The Electioneering Monitor. | MONDAY MORNING, JUNE 15, 1863. A few Falsehoods Culled from the ** Beacon.”’ The Beacon of Friday last contains the following, amongst many other, erroneous statements «Me, Bashinan was 66 ain returned on Mondi clamation in Hi on. He stated his determination saipepport tbo} Government.” This is false, and the Beacon must have known it; for Mr, Buchanan refuted the ander in an able and lengthy letter pub- Thursday. Again; the Beacon says : “ Ais Bietion Oashasties have decided that a man cannot qua property, it can form no asential tot iis ‘qualification.’ This also is untrue. No Election Com- mittee ever decided any thing of the kind. The reference is to the Rankin case, where the Committee held, and held rightly, that since Mr. Rankin had conveyed the pro erty, upon which he desired to qualify, to his wile, whilst he was in insolvent circum- stances, the Deed to his wife was void, and therefore Sd nothing. In Mr. Daly’s case the fact is altogether different. Mrs. Daly’s title ts her property is indisputable, having been conveyed to her by Col. Daly, whereas Mrs. Rankin had no title at all. Again the Beacon states : “That Mr. Macfarlane proved bis qualification be- fore the Election Committe® of House, less six weeks ago; and Daly i Besides, Macfarlane pr fieate fom the Sheriff that he had made claration of qualification, according to law, before he was nominated a candidate, at the present election,” This also i is false. Mr. Macfarlane did e his qualification. It is tru : was eseetin in his attempt to do when the House ol tess but had ro completed his proof, and would have been quite unable to do so. noe the Roiceh asks: “Q——What exouse had Daly to offer for declaring toa om vatalifeatio Ee ai —That it was not so immoral to “solemnly aceite ’ as to swear, is an Exsouaely: gross and uncall- ed for alsshoédi Mr. Je never offered td such excuse, nor was y excuse ne- Tr t. never fr decTRrbn to a & ceeds qualification. gain, the Beacon asks e Q—W hat does the statute say ?” and replies : 8 “4 o ‘solemnly declare’ that as teuth, h is false, is perjury,—a ‘solemn declaration’ be- ing in law, and in fact an oath This, too, is false. The Statute merely says that any person who, ‘ in giving the ‘al q deeeripaen, of such lands or tenements as above sec yg? * knowingly and wilfully “makes an atement relative to the “situation, peeition extent or bounds of “such lands or tenements, shall be deemed “guilty of a misdemeanor.” The Decla- ration is nowhere called a “solemn” de- claration ; yet the Beacon desired its read- ers to understand it was so called, and placed the words in inverted comas. words used are simply “I, A. B., do de- clare and testify,” &c. A “solemn declaration” is not, ‘in fact and law,’ an oath. Th Beacon might, with equal truth, assert that stealing an nd shooting are identical crim Electors of Perth ! can you relyion a ana statement advanced by the might go on to column after peaks with ‘false staments’ culled from that ex- ceedingly corrupt sheet, but space will not permit us. VOTE FOR Tr. NA. ramen dag 't NO MORE LAWYERS IN THE HOUS! Electors of Perth! listen to no lying re. ports which the Grits may have circulated with reference to Mr. Daly’s Qualification. |Rally to the Polls early on TUESDAY Morning, and vote for T. M. DALY, the poor man’s friend. Electors! Mark This! What the ‘‘Globe”’ says of Mr. Mac- farlane, From the Globe, Saturday, July 12, 1862. The Stratford Bea returns to the charge about the Perth election and the inaction of The Globe. It says “that the Reformers of Perth did expect, and had a right to expect, that the leading organ of the party would have repudiated Mr. Daly.” And again it says :—“ If we know any thing of the former tactics of The Globe, we should say that its duty was to denounce Mr. Daly, and unhesitatingly ac- cept the nominee of the Reform party.”— We have already informed the Beacon that no member of the convention that nomi- nated Mr. Macfarlane communicated the facts to us; that no statement was ever made of the reasons which induced the majority to vote for him, and that we had no declaration of principles from him or any of his immediate supporters. bee pyeislinin a Conservative, Noméinat- specially to catch the Catholic vote! a that we knew of Mr. Macfarlane was, that he had been a Conservative, that h was nominated Sen i cael. ane Ro- man Catholic vote, an we were told he adopted the entire ata iy “the Min- istry. Mr. Macfarlane against Rep. by Pop. and, in | favor o of Sep arate Schools. ot approve of, but we permitted Mr. Maefar- lane’s friends to work out their policy with- out our interference. The m is not content with this. It says the Reform Par- ty in Perth hye & right to expect the ou ort of e for its nominee. J} line has ever Baht: in The Globe ace. ing the eighteen years of its Babies tion which justified that expertation: We ha never given up 01 vate judgment te man or set of men, and we are as- tonished that a Reform journalist can as- sert that it is our duty to do so. Principles before Parties. We recognize fully all the advantages of party union and party effort, ég but : there must be harmony of principle first. We have never asked any one to act with us on any other ground than an agreement in political views. n. er union is an immorality of the worst kind. é s of a away held that the decisions of such bo- dies are open toa revision by the members of a party. Macfarlane dare not «vow his Principles. We repudiate onee for all the monstrous doctrine that a convention of the Reformers of Perth having nominated Mr. Macfarlane on poe that they @@> dared not pub-| ? lish openly; to. the ied the Globe was bound to. support him No journalist, nimated: by a proper sense of the trust re- posed, in him, would submit to such dicta- tion, If any of the Reformers of Perth de- sired. the support of The Globe for their can- diate, they knew how to get it. a nat to show that his principles were sound. Why was it that not one of our Sad in the county Mente the task? Why er all silent as it not ihe ause they knew that Mr. Micteansts principles were not ours, and that they could not claim our support on conscientious grounds. 3 That is the only reason we i How absurd it would be for now to denounce us for not supporting their candidate, when they dar- ed not even recommend him to us.” : VOTE FOR T.M.DAI-Y, THE i VOTE FOR T. MM. DALY, Civil and Religious Liberty. Mr. Daly’s Prospects. Ocr friends will be glad to hear that Mr. Daly has met with the greatest possible, success at every one of his numerous meet- ings in the SONY, Electors, hitherto strong in their ition, have expressed friends in his behalf. We predict for Mr. Daly a very handsome majority, but in or- der to ee the splendor of the victory we urge our friends to vote earl; first day. Let them rush to the polls, and let their cry be “ Excelsior !” VOTE FOR T. M. DALY. AND GOOD GOVERNMENT. Defeat of the Minist The tae have been gloriously de- feated in Montreal! They pitted their strongest men ii Me fea Cartier, Rose and McGee, and the following is the result: Montreal West—McGee...... 2129 sd You o Majority for Rose... Montreal East—Cartier’s Majority of good government may the | higheat figure. Hol ton, ‘inance Minis feated candidates, the Globe ceptance of office atitueney, or, failing that, who can take his place.” What a sorry confession to make ! one man amongst them fit for the post ! AND Equal Rights to all. 1379 ees dyes of this victory to the friends estimated at “Mr. Holton vacated his seat say Victo- | they ria Division in the Upper House by his ac- We hope that he will be induced to try another Assembly con- t, will be again a candidate for Victoria Division. The country aac afford to part with Mr, Hol- ton at the present crisis. There is no one Only VOTE FOR DALY Booker: naan one Vote be- is worth two aniarootin. A Metremmect, opined demanded L Bep. by Pop., pure and simple, as th 1858, tangut—A igen Ministry formed,coi fainin aa always opposed Bop. by as Pop. iti hange Rep. by Pop., Le, bg and simple, for Rep. by Pop. with “checks and g )—Gritism, on the testimony of even one of its leading members we say it, threw Rep. by Pop. over- boa: “sh — Gritism advocated « dissolution of the unio th “ some joint authority” to rule the two pro Tamigistratiee fanetions of “ some joint podhority? 20h stated. 186i—Gritism re-ndyocated Rep. by Pop. so freely ts denial might cause people to look Gri n assailed Mr. J, H. Cameron for” ng asa “check and Seer to Rep by Pop e representation of the two provinces should continue equal in Gritism wanted da Ministry which a substitute a y Pop, overboard, for jhe enka HE abisioiog office, [June]—Mr Brown and the Grit clique find shaabeltes had Dushed to reconeile past professions with a + the electors, of Upper {Cansda, these Changes ‘een induce c If so, are the men who, since Tss7, hav found something to alter in the palhey of the pi ing year, sufficiently wise and _enhghtened, to ae trusted with the government of Canada? " Have changes been induced by si posed policy? If the latter, are ciples” are regulated by tlre or supposed inter: Have all ‘onvictions ? v8 brery year ced ‘ori Yap | sufficiently honest or honorable to be entrusted with the Pieea a, fic et Parasite: ual The ese changes can ave been Montrea entre— hose =| Holton . 651 Aa aa virtue tainly not those who are Sayama: re gn ont ae of ley ators and rulers,—Lead above retrospect, which we clip from the Leader, is worth reading. It gives a faint idea of what sort of principles go- vern the Brown pay” ie are now at- tempting to rule Can: is now appealing to the ‘people of Upper Canada to support his tools in order that may obtain their rights—that repres- entation may be obtained. How, let es! ask, is this to be brought about? “Erashan Mr. perce Pmmaate ee and ae cals leagues will measure and! all measures ‘atevdecod for the reliota hie the double msioniy, the moment it came between them and $5000 a year. They omens the atatak Money it Spent. fore they left office for the purpose of carry: ing on the work on the Ottawa buildings. Mr. Howland stated on the floor of the at the work on the ee ioe want of funds. 000 been spent ? jivided among the Grit candidates for Bt purpose of carrying the election. That i: present time in bribing v Township of Fullarton there are men trav. elling about offering pants, influenced by such means. lOar readers will remember that $500,C00 were voted by the Conservative party be- Ministerial newspapers informed the cele Ottawa buildings was he Z What has We are in a position to in- ie our readers that this $480,000 has been coats, money, &c., &c., to people who they think can be forced upon the Seats of Upper Canada a measure they themselves had always op- posed, a measure which for years: ay had used as a hobby through the country, they forced me ees School Bill upon the people o' er Canada in opposition to} “| the voice oH A (ae se of their representa-' tives. What guarantee, then, is there that these men will do Upper Canada justice? None whatever, but on the contrary there is every reason to believe that the rights and pai fea of pe a should not be ave wasted $100,000 ey a s Hieiseing Ottawa Corea any have made a present to the Grand Trunk RALLY TO THE POLLS AND IN FAVOR OF Your old and well-tried Representative Work well on ‘Tnesday and Wednesday, and VICTORY is ours! ! PEOPLE’S CANDIDATE. CAST YOUR VOTES TT. MM. DALY. of $100,000 a- ryean-abey} Se wasted the $500,000 voted, in the vain hope of carry- ing the present elections. VOTE FOR One of ourselves.