The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

*3 Wool Sergesâ€"J B Branuen C€learing saleâ€"Dew ar Wool Goojsâ€"J B Brannea Cheap Pantsâ€"Dewar Millineryâ€"J B Braunen Evening Partyâ€"Dr Panylos Felt Skirtsâ€"J B Braunen Underelothingâ€"Dewar Gowan‘s Opera House â€"Mid Wool Vestsâ€"Dewar Auction Saleâ€"A B Macdon: To the Electors of By Ward: New Advertisements. The strike of the Brotherhood of En: gineers of the Grand Trunk Railway has come to an end and in a‘ few days the full service of the road will be restored. A compromise has been effected between the Company and the drivers, the partiâ€" culars of which, however, we bave not learned. It is siated in a general way that Mr. Hiccson has [conceded some of the ‘demands _ made _ upon . him by the men, and that certain grievances of which they complaizp will be fully examined at some future time. It is probable that they hare got just what they might have obtained without resortâ€" eause of their complaints and dissatisfac â€" factiqn. It fis unfortunate that they were so badly advised and so hasty in obeying evil counsels. By their violence, lawlessâ€" ness and intimidation they have earned a bad repute, and some of them are amenal bie to the law for wrongâ€"doing. However, the general community will be glad to know that the strike has ended without more serious consequences than those which have unfortunately arisea. ing to the extreme of a strikeâ€"that is, a modification of the regulations which had been issued, and which were the alleged The firm attitude assumed by Turkey in relation to the proposals of the Conâ€" ference is said to have surprised all Europe. It was not seriously believed that the Porte would have the courage to resist proposals which were backed by all the great Powers. This surprise may have been caused by Europeans generally looking too much at one side of the questionâ€"at what the great Powers desized and propoasedâ€" and almost entirely forgetting that Turkey had her own side of the question. One authority thinks that it have been better for Turkey had lhofi::puy and gracefully accepted the position marked out for her by the Powers. Another believes that it would have been Letter for her had she been less pronounced in her resistance, temporizing & little more, and as her _ answer _ placin; before _ the The Times. her _ answer _ placin; before _ the Conference counter proposals. . What the effect of sither of these courses might have been we do not know for cerâ€" tain ; but the {fact is beyond dispute, that Turkey choses to think for herself, und take views of her interests opposed to the proposals of the Powers. Her sttitude is now, apparently, well underâ€" OTTAWA, THURSDAY, JAN, 4, 1877 stood, and it has produced a darkening influence on the prospects of peace. It is supposed that the Conference This morning we give a report o( the judgment of the Court, as rendered by Judge Maevizz, in the Bonaventure Elecâ€" tion case, which is interesting and im portant because it invoives the wmuch vexed question of clerical influence exerâ€" cised im election contests. One of the grounds of contestation on the part of the petitioners was that certain priests had improperly used the influence of their sacred office on the part of the respond: ent. A careful perusal of the remarkably lucid and comprehensive juigment of Judge Macvuias will show what priests mayilawfully do in election contests and what they may not do. They may entfeat, counsel, ‘advise, guide, direct and otherâ€" wise help the electors to a choice of has made its last appeal to the Porte, and that the whole matter is now under the consideration of the Great Council ot the Empire. In the meantime the Conâ€" ference stands adjourned till toâ€"day, when, :t is expected, the final resolution of the Ports will be made known. neer ndâ€"A Buftalo Ro in matters purely temporal. It is unlawâ€" ful to intimidate the electorate with threats of ecclesiastical punishment. It is contrary to the civil law to constrain the electorate to vote this or the other way, for this or that candidate, by threats of withholding the sacraments. We are glad to see these matters authoritatively The sannouncement that Mr. Apaix Horz, of Hamilton,had been offered a seat in the Senate, bas been received with general favour in the Western part of the Province. Mr. Hors is a gentleman of very considerable influence in theProvince, having large mercantile experience and h-'n.p“ddnfnunwolobflhy Fur anything we know to the contrary the Government have made & good selection, so far as â€"Mr. Hora‘s position, influence Muufiow-nnb most expedient arrangement for filling the remains to be If rumour is to ingly held up before the gase of the faithâ€" expizined by the Bench. It is to be hoped that the "interpretation of the law thus temperately and convincingly laid down, will be generally accepted as conâ€" clusive, and that while the priesthood may exact all the rights which are due them, they will carefully avoid any inâ€" fringement of theâ€" civil rights of the electors. â€" Owrice: 68 & 70 Riomav Str®et L B. TAYLOR, Preprietor. Schoc the Benefl W in Slatte 4. Hene | I ful supporters _ of the Government, and there have been several ambitious as an Independent candidate. Tuis would, perhaps, be the strictly honourâ€" able course for him to take, {that is, assuming that his own feeling is now against the Government, for if returned again he would have the full authority of his coustituents to take any side of the House he might choose. We are inclined to sympathize with the Doctor. He has been very badly used ; and with or with out the expressed consent of his constiâ€" tuents should resent the usage by pursuâ€" ling.course indepenlent of the Governâ€" ment. X. To the Kditor of THE TIME®. Sisz,â€"I notice in your issue of yesterday a letter from Mr. George Crain, contractor fer Victoria Ward rowar, referring to my remarks on his contract cn the day of nomipetion. As Mr. Craim‘s letter is erroneo1s throughout, and likely to create a wrong impression in the minds of every one unacquainted with the circumstances, I deem it but my duty to briefly state the facts of the case. Mr. Crain would lead your readers to believre that Rowe & Co. tendered to complete the main sewer for $#207,354, and that they were paid $45,â€" 678.02 over that amount. . This, however, is not the fact. There was no tender from anvone for any given sum. The work wey given out on a schedule of prices, and what it was to cost was to deâ€" peud eatirely on the quantities and the charact »~ of these quantities, as between rock ar l earth excavatioa. If the rock and ea‘ch excara.ion, and other items of the work, turnei out to be as the late Mr. Sowden assumed in his approximate .estiâ€" mate, and no variatiou took place in the cbharaeter of the work, the contract would have been completed for $207,354,jbut not only the quantities and the character of the excavatica were far aifferentâ€"as was natural enoughâ€"from what he assumâ€" ed, but changes had been made in the work by order of the City Couneil, which acoounts for the difference between the original estimate avu the amount actually paid for it. Now, respecting his own contract,‘tonâ€" cerning which the least he says in public print, in my opinion, the better for his reâ€" putation as a contractor. The actual stats of the case is this : On a sci :« tle of prices, the same as Booth & Mu , v, he tendered for the Viccria Wa i sewer, and if the quantities ssumed c ne true OV _ This statement of facts, Mr. Editor, disâ€" poses of Mr. Crain‘s assertions respecting the Booth & Murphy coatrast. 3 tendered for the Vic.cria Wa 1 sewer, and if the quantities sesumed c( ne true and no change took place in the characâ€". ter of the work, ba would have got $32, 041.16 when his cont act was completed. E .t quantities in his case varied, and by order of the Ceuncil a portion of the work was altered, reducing thereby the cost of construction. So that if Mr. Criin bad finished his contract under the changes he would have been entitled to $30,298.26. Of this amount the aciual sum paid him was $28,448.04. leaving, as I stated on the day of nomination, & bal â€" ance due him of $1,850.22, it his coutract ‘were completed to the satisfaction of the Engineer. These are all facts. â€" mAaYOR WALLER‘® STATEMENTS Now for a few more facts. In addition. to the $28,448.04 paid Mr. Crain on acâ€" count of $30,2908.26 worth of work, he claims a balauce due him of $35,430.41, or a total sum of $63,357.62 for a piece of work that, according to his tender, he offtered to do :s ‘o> = >~~cJulo of prices for $32,041.16. ‘These are facts also, and whether to the credit ot Mr. Crain, as a public contractor, the public can judge. For the recovery of this extravagant # mount, Mr. Crain threatened ard still threatens the Corporation with law; and what I said on the day of nomination, and now reiterate, is that before he shall get oae uollar more from the city than he is justly entitled to, he will get all the law he requires, from the lowest to the highâ€" ‘ est Court in the Dorninion, if necessary. N Apologumg for l«upuing so much on your valuable apace. _ _ To the Editor of THE TIMES Siz,â€"The ideas which I have thought proper to give expression to in‘ this letter have been mainly sugrested to me by m pervsal of the hydraâ€"headed article which appeared in the PFree Press of Saturday last. That performance seems to aim at reviewing the events of the year 1876. The object is cert rinly a praiseworiliy one, and the production, on the whole, shows some intelligence in its anthor. In so far to be expre: as it i thke result of mental labour the thanks of the readers of the Free Press are due to the proprieto: for his enterâ€" prise. â€" In so far as the so=called digest is wanting in candour, partial in its views, and incorrect in its conclusions, so far should it be open to severe criticisms, so far ahould the person who gave it literary birth be heldtrmponn’blo I will pot eay anything of the style of writing displayed therein. I will not find fault, even though its editor abaudons, in bis héading, the ordinary for the more fanciful form of alliterationâ€"even though he does so at the expense of common sense. It opens with the statement taat the world has not made much progress since the Free Press review of the preceding year was written. Whether we are to gather from this that the appearance of the last review had the effect of retarding the progress of the nineteenuth century for a twelverconth or not, I will not stop to consider From a careful comparison of the later with _ the earlier _ reviow, _ many would feel _ strongly disp( ed _ to conclude that not much ‘ess was lmsdo in the art of boiling Jown history. In support of his theo.y of nonâ€"advanceâ€" m nt the writer quotes (not without unâ€" Christian levity) & text of Scripture, and that only. No arguments or facts ars brought forward to support it. From his own " Record" of 1876, uninviting as is its appearance on the score of morality, most persons would think that the world had made material progress in niany ways Passing over an xngenflomnulnlion to the learned statesman who 1 the Opâ€" position in our present House of Comâ€" mons, the reader comes to a list of * Hisâ€" ‘wn‘od Events," which in some degres takes him by surprise. In a category in Iwhicb a fancy dress ball, and a lacrosse ee rmment , occupy a prominent ition as fluwricnl E'mtflh, one :;uflnmrdz expect some allusion to the di ® the rem-iuof'!‘ocnmohmdm( of the Renfrew relics of an antedelurian amphibious war horse. But in this the rewler is doomed to disappointment. When, however, he learns tu&lho seitle went of the New Brunswick School tion is a thing of “.Grr‘ (a pdm achievement of the government, of course) the disappointment is | forgotten Uttawa, Jan ORNRESPONDENCZ. H THE A®T OF BOILNG BOWN HISTORY. een A LLMB nal me sentmen artiy on A strong supporter 0 Yours truly onsiderat it che s prop W. H. Wauuer, Mayor it of the of his mate Puis ter n# correctly under as editor to public, at SUPERIOR COURT (Sitting in Reyiew, AND Pisars Cuovis Bravonssx®z, Judgment was rendered in this case on the 18th prox by the Court of Review, composed of the Honourable Justices Msguire, Cassault and McCord. The folâ€" lowing is the opinion of Mr. Justice s1 . â€" The election brought under the notice rf the Court in this case took place on the 7th July, 1875, in the County of Bonavenâ€" tu~s, for a meinber to represent that county in the Legislative Alombl{ of (iabec. The petitioner was one of the candiGates for election, the iespondent t a other. The election resulted in the râ€"tur: of ihe respondent as the (member daly e soted. ‘The petitioner conierts the re.urn. The grounds of contertation are thies in number, to wit : Ist, want of the property qualification required by| the statute ; 20d, undue influence practicei by the Roman Catholic clergy upon the electo.s; 3rd, corrupt practices by the respondent and his agents. The allegaâ€" tion of corrupt practices by the responâ€" dent : or his agents being unsupâ€" port »l by auy evidence, that gr3und of contestation may be at once disâ€" missed from further consideration by the * contested Clection Act of 1878. Jonx Rosixsox Haxtiuro®, Court, As to the property qualification, || the Quebec Election Act, clause 124, proâ€" | vides that no person shall be elected a | mem‘>er of the Legislative Assembly of | this Province who is not a propgietor in | . possession of lands and tenereuts in | . the Province of the value of $2,000 over ; and above all rents hypothecs, incumâ€" # brances or hypothecary claims thereon. || Finding this to be one of the requireâ€" | . ments of the statute, it is not for us to | speak of the policy of the law restricting i the choice of the elector to persons havâ€" ‘ ing the property qualification raferred to ; | the petitioner alleges that the lands and tenements upon‘ which the respondent. qualified, were not in fact his Eumperty at the tire of the said election, but that he obtained his;title thereto ;collussively for the purpose of qualifying as a candiâ€" dete for election ‘as a member of the .e rslative AssemUly. _ Petritioner also a‘le zes that the said lands and tenements woere not of the value required by statute. It then becomes necessary to ascertain from the evidence submitted by the peâ€" titioner, as well as the respoudent, whether at the time of the election; the respondent was. the proprietor of the lands and tenements upon which he qualified, whether he obtained his titles thereto ooflluuively or Mmdu{'a ‘f.o: u;: purpose 0 qudlfan(' ing as a i to elected a member of the Legislative Assembly, and whether the said lands and tenements were of the value requirâ€" ed by law. A considerable number of. witnesses have been . heard on both sces of the question of the value of the property ~described by the respondent in his declaration o‘i qualification, and which property is foun. situate, & 'l)zm in Carleton and a part in Maria, both places being in the County of Bouaventure ; and after examining the evidence we consider that it has not bean shown that the la2ds and tenements claimed and described as the m&onden&'l property aqaualiGcation are insufficient in valra. OJn the question of ownrership, resâ€" por dent was beard as witzess and pro%t.m | titles, purporting to be two acts, soas | seing prive, or deeds of sale, one for the , projmrty at Carleton bearing date the 4th | of July, 1873, the other for the prog;rty | situate in Maria and dated 8th of May, | 1874. According to the deeds theâ€"responâ€" | dent paid $1,200 in cash argent oofitant ;| for the property in Carleton, and $1,600 , | for the property situate in Maria, also in | cash, argent comptant. ‘The respondent ; | i ays in his evidence that several months ; | after the purchase of the Carleton proâ€" .| pc ty, he paid Aunguste Lefebyre, from , | w..om he irad b::ght it, the price imen: , | tioned in the Ceed of sale, to wit, $1,200, r id thit Lefabvre lent him $1,200 the # nme cay. Thus the respondent, after giving ‘he $1,200 to Lefebyre as the price of the property at Carleton, rucsived the money g‘ck from the latier the same day without giving any receipt or acknowâ€" ledgment for the amount. No visible change has taken place in the ownership of the property, the Lefebvres, father and sons, continue to occupy and enjoy it as before the alleged sale ; tue respondent has never been entered on the valuation roll of the municipality as the owner. Ludgar Lucier, the vendor according to the deed of sale of the property situate in Maria, has also been examined as a witness, and by his evidence, as well as by the evidence given by the respondent him.:ll% &t) in:-hubu-hodtht he aid ::; y $1,600 cash argent comptant, as sta xp;thodoodofnlo, to the said Ludgar Lucier for the property, but gave his proâ€" missory note, L‘n'n; date the 12th of May, 1874, for the sum of $1,600, payable o Mr. Lucier. The note was not stamped until the 4th of August, 1874, after Lucier bad received a subpcons to appear ‘as a m:no-,vhndnuonunpqhn:.hdby respondent, were put upon the note by Lucier, lmf:r:i.mulht&h: offered the property sinse the flhfi purchase by the respondent, but adds t it was en Lauac Michand, a witness examined, says Lucier offered to sell him the mill property at Maria alloged sale to the respondent. 10 we BONAVENTURE ELECTION is the opinion of Mr. Justice , the President of the Court. | He Yours truly, THE TIMES, OTTAWA, THURSDAY, JANUARY 4 1877; Respondent. Petitioner The respondent performed no act of ow.:ership concerning the property ; Lusier continued to occupy and enjoy the property, to work the mill, receiving the pio>fits accruing therefrom ; Lucier‘s nave was continued on the valuation roll of the municipality as the owner. Seeing and considering the foregoing fucts, we are forced to the conclusion that the respondent at the time of his elelclion M F7 mss mCs MR Uey U Pmies en in es en snle was not in reality the owner of the lands and tenements described in his declaraâ€" tion of qualification ; that the purchase thereo{ by twe respondent was not real, but simulated, and that his titles to the said lands and tenements were obtained by him collusively anu colourably for the purpose of qualifying as & candidate to be elected a member of the Legislative Assembly of this Province. Our attention is next called to the second ground of contestation, the alleged undue influence ‘of the Roman Catholic clergy upon the electors. The respondent ubjected to the proof adduced by the petitioner, in order to estaolish that un due influence for four reasons: lst. Because it tended to criminate a clergyâ€" man for is acts in discharging the duties of his ministry. 2nd. Because the priest is only responsible for his conduct to his ecclesiastical â€" superior. â€" 3rd. Bocause such proof would virtually bring a priest betore a civil wibvnal on a question of discipline without having the permission of his ecolesiastical superior. 4th Because such evidence did‘ not go to prove an offence in law, or agairst the Quebec Election Act. â€"I am ready to admit some \of tbe positions taken by the learned. counsel for respondent in his factum and. a. guments, for, as all Roman Catbolics do, I fully acknowledge the superiority of the Church over the State, to as great a degree as divine are superior to human instituâ€" tions. â€" Also. that whilst the priest acts as such in the discharge of the duties of his ministry, he is not amenable to the civil tribunals, for he violates no law. But all wlo infringe the law, whether lay or clerical, are amenable to the civil tribunals of the couutry. We have to administer the laws as we find them ; no distinction is made between persons, and the Court can make nodae. )gow let let us look at existing facts and circum:â€" stances, to see if it could be otherwise. The population of the Province is Roman Catholic and Protestant, the Legislature is Roman Catholic and Protestant, the Judiciary is Protestant and @oman Cathoâ€" uP it Psn e e ns n e ues lic, and in the case before us oue of the | T parties, the petitioner, is a Protestant, whilst the respondent is a Roman Catho lic. Under theee circamstances, would it | & then be possible for the Court to sanction | " the exceptional mogn clairaed by the mfindent in f of the Roman Catholio clergy? Certainly not; and I |! have to leavn t it the Rowan Catholic Caurch eve* exac.3d, in matte. s ofdlwig- a line, anything from her children which it was impossible: for them to grant. If | , could bsrdly be expectad that the gm.l- tioner, a Protestant, complaining of the Ro.man Catholio clergy of the County of Beraventure, would submit his alleged wrongs to the Bisbop of the diocese, who, ‘ I here no doubt, would advise justice, but would be powesless to enforce it. _ It IY- pears that there are nine Roman Catholic priests in charge of parishes in the County of Bonarenture. The evidence réfers only to two of these revereni gentlemen «s | baving taken an active part in the eleoâ€" tionâ€"the cure ot Bonaventure and the | cure of New Richmondâ€"and we must su â€" pose that the other clergymen of the county, guided by that 1pmprie!y and prudence so becoming their sacred charâ€" acter, abstained from interfering actively in the election. I do not mean to say that a cure may not, should he think it prudent to do so, take part, like any other citizen, in the political conflict be tween two oppeuing cendidates; and, as was said in the bontford election case, he may advise, couusel, entreat and give his reasons for preferring one candidate to another, but%o may not, without comntit ting the offencejfof undue influence, under the statute, threaten the electors with the deprivation of the sacraments of the church. The election was held on the 7th July, 1875. The Rev. Mr. Thivierge, cure of Bonaventure, and the Rev. Mr. Gagne, cure of New Richmond, on the 29th of Jure. the feast of St. Poter and Paul, and the Sunday preceding the election, adâ€" dressed their congrezations in church on the subject of the then coming election, and threatened to refuse the sacraments of the church to such of the electors as would vote for the petitioner. . The witresses diffor as to the words used, but agree sufficiently as to the main fact, that the deprivation of the sacraments of the church was throatened, and we hold this to be undue influence . under the statute. This had a certain influence on the electors, for somé abstained from voting, others v@ted for the respondent, thou;sh they pre viously intended voting for the petitioner, | but to what extent it affected«the elecâ€" tion does not appear. The Rev. Mr. 1 Thievierge and the Rev. Mr. Gagne have . not been brought into the case, and canâ€" not be declared guilty of undue influence | under the Act, but the potitioner claims the disqualification of the respondent by reason of the undue influence exercised | by the Rev. Mr. Gagne. â€" Resnendent | was present in church when the cure threatened the electors with ths depriva | tion _ of _ _the _ sacraments of: the ‘ | Church, and one witness says the Rev. ( Mr. Thievierge named the respondent as | the person for whom the oloom: should { vote. That witness, bowever, is contraâ€" S dicted by othe:s who s1y the cure did | not name the respondent, After the con:â€" , | gregation had issued from the church the ‘| respondent addressed them, l'gnx he , | was supported by the Roman thalis | clergy, and that he would not have been ; | a candidate without their support ; bat y he made no refarence to what the cure ; | had said in church. I do not,therefore, ; think that the respondent should be held , | respousible for t..e words of the cure in ¢ church, or that he should be aisqualified â€" | on that account. L The next branch Of this case is the charge of corrupt practices by treating, preferred by the respondent against the petitioner. The petitioner met Damage Bourdages, aun elector, at New Carlisle, in May, 1875. The election took place on the 7th July. ‘The petitioner took Bour dages to his house and entertained him at dingfr, spoke to him about .th% coming election and solicited his vote. The petiâ€" tior er on the polling day took liquor into t. s room set apart forthe electors to preâ€" pare their ballot papers and treated John Keys, John O‘Neil, Edouara Arseneau, u‘ndyaeorge Fallu, all electors. According to one of the witnesses the words made use of by the petitioner when invitin% them .0 drink werejas follows:â€"" Gentlemon, if you wish to take a glass of brandy, t.hzre is some in the room, go and help yourâ€" selves ; but before you go, go and vots for whom you like." He.also treated John Augustus Meagher, an electorâ€"who cannot say whethor he had voted when he drank with the petitioner or not. Other eviâ€" dence goes to prove theâ€" same charge. The parties were ‘?ut under promise of secresy not to divulge what had oc ourro'j as to the treatiag. For this the penalty is disqualification. _ _ _ _: Judges Caseault end MoCord held, that the respondent was responsible for the words of the cure, and disqualified him on that account, but concurred in the reâ€" mainder of the abovejudgment, whereby each party was ordered to pay his own costs. A Cincinuat: woman saw a boy slide intoâ€"a sewer opening. She did not faint, or scream; but she huhl&:ook off her shawl, lowered it so that lad could eatch hold of one end, and i1 that way kept afloat until assistance came. Conoset ToKiGHt.â€"A ?nd Concert will be given in the Court House toâ€"night forthobe‘::fitonhopo&rcé-fi. city. It is under the patronage is Exoeliency the Governor General, andâ€" it is to be hoped a large audience will be present, especially as the object is ‘a charitable one. The programme, which is a good one, will be found in our advertising columns. ¢ 0.:}.‘2:-..4”" horset f'&'“‘..."*m JACKET S FUR SETTS R. J. DEVLIN New Season Japan Tea 40c worth 60. ENGLIsH BREAKFAST 80UCHONG ' GOc WORTH 80 of the nnen q{nmlu, rnd nvgno and well seâ€" lected stock of the cholcest Wines Liquors and also a complet stock of /MacKinnon‘s, and Christie, Brown & Co‘s _ i Fresh Crop Fruit GENERAL GROCERIES ! Arflvln& fresh from the manufacturers every week. Keagle & Gender‘s celebrated, â€" MoEwans, celebrated Finoan HaddiesZand Bloaters daily .rrlvin( by express. Orders taken for cholce dairy produce. JAMES JACKSON W. F. BUCHANAN Wine & Spirit Merchant, Has now in his Cellars the following carefully selected Stock, to which he specially invites the uttention of the family trade : LOUIS ROEDERER, â€" J MMERY & GRENO v. mrfi oat%uou'. AYALA #700. OHAS. FaARRE Sparkling Moselles and Hocks DEINHARD‘S NONPAREIL and ist QUALâ€" flm&&l’]'%& cGa, Kupferberg‘s 5) Burgundies "itros P \Wtragor, UHATEAU HAMAU% EACE&IEAJI LATOUR Uu.a E B;.ru B LC ? u "SaaAtEAU Lamnos AU CHATEAU BE o dA ShmpHm: _ la 8t of_ Tabl afl WTm“l‘l‘a.womnd lo“le.. ant ,‘. w1easr ALICANTE, i & Spirits e it Eons To â€". â€" other Shippers. ou'â€"% rimrme _and . BOLL & DUNâ€" Scootch Whiskeyâ€"RANSAYS ISLAY. OANADIANBOE(&?%&O&F;‘«â€"M makers, OLD JAMAICAZRUM, All of the above, in wooda and bottle, including some very old _ Celebrated Buscuits, CFERRY BBANDY :ORANGE and A} WHITE AND RED CURACOA, MARASCHINO \ NoYad,â€" . > / RAWLING‘8 ARATED WATERS: (Soda, SHeltzer, Lemonade, Ginger, Ale and Potass)., 4 The celebrated APOLLINARIS WATER. â€" GERMAN SELTZER. 316 4318 WELLINGTON ATREET, Now auriving and for Sale _ _ Baltimore Oysters! Carings Amber Ales and: Porter. Fm% AI%%T&HONSB%&K&M e Trade dealt with on Lberal Term, all diseases arising from weakness cured by 1 nave been suffert from & severe Attack of Bronchitts lmmnfi. with reat bodily weakness. 1 was recommended fo t mr PROSPHOZONE wmgh Ldid, it l.c'.z Achsm.uimgmyhnhmun lvuv‘- every and also my stren; mug =â€" g‘w it a gry nluiu medicine. PHOSFOZO Nt James Jackson, Ports and Sherries Ot the bostibrands. 32 OCONNOR SA1.. WHLTE FUR Mineral Waters . o prdaHE ac ooan s OBERnE‘S: Still Hocks 9!‘!"[0“ AND % € Champagnes ROUSLLLON | Full assortment of vintages. Liqueurs, &C. CHILOREN‘8 267 Nore® Dax® STREET MONTREAL‘ 30(h Oct. 1876 DOLLAR STORE SILLON Sorie and red‘: TARRAGONA _ gxg})l}hnmm rylold, nBottle . Clarots COR. APARy8 _BRINCHITIS _ CATARRH rhUJ O vs€MIF 141\ Oitrresraxp, * NIERSTEIN. VERMOUTH. of new music justireceived by Follv __ tE (ok Jacks faro{ell w The maid I love is six years old Aide Music of the séa, * Almost, _ Cowen Why 1 t The old love is the new, ‘&na old eweet story, by: Scott Gatty. ithered mses, by e 6 As you like fl.’ by Pingita Al! the worid‘s a stage & Dresd n, China Molloy Orme & Son, Remember or}forget Waltz, Coote Once again 4 Polly 66 Trop De Bonheur, Schnelc Loves kiss Waltz Solut a New York B eak of Day, Galop, Mesars. Orme & son, have a very large stock of Pianos, and Org ns, now in their show room and are offering special inducements during the Holidays boih in price and terms of payâ€" ment. p WARERODULS:â€"â€"â€"NO. 31 SPARKSI!S8 . J A NU A RY 1877 . All the above®Waitzes arefbeautifully illusâ€" . trated. Stock Taking Month. Bargains in Every Deâ€" partment. â€" 1, Silks and Velvets. & Millinery. 5 Mourniags (fallavd complimentary.) 6. Mancbester. 9. Glovesand Hosiery. 7. Lace and Ribbons. Special Departmentil SALE WEEK KID GLOVES *XMZLS BULLETIN T. RUNTON, SON & LARMONTH, Ask for Our Price List. 94 & 96 Sparks street. Roots, Barks, Herbs, TO THE ~AF FLIFTED! ___ ANDALLOTHER EXTRAOTS . y o Oeiearonins. â€"Preltrtption CHE MIST ’ CGRENVILLEâ€"CANAL ENLARGEM E) /A Apply at the works to 4LWAYS ON HAND."UR& . BM Physicians‘ ‘Prescri and Family munm}ymnrm STEPHEN 8. STRATTON, No‘ 25 Yark strsot, OlWA%a. PATENT MEDICINES, _____ w immediately after tlose offnavigation to work 800 Laborers W ANTED H. ‘F."® MacCARTHY CHRISTMAS PR ES:NTS 1876. WINTER 167 7. FUR® FOR) Cote & Leblane‘s Just Received Market Drug Store, (Opposite:the Russell House ) oTrawi. Instrumental. 31 SPARK®S ST FROM THESHAKERS. James Goodwin. Vocal. WELULNGTON3TREET 2 Mautles and Costumes, 4. Dress Goods, 8. Furs & Fancy Woolens 10. Fancy Goods. Kowalaki _ $1.00 White 50 Lamothe _ _ T5 Schneider CENTS. 8) ERY ETC ESTABLISHED 1854 .. THOS. PATTERSON Virect Importations from the Froducers BRANDIES, PORF & SHERRY WINE, GIN, POMTEH, 4&, 200 Packages & E, RROW N Crackerse SSE AAote Pog Mainh +5n. Porter and Alos. SVINSSES MAphIN‘:s ByEXE, BArSpe yrounerns, a d ERS GIN, Glasgow, Pess P.'.lar? ?&ltmke'y- es Nok Sm oL. ang Caroiitis Shiok Srephge Po‘ er for "“l" Food. f PS and TINNED MEATS Bologga* Sa.umers; o r Paney urogarise, to nuimmone ty hame oriky mok kinds. a lowest ORS. Pugt.'rhc‘.wmmc* and PRIVATE IRESIDENCE® Heatedon the most approved: prinâ€" BLYTH & KERR, HOT AIR|! HOT WaAiER!! STEAMI!! | 56 RIDEAU STREET, 5e well know t who the last twelve has made a JN“ many vondorml;onm is now fstopping at the Stoves ‘RUSS*LL HOUSE, a w &.. Entrance on Sparks street: garrhqu ‘Aar.nd s_lgig_hs Ke t on hand of maide to or««+, at the shortâ€" t ie se sls beer materiel and by C o I * . . ailg "Chug 5, 1876 | «215y Royal Carriage Factory fr as s workme p. PURE and UNADULTERATED, for Family use and Medicinal purposes, WHOLESALE & RETA. 58 PALY STREET. 58 Purveyor to His Ezosilency the Barl of Dufferin, i P M A Call solicited to Examine at THOâ€". PA TTERSON®S, TENDERS ON APPLICATION. Holloware A Specialty. _ _ CHRISTIE, RROWN & CO., NEW FRUIT, (the finest of theJecason) in $Raising, JOurrant , Figs, Green Grapes, etc. G and BUILDERS HARDW ARE OF THE BEST MaXES. 2l5y1 |and G:om»=â€" i *A adresm, JA MEG VICK, Rochesst, 60 (BLUE SrORF) $ 00 Ter esnt o2 /s year. Vick‘s Flower and V. Gar | ic tleanorasinevens phot Ses vublications are ‘ Vick*"s _ FLOWER AND VEGETABL® GARL is the most beautiful work of the kind in world. Jt contains nearly 150 pages of fine lilustrations, J siz Chrome ' i Flowers, b drawn and foltres, in "Pramm ie Bensssnss w * Vick‘s Fioral Guide, Quarterly 25 ""'i * *"lok‘s Catalogueâ€"9#) IMiustrations, 088 8 Vick*"s FLOWER AND VEGETABLE SEED® | ARFE PLANTED EY A MILLION PEOPLEIN _ . AMERICA. Vick‘s Catalogueâ€"300 Mustrations, onlÂ¥ ""Vick‘s Floral Guide, Quarterly. " Al Vick*s Floral Guide OTTAWA, 187677 w puilding Raki "lfim“} Werrey, Jan. “ w-.‘~1 'wuofl'*‘ The WhitbY3 â€" "Ad at 3:30. 28 ‘ "‘11.;”% H jre this aftern :‘," fire . Drieo! C °_~ prevented «waer . P Apnudfim J . Chadwick afigwodl « tract with the C The Cattle W”mr Gusuwre, Jw wbfl.l The Douki® # #pecial to"THE Kmo«rox, « markahble mes Hall of anti addresses by % nadia! However, Loss by the â€" Haxuto®, cause of the Kngitâ€"b M eredit 3098 praise duct have Bay