€"h be behoved. was a very sufficient p more so as a great & 1 f uublhhwutzfu 4 mention eb mmt%um C ue | of any kind to the U * |ouqagmn-fl- i Brazil, Spain, Portugal a25 Sige! this Parliament would effect upon the negotisbObt "ugf. between _ Grpat _ ©400 yPe T P aa x o rweeamk ) (te _ ==. United States, P°."" e P x+ for ae~ ue P\ 5 in the npight, his remarks, many other ©0 his views, but as to the Bill something HARRT§Q§ er. He . this day \UC o in W ihe u‘-!' (ani@t P had # rs _ there _# for an Aot 4. the United the H 1281 op «£* [ ~ "that the population b _ Sfy to cne, the quan 193 the Hectprooity +105 iprocity Woue in operation, lergely interested in becanse she could her oate and p« F Nov: Sootin W‘dq Preat a very amal had Mm eqi ""%:"" a fol toat with she. bn.uhd whermen who hay Spbing grounds wili i in the unset ' and «8 that the th low uit of m':m years ago the waltered along the « way as our amoercur®e the City of Quebes, L"’_ t and lake St With regard to D/ Bdward‘s Island | ® that some Ame nu.dmfln .“lh"h‘fi ‘.,‘Mfa. this, might say the North Lenark ? In t w-h;:::d ” 1 ?“&hydlovil of fishermen on thoi taking the necesar) a destraction Y frdeed, by overdoin way as Our ame{teurs â€"â€"oreprqat o veols From the same 02 grounds are not #so .~ um-l’p namely, dry cod fish mackerel are the 0n '““ United tbat will obt Uiea Bmzter could States could oar fishermen could Cl sake our fieh â€" #::m. e has been Pr""*""__ ions and fishing £°° * “ 'nh outr bounty from their { on |!’~v unde L _4 â€" Gtate® to them for w®"! _ 'lm T a _z 0 _ or those | fation of t90"" .;’; against ‘_ â€"ads =.‘-«mwu By that Treaty T ner JA ‘P"d" o "*D" _ .. To say that the have bepefitted b "BAVLLLpp> P rrarm: £ and | hate re With several o Norti CanaDp, a* by & m Senite United and the amoun n ri® f sa of this d number of ou ute to the mo ce and the L e~HID8E Li 6Oump aac t 4 TELAR m OF DR w ASHING Hhey 16 Noi Aer uo same , whilst abhe * on the sy Wito !WnOus cangbt m a ma lind. in. 108E â€" the offere: and 1 con r the fol m ihe n” zed up 0 »o0 r very the °P 1.0Q Rivep a Treat) ind B the [ Mother that J 6 61 to on the y ie €.15 Canens Where 10.0% D ites mos 4 O